Citations

AbstractBackgroundRecent advances in automatic face recognition have increased the risk that de‐identified research imaging data could be re‐identified from face imagery in brain scans.MethodAn ADNI committee of independent imaging experts evaluated 11 published techniques for face‐deidentification (“de‐facing”) and selected four algorithms (FSL‐UK Biobank, HCP/XNAT, mri_reface, and BIC) for formal testing using 183 longitudinal scans of 61 racially and ethnically diverse ADNI participants, evaluated by their facial feature removal on 3D rendered surfaces (confirming sufficient privacy protection) and by comparing measurements from ADNI routine image analyses on unmodified vs. de‐faced images (confirming negligible side effects on analyses).ResultEffects of the de‐facing methods on FreeSurfer at UCSF (Figure 1‐top), ASHS at University of Pennsylvania (Figure 1 bottom‐left), and longitudinal atrophy at Mayo Clinic (Figure 1 bottom‐right) were comparable with each other and sufficiently small vs. unmodified scans to recommend de‐facing in ADNI‐4. The FSL and mri_reface methods were more thorough in removing facial features, partly because these also removed ears (Figure 2‐top). mri_reface was recommended for ADNI‐4 primarily because fewer (zero) images had modified brain (Figure 2‐bottom), and ADNI leadership approved de‐facing with mri_reface. ADNI performed a second validation of its latest version on another diverse sample of 100 ADNI‐3 participants. These analyses included: boundary shift interval at University College London, where average differences in measurements were all <0.05%; cortical white matter hyperintensities at UC Davis, where they found “minimum impact” (R>0.97); and others.ConclusionADNI‐4 de‐faces all indicated image types (Table 1) before subsequent pre‐processing, analyses, and public release. Sites upload images to the central repository (LONI), where they are queued to the MRI Core at Mayo Clinic for de‐facing. Image types requiring de‐facing are de‐faced using mri_reface. Trained analysts inspect de‐faced images to confirm complete removal of the face and complete non‐modification of the brain, and any flagged images are re‐processed manually until issues are resolved. De‐faced images are converted back to DICOM and re‐uploaded for further distribution. Image types not requiring de‐facing are indicated to proceed directly to subsequent steps. In summary, ADNI‐4 has adopted mri_reface because it successfully de‐faces without substantially affecting brain measurements.

AbstractBackgroundPhase four of the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI4) began in 2023. This time‐period corresponded to MRI vendors introducing product sequences with compressed sensing (CS), cross‐vendor adoption of arterial spin‐labelling (ASL) and multi‐band slice excitation, and hardware improvements (head‐coils, increased gradient amplitudes). These advances enabled the acquisition of new imaging measures and reduced scan times. The ADNI4 MRI protocol aims to maintain longitudinal consistency across two decades of data acquisition, while adopting new technologies. Here we describe the design and justification behind the ADNI4 protocol and list the target imaging biomarkers.MethodsThe ADNI4 MRI protocol includes 9 MRI sequences; i) T1‐weighted (T1w) MP‐RAGE, ii) a compressed sensing T1w MP‐RAGE, iii) 3D T2w FLAIR, iv) structural isotropic 3D T2w v) T2*‐weighted susceptibility imaging vi) multi‐post labelling delay (PLD) 3D ASL, vii) 2D multi‐band‐multiple‐shell diffusion (dMRI), viii) 2D multi‐band EPI BOLD ix) high resolution, limited field of view, imaging centered on the hippocampus. Table 1 gives a detailed summary of the key protocol parameters and lists some of the imaging biomarkers that can be obtained from each series.ResultsStructural imaging was kept consistent across imaging sites. Variations in vendor specific sequences, software upgrades, and hardware performance capabilities, resulted in variations in advanced imaging strategies. Table 2 highlights the advanced sequences introduced in ADNI4, which will gradually be implemented as the required upgrades and licenses are obtained at each site. The main advanced sequences that are new in ADNI4 from ADNI 3 are i) CS for T1w images, ii) pseudo‐continuous‐ASL (pCASL) being implemented on all 3 vendors (GE, Siemens, Philips), iii) multi‐PLD ASL, which allows for the generation of quantitative maps of cerebral blood‐flow (CBF) and arterial transit times (ATTs), iv) and isotropic 1mm3 resolution for 3D FLAIR. When ADNI4 began, product sequences that utilized artificial intelligence were not widely available and could not be adequately tested before the rollout of ADNI4.ConclusionsThe ADNI4 database will continue to help the neuroimaging community, not only extract valuable imaging biomarkers, but provide the data necessary to test the impact of advanced imaging strategies on diagnostic accuracy and disease sensitivity.

AbstractBackgroundRecent studies highlight distinct patterns of cortical atrophy between amnestic (typical) and non‐amnestic (atypical, with subtypes: behavioural, dysexecutive, logopenic and visuospatial) clinical phenotypes of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The current study aimed to assess regional MRI patterns of cortical atrophy across AD phenotypes, and their association with amyloid‐beta (Aβ), phosphorylated tau (pTau), axonal degeneration (NfL) and microvascular deterioration (COLIV).MethodPostmortem In‐situ 3DT1 3T‐MRI data was collected for 33 AD (17 typical, 16 atypical) and 16 control brain donors. Images were segmented and AAL3 atlas regional volumes were obtained using QyScore®. At subsequent autopsy, eight brain regions were selected, immunostained for Aβ (4G8), pTau (AT8), Neurofilament‐light (NFL), and Collagen‐IV (COLIV), and quantified using qupath. Group comparisons and volume‐pathology associations were analyzed using linear models and partial correlations with covariates age, sex, postmortem delay, and intracranial volume.ResultsCompared to controls, AD phenotype groups showed overall lower cortical volume, while only minor volume differences were observed between AD phenotype groups, observed primarily in limbic regions (Fig. 1). Across pathological markers, AD phenotype groups showed consistently higher immunoreactivity than controls, while atypical AD showed consistently higher immunoreactivity than typical AD (Fig. 2). Moreover, different patterns of pathology could be observed between atypical subtypes (e.g. distinctly higher pTau load in the occipital gyrus of the visuospatial subtype). In typical AD, global volume loss was associated with lower Aβ and higher pTau, NFL and COLIV immunoreactivity, while in atypical AD, global volume loss was primarily associated with higher NFL immunoreactivity (Fig. 3a). Regionally, AD phenotype differences in atrophy‐pathology association were most pronounced in the (para) hippocampal regions. This distinction was mainly characterized by negative associations for NFL and COLIV, which was only observed in typical AD (Fig. 3b‐c).ConclusionAtrophy patterns between AD phenotypes showed only minor differences, potentially attributable to the on average later disease stage of the study cohort. The higher immunoreactivity for pathological markers found in atypical AD might suggest a more severe disease burden. (Para) hippocampal volume decline was associated with axonal and microvascular deterioration in typical AD, but not in the higher pathologically burdened atypical AD group, suggesting a differential susceptibility between AD phenotypes.

Importance Since 2018, a movement has emerged to define Alzheimer disease (AD) as a purely biological entity based on biomarker findings. The recent revision of the Alzheimer’s Association (AA) criteria for AD furthers this direction. However, concerns about a purely biological definition of AD being applied clinically, the understanding of AD by society at large, and the translation of blood-based biomarkers into clinical practice prompt these International Working Group (IWG) updated recommendations. Objective To consider the revised AA criteria and to offer an alternative definitional view of AD as a clinical-biological construct for clinical use. The recommendations of the 2021 IWG diagnostic criteria are updated for further elaborating at-risk and presymptomatic states. Evidence Review PubMed was searched for articles published between July 1, 2020, and March 1, 2024, using the terms “biomarker” OR “amyloid” OR “tau” OR “neurodegeneration” OR “preclinical” OR “CSF” OR “PET” OR “plasma” AND “Alzheimer’s disease.” The references of relevant articles were also searched. Findings In the new AA diagnostic criteria, AD can be defined clinically as encompassing cognitively normal people having a core 1 AD biomarker. However, recent literature shows that the majority of biomarker-positive cognitively normal individuals will not become symptomatic along a proximate timeline. In the clinical setting, disclosing a diagnosis of AD to cognitively normal people with only core 1 AD biomarkers represents the most problematic implication of a purely biological definition of the disease. Conclusions and Relevance The ultimate aim of the field was to foster effective AD treatments, including preventing symptoms and dementia. The approach of diagnosing AD without a clinical and biological construct would be unwarranted and potentially concerning without a clear knowledge of when or whether symptoms will ever develop. It is recommended that those who are amyloid-positive only and, more generally, most biomarker-positive cognitively normal individuals, should not be labeled as having AD. Rather, they should be considered as being at risk for AD. The expansion of presymptomatic AD is viewed as a better diagnostic construct for those with a specific pattern of biomarkers, indicating that they are proximate to the expression of symptoms in the near future.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Although frontotemporal dementia (FTD) with right anterior temporal lobe (RATL) predominance has been recognized, a uniform description of the syndrome is still missing. This multicenter study aims to establish a cohesive clinical phenotype. METHODS Retrospective clinical data from 18 centers across 12 countries yielded 360 FTD patients with predominant RATL atrophy through initial neuroimaging assessments. RESULTS Common symptoms included mental rigidity/preoccupations (78%), disinhibition/socially inappropriate behavior (74%), naming/word‐finding difficulties (70%), memory deficits (67%), apathy (65%), loss of empathy (65%), and face‐recognition deficits (60%). Real‐life examples unveiled impairments regarding landmarks, smells, sounds, tastes, and bodily sensations (74%). Cognitive test scores indicated deficits in emotion, people, social interactions, and visual semantics however, lacked objective assessments for mental rigidity and preoccupations. DISCUSSION This study cumulates the largest RATL cohort unveiling unique RATL symptoms subdued in prior diagnostic guidelines. Our novel approach, combining real‐life examples with cognitive tests, offers clinicians a comprehensive toolkit for managing these patients. Highlights This project is the first international collaboration and largest reported cohort. Further efforts are warranted for precise nomenclature reflecting neural mechanisms. Our results will serve as a clinical guideline for early and accurate diagnoses.

AbstractBackgroundEthnoculturally diverse individuals from underrepresented populations (URPs), including but not limited to Black/African American and Hispanic/Latinx adults, are disproportionally affected by Alzheimer’s disease (AD) compared to non‐Hispanic/Latinx white (NLW) adults. However, URPs have historically been under‐included in AD studies. The objective of this study is to describe efforts, and the results of those efforts, to increase enrollment and engagement of ethnoculturally diverse individuals from URPs in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 3 (ADNI3).MethodsEfforts undertaken by ADNI to increase enrollment and engagement of URPs included (1) launching of a Diversity Taskforce (DVTF) lead by two health disparities experts in July 2020, charged with overseeing ADNI’s mission in this space. Specific DVTF activities included: (2) the establishment, funding, and instrumental support (e.g., training, consultation, resources) of diversity at 13 ADNI3 sites; (3) changing ADNI protocol to facilitate research participation of URPs (e.g., optional lumbar puncture and sharing of amyloid PET results); (4) hiring a marketing agency to launch culturally‐informed digital/social media campaigns for the 13 DVTF Sites, with local websites; (5) development of a database to capture performance metrics of inclusion efforts at the 13 DVTF Sites; and (6) formation of a six‐member External Advisory Board, comprised of leaders in health disparities research, to guide DVTF efforts.ResultURP enrollment at these 13 DVTF sites improved from 1.1 URPs per month previously to >4 URPs per month, a 264% increase. Across all 59 ADNI sites, overall enrollment of ethnoculturally diverse individuals from URPs went from 89 (16.8%) to 126 (21.1%), representing a 25% increase in enrollment between May 2020 and September 2021. Moreover, since February 1st, 2021, ADNI enrolled 43 new participants of which 33 (77%) were from URPs.ConclusionIt is possible to improve the enrollment and retention of URPs in AD research using a multi‐pronged community engaged approach that also provides human capital, infrastructure, and financial resources. The success of the DVTF has led to the formation of a new Engagement Core in ADNI4, tasked with implementing a scaled‐up culturally‐informed, community‐engaged research approach to URP inclusion and retention across all 59 ADNI sites.

AbstractBackgroundThe Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is a longitudinal observational study of individuals across the dementia spectrum that validates biomarkers for clinical trials. The newest phase of the study, ADNI4, aims to substantially increase the inclusion of underrepresented populations to improve generalizability of ADNI results. Novel biomarkers, including a speech‐based cognitive assessment and blood‐based plasma biomarkers, are integrated into the study design as key participant screening measures.MethodTo help achieve recruitment goals, ADNI4 uses a new, multi‐phase approach to remotely enroll and screen participants. A large study cohort (aiming for 20,000+ participants) provide initial screening data via an online study platform including demographics, medical history related to study exclusionary criteria, and results from a speech‐based cognitive memory assessment (Novoic Ltd. Storyteller test) and a measure of subjective cognitive/functional decline (Everyday Cognition (ECog) 12‐item). Based on screening results, a subset of online study participants is referred to a Quest Diagnostics location to provide a blood sample for plasma biomarker analysis (aiming for 4,000+ participants). Finally, select participants are referred to ADNI clinical sites for in‐depth characterization (goal of up to 1,500 in‐clinic participants).ResultWe report ADNI’s initial approach for selecting participants from the online screening cohort to undergo plasma biomarker phenotyping, and subsequent selection to a clinical site. Participants from diverse demographic backgrounds (especially for race, ethnicity, and/or education) and those with a higher estimated likelihood of cognitive impairment are given priority in the referral selection process. Likelihood of cognitive impairment is assessed using results from subjective memory complaint questions, responses to the ECog 12‐item questionnaire, and the Novoic Storyteller results. Individuals with results showing high concordance across these measures are prioritized, as well as those who have subsequent plasma results indicating biomarker positivity.ConclusionWeighing the various study requirements and inclusivity goals increases the complexity of participant selection decision making, and is a time‐intensive process. As the ADNI study progresses we aim to automate the participant selection/referral process by developing algorithms that account and encode for changing study prioritizations and dynamics across numerous dimensions. Learnings from ADNI4’s new remote processes will help inform future clinical trial design.

AbstractBackgroundSmartphone‐based cognitive and motor tests enable frequent remote assessments in observational research studies and clinical trials, limiting travel burden and increasing access to research for underrepresented groups. One such smartphone tool is the ALLFTD Mobile App, which was designed to capture the clinical features of neurodegenerative diseases via a battery of cognitive, speech, and motor tasks. In this study, we focus on recruiting a demographically diverse normative sample. We have partnered with the UCSF Brain Health Registry (BHR) to recruit 1,000 cognitively healthy participants across the lifespan. Here we describe the study design and initial feasibility results.MethodsWe designed an automated workflow in which participants never interact with the study team except for troubleshooting. BHR participants without reported cognitive impairment were contacted by email to participate in this study (n = 668). Interested participants downloaded the app onto their smartphone and completed in‐app electronic consent. They were asked to complete three ∼30‐minute sessions of cognitive, motor and speech measures over two weeks. Adherence was determined by evaluating the completion rate of app tasks. In a subset who completed a user experience questionnaire (n = 116), responses were quantified using descriptive statistics.ResultsThe current enrollment rate is 23.20% (155/668) of contacted participants. Average age is 62 (SD = 8.2, range = 25‐84). Average adherence is 76%. Participants reported a range of perceived task difficulty: 38% indicated tasks were “very easy” or “somewhat easy”, 26% indicated they were “neutral,” 36% found the tasks “somewhat difficult,” and none reported them to be “very difficult.” The time commitment was reported to be acceptable by 97% of participants, and 20% were willing to complete additional tasks. Over half (59%) of participants indicated that they preferred using a smartphone to complete cognitive assessments over traditional pen‐and‐paper measures.ConclusionsOur preliminary results demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of recruiting participants, including older adults, through a registry and conducting remote smartphone testing via a fully automated workflow that is highly scalable. Future analysis will study the effects of demographic factors on feasibility and investigate the reliability and validity of the app measures in this sample.

AbstractBackgroundLower gray matter connectivity measures are related to faster cognitive decline in prodromal Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). We investigated the biological underpinnings responsible for this loss of brain connections using cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteomics.MethodData from ADNI was used to select 82 individuals with MCI and abnormal CSF amyloid (mean age±SD 74±7) and 37 controls with normal amyloid levels (mean age±SD 75±5), for whom repeated MRI‐scans (median of 6 scans over 1.5 follow‐up years) and baseline CSF proteomic data (in total 306 proteins) were available. We used an automated pipeline (Tijms, Series et al. 2012) to construct gray matter networks from 3D‐T1 sequences and calculate connectivity density and gamma – measures previously found to be most strongly related to cognitive decline (Dicks, Vermunt et al. 2020). Linear mixed models were applied to test associations between baseline CSF protein levels and repeated connectivity metrics, controlling for intracranial volume, age and sex. Proteins that demonstrated significant associations (p<0.05) were identified and examined for their biological relevance according to Gene Ontology.ResultConnectivity density declined over time with ‐0.8% per year (pMCI = 0.001; figure 1), which did not differ from controls (pdif = 0.15). Gamma declined faster in MCI than in controls (bMCI = ‐0.016 vs. bCN = ‐0.007, pdif <0.001; figure 1). Higher levels of 99/108 proteins were associated with faster decline in connectivity density (a.o. tau and neuroprentaxins). These proteins were involved in regulation of synapse organization (GO:0050807; pFDR = 7.00E‐07; figure 2). Higher levels of 9/108 proteins associated with less decline and were involved in chemotaxis (GO:0048247; pFDR = 1.40E‐02). Similarly, 25 out 30 proteins (83%) associated with alterations in gamma over time, showed associations of higher levels with less gamma decline and were also involved in chemotaxis (GO:0050926; pFDR = 9.42E‐05; figure 3). There were no protein‐connectivity relationships in controls.ConclusionProteins involved in synapse organization were associated with faster decline in connectivity density over time in patients, while chemotaxis was associated with less decline. This suggests that synaptic degeneration may predict disease progression while immune responses may serve as a resilience mechanism in AD.

AbstractBackgroundWhite matter hyper‐intensities (WMH) are observed on FLAIR MRI, increase with age and are more prominent in neurodegenerative diseases such as in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). The aim of this study was to assess the association between WMH and neuropathological staging of amyloid‐beta, neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) and α‐synuclein (α‐syn).MethodIn‐situ 3T‐MRI 3DT1‐weighted and 3D‐FLAIR data were collected for 77 clinically defined and pathologically‐confirmed brain donors; 31 AD, 21 PD and PD dementia (PDD), and 25 controls. WMH were segmented on FLAIR using an in‐house developed multiview convolutional neural network, followed by manual checking, and volume was obtained with FSL. Fifteen brain regions were dissected at autopsy, immunostained and evaluated for neuropathological diagnosis, including Thal amyloid phase, CAA type, and Braak stages for NFT and α‐syn. Group differences were assessed with linear models (corrected for age, gender, post‐mortem delay), and associations with Spearman and Pearson partial correlations.ResultCompared to controls, WMH load was higher in AD (p<0.001), specifically amnestic AD (p = 0.003) rather than non‐amnestic AD (p = 0.053), and higher in PD (p = 0.016), specifically non‐demented PD (p = 0.015) rather than PDD (p = 1.0). No difference in gender was observed (p = 0.38). Without the influence of pathology (in controls), WMH was associated with age (r = 0.49,p = 0.016).In the whole cohort, WMH was associated with Fazekas score (r = 0.67; p<0.001), normalized brain volume (NBV; r = ‐0.31,p = 0.007), gray matter volume (NGMV; r = ‐0.36,p = 0.002), Thal phase (r = 0.24,p0.034), Braak NFT stage (r = 0.33,p = 0.004), and Braak α‐syn stage (r = 0.27, p0.018).Across controls and AD, WMH associated with NBV (r = ‐0.39,p = 0.004), NGMV (r = ‐0.42,p = 0.002), left and right hippocampal volume (r = ‐0.36,p = 0.008 and r = ‐0.32,p = 0.022), Braak NFT (r = 0.41,p<0.001), Thal phase (r = 0.41,p = 0.002), and CAA (r = 0.34,p = 0.01). Amnestic and non‐amnestic AD showed similar results, except for CAA, which was associated with WMH in non‐amnestic AD only (r = 0.33,p = 0.04).Across controls and PD(D), WMH associated with Braak NFT stage (r = 0.39,p = 0.008) and Braak α‐syn stage (r = 0.60,p<0.001), but not with MRI outcome measures. In this respect PD and PDD showed different results; in PD WMH associated with NGMV (r = ‐0.37,p = 0.031), in PDD with left and right hippocampal volume (r = ‐0.44,p = 0.014 and r = ‐0.44,p = 0.015).ConclusionWMH associate with pathological stages of AD and PD(D), and contributes to MRI atrophy.