Citations

Background and Rationale: Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a clonal hematologic neoplasm characterized by abnormal accumulation of mast cells which can lead to symptoms related to mast cell degranulation and/or, in the case of advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM), organ dysfunction due to mast cell infiltration. AdvSM is a category of SM comprised of aggressive systemic mastocytosis (ASM), mast cell leukemia (MCL), and SM with an associated hematologic neoplasm (SM-AHN). Among these, SM-AHN is the most common subtype, accounting for approximately 70% of AdvSM. A KIT D816V mutation found in up to 95% of SM cases is the primary oncogenic driver, making it a key therapeutic target. Avapritinib, a highly potent and selective inhibitor of D816V mutant KIT, has demonstrated high rates of rapid, deep, and durable responses in all AdvSM subtypes, including SM-AHN (Gotlib et al. Nature Medicine, 2021; DeAngelo et al., Nature Medicine, 2021). However, despite showing prolonged OS and low risk of progression of the SM component, some patients (20%) exhibit progression of the AHN component, including transformation to AML. In some patients, combination therapy with avapritinib and AHN-directed therapy may therefore be necessary for optimal control of SM-AHN. Hypomethylating agents (HMA) form the backbone of therapy for advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN); hematologic neoplasms most likely to co-occur with SM in patients (pts) with SM-AHN. To date, the combination of HMA and KIT inhibitors has not been clinically evaluated. In this study, we aim to assess the safety and tolerability of the combination of avapritinib and decitabine in patients with SM-AHN. Study design and Methods: The primary objective of the study is to establish the recommended dose (RP2D) of avapritinib in combination with decitabine based on dose-limiting toxicity, overall safety, and clinical activity data. A dose evaluation steering committee (DESC) comprised of participating investigators will review the totality of safety and efficacy data to determine RP2D. Secondary endpoints include SM overall response rate by the end of 6 cycles by the m-IWG consensus criteria and proposed ECNM-AIM criteria (Gotlib et al., J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 2022) and incidence/frequency of adverse events. Exploratory endpoints include patient reported outcomes, PFS, OS, and correlative biomarkers linked to mast cell disease or AHN. Pts with a diagnosis of SM-AHN by the WHO 2022 criteria will be eligible for inclusion. Pts must have any of the following myeloid AHN per WHO 2022 criteria: MDS, CMML, MDS/MPN with neutrophilia, MDS/MPN with SF3B1 mutation and thrombocytosis, or MDS/MPN-NOS. Patients with MDS must have intermediate, high- or very-high risk by IPSS-R. Patients with very-low or low-risk MDS by IPSS-R must be intolerant/refractory to ESA or have serum EPO > 200 U/L. A baseline platelet count of ≥ 75 x 109/L and ≥ 25 x 109/L will be required for inclusion in the dose-finding and the dose-expansion phases, respectively. Key exclusion criteria include a diagnosis of AML, history of intracranial hemorrhage, prior treatment with avapritinib or decitabine with documented progression in SM or AHN component, respectively, or treatment with alternative KIT inhibitor or azacitidine within 4 weeks of study treatment initiation. In the dose finding part of the study, a Bayesian adaptive design will be employed to assess different doses of avapritinib (50 to 200 mg PO daily) in combination with fixed doses of decitabine (oral decitabine/cedazuridine: 35/100 mg/day or intravenous decitabine: 20 mg/m2/day on days 1-5) in a 28-day treatment cycle. Close attention will be paid to treatment-emergent thrombocytopenia with protocol-driven treatment holds and dose modification strategies employed when platelet count drops below 50 x 109/L. After RP2D is determined, an additional 10 patients will be enrolled in the dose expansion phase. Patients with platelet count ≥ 25 x 109/L and < 75 x 109/L, will receive lead-in dosing with decitabine or decitabine/cedazuridine with the ability to add avapritinib if sufficient platelet thresholds are achieved. Planned correlative studies include serial single-cell multi-omics utilizing scDNA-seq and immunophenotyping to assess impact of combination treatment on a molecularly complex disease state. This study is currently open to accrual (NCT06327685).

Background: JAK2 mutations are invariably associated with polycythemia vera (PV); more than 50% of affected patients also harbor non-JAK2 mutations, some considered prognostically relevant (BJH 2020;189:291). We queried a large single institutional database of patients with PV, in order to examine the incidence and distribution of non-JAK2 mutations, across different disease stages, in order to assess their impact on disease phenotype and prognosis, in the context of other risk factors. Methods: Mayo Clinic databases (1998-2023) were searched to identify next-generation sequencing (NGS)-annotated patients with PV, with diagnosis retrospectively fitted to meet the 2022 International Consensus Classification (ICC) criteria (Blood 2022; 140:1200). NGS was performed either through research-based targeted capture assays or a clinically ordered 42-gene panel. Conventional statistical methods were used for group comparisons and survival analyses. Results: i) Mutational frequencies in chronic vs. transformed disease phases 319 patients with PV were considered; NGS was performed at time of i) diagnosis or before fibrotic or leukemic transformation (N=270; 84.6%), ii) fibrotic progression (N=37; 11.6%), or iii) leukemic transformation (N=12; 3.8%). Mutational frequencies in newly-diagnosed/chronic phase PV were 19% for TET2, 10% for ASXL1, 4% for SRSF2, ⁓3% each for SF3B1, DNMT3A, and SH2B3, and 1-2% each for TP53 and IDH2. Significant differences in mutation distribution were apparent for TP53/SRSF2/IDH1/U2AF1 in blast (50%/25%/17%/8%) vs. fibrotic (8%/0%/0%/5%) vs. chronic (2%/4%/2%/0.4%) phase (p<0.01, <0.01, =0.03, and =0.03, respectively). ii) Phenotypic correlates of specific mutations among patients with NGS information obtained during chronic phase (N=270) Median age was 61.4 years (51% males) and incidence rates included 22% for leukocytosis ( ≥15 x 10(9)/L) and 25%/14% for arterial/venous thrombosis history. Numerically prevalent or prognostically relevant mutations were selected for comparison of clinical or laboratory characteristics: TET2, ASXL1, SRSF2, TP53, IDH2. Significant associations were apparent for ASXL1 (younger age distribution), SRSF2 (older age distribution, leukocytosis), and TP53 (leukocytosis) mutations. Median age was 66.4, 58.7, 76.8, 63.9, and 68.6 years for TET2, ASXL1, SRSF2, TP53, IDH2 mutations, respectively (p<0.01). The corresponding median leukocyte counts were 12.1, 11.4, 14.4, 16.7, and 11.5 x 10(9)/L (p<0.01). iii) Prognostic impact of mutations detected at diagnosis or chronic phase (N=270) At median follow-up of 9.5 years (range 0.1-42.4), 115 (43%) deaths, 12 (4%) leukemic transformations, and 53 (20%) fibrotic progressions were documented. In univariate analysis of mutations, overall survival (OS) was adversely affected by SRSF2 and IDH2 mutations, leukemia-free survival (LFS) by ASXL1, SRSF2, IDH2, RUNX1, and CEBPA mutations, and myelofibrosis-free survival (MFS) by SRSF2 mutation. Age-adjusted (p<0.01) multivariable analysis, including mutations and other risk variables, identified SRSF2 (HR 4.2, 95% CI 1.9-9.5), ASXL1 (HR 2.0, 1.1-3.7), IDH2 (HR 5.3, 1.8-15.3) mutations and leukocytosis ≥15 x 10(9)/L (HR 2.0, 1.3-3.1) as independent predictors of inferior OS. SRSF2 and ASXL1 mutations were also independently associated with inferior LFS (p=0.02 and 0.06, respectively) and SRSF2 (p<0.01) and karyotype (p<0.01) with inferior MFS (p<0.01). Median survival for 235 patients without any adverse mutation (ASXL1, SRSF2, or IDH2) was 17.8 years vs. 8.8 years for 35 patients with any one of the three adverse mutations (p=0.01; HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-2.9). The number of non-JAK2 mutations, in general, was also associated with significantly different survival outcomes: median OS was 20, 15.1, and 9.3 years for patients with non-JAK2 mutations numbering zero, one, or two or more, respectively (p<0.01) Conclusions: SRSF2 mutations in PV cluster with older and ASXL1 with younger age distribution. SRSF2 and TP53 mutational frequencies were higher in blast-phase disease. SRSF2, ASXL1, and IDH2 mutations were significantly associated with inferior OS, independent of each other and other risk factors. SRSF2 mutations were also detrimental to LFS and MFS and ASXL1 to LFS. Such information might allow further refinement of current risk models for PV, which in future studies should also account for variant allele frequency.

Background Pacritinib (PAC) is a relatively selective JAK2 vs. JAK1 inhibitor (JAKi) and is one of four FDA-approved JAKi for use in myelofibrosis (MF). PAC is indicated for MF patients with thrombocytopenia (Platelets <50 x 109/L). In a previously published controlled study of MF patients with platelet count <100 x 109/L (PERSIST-2), including JAKi-naïve and ruxolitinib-experienced, PAC therapy at the recommended dose of 200 mg BID was associated with a ≥35% spleen volume reduction rate of 22%; response rate was lower in ruxolitinib-experienced patients for both 200 mg BID (9.3%) and 100 mg BID (1.8%) dosing (JAMA Oncol 2018;4:652); a more recent post-hoc analysis suggested an additional benefit in anemia with 25-37% of transfusion-dependent patients achieving a ≥12-week transfusion-free period (Blood Adv 2023;7:5835). Herein, we describe our experience with the drug outside of a clinical trial setting. Methods Study patients were retrospectively recruited from Mayo Clinic (USA) databases, after approval from IRB. Diagnostic criteria were according to the International Consensus Classification (Blood 2022;140:1200). Study inclusion criteria included documentation of PAC therapy outside of a clinical trial setting. Spleen response was adjudicated by the 2013 International Working Group-European LeukemiaNet (IWG-ELN) response criteria (Blood 2013;122:1395). Anemia response was rated by the revised 2024 IWG-ELN criteria (manuscript submitted; transfusion-free period x 12 weeks and/or 12-week average increase in hemoglobin ≥1.5 g/dL). Conventional statistical methods were employed. Results A total of 60 MF patients (median age 70 years; males 62%; primary MF 63%) received PAC upfront (N=19; 32%) or after failing treatment with another JAKi (N=41; 68%), including ruxolitinib (N=39; 65%): JAK2 60%, CALR 27%, MPL 10%. Reasons for discontinuation of previous JAKi treatment included drug intolerance (41%), relapse after initial response (33%), and suboptimal response (26%). Median interval between diagnosis and treatment with PAC was 4 years (range 0-22). At PAC treatment initiation, DIPSS-plus risk distribution was high in 48%, intermediate-2 47%, and intermediate-1 (5%). Transfusion-dependent anemia (TDA; ≥3 units during 12 weeks prior to enrollment) was present in 40% of patients, platelet count <50 x 109/L 25%, leukocyte count >11 x 109/L 40%, spleen size >15 cm 76%, constitutional symptoms 55%, complex/monosomal karyotype 27%, and mutations in SRSF2 11% or ASXL1 33%. PAC initial dose was 100 (N=41) or 200 (N=19) mg BID. Dose was increased in 44% of patients started at 100 mg BID and decreased in 55% of those started at 200 mg BID. Among 47 patients evaluable for anemia response, only one of 23 with non-TDA (2% overall and 4.3% at 200 mg BID dosing) and none of 24 with TDA responded. In evaluable patients, spleen response rate was 13% (95% CI 5.9-24.7) overall and higher in JAKi-naïve (29%; 95% CI 11.7-54.7) vs. JAKi-experienced (6%; 95% CI 1.6-19.1; p=0.04). Spleen response rate was higher in the absence of leukocytosis (21% vs. 0%; p=0.01) or complex/monosomal karyotype (17% vs. 0%; p=0.05) but similar between 100 and 200 mg BID initial dosing (p=0.9). At a median follow-up of 14 months (range 1-27), PAC was discontinued in 80% of the patients: intolerance 58%, suboptimal response 54%, transition to allogeneic stem cell transplants (ASCT) 10%. Major side effects were more frequent with 200 vs. 100 mg BID dose and included diarrhea 43%, nausea/vomitting 17%, dyspnea 25%, peripheral edema 28%, allergic reaction 13%, grade 3/4 neutropenia 22%, and grade 4 thrombocytopenia 34%. Up to the time of this writing, 17 deaths (28%), 11 (18%) ASCT, and 3 (5%) leukemic transformations were documented. In multivariable analysis, post-PAC survival was adversely affected by TDA (HR 11.9; p<0.01), platelet count <50 x 109/L (HR 7.4; p<0.01), and SRSF2/ASXL1 mutations (HR 10.7; p<0.01), all independent of ASCT, which was independently associated with longer survival (HR 9.0; p<0.01). Conclusions: The observations from the current real-world study, regarding the moderate activity of PAC for reducing spleen size, are consistent with those of the aforementioned controlled clinical trial (PERSIST-2). However, despite recent suggestions of the drug's mechanistically unique erythropoietic activity, the anemia response rate seen in the current study was underwhelming.

Background and Significance When patients (pts) with follicular lymphoma (FL) present with a high tumor burden, they require systemic treatment with rituximab (R) in combination with chemotherapy (chemo). Given the known cumulative toxicities of chemotherapy and the older age of pts at the time of diagnosis, novel chemo-free treatment approaches are desired by pts as well as physicians. R-lenalidomide (R-Len), a chemo-free alternative to R-based chemoimmunotherapy, has recently been listed as a chemo-free option in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN) guidelines. Golcadomide (GOLCA) is a potential first-in-class oral cereblon E3 ligase modulator (CELMoD™) agent purposefully designed for the treatment of lymphoma. GOLCA co-opts cereblon to induce targeted degradation of the transcription factors Ikaros/Aiolos, inducing deep, rapid, and extensive tumor killing, independent of cell of origin, and enhanced immunostimulatory activity. Compared with immunomodulatory (IMiD) agents like lenalidomide, GOLCA more efficiently drives the cereblon complex to the closed active state resulting in more potent degradation (Watson ER et al, Science 2022), which is expected to translate into improved clinical benefit. In addition, the phase 1/2 study CC-99282-NHL-001 showed that GOLCA alone or in combination with R (GOLCA-R) was well tolerated and showed promising activity in pts with heavily pre-treated relapsed/refractory (R/R) FL, including in those with prior Len-based therapies and/or T cell-redirecting therapies (Chavez et al, EHA 2024). Based on this, GOLSEEK-2 (NCT06425302) is a randomized phase 2 trial assessing the efficacy and safety of GOLCA-R as a chemo-free option in pts with newly diagnosed advanced-stage FL. Study Design and Methods After a screening period of ≤ 5 weeks, approximately 90 pts with newly diagnosed advanced-stage FL will be randomized 1:1:1 between GOLCA plus rituximab at a dose of 0.2 mg or 0.4 mg once daily from day 1 to 14 every 28 days for 12 cycles or investigator's choice R-chemo (R-CHOP or R-bendamustine). R maintenance could be considered (as per pt and physician decision) for pts who achieve a partial response or better after completion of initial therapy for up to one year in GOLCA-R arms and up to one and a half years in the R-chemo arm. Pts with histologically confirmed diagnosis of grade 1, 2, 3a FL, or classic FL according to WHO classification would be eligible for the study. Other key inclusion criteria include no prior systemic treatment for FL, stage II-IV disease, the requirement for treatment as per investigator's judgment, and measurable disease as defined by Lugano 2014 criteria. Key exclusion criteria include other lymphoma subtypes, clinical evidence of transformed lymphoma, and documented or suspected central nervous system involvement. The primary endpoint is complete metabolic response (CMR) during the GOLCA plus rituximab combination treatment period, assessed by the investigator and based on Lugano 2014 Response Criteria. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall survival, overall response rate, duration of response, complete response rate at 30 months, CMR rate at 6 months and 12 months, and safety outcomes.

Background Survival risk models in essential thrombocythemia (ET) include the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSET; Blood 2012;120:1197) and the more recently described “triple-A” prognostic score that considers Age and absolute neutrophil (ANC) and lymphocyte (ALC) counts, as risk variables (AJH 2023;98:1829). Monocytosis, defined by absolute monocyte count (AMC) of ≥0.8 x 109/L, was recently reported to be associated with inferior survival in polycythemia vera (ASH 2024 abstract). The current study examined the prognostic contribution of monocytosis in ET, in the context of other clinical and genetic risk factors. Methods Study patients were recruited from Mayo Clinic (USA) databases, based on availability of information on ANC, ALC, and AMC (N=649). Diagnostic criteria were according to the International Consensus Classification (Blood 2022;140:1200). Mutations were screened by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Conventional statistical methods were employed (JMP Pro 17.0.0, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and optimal cut-points for age, ANC, ALC, and AMC were determined by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and ROC plots were used to estimate predictive accuracy of risk models. Results A total of 649 patients (median age 60 years; females 65%) were informative for AMC, ANC, and ALC, with median (range) values of 0.6 x 109/L (0.2-2.5), 5.7 x 109/L (1.5-26.5), and 1.9 (0.4-5.7), respectively. At presentation, IPSET risk distribution was low in 34%, intermediate 47%, and high 19%; triple-A risk distribution was low 21%, intermediate-1 50%, intermediate-2 13%, and high 16%; driver mutation distribution was 63.8% JAK2, 24.0% CALR, 3.7% MPL, and 8.5% triple-negative; median for platelets were 728 x 109/L, hemoglobin 13.9 g/dL, and leukocytes 8.5 x 109/L ; leukocytosis (leukocytes ≥11 x 109/L) was documented in 18.8% of patients, palpable splenomegaly 7%, arterial thrombosis (AT) history 14.5%, venous thrombosis (VT) history 9.2%, and major hemorrhage 7.8%. At median follow-up of 7 years (range 0.02-31.4), 146 (22.5%) deaths, 52 (8%) fibrotic progressions, 22 (3.4%) leukemic transformations, 71 (11%) AT events, 36 (5.6%) VT events, and 64 (10%) major bleeds were recorded. In age-adjusted univariate analysis, higher AMC was significantly associated with inferior survival, with a ROC determined cutoff value of ≥0.8 x 109/L (N=154; 24%); significance was sustained (HR 2.3; p<0.01) during multivariable analysis (MVA) that also identified age >70 years (HR 16.6; p<0.01), age 50-70 years (HR 4.3; p<0.01), ANC ≥8 x 109/L (HR 1.9; p<0.01), ALC <1.7 x 109/L (HR 1.8; p<0.01), and AT history (HR 1.6; p=0.01). A similar MVA conducted on an external cohort from the University of Florence (N=514) confirmed the significant contribution from all of these risk variables, except AT (p=0.8). An HR-based 4-variable prognostic model based on Age >70 years (4 points) or 50-70 years (2 points), AMC ≥0.8 x 109/L (1 point), ANC ≥8 x 109/L (1 point), and ALC <1.7 x 109/L (1 point), henceforth referred to as the AAA+A model, was subsequently developed using the Mayo Clinic cohort and validated by the Florence cohort: Low (0-1 points; N= 180; median not reached), intermediate-1 (2-3 points; N=266; median 21.6 years), intermediate-2 (4-5 points; N=151; median 12.2 years), and high (6-7 points; N=52; median 8.7 years); HR values were 2.1 for high vs. intermediate-2, 5.4 for intermediate-2 vs. intermediate-1, and 3.8 for intermediate-1 vs. low (p<0.001in all instances). The 20-year survival predictive performance of AAA+A (AIC 131; AUC 0.88) was superior to that of AAA (AIC 143; AUC 0.85) and IPSET (AIC 149; AUC 0.84). In MVA that included AAA+A risk variables, AMC ≥0.8 x 109/L (p=0.04) and ALC <1.7 x 109/L (p=0.06) appeared to affect leukemia-free survival and ANC ≥8 x 109/L (p=0.04) myelofibrosis-free survival. In univariate analysis, AMC ≥0.8 x 109/L was associated with AT (p=0.03) but not VT (p=0.14) history and showed borderline significance for venous (p=0.09) and arterial (p=0.07) thrombosis-free survivals; however, significance was lost during MVA. Conclusions: Monocytosis is an adverse prognostic factor in ET and its inclusion as a risk variable enhances the predictive performance of the AAA risk model and is equally simple to apply worldwide. Analyses that include mutations will be presented at meeting.

Introduction Prognostication in myelofibrosis (MF) currently relies on manual assessment of clinical, pathological, and laboratory variables, which is inefficient and error-prone. The potential of large language models (LLMs) and rule-based programming to automate data extraction and prognostication in these patients remains unexplored and merits investigation. Methods Patients with MF were identified from a retrospective chart review. Data regarding clinical (age, constitutional symptoms, transfusion requirements), laboratory (hemoglobin, circulating white blood cell, platelet, and blast counts), and pathological (grade of bone marrow fibrosis, chromosomal analyses, cytogenetics) features was extracted from the latest free-text clinical notes and pathology reports using the generative pretrained transformer-4 (GPT-4) model in a zero-shot setting with the prompting parameters set to generate deterministic responses. The patients were randomly sampled into development (15%) and test (85%) sets, with the documents of patients in the development set used for iterative prompt engineering. The finalized prompts were used for data extraction in the test set. Rule-based programming was used for post-processing of the extracted data and ascertaining prognosis via Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS), DIPSS-plus (DIPSS+), and Mutation-enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System-70 (MIPSS-70). Automatically extracted data and prognostic categories were compared with the manually generated human annotations. Mean accuracy, precision, and recall with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed. Detailed error and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess performance. Results The study included 100 patients (development: 15; test: 85) with 100 clinical notes (development: 15; test: 85) and 90 pathology reports (development: 13; test: 77). The mean age of these patients was 70 (SD: 10.6); 55 (55%) patients were men, and 93 (93%) patients were White. In the development set, the mean accuracy, precision, and recall for data extraction from clinical notes were 94% (95% CI: 90-98%), 92% (84-99%), and 99% (97-100%). For data extraction from pathology reports, the mean accuracy, precision, and recall were 96% (93-100%), 98% (92-100%), and 83% (63-100%). For prognostication, the mean accuracy, precision, and recall were 87% (79-94%), 80% (73-87%), and 100% using DIPSS (accuracy: 80%; precision: 73%; recall: 100%), DIPSS+ (accuracy: 93%; precision: 83%; recall: 100%) and MIPSS-70 (accuracy: 87%, precision: 83%; recall: 100%). In the test set, the mean accuracy, precision, and recall for data extraction from clinical notes were 96% (95% CI: 93-98%), 91% (87-96%), and 98% (97-100%). For data extraction from pathology reports, the mean accuracy, precision, and recall were 95% (92-98%), 93% (87-99%), and 90% (80-100%). For prognostication the mean accuracy, precision, and recall were 95% (94-96%), 89% (88-90%) and 99% (96-100%) using DIPSS (accuracy: 94%; precision: 89%; recall: 100%), DIPSS+ (accuracy: 95%; precision: 88%; recall: 95%) and MIPSS-70 (accuracy: 94%, precision: 90%; recall: 100%). Error analyses identified incorrect extractions by GPT-4 were related to the circulating blasts and constitutional symptoms variables from the clinical notes. Sensitivity analyses excluding the associated variables improved overall accuracy from 94% to 97% and 96% to 97% in the development and test sets, respectively. Similarly, incorrect extractions from the pathology reports were related to the CALR gene mutation variables. Sensitivity analyses excluding the associated variables improved the overall accuracy from 96% to 98% and 95% to 97% in the development and test sets, respectively. Conclusion LLMs and rule-based programming can accurately extract data from the electronic health records and prognosticate MF patients via DIPSS, DIPSS+, and MIPSS-70. The automated approach could significantly streamline clinical and research workflows, providing an efficient and less resource-intensive alternative to manual prognostication.

Background: The JAK2 46/1, also referred to as the GGCC, haplotype, is represented by 4 main SNPs spanning a region of 250kb in chr9 including the JAK2 gene, that are in complete linkage disequilibrium. The GGCC haplo was found to confer susceptibility to JAK2 mutated myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) (Jones AV, 2009; Olcaydu D, 2009; Kilpivaara O, 2009) while association with JAK2-wildtype MPN remains controversial (Pardanani A, 2010; Jones AV, 2010; Guglielmelli P, 2010; Trifa A, 2016). The GGCC haplo was also found enriched in MPN pts with splancnic vein thrombosis (SVT) (Smalberg JH, 2011), and to correlate with higher JAK2V617F variant allele frequency (VAF) (Alvarez-Larran, A, 2012). Nullizigosity for GGCC haplo was associated with reduced survival (OS) in pts with myelofibrosis (MF) (Tefferi A, 2019), but no information on the impact of GGCC haplo status with phenotype and outcome in PV is available. Aim: To assess the clinical correlates and the prognostic significance of GGCC haplo status in a large cohort of pts with PV. Pts and Methods: A total of 399 PV pts, all JAK2V617F mutated, diagnosis revised according to 2022 ICC criteria, were genotyped for 46/1 haplotype by PCR allele discrimination with rs12343867 (with the “C” allele standing for 46/1 haplotype). Results: A total of 301 pts (75.4%) had the C allele, of which 143 (47.5%) were CC homo and 158 (52.5%) CT hetero; 98 (24.6%) were nullizygous for GGCC (TT). Since preliminary analysis disclosed no significant difference between CT and TT haplotype for all variables considered, homozygous CC pts were compared to TT+CT. The CC haplotype was associated with higher leukocytes (median 11.3x10e9/L vs 9.6, p<.001), higher hemoglobin (18.4 g/dL vs 17.5, p<.001), lower platelets (441x10e9/L vs 514, p=.002) more aquagenic pruritus (51.8% vs 33.2%, p=.001), and higher JAK2VAF (60.8+-24.8% vs 36.8+-19.7%, p<.001) at diagnosis. Pts with a VAF >50% were 69% in CC versus 24.1% in TT+CT pts (p<.001). ASXL1 mutations were enriched among CC pts (20.3% vs 9.4%, p=0.04), otherwise no difference regarding additional myeloid mutations was noted. All above differences remained significant when considering CC versus TT and CT separately. More pts with CC haplotype suffered from venous thrombosis (VT) during the FU (16.1% vs 4.3%, p<.001), no difference was noted for arterial thrombosis nor for splancnic vein thrombosis. VT-FS by Kaplan Meyer was significantly shorter (p<.001) in CC pts; the rate of VT at 5, 10, 15y after diagnosis, was 5.5%, 12%, 20.2% for CC versus 2.6%, 3.4%, 6.4% for TT+CT, respectively (all p<.001). In multivariable analysis, including JAK2VAF >50%, age >60y, history of VT, WBC >15x10e9/L, only CC haplo remained significant (HR 3.6, 95%CI 1.4-9.5, p=.009). Progression to post-PV MF occurred in 81 pts (20.3%), significantly more among CC (n=45, 31.5%) than TT+CT (n=36; 14.1%; p<.001). Myelofibrosis-FS was significantly shorter in CC vs other genotypes (p=.02). However, in multivariable analysis, only BM fibrosis G1 remained significant (HR 3.2, 1.7-5.9; p<.001). Evolution to blast-phase occurred in 13 pts (3.2%), 9 (6.3%) with CC haplo vs 4 TT+CT (1.6%; p=.01). During the follow-up, 102 pts (25.5%) died, 50 (35%) CC and 52 TT+CT (20.3%; p=.001). In multivariable analysis, including MIPSS-PV variables (Tefferi A 2020), the CC haplo remained significant (HR 1.8, 1.04-3.2, p=.03) together with age (HR 3.0, 1.6-5.7; p<.001), WBC (HR 2.6, 1.3-4.8; p=.004), and thrombosis history (HR 1.9, 1.0-3.7; p=.03). Conclusions. Homozygosity for the 46/1 or CC haplotype contributes to the phenotype diversity of PV, in part possibly mediated by associated higher JAK2V67F VAF, and predicts for incident VT and shorter OS. Supported by AIRC, 21267; MIUR,2022F4WMR3; IHM, PNRR-MAD-2022-12376695

Introduction Knowledge of epidemiologic risk factors, clonal changes associated with MDS development from precursor states, and evolution from one MDS state to another (lower- (LR) or higher-risk (HR) disease or leukemia (AML)) are largely limited to retrospective studies, which may not reflect the true MDS spectrum. The MDS NHS is an established prospective cohort of patients (pts) with suspected MDS enrolled at diverse US sites. Extensive clinical data and biospecimens are collected at baseline and throughout follow-up (F/U), in real time, as pts are followed for life. Here, we assess rates and potential predictors of progression providing a foundation for precise stratification across the MDS spectrum, which may ultimately guide intervention. Methods At baseline, all MDS NHS pts have central pathology review and those assigned to MDS, MDS/MPN overlap, AML<30% blasts, or at-risk of MDS (AR-MDS: CCUS and other at-risk) are followed prospectively. We compared AR-MDS with LR-MDS (MDS and MDS/MPN overlap with IPSS-R ≤ 3.5) and HR-MDS (MDS and MDS/MPN overlap with IPSS-R > 3.5). We defined disease progression as any F/U diagnosis of worsening disease or documented disease-related death. Rates of disease progression were compared between groups using survival analysis methods for cumulative incidence incorporating non-disease death as a competing risk. Associations between progression and predictor variables were explored using univariate tests of association and multivariable survival (Cox regression) models for time-to-progression and logistic models for probability of progression (yes/no). Results The MDS NHS enrolled 2051 pts during June 2016-February 2024, with 54% (1111, above categories) followed prospectively. Median F/U is 1.7 yrs (IQR: 0.8-3.1 yrs, max: 7.9 yrs). For the current analysis, 582 MDS and 505 AR-MDS pts were included. Compared to AR-MDS, MDS patients were more often male (70% v 61%, p<0.01), older (median age: 75 v 72 years, p<0.01), and had lower baseline hemoglobin (median: 10.1 v 11.9 g/dL, p<0.001), platelets (median: 124 x109 v 146 x109 cells/L, p<0.001), and absolute neutrophil counts (median: 1.9 x109 vs 2.8 x109 cells/L, p<0.001). F/U time was similar among AR-MDS and MDS (median: 1.9 vs 1.6 yrs), with both groups having a 75th percentile of 3 yrs and maximum of 7 yrs. A total of 331 deaths were observed (30%), with 145 (44%) of these due to causes related to MDS (myeloid disease and/or cardiovascular disease). Overall, 18.5% had disease progression, with annual rates of 8% (MDS) and 2% (AR-MDS) (p<0.01). Among HR-MDS, progression rates were greatest in the 1st year following diagnosis (33%) and declined thereafter, whereas progression rates remained between 5-8% for LR-MDS and 1-3% for AR-MDS over 5 yrs of F/U. AR-MDS had similar rates of progression within the first 3 yrs from diagnosis as MDS with the lowest IPSS-R category. Among AR-MDS, low hemoglobin (hazard ratio, HR [95% CI]=3.2 [1.4-7.3], p<0.01) was significantly associated with progression. Among MDS, low hemoglobin (HR=4.0 [2.2-7.0], p<0.001), low platelet count (HR=3.1 [1.7-5.6], p<0.001) and higher numbers of mutations (HR=1.13 [1.0-1.2], p<0.01) were significantly associated with progression. Due to the low rate of progression in AR-MDS, meaningful comparisons of mutations could not be completed. In MDS, univariate analyses showed that somatic mutation prevalence in gene pathways for transcription, cell cycle and RAS signaling, and in genes TP53, BCOR, SF3B1, DDX41, PTPN11, SETBP1, and JAK2 were significantly associated with the probability of progression (p<0.05 in all). In multivariable models, adjusting for patient age, sex, and MDS risk level, the probability of progression (PP) was significantly higher among those with vs without somatic mutations in BCOR (PP=63% vs 29%, p=0.004), PTPN11 (PP=67% vs 29%, p=0.009), SETBP1 (PP=61% vs 30%, p=0.02), JAK2 (PP=59% vs 30%, p=0.02), DDX41 (PP=56% vs 30%, p=0.03) and TP53 (PP=43% vs 29%, p=0.04). Conclusions In this large prospective cohort of MDS and pts at risk for MDS, the annual rate of any disease progression was 8% among MDS and 2% among AR-MDS, lower than some retrospective series. Specific cytopenias and genetic factors associated with progression were identified. The MDS NHS provides an incomparable opportunity to address the critical clinical challenges of management and prevention of MDS progression across its spectrum.

Background: The Phase 1/2 ECOG-ACRIN sponsored intergroup trial E4412 (NCT01896999) investigated brentuximab vedotin (BV) combined with the checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab (N) and ipilimumab (I) in patients with relapsed or refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R HL). Here we present the safety and efficacy results for the cohort of pediatric patients aged 12-17 years. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with the doublet of BV/N or triplet of BV/N/I, with the following dosing: BV 1.8mg/kg every 21 days for up to 16 cycles; Nivolumab 3mg/mg every 21 days for up to 34 cycles; Ipilimumab 1mg/kg every 9 weeks for up to 9 doses. Response evaluation by PET/CT was performed after 4 cycles. Transplant-eligible patients with CR could discontinue protocol therapy to receive a consolidative autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Results: Sixteen pediatric patients with a median age of 16 (range 12-17) were randomized. 75% of patients had received only 1 prior line of treatment with none having previously received BV and only 1 patient with prior ASCT. All patients were treated (8 in each arm) and included in the pediatric safety analysis cohort receiving at least one cycle of therapy. There were four reported grade (gr) 3 or greater toxicities: lymphopenia (gr 3) and neutropenia (gr 3) on the BV/N arm; and neutropenia (gr 4) and rash (gr 3) on the BV/N/I arm. Rash of any grade was more common in patients treated with BV/N/I (n=6) compared to BV/N (n=1). Peripheral sensory neuropathy was reported in 2 patients (BV/N, gr 2, n=2) There were no grade 5 toxicities. Fourteen patients (7 in each arm) were evaluable for response. The CR rate on both the BV/N and BV/N/I arms was 100%. The median survival follow up was 23.7 months (15.7 - 31.7). The 24-month PFS was 57% for BV/N and 100% for BV/N/I. Six patients (2 BV/N; 4 BV/N/I) discontinued protocol therapy to receive a consolidative ASCT. The 24-month PFS for patients consolidated with an ASCT was 100%, with all events occurring in patients randomized to BV/N, but not receiving an ASCT. Conclusion: Pediatric patients receiving both BV/N and BV/N/I had 100% CR rate with limited toxicity. Although this is a small cohort, there have been no progression events observed in patients treated with BV/N/I, including 3 patients treated without a consolidative ASCT.

Background: TP53 mutations (TP53mut) are highly prevalent in therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) compared to de novo MN (35-40% vs 7-13%) and are associated with a poor outcome. Understanding the risk factors involved in the pathogenesis of TP53mut t-MN is critical to prevent its development. Methods: We characterized t-MN cases by examining primary cancer type vs autoimmune disease diagnosis vs solid organ transplantation, treatment modality, and latency (interval between primary cancer/disease and t-MN diagnosis) to identify patient and disease-related factors associated with TP53mut t-MN. Allelic loss of TP53mut MN was defined according to International Consensus Classification (ICC) criteria (Arber et al., Blood 2022). Results: Of 587 t-MN patients, 33% (n=194) had acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) and 67% (n=393) had myelodysplastic syndrome (t-MDS, blasts<20%). Primary diagnosis comprised of 243 (41.6%) solid cancers and 300 (51.4%) hematological malignancies, while 7% (n=41) of t-MN cases had autoimmune disease or underwent solid organ transplant. Overall, 94 (16.1%) patients received prior radiotherapy (RT) alone and 75.6% (n=444) received chemotherapy (CT) with/without RT. 109 patients (18.7%) underwent autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). The median latency from primary diagnosis to t-MN was 83.2 months (IQR 41.3, 153.2), and there was a trend towards shorter latency in t-AML compared to t-MDS (70.5 vs 85.8 months; P=0.07). Of the t-MN patients, 280 (47.7%) harbored TP53mut, which was associated with significantly poorer survival compared to wild-type (TP53wt) t-MN (9.7 vs 21.9 months; P <0.001). In contrast to TP53wt (59.0% vs 41.0%), the majority of TP53mut t-MN presented with t-MDS vs t-AML (75.7% vs 24.3%; P <0.001). According to ICC criteria, multi-hit MDS (n=131; 47.8%) was the most common entity, followed by AML (n=68; 24.8%), MDS/AML (n=34; 12.4%), and single-hit MDS (n=8, 2.9%). Poor prognostic karyotype changes e.g., del 5q, del 7q, complex karyotype and monosomal karyotype, were more prevalent in TP53mut compared to TP53wt t-MN. Co-mutations in other genes were enriched in TP53wt t-MN. As TP53mut t-MN is associated with a dismal outcome, we assessed the factors associated with its development. There were no significant differences in median age at primary cancer/disease diagnosis (59.0 vs 59.9 years; P=0.4) or gender (females 43.3% vs 39.3%; P=0.3) between TP53mut and TP53wt t-MN. However, TP53mut patients were older at t-MN diagnosis (69 vs 67.4 years; P=0.05). Correlations between gene mutations and prior malignancies revealed a significant association between TP53mut and hematological primary cancers (odds ratio [OR] 1.6; P=0.006), especially multiple myeloma (MM, OR 4.9; P<0.001) and lymphoproliferative disease (LPD, OR 2.0; P=0.013). Among solid cancers, head and neck malignancies were significantly associated with increased risk of developing TP53mut t-MN (OR 7.7; P=0.01). Compared to RT alone, ASCT (OR 2.2; P=0.004) and CT (OR 2.0; P=0.008) were associated with an increased risk of TP53mut t-MN. Recent studies indicate that CT/RT confer a selective advantage to preexisting TP53mut hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, allowing clonal expansion/evolution and progression to t-MN. We hypothesized that TP53mut t-MN with high-risk disease features is a function of TP53mut clonal expansion/evolution rate and would predict latency between primary cancer and t-MN. Indeed, the latency between primary cancer and t-MN diagnosis was longer in TP53mut (87.8 months, IQR 45.5, 154.1) compared to TP53wt (74.7 months, IQR 37.5, 146.9 months) t-MN (P=0.05). Interestingly, 54% and 29% of TP53mut t-MN had a latency of ≥5 and ≥10 years, respectively. There were no correlations between latency and TP53 variant allele frequency (VAF) (r=0.38 and P=0.7) or between TP53mut t-MDS and t-AML (85.2 vs 109.3 months; P=0.9). Together, latency between primary cancer and t-MN was not associated with TP53mut t-MN phenotype, VAF or other poor-risk disease features. Conclusion: Hematological malignancies, especially MM and LPD treated with high-dose CT, were strongly associated with TP53mut t-MN development, highlighting the importance of careful and ongoing screening in this population. Also, the long latency of TP53mut t-MN provides an opportunity to devise effective surveillance strategies and preventative interventions long before TP53mut t-MN development.