Citations

Background: CLL is one of the most common types of leukemia in the United States, with an estimated 20,700 new cases in 2024. Although cBTKis have become the standard of care for CLL/SLL in treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory patients, cardiovascular (CV) toxicity is a known side effect. Further, clinical outcomes often worsen as patients progress beyond 1st-line therapy (1L), and the frequency of CV adverse events (CVAEs) may increase with age and as patients progress to 2nd-line or later therapies (2L+). This research evaluated the real-world incidence of CVAEs and clinical outcomes in patients who initiated cBTKi between 2020 and 2023. Methods: Adult patients diagnosed with CLL/SLL who initiated cBTKi treatment (index date) between 2020-2023 in the United States were identified using claims data from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database and followed up to 36 months post-index. Cohorts were assessed as those initiating 1L or 2L+, reflecting treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory patients. Results were presented for patients with an incident CVAE (not present pre-index) and those without. Demographics, incident CVAEs, overall survival (OS) and proportion of patients who discontinued index cBTKi therapy, initiated next treatment or experienced death (NT+D) were assessed. Time to CV event (TTCE) for ibrutinib and acalabrutinib were determined using a Kaplan-Meier (KM) model and Log rank test. Results: Overall, 2,163 eligible patients were identified with a mean ± SD age of 73.8 ± 9.2 years, and 40.6% were female. Of these, 1,958 (90.5%) were included in the 1L cohort and 205 (9.5%) in the 2L+ cohort; 619 (31.6%) and 63 (30.7%) patients had CVAEs, respectively. The mean ± SD [median] observation period was 1.6 ± 0.9 [2.0] years in 1L and 1.5 ± 1.0 [1.0] years in 2L+. The most common cBTKi (in 1L and 2L+) at index were ibrutinib (55.5% and 55.6%), followed by acalabrutinib (40.3% and 38.5%), and zanubrutinib (4.1% and 5.9%). At 12-months post-index, the proportion of 1L patients with and without CVAEs who discontinued treatment was 44.9% and 41.6%, rising to 65.6% and 59.0% by 36-months post-index, respectively. For those in 2L+, 50.8% and 40.8% of those with and without CVAEs discontinued treatment by 12-months; 68.3% and 55.6% discontinued by 36-months. Among those with and without CVAEs, NT+D in 1L patients was 35.9% and 22.5% within 12-months post-index and 56.9% and 32.8% by 36-months. In the 2L+ cohort, 46.0% and 31.7% experienced NT+D by 12-months, rising to 63.5% and 41.5% by 36-months. OS in 1L patients was 84.7% and 93.1% in those with and without CVAEs at 12-months and 69.1% and 88.0% at 36-months. For 2L+ patients, OS was 71.4% and 88.0% at 12-months and decreased to 54.0% and 80.3% at 36-months, among those with and without CVAEs, respectively. The most common incident CVAEs following cBTKi initiation in the 1L and 2L+ cohorts were hypertension (31.2% and 21.7%), heart failure (14.6% and 17.7%), atrial fibrillation (13.9% and 18.4%), atrial flutter (13.3% and 16.9%), and ventricular arrythmias (13.0% and 14.5%). The occurrence of incident CVAEs between 1L patients who received acalabrutinib and ibrutinib was 3.4% and 13.2% for atrial fibrillation, 2.7% and 12.7% for atrial flutter, 9.3% and 31.0% for hypertension, and 6.8% and 11.7% for ventricular arrythmias. For 2L+, the proportion experiencing CVAEs with index acalabrutinib or ibrutinib were 8.6% and 14.8% for atrial fibrillation, 7.6% and 14.8% for atrial flutter, 10.5% and 25.0% for hypertension, and 10.1% and 8.8% for ventricular arrythmias. Among acalabrutinib and ibrutinib patients, KM estimates (medians not reached) in 1L showed that 84% and 72% of patients would not experience a CVAE by 12 months, with 57% and 52% not experiencing a CVAE at 36-months (p<0.001); 2L+ KM estimate rates were 77% and 73% at 12-months and 64% and 60% at 36-months (p=0.28). Mean TTCE for acalabrutinib and ibrutinib in 1L was 2.2 and 1.9 years with 1.6 and 1.2 years in 2L+. Summary/Conclusion: Utilizing real-world evidence from patients with CLL/SLL receiving cBTKIs, this study highlights the CV disease burden among patients who incur new CV events in 1L or later lines of therapy. This research underscores the need for innovative therapies with improved efficacy and CV safety profiles that delay progression to later lines of therapy, as well as careful CV monitoring to allow for early management and improved outcomes.

Background: Contemporary questions about treatment and outcomes of patients (pts) living with multiple myeloma (MM) demand efficient and timely evidence generation methods, where real-world/ everyday practice data can play an important role. Relevant potential applications include understanding and addressing disparities in treatment access, mitigating toxicities of novel therapies while maintaining quality of life, appropriately sequencing treatments within long-term management strategies, and disseminating and appropriately using surrogate endpoints in practice, such as minimal residual disease. However, existing real-world data (RWD) repositories are limited by an inability to implement interventions in response to issues identified through retrospective data analysis, which is pivotal for the use of newer therapies. The ASH Research Collaborative (ASH RC) MM Data Hub Program was developed to address these gaps. Methods: We developed a multicenter network of US-based tertiary academic medical centers, engaging site clinicians, patients, biostatisticians, informaticians, and data scientists. Initial activities included constructing a shared real-world MM data model comprised of consensus core data elements. Pt data from each site, dating back to at least 2019, is currently being entered through electronic case report forms, batch uploaded utilizing existing institutional data repositories, and soon direct electronic health record import in standard data acquisition formats. Data are aggregated in the Data Hub and shared in a confidential Site Portal with each site. The Portal allows sites to track their own pts, analyze outcomes, and identify ways to improve the quality of care provided to individuals living with MM. We also developed an innovative evidence generation learning community of site clinicians who meet monthly and collaborate on the “COVID-19 OutcomeS in Myeloma and the Impact of VaCcines (COSMIC)” study, a prospective, decentralized observational study that rapidly accrued pts and collects relevant practice information. The group also shares best practices in study conduct to accelerate study enrollment and execution. Results: The MM Data Hub Program now contains twelve centers: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, University of California San Francisco, University of California Davis, Medical College of Wisconsin, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, University of North Carolina Medical Center at Chapel Hill, Emory University Hospital, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Atrium Health. From this Network, six centers have contributed data from 8,824 pts (2,825 with sufficiently complete data are included in this analysis). The median age at time of MM diagnosis is 63, and of the 627 deceased pts, the median age at death is 70.6 years, with median time to death from first MM diagnosis of 6 years. The proportions of pts by decade of diagnoses are 34.9% from 2020-2024; 57.6% from 2010-2019; 7.3% from 2000-2009; and 0.9% prior to 2000. 83.1% of pts had a diagnosis of plasma cell myeloma (non-light chain), and 14.4% of pts had a diagnosis of light chain myeloma. 42.3% of pts are female, and the self-reported patient races are: 85.0% white; 9.2% black or African; and 4.3% all other races (race was not documented in 1.5% of pts). 2.8% of pts are of Hispanic ethnicity. Participant data files are currently undergoing completion and cleaning procedures; the analysis will include updated results at the meeting, and a Network-wide analytic data set will be available for initial retrospective data analyses in early 2025. The COSMIC study opened for enrollment on January 22, 2024, and completed enrollment of 200 pts on May 17, 2024. Conclusions: The ASH RC Data Hub MM Program launched in 2023 and is comprised of 12 sites that collectively have contributed participant files for 8,824 pts thus far. Utilizing the structure of the Network, we successfully implemented and established the feasibility of collecting data directly from pts electronically to monitor SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and COVID-19 related outcomes. The Program serves as a successful proof-of-concept model, providing an enduring RWD resource and a prospective evidence generation platform for the myeloma community.

Introduction: Although not formally approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax (ven) has shown promising activity in patients (pts) with MM whose disease harbors t(11;14). The randomized BELLINI trial (VenVd vs Vd in unselected MM pts, Kumar Lancet Oncol 2020) demonstrated improved PFS, especially in the 35 patients with t(11;14) [HR 0.11], although worse OS in the intention to treat population due to increased treatment related mortality. The subsequent CANOVA trial (Vendex vs Pomdex in MM pts with t(11;14), Mateos IMS 2023) failed to show a PFS benefit (median PFS 9.9 mo vs 5.8 mo, p=0.237), leaving an uncertain future for ven in myeloma, despite the biological rationale and clinical activity. We therefore analyzed real world physician practice patterns using off-label ven for MM in the US. Methods: This retrospective observational study used data from the US nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR)-derived de-identified longitudinal database. The Flatiron Health database contains structured and unstructured data curated via technology-enabled abstraction from approx. 280 cancer clinics and 800 unique sites of care. We included all patients in the Flatiron Health database with multiple myeloma (ICD-9 203.0x or ICD-10 C90.0x, confirmed with clinical review) who had received ven as part of any line of MM treatment. This included patients who commenced ven between 2016-2024. The primary endpoint was time to next treatment or death (TTNT) from ven initiation, with overall survival (OS) from ven initiation as the key secondary endpoint, both of which were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Outcomes were compared using Cox proportional hazards model, using R v 4.3.0. Results: We included 208 patients who received ven for MM. They had a median of three prior lines of therapy (range 0-12), a median age of 67 years (Range 34-85 yrs), and 59% were male. Race/ethnicity breakdown was: Non-Hispanic White: 136 pts (72.7%), Black 36 (19.3%), Hispanic 10 (5.3%), Asian 5 (2.7%), other/unknown 21 (10.1%). Most had commercial insurance (188 pts, 91.3%) and 108 pts (52%) were cared for in academic settings while 100 (48%) were in community settings. ECOG performance status was 0 in 50 pts (24%), 1 in 80 pts (38.5%), ≥2 in 31 pts (14.9%) and unknown in 47 (22.6%). ISS Stage was I in 42 pts (20.2%), II in 43 pts (20.7%), III in 52 pts (25.0%) and unknown in 71 (34.1%). 148 pts had t(11;14) (71.2%), while 25 pts did not (12%) and 35 pts had unknown t(11;14) status (16.8%). Most pts received ven as part of a triplet combination (106 pts, 51%), followed by doublets (39, 18.8%; 21 ven+dex and 18 ven+non-dex doublet), quads (38, 18.3%), as a single agent (17, 8.2%) or in other combinations such as with multi-agent cytotoxic chemotherapy or in addition to quadruplet therapy (8, 3.9%). Most common first ven-containing regimens used were VenDd (34 pts), VenKd (31), VenVd (25), Vendex (21), VenDVd (13), VenDKd (7). Ven was used as part of ≥2 different regimens in 20 patients, in 10 of whom those regimens were non-consecutive. Median TTNT was 10.2 months (mo) in all comers, 12 mo in pts with t(11;14), 3.4 mo in pts without t(11;14) and 7.6 mo in pts with unknown t(11;14) status. Median OS was 27.6 mo in all comers, 30.5 mo in pts with t(11;14), 8.1 mo in pts without t(11;14) and 27.9 mo in pts with unknown t(11;14) status. Pts with t(11;14) receiving ven had a significantly longer TTNT than those without t(11;14) [median 12 mo vs 3.4 mo, HR 0.59, 95%CI 0.42-0.84, p=0.003]. and a significantly longer OS [median 30.5 mo vs 8.1 mo, HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38 - 0.89, p=0.012]. Discussion: We evaluated US ven prescribing patterns in 208 pts with MM in the largest real world study of ven in MM to date. While it was mostly used in pts with t(11;14) (71%), there was occasional use in pts without t(11;14), and it was used in a wide variety of combination regimens. Ven achieved meaningful TTNT in some patients and both TTNT and OS were greater in pts with t(11;14) than those without. This suggest that despite mixed data from clinical trials, clinicians are using ven for MM patients in practice and further data is required to optimize its use and understand its best combination treatment partners in MM.

Introduction: CARTITUDE-4 is a phase 3 randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing the efficacy and safety of CARVYKTI (ciltacabtagene autoleucel; cilta-cel) versus pomalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (PVd) or daratumumab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone (DPd) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with one to three prior line(s) of therapy that included an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD) and a proteasome inhibitor (PI), and who are refractory to lenalidomide. Based on the latest reported results from CARTITUDE-4, cilta-cel demonstrated superiority over PVd and DPd on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and response rates (overall response rate [ORR], very good partial response [VGPR] or better, and complete response [CR] or better [CR or better]). In 2023, an initial analysis was performed to compare the efficacy outcomes between all apheresed patients from the cilta-cel arm in CARTITUDE-4 vs doublet (Pd and Kd) and daratumumab-based triplet (DKd and DVd) therapy regimens in the same target population using available patient level data. Data from an updated prespecified data-cut of CARTITUDE-4 with median follow-up of 34 months became available, allowing for an updated assessment of the comparative efficacy, including OS, between cilta-cel and these treatment regimens. Methods: Individual patient data were collected from the CARTITUDE-4 (cilta-cel), CASTOR (DVd), CANDOR (DKd and Kd), and APOLLO (Pd) RCTs, from which patients who met CARTITUDE-4 eligibility criteria were identified. As no patients in the comparative trials had prior treatment with anti-CD38, patients with prior exposure to anti-CD38 therapies in the cilta-cel cohort were excluded. Key prognostic baseline covariates including refractory status, ISS stage, presence of extramedullary disease (EMD), and time to progression on prior line, were adjusted for using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), with average treatment effect in the treated weights. Differences in baseline characteristics were assessed using standardized mean differences. PFS, OS and response rates (ORR, ≥VGPR and ≥CR) were compared between cilta-cel versus the comparator regimens. Relative efficacy for PFS and OS was estimated with Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using weighted Cox proportional hazards regression. Response endpoints were analyzed using weighted logistic regression estimating response rate ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs. Sensitivity analyses using alternative statistical approaches and including additional covariates were explored. Results: After the exclusion of 53 patients with prior exposure to an anti-CD38 therapy, 155 patients in the cilta-cel arm remained, and were compared to patients treated with DVd (n=44), DKd (n=98), Kd (n=46) and Pd (n=92) who met the CARTITUDE-4 inclusion criteria. Baseline covariates were well balanced across the cohorts after IPTW. Patients from the cilta-cel arm showed significant improvements in PFS versus all comparators, with adjusted HRs ranging from 0.21 vs DVd to 0.58 vs DKd (all p ≤0.01). Also, OS was significantly longer for cilta-cel versus all other regimens, with adjusted HRs ranging between 0.31 vs Pd to 0.55 vs DKd (all p ≤0.05). While comparative estimates for ORR and VGPR did not change versus the previously reported results, the relative benefit for cilta-cel versus other regimens further increased on deeper levels of response, with adjusted RR for ≥CR from 2.71 vs DKd to 31.47 vs Pd (all p≤0.001). Treatment with DKd consistently yielded the best results out of all comparator regimens but results were still significantly in favor of cilta-cel. Results of cilta-cel benefit were generally consistent across sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Results from this updated analysis confirm the previously observed significant superiority of PFS and response outcomes of cilta-cel, whilst showing significant OS benefit compared to commonly used treatment regimens for this patient population. These findings provide valuable information to support cilta-cel as a highly effective treatment for RRMM patients who received 1-3 prior lines of therapy, including a PI and IMiD, and who are refractory to lenalidomide, particularly in countries where standard of care may be different from DPd/PVd.

Background: The majority of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) harbor somatic mutations with the most frequent being TET2 (56%), SRSF2 (42%), and ASXL1 (41%) (Leukemia 2020;34:1407). The prognostic relevance of mutations in CMML has been studied extensively with consistent observations suggesting favorable survival impact from TET2 and unfavorable from DNMT3A, ASXL1, NRAS, and SETBP1 mutations. Among the latter, DNMT3A mutation stands out as being the strongest predictor of inferior overall (OS) and leukemia-free (LFS) survival (AJH 2017;92:56). The current study was inspired by observations from exploratory analyses of a large Mayo Clinic CMML cohort. Methods: The current retrospective study was conducted under an institutional review board approved minimum risk protocol that allowed retrospective collection and analysis of data from patient records (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Scottsdale, AZ; and Jacksonville, FL). Mutations were screened by multi-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS). Diagnostic criteria were according to the International Consensus Classification (Blood 2022; 140:1200). Conventional statistical methods were employed for comparisons of groups and survival analysis (JMP Pro 17.0.0 software SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Results: Exploratory analysis of a well-characterized cohort of 398 Mayo Clinic patients with CMML suggested an unusually long median survival of 96 months for 7 patients harboring PHF6 mutation vs. 27 months for those without the mutation. A subsequent institutional database search focusing on PHF6-mutated CMML identified 20 more cases, expanding the total number of study patients to 418, including 27 PHF6-mutated cases. PHF6 mutations clustered with (co-mutation frequency) TET2 (93%) and less likely to be co-mutated with TP53 (0%), PTPTN11 (0%) and SF3B1 (0%) mutations. PHF6-mutated patients often presented with thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100 x 10(9)/L; 85% vs. 51% in PHF6 wild-type cases; p<0.01). Median time from initial presentation with thrombocytopenia to CMML diagnosis was 4 years (0-14 years). In order to isolate the prognostic impact of PHF6 mutation without associated DNMT3A mutation and independent of TET2 mutation, we considered 4 mutational categories: i) DNMT3A-mutated (N=19; 2 co-expressed PHF6 and 7 TET2 mutations), ii) PHF6-mutated with wild-type DNMT3A (N=25; 23 co-expressed TET2 mutation), iii) TET2-mutated without DNMT3A or PHF6 co-expression (N=169), and iv) wild-type for DNMT3A, TET2, and PHF6 (N=205). Compared to the other groups, PHF6-mutated patients with wild-type DNMT3A were less likely to display leukocytosis (p<0.01) or red cell transfusion need at presentation (p<0.01). At a median follow-up of 18 months, 302 deaths, 78 leukemic transformations, and 44 allogenic stem cell transplants were documented. Univariate analysis for OS disclosed superiority in favor of PHF6-mutated patients with wild-type DNMT3A (median OS 90 months) vs. the other three groups with median OS ranging from 10 months for DNMT3A-mutated patients (HR 20.7, 95% CI 8.1-52.7; p<0.01) to 40 months for TET2-mutated cases with wild-type DNMT3A (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.7-7.6; p<0.01). Results were similar for multivariable analysis of LFS, where, remarkably, none (0%) of the 25 PHF6-mutated patients with wild-type DNMT3A experienced leukemic transformation vs. 15-30% risk of leukemic transformation in the other three groups (p<0.01). Multivariable analysis for both OS and LFS, which included other risk factors such as red cell transfusion need, leukocytosis (leukocyte count ≥13 x 109/L) and karyotype, confirmed the independent and favorable impact of PHF6 mutation/wild-type DNMT3A (p<0.01 in both instances). Finally, all-inclusive multivariable analysis of karyotype and mutations, in DNMT3A wild-type patients, confirmed the highly favorable and independent prognostic impact of PHF6 mutation (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.09-0.37). Conclusion: The current study proposes a 2-gene genomic signature (PHF6 mutated and DNMT3A wild-type) to identify a unique subset of CMML patients who often present with thrombocytopenia and whose clinical course is characterized by a very low risk of leukemic transformation, resulting in superior overall survival. Additional studies are warranted to validate these findings and include the information in contemporary risk models.

Background: Management of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) with chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) has evolved in the last decade. First line treatment tocilizumab (toci) was initially given for grade 2 or higher CRS in clinical trials (Toci/CRS≥2). Earlier use of toci in grade 1 CRS was found to be safe without negative impact on clinical response in cohort 4 of ZUMA-1 study for axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL; Toci/CRS1). This practice was also adopted for other CAR-T therapies for other disease indications. Subsequently, FDA also updated the package insert for axi-cel in 2021 to include the use of prophylactic dexamethasone (ppx dex) to be given on days 0, 1, 2 of CAR-T infusion based on the results from cohort 6 of ZUMA-1. We examined CRS and ICANS (immune effector cell associated neurologic syndrome) outcome of patients who received FDA approved axi-cel in standard-of-care (SOC) practice with these evolving practices. Of note, adoption of ppx dex has been variable across CAR-T treatment centers in the US (Khurana et al, Blood 2022). At Mayo Clinic Rochester, patients considered high-risk for severe CRS/ICANS (those who received bridging therapy and had LDH above upper limit of normal and/or with secondary CNS involvement or other CNS pathologies) would be considered for ppx dex. Methods: Medical records of patients who received axi-cel in SOC between 2018 and 2023 at Mayo Clinic Rochester were reviewed. ASTCT guideline was used for CRS and ICANS grading. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-squared test and continuous variables were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: Among 187 pts receiving SOC axi-cel, the median age was 60 years and 121 (65%) were males, 152 (81%) had CRS, of which 73 (39%) were grade ≥2; 97 (52%) had ICANS, of which 65 (35%) were grade ≥2. Of the 152 CRS pts, 54/152 (36%) pts never received toci or ppx/dex. Of the pts who received Toci, 35/152 (23%) received Toci when CRS is at least grade 2 (Toci/CRS≥2), 49/152 (32%) received Toci/CRS1 without ppx dex (Toci/CRS1), and 14 (9%) received ppx dex with Toci given in CRS1 when pts developed CRS (PPX DEX). Baseline demographics were comparable except age (Toci/CRS≥2: 58y; Toci/ CRS1: 63y; ppx dex: 50y; p=0.001) and pre-LD CRP (Toci/CRS≥2: 34mg/L; Toci/ CRS1: 6mg/L; ppx dex: 16mg/L; p=0.002). Pre-LD LDH and ferritin were also comparable. PPX DEX or Toci/CRS1 had significantly lower rate of maximum grade CRS≥2 (PPX DEX: 4 (29%); Toci/ CRS1: 20 (41%); 35 (100%); p<0.001) and duration of CRS (PPX DEX: 2.5d; Toci/ CRS1: 3d; Toci/CRS≥2: 5d; p<0.001). Time to onset of CRS was not statistically different between the 3 groups. Not surprisingly, Toci/CRS1 group had higher overall rate of toci use, compared to . Interestingly, use rate of ≥2 doses of Toci or siltuximab was significantly higher in Toci/CRS1 or PPX DEX (PPX DEX: 8 (57%); Toci/ CRS1: 26 (53%); 9 (26%); p=0.02). Pt who received PPX DEX or Toci/CRS1 had a significantly lower rate of ICANS (PPX DEX: 6 (43%); Toci/ CRS1: 33 (67%); 32 (91%); p=0.001) and rate of max grade ICANS ≥2 (PPX DEX: 3 (21%); Toci/ CRS1: 23 (47%); 27 (77%); p<0.001). The time to onset and duration of ICANS was not different among the 3 groups. Conclusion: Our real-world study shows that earlier use of Toci in grade 1, compared to its first use in grade 2, can result in lower overall incidence of more severe CRS, duration of CRS, incidence of ICANS and more severe ICANS. While we selected patients at higher risk for having more severe CRS in our PPX DEX cohort, experience to date suggests that these patients, compared to toci/CRS>=2 cohort, could also have reduced severity of CRS and ICANS with this updated management.

Introduction Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is associated with a 15-30% risk for blast transformation (BT) over 3-5 years. Post-BT survival remains dismal with a median overall survival (mOS) of ~6 months (mo), even with intensive therapies. Although genetic drivers are identified in >40% of BT-CMML cases (Carr, 2021), mechanisms of BT remain to be elucidated. This multicenter study examines risk factors for BT in CMML and predictors of post-BT survival. Methods CMML patients at Mayo Clinic (n = 400, 47%) and MD Anderson Cancer Center (n = 449, 53%) were included with IRB approval. Analyses used clinical and molecular data at diagnosis or first referral in chronic phase (CP) and again at BT. Categorical variables were compared by Chi squared and continuous by Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Multivariate analyses used Cox proportional hazards models with binarization via receiver operator curves. Kaplan-Meier analyses were censored at hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). P < 0.05 was considered significant. Calculations used BlueSky (v10.3.1) or Prism (v10.2.3). Results Of 849 CMML patients (median age 71 years, 32% female, 90% white) included in the study, 133 (16%) underwent BT. In comparison to CP-CMML without BT, those with BT were more likely (p < 0.05) to have had higher WBC counts (15.1 vs 11.4 x109/L), higher absolute monocyte counts (2.9 vs 2.2 x109/L), lower platelet counts (84 vs 102 x109/L), have circulating immature myeloid cells (52% vs 37%), and be classified as myeloproliferative (MP)-CMML (58% vs 44%) or CMML-2 (33% vs 17%) at diagnosis/first referral in CP. More mutations were detected in BT-CMML than in CP-CMML (mean 3.2 vs 2.8, p = 0.002). Mutations in RAS (NRAS, KRAS, BRAF, CBL, PTPN11; 51% vs 40%, p = 0.02) and signaling (CSF3R, FLT3, JAK2, SH2B3; 15% vs 7%, p = 0.004) pathway genes were more frequent in BT-CMML. Conversely, there were fewer BT-CMML patients with the favorable ASXL1WT/TET2MT genotype compared to CP-CMML (22% vs 33%, p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis identified MP-CMML (hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, p = 0.04), CMML-2 (HR 2.4, p < 0.001), and the presence of ≥4 somatic gene mutations (HR 1.8, p = 0.002) as risk factors for BT whereas the ASXL1WT/TET2MTgenotype was protective (HR 0.45, p = 0.002). The ASXL1WT/TET2MT genotype was also protective in the MP-CMML (HR 0.49, p = 0.04) and RAS-mutated (HR 0.35, p = 0.005) subgroups. Amongst BT-CMML cases, the median time to BT was 10 mo from diagnosis/referral. Compared to their CP assessment, patients in an overlapping Mayo Clinic BT-CMML cohort (n = 156, median age 69 years, 35% female) were more likely to have NPM1 (24% vs 3%, p < 0.001) and IDH2 (14% vs 1%, p = 0.01) mutations at BT. Amongst cases with paired molecular evaluations (n = 44), 7 (16%) acquired new mutations, including FLT3-ITD (n = 2) and NPM1 (n = 2). Conversely, 6 (14%) lost mutations, including TET2 (n = 3), SRSF2 (n = 2), CBL, NRAS, or PTPN11 (n = 1 each). There were no differences in variant allele fractions in driver genes present at CP and BT. Abnormal karyotypes were more prevalent at BT than in CP (60% vs 34%, p < 0.001), and 26 (25%) patients with a normal karyotype in CP acquired structural (65%) and/or numerical (69%) changes at BT, including 6 (23%) that acquired a complex karyotype. Acute myeloid leukemia defining translocations were seen in 4 (4%) cases: 2 with t(8;21) and 1 each with inv(3) and t(10;11)(KMT2A::TET1). After considering mutation and karyotype changes, only bone marrow blasts ≥30% (HR 1.7, p = 0.04) were independently prognostic for OS after BT (mOS 4 mo). Compared to supportive care (n = 50, mOS 1.3 mo), OS was improved by hypomethylating agents (HMA, n = 14, mOS 16 mo, HR 0.3, p < 0.001) or induction chemotherapy (n = 56, mOS 8 mo, HR 0.3, p < 0.001), but not by HMA + venetoclax (n = 11, mOS 6 mo, HR 0.7, p = 0.4). Allogeneic HCT (n = 28) improved mOS to 46 vs 3 mo (p < 0.001). Amongst 4 patients with paired whole genome sequencing before and after BT, 3 had increased copy number alterations (including 2 with loss of heterozygosity, 2 with gains, and 3 with deletions) while the 4th acquired novel likely pathogenic somatic mutations (MUC4, BAX, WNK2). Conclusions Survival in CMML after BT remains exceptionally poor. In this multicenter cohort, MP-CMML, CMML-2, and the presence of ≥4 somatic gene mutations were identified as risk factors for BT, with the ASXL1WT/TET2MT genotype being protective. Following BT, bone marrow blast burden ≥30% was an independent adverse predictor of survival.

Introduction: Outcomes from multidisciplinary lymphoma tumor boards in the molecular era are limited, and the effects of transitioning to virtual formats during the COVID-19 pandemic are not well-documented. This study evaluates how the transition of the Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Tumor Board to a virtual format has impacted its effectiveness and operations. The board, part of the International Mayo Clinic Care Network (MCCN), involves case presentations, subspecialist reviews, and collaborative recommendations. Methods: The Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Tumor Board, an integral part of the Mayo Clinic Care Network (MCCN), conducted a comprehensive review of lymphoma cases from 2014 to 2024. The board's review process involves a structured approach including the presentation of clinical case details, radiology and hematopathology findings, proposed treatment options, relevant literature review, and discussions. From 2014 to 2024, the Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Tumor Board reviewed a total of 722 patients. The review process involves a multidisciplinary team, including physicians, pharmacists, clinical research associates, and trainees. Recommendations and changes related to radiology interpretation, pathologic diagnosis, and treatment approaches were documented and tracked prospectively. In March 2020, the board transitioned to a virtual format due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This shift allowed for remote participation and continued collaborative review while maintaining the board's structured approach and documentation practices. Results: In a total of 722 patients, changes in care were identified in 423 patients, including 287 with newly diagnosed lymphoma and 136 with relapse or refractory disease. Among those who experienced changes, 94 had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 49 had follicular lymphoma, 39 had marginal zone lymphoma, 36 had classical Hodgkin lymphoma, and 29 had mantle cell lymphoma. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 431 patients were analyzed, with 217 (50.3%) experiencing changes. A total of 268 changes were documented among these patients. Changes in radiologic interpretation occurred in 9 patients (2.1% of 431 total patients). Pathologic diagnosis changes were noted in 42 patients (9.7%). Additional testing was recommended for 73 patients (16.9%), and clinical management was altered for 144 patients (33.4%). After transitioning to a virtual format, 291 patients were reviewed post-COVID, with 206 (70.8%) having recommended changes. The total number of change recommendations was 322, reflecting increases across all components compared to previous data, with adjustments for varying numbers of patients reviewed. Specifically, radiologic interpretation changes occurred in 21 patients (7.2%), pathologic diagnosis changes in 57 patients (19.6%), additional testing recommendations for 85 patients (29.2%), and clinical management alterations in 159 patients (54.7%). Conclusion: Transitioning to a virtual format in the Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Tumor Board's continued to demonstrate the effectiveness, with increased changes in diagnostic interpretations and clinical management. These results illustrate the potential of virtual tumor boards to improve collaborative decision-making and adapt to evolving clinical needs.

Introduction: Considerable variation has been observed in the prevalence of monoclonal gammopathies across the globe. Although the prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) has been evaluated in two hospital-based studies in India, no data exists on its prevalence in community-based settings amongst the rural Indian population. Objectives: To determine the prevalence of MGUS in a rural Indian population in a community-based setting. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted across 58 agrarian villages/hamlets of a tribal (aboriginals) district and 8 agrarian villages of a Non-Tribal district of Western India spreading over 2299 square miles (sq-mi), as part of SIMPLe (Screening Intervention for Myeloma and Prevention of Lifestyle diseases) study. For the complete study population, demographic details, medical history, and blood samples were collected after a thorough medical examination. Hemograms and serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) were performed in all individuals. SPEP was performed using on-site capillary zone electrophoresis. Serum immunofixation electrophoresis (SIFE), and biochemistry (liver and renal function tests) were performed for those with abnormal SPEP graphs (those with M spike and those with abnormal bulges in beta-2 or gamma region suspicious of MGUS). Patients with monoclonal protein on SPEP or SIFE were further assessed for any smoldering/ multiple myeloma features. The data was analyzed using JMP ver. 17.2.0. Results: A total of 10,024 individuals were screened and data was analyzed for 9283 (8527 Tribal + 756 Non-tribal) individuals. The prevalence of MGUS in the study population was 62 (0.66%) and was 1.79% above the age of 55y (62 of 3447w). The median age of individuals with MGUS was 65y (IQR 59-72) with male preponderance. None of the patients satisfied the criteria for smoldering or multiple myeloma using IMWG criteria. The median Hb of the study population was 12g/dL (IQR 11.4-13). Among those with MGUS, the distribution of heavy and light chains was IgG - 83.33%, IgA - 16.67%, with none having IgM/ IgD paraprotein, Kappa - 50%, and Lambda - 50%. Two individuals only had light chain MGUS. There was no statistically significant difference between the tribal and non-tribal populations (aged >45y) in the incidence of MGUS (1.798% Vs. 1.745%, p=0.78), total protein levels (7.71 vs. 7.19 g/dL, p=0.87) and albumin-globulin ratio (1.54 vs 1.62, p=0.77) with numerically more patients having polyclonal gammaglobulinemia in the tribal population. The low Hb reflected the statistically lower Hb levels in the tribal population (9.1±4.2 Vs. 12.39±1.8g/dL, p-0.021) owing to concurrent hemoglobinopathies (sickle cell/ thalassemia traits). Conclusion: The prevalence of MGUS in the rural population of Western India is low at 0.66%, rising to 1.79% in individuals over 55 years, predominantly affecting older males, with IgG MGUS being the most common type. There are no significant differences in MGUS prevalence, total protein levels, or Albumin-globulin ratios between tribal and non-tribal populations over 45 years. Our study comprehensively describes the prevalence of MGUS in rural community settings in India. The background prevalence appears to be lower compared to the Western (both USA ~3% and European~5%) population.

Background: Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) based gene therapies (GT) have successfully demonstrated significant reduction in vasocclusive crises (VOCs) associated with sickle cell disease (SCD). The efficacy and safety of these products is well established across multiple clinical trials (Kanter et al. NEJM 2022, Frangoul et al. NEJM 2024). This led to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the lentiviral-based gene addition product (lovotibeglogene autotemcel) and CRISPR-Cas9 based gene editing product (exagamglogene autotemcel) for patients with SCD above 12 years of age. As these therapies have a different logistical process compared to a standard allogeneic HSCT, there is a need to develop a collaborative transition of care plan for these patients and families prior to and long after completion of transformative therapies. Methods: Upper Midwest Sickle Cell Curative Therapies Consortium is a collaborative model including multiple stakeholders between 7 centers across the upper Midwest United States, the regional community-based organization (CBO) and National Marrow Donors Program (NMDP). The structure and workflow for this model was presented previously (Blaylark et al. ASH 2023). With the advent of commercial GTs, we developed a multi-specialty care model in collaboration with community stakeholders to address diverse patient and logistical needs for smoother transition to and from these therapies. Discussion: The initial transition is a period of potential gaps in medical care and often high anxiety for patients and families. Thus, when patients and families are considering GT, our care model engages a multidisciplinary team. As part of the comprehensive evaluation prior to gene therapy, an initial shared collaborative checklist includes an extensive medical history, assessment of treatment plan, an individualized pain plan and adherence, transfusion planning (simple or exchange) with setting of target hemoglobin and hemoglobin S% targets, and coordination of multi-specialty consults including apheresis, fertility preservation, child life, and social work. Additionally, pain, psychology, and integrative medicine specialists address not only ongoing concerns, but also help develop a plan for future transition back to the primary site of SCD care (“re-transition”) after GT. Patients undergo neuropsychological evaluations to establish baseline functioning and the role of chronic pain and fatigue, as GT can significantly impact long term cognitive functioning, emotional coping with transitions, and overall daily functioning. When appropriate and available, warm handoffs are encouraged between centers within each of these specialties. Our team also reviews available resources for education and ongoing support through the process and after from national and regional CBOs. Similarly, the post-GT transition is also a period of potential medical care gaps and high anticipated anxiety and concern, as patients go through significant unfamiliar adverse effects followed by the potential for persistent freedom from VOCs. In the post-GT transition, ongoing psychology, integrative medicine, and pain team support; peer mentoring; and support groups are critical for a smooth re-transition to post-GT care and further successful re-transition back into the community. Using this interdisciplinary approach across GT clinical trials, we successfully weaned opioids in 83% of patients (5/6) by day 60 post-GT infusion and successful re-transition of these patients, further highlighting the role of interdisciplinary care. Our team's collaborative approach to SCD care with sickle cell specialists, transplant team and other care providers and CBO continues into the long term follow up period, including ongoing supportive services for both patients and their families. Conclusion: As newer therapies are developed and approved for transformative SCD care, development of a transitional model with early engagement of an interdisciplinary team is critical for empowering sickle cell warriors and for their successful transition back into the community.