Citations

AbstractBackgroundThe use of videoconference platforms for neuropsychological assessment was not as common among mental health practitioners before the COVID‐19 pandemic. However, due to lockdowns and quarantines worldwide, mental health professionals had to find a feasible alternative and shift to virtual evaluations. This increased the use of teleneuropsychology in both at a clinical and research level. Studies conducted during the pandemic provided evidence of the feasibility of virtual assessments, but data from low‐and middle‐income countries is scarce and conclusions from studies in other regions cannot be generalized. The objective of this study is to develop and apply a teleneuropsychological assessment battery on a group of elderly adults in Panama and Hispanics living in the United States.MethodThis is a multicenter study that will gather data from a Panamanian Cohort parallel to the current Florida‐based study Development and Validation of TeleNeuropsychology Normative Data for Older Adults (FLOAT). So far 80 participants over 50 years old have been assessed in Panama and Florida. Inclusion criteria includes passing a screening with TICS‐M for low risk of developing dementia and having basic knowledge and accessibility of electronic devices. Researchers contact potential participants through calls and WhatsApp chats to explain the study and obtain informed consent. Participants are then screened to see if they are eligible to be assessed through the video conference platform. Participants must complete the teleneuropsychological assessment battery from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC), and different questionnaires to provide socio‐demographic and functional data. All information is gathered with the REDCap platform.ResultOne hundred participants will be assessed with a teleneuropsychology protocol in each cohort. Once all data is collected, it will be analyzed with multivariate statistics methods. We expect to describe the protocol’s feasibility assessing older adults in both locations.ConclusionTo our knowledge this is the first study of its kind in Panama and one of the only ones in the region. The study seeks to generate data that could be shared and applied for future research or clinical practice regarding teleneuropsychological assessments with older adults with similar cohorts.

AbstractBackgroundFrontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a common young‐onset dementia. Challenges to in‐person FTD evaluations (e.g., behavioral symptoms, disease rarity), highlight the need to develop remote, low‐burden assessment techniques. A growing literature supports passive digital phenotyping for monitoring neurobehavioral change. Thus, we examined the utility of passively collected data from smartphones to detect prodromal or symptomatic FTD compared to that of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a common cognitive screener.Method199 adults enrolled in the ALLFTD Mobile App study (mean age = 53.4 [SD = 15.2]; 58% women) completed up to 6 months of passive smartphone monitoring via the ALLFTD Mobile App. 55% were unimpaired [CDR®+NACC FTLD = 0], 22% had prodromal FTD [CDR®+NACC FTLD = 0.5], and 23% had symptomatic FTD [CDR®+NACC FTLD≥1] with a variety of syndromic presentations. Battery percentage was collected frequently (median interval = 45 min), and total daily battery usage was calculated as a proxy for smartphone use (higher battery usage = more smartphone use). Daily step counts were also passively collected. Logistic regression classified prodromal or symptomatic FTD vs. unimpaired as a function of: MoCA score [Model 1]; 7 passive features characterizing average, inter‐day variability, and changes over time in smartphone use and movement [Model 2]; or passive smartphone features and MoCA [Model 3]. Analyses were repeated excluding participants with symptomatic FTD to detect prodromal FTD vs. unimpaired.ResultThe area under the curves (AUCs) for detecting prodromal or symptomatic FTD (vs. unimpaired) from the MoCA alone [Model 1] and passive smartphone features alone [Model 2] were 0.77 (95%CI: 0.70‐0.85) and 0.77 (95%CI: 0.70‐0.84), respectively. Their combination [Model 3] resulted in a significantly improved AUC of 0.86 (95%CI: 0.80‐0.92) compared to Model 1 (p = 0.001). Significant Model 3 predictors included average daily battery usage (p = 0.02), slopes of change in step count (p = 0.04), and MoCA score (p<0.01). When distinguishing prodromal FTD from unimpaired, passive smartphone features alone (AUC = 0.75) were significantly better than the MoCA alone (AUC = 0.66; p<0.01), and their combination had the largest AUC (0.80).ConclusionResults support the utility of novel passively collected information from smartphones for detecting and monitoring FTD without contributing to assessment burden. With continued validation, passive digital monitoring methodologies have potential to increase access to dementia care.

AbstractBackgroundFrontotemporal dementia (FTD) presents with heterogeneous neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS). These symptoms often begin prior to the onset of FTD, and progress throughout the prodromal stages of FTD. Particularly, familial FTD due to autosomal dominant genetic mutations might display mutation‐specific NPS profiles. We hypothesized distinct NPS trajectories for chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72), progranulin (GRN), and microtubule‐associated protein tau (MAPT) mutation carriers during their transition from presymptomatic to symptomatic stages of FTD.MethodIn this study, we analyzed N = 1662 participants from the ARTFL‐LEFFTDS Longitudinal FTLD (ALLFTD) Study, with 342 C9orf72, 148 GRN, 168 MAPT mutation carriers, and 1004 noncarriers. We used the CDR plus NACC FTLD global scores to define the conversion status, and stratified participants into four stages of progression: 1) Presymptomatic (CDR = 0 throughout the follow‐up), 2) Early conversion (began with CDR = 0, then increased to 0.5), 3) Advanced conversion (began with CDR = 0.5, then increased to 1.0 or above), and 4) Symptomatic (CDR>1.0 throughout). Over up to seven visits, the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI‐Q) assessed changes in NPS. We analyzed total NPI‐Q score trajectories using a generalized linear mixed‐effects model, adjusting for age and baseline NPI‐Q scores.ResultOur findings showed similar NPS trajectories among carriers and noncarriers during presymptomatic stages. However, in the early conversion stage, C9orf72 and GRN carriers exhibited significantly higher NPI‐Q score increases compared to MAPT carriers, primarily in the psychosis and hyperactivity domains. In the advanced and symptomatic stages, the rate of increase in NPS was not significantly different across groups.ConclusionThis study suggests that people with familial FTD, particularly those predicted to have underlying TDP‐43 pathology, may experience more severe neuropsychiatric symptoms like psychosis or hyperactivity as they progress from presymptomatic to prodromal phases. This trajectory appears distinct from those with tau pathology or sporadic FTD. Further studies are warranted to understand these unique progression patterns and their implications for FTD management.

AbstractBackgroundProdromal dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) research criteria were recently published and further work is needed to characterize the neuropsychological profile and refine clinical criteria. We performed a meta‐analysis to compare the cognitive performance of mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI‐LB) groups to controls, MCI due to Alzheimer’s disease (MCI‐AD), and DLB.MethodFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we searched the literature for 1) English‐language studies on MCI‐LB; 2) published January 1990‐March 2023, 3) with ≥1 standardized cognitive measure; and 4) comparison data from controls, MCI‐AD, and/or DLB. Pooled means with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for demographics. Effect sizes were calculated for group comparisons on cognitive domains. Random effects meta‐analysis models were used for group comparisons.ResultThere were 3440 participants from 27 studies across 10 countries. Mean age did not differ between groups. The percentage of female subjects was lower in the MCI‐LB group than the MCI‐AD group. Mean years of education for the MCI‐LB group was lower than the controls, but similar to MCI‐AD and DLB groups (Table 1). Compared to controls, the MCI‐LB group had lower scores for the global screening, executive function, visuospatial, language, learning, and memory domains. Compared to MCI‐AD, MCI‐LB performed better on learning and delayed recall, but similarly across other domains. Compared to DLB, MCI‐LB had better scores for global screening, executive function, language, and delayed recall (Table 2). Recognition for MCI‐LB vs. MCI‐AD; visuospatial, learning, and recognition for MCI‐LB vs. DLB could not be assessed, as fewer than 3 studies reported this data.ConclusionCognitive measures can help differentiate MCI‐LB from controls and DLB. Neuropsychological measures of learning and memory may be required to discriminate MCI‐LB from MCI‐AD in clinical practice but global screening measure scores appear insufficient in this regard. High heterogeneity across MCI‐LB studies highlights the need for harmonized neuropsychological research protocols.

AbstractBackgroundPrevious studies have linked impaired odor identification and global cognition with increased risk of cognitive decline and transition to dementia. However, the reverse question remains: if individuals have intact performance on these measures, are they at reduced risk for transition? We aimed to examine the accuracy of intact odor identification and global cognition for identifying lack of transition to dementia/cognitive decline using the population‐based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging and compare their accuracy against and in combination with amyloid PET (Positron Emission Tomography).Methodn = 647 participants age≥55 without dementia completed at baseline the Brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT; ‘Intact’ = 9‐12), Blessed Information‐Memory‐Concentration Test (BIMCT; ‘Intact’ = 18‐20,), and amyloid PET (‘Normal/Intact’ SUVR<1.48). We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for these measures, with “lack of transition to dementia” as the gold standard/target. “Lack of cognitive decline” (cognitively unimpaired to mild cognitive impairment [MCI]; cognitively unimpaired to dementia; or MCI to dementia) was a secondary target.Result94.7% of participants (613/647) did not transition to dementia and 84.2% (545/647) did not cognitively decline over 11.25‐year‐follow‐up. The combination of intact BSIT+BIMCT had high rates of lack of transition to dementia (98.3%, 355/361) and lack of cognitive decline (93.1%, 336/361). This combination yielded mixed sensitivity (0.579) and specificity (0.824) though had high positive predictive value (0.983) for identifying lack of transition to dementia. Intact amyloid PET alone exhibited comparable rates of lack of transition to dementia (99.0%, 418/423) and lack of cognitive decline (92.4%, 391/423). When evaluated conjointly, the combination of all three intact measures also had mixed sensitivity (0.421) and specificity (0.962) though higher positive predictive value (PPV = 0.996) for lack of transition to dementia. 99.6% (258/259) of participants with intact/normal status on all three did not transition to dementia and 96.5% (250/259) did not cognitively decline.ConclusionThis replicates prior reports that intact olfaction/global cognition have strong utility for identifying individuals unlikely to develop MCI/dementia. Intact/normal amyloid PET further enhances the positive predictive value. Clinically, identifying individuals at low risk of transition can shorten diagnostic workups, reduce need for early follow‐up visits, and screen patients in‐or‐out of clinical trials.

AbstractBackgroundImpaired cognition is prevalent in older adults in the emergency department (ED), but many cases go unrecognized. The Ascertain Dementia 8 (AD8) is a validated, self‐administered screening tool that can be used by patients and caregivers to assess for early cognitive changes associated with dementia. However, little is known regarding the degree of alignment between respondents in the ED setting. Our objective was to assess the agreement between the patient‐(pAD8) versus caregiver‐completed AD8 (cAD8).MethodsWe conducted a prospective observational study of community‐dwelling older adults aged 65+ years seeking emergency care and their caregivers between October 2021 and November 2023. Patients with a diagnosis of dementia indicated in the electronic health record were excluded. Collected by trained research assistants, AD8 scores ranged from 0‐8, with scores 2+ indicating cognitive impairment. Patients and caregivers were blinded to the others’ AD8 rating. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the agreement of the presence or absence of cognitive impairment based on pAD8 and cAD8 scores.ResultsOur analytic sample included 538 dyads, of which 34.7% of patients were male with a mean age of 73.5. A total of 132 (24.5%) patients scored themselves as cognitively impaired versus 201 (37.4%) patients were scored as cognitively impaired by their caregivers. Between groups, an ICC of 0.519 (95% CI 0.454‐0.578) demonstrated moderate agreement in identifying cognitive impairment based on pAD8 and cAD8 scores.ConclusionApproximately 1 in 4 older adults without a dementia diagnosis in the emergency department identified themselves as having cognitive impairment, with caregivers even more likely to identify cognitive impairment in accompanied older adult patients. With current guidance suggesting that the pAD8 be used in the absence of the cAD8, these findings highlight important differences to account for based on the respondent when screening for cognitive impairment.

AbstractBackgroundPrior longitudinal studies among older adults have documented associations between hearing loss and changes in brain morphology. Whether interventions involving hearing aids can reduce age‐related atrophy is unknown. A substudy within the Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders (ACHIEVE, Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03243422) randomized controlled trial tested the effect of a best‐practices hearing intervention versus health education control on three‐year change in cortical thickness among older adults with hearing loss.MethodThe ACHIEVE study enrolled 977 community‐dwelling adults aged 70‐84 years at baseline (2018‐2019) with untreated hearing loss (better ear pure tone average [0.5‐4 kHz] ≥30 and <70 dB HL) and without substantial cognitive impairment from four sites across the U.S. (Jackson, MS, Forsyth County, NC, Minneapolis, MN, Washington County, MD). Participants were randomized to a hearing intervention (provision of hearing aids and related technologies, counseling, and education) or a health education control (individual sessions with a health educator covering topics relevant to chronic disease and disability prevention). Three‐dimensional magnetic resonance imaging was performed on 3 Tesla Siemens scanners in a subsample of 445 participants at the ACHIEVE baseline and three‐year follow‐up. Linear mixed effects models were used in intention‐to‐treat analyses to estimate three‐year change in cortical thickness. All models adjusted for baseline measures of hearing loss, recruitment source, site, age, sex, and education. Missing outcome and covariate data was imputed to mitigate bias caused by informative attrition.ResultAt baseline, 224 participants were women (50.3%), 52 participants were Black (11.7%), and the mean (SD) age was 76.4 (4.0) years old (Table 1). Compared to the health education control, the hearing intervention exhibited a nominally protective effect on three‐year change in average cortical thickness (Figure 1). The greatest effect size for cortical thickness was observed in the occipital lobe, while the smallest effect size was detected in the temporal lobe. Statistically significant effects were detected in the pars orbitalis, rostral anterior cingulate, posterior cingulate, and isthmus cingulate (Figure 2).ConclusionHearing aid use may reduce decline in cortical thickness among older adults. The effects of hearing aids may be greatest in regions other than those associated with the auditory cortex.

AbstractBackgroundSelf‐administered cognitive assessments demonstrate usability and ability to detect cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease, but usability in other neurodegenerative diseases is understudied. We investigated whether Mayo Test Drive (MTD), a self‐administered multi‐device compatible cognitive assessment platform, demonstrates usability and correlation with traditional neuropsychological tests in a pilot study of individuals with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP).MethodEleven individuals with PSP (mean age = 69.6±7.2 years; mean education = 15.3±2.7 years; 72.7% male; 90.9% white; PSP Rating Scale [PSPRS] = 32.4±15.5) enrolled in a Neurodegenerative Research Group study at Mayo Clinic participated. Participants completed neurological evaluation, traditional neuropsychological assessment, in‐person self‐administered MTD comprised of the Stricker Learning Span and Symbols Test, and a MTD usability questionnaire with quantitative and qualitative questions. Participants received diagnoses of PSP clinical variants per Movement Disorders Society‐PSP criteria. Seven participants had PSP‐Richardson, two had PSP‐postural instability, and two had PSP‐parkinsonism. We used descriptive analyses to examine usability questions, qualitative analyses for free text responses, and Spearman correlations to analyze associations between MTD and traditional tests of global cognition and five cognitive domains.ResultTen of eleven patients completed MTD (average completion time [minutes] = 22.2±6.5). Study staff terminated one participant’s session early due to an appointment conflict; we excluded this participant from analyses. Six participants completed MTD with tablets and four used smartphones. Participants reported high ease completing MTD (9.00±1.76 on 0‐10 scale) and comfortability using their devices (9.40±1.58). All participants reported they could complete MTD independently, with one participant indicating need for assistance with hyperlinks and three reporting need for assistance with QR codes. Qualitative data suggested three participants had motoric difficulty using the tablets; these individuals had the greatest PSPRS symptom severity, although MTD performance was not correlated with the PSPRS (rho = ‐.122; p>.05). MTD performance significantly correlated with the MoCA (rho = 0.88) and tests of attention, executive, and visuospatial function (Table).ConclusionIn a MTD usability pilot for participants with PSP, participants reported high ease and comfort completing MTD independently; those with greater motor symptoms had more difficulty navigating technology. Additionally, performances on MTD were correlated with the MoCA and other in‐person assessments, demonstrating convergent validity.

AbstractBackgroundFew normative data for computerized measures administered in unsupervised remote environments are available. We aimed to determine what variables to include in normative models for remote self‐administered assessments, develop normative data for measures administered through Mayo Test Drive (MTD, a multi‐device remote cognitive assessment platform) and evaluate application of norms.Method1240 adults ages 33‐100 (96% White) from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging and Mayo Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center met normative sample inclusion criteria that included a concordant Cognitively Unimpaired (CU) diagnosis (3 independent raters all diagnosed CU) and CDR = 0 (see Table 1 for sample characteristics). Raw test scores were converted to normalized scaled scores. We derived regression‐based normative data that adjusted for age, age2, sex and education (base model); alternative models are also provided (age+age2+sex; age+ age2). We evaluated whether additional model terms beyond the base model were needed using an a priori cut‐off of 1% variance improvement in adjusted R2 over and above the base model. We examined rates of low test performance defined as performance below ‐1 SD in independent validation samples (n = 167 concordant CU, n = 64 mild cognitive impairment (MCI), n = 14 dementia). Rates are considered significantly different than expected when 95% confidence intervals (CIs) do not include the expected 14.7% base rate frequency.ResultNo additional potential model terms met our a priori cut‐off for inclusion beyond the base model (see Table 2), including other quadratic and cubic terms or interactions, device type, response input type, potential session interference, and national area deprivation index (ADI available in subset; N = 776). Application of norms showed expected rates of low test performance among CU participants (95% CI includes expected base rate) and significantly greater than expected rates of low test performance for all variables in MCI (e.g., 62.5% for composite) and dementia (e.g., 71.4% for composite; see Table 3).ConclusionTypical normative models appear appropriate for remote self‐administered measures and are sensitive to cognitive impairment. Device type and response input did not explain enough variance to warrant inclusion in normative models but are important for individual level interpretation. Future work will improve representation of individuals from under‐represented groups.

AbstractBackgroundLimbic‐predominant age‐related TDP‐43 encephalopathy (LATE) is a neuropathologically‐defined disease, and it is frequently comorbid with Alzheimer’s disease neuropathological change (ADNC). However, the neurological syndrome associated with LATE neuropathological change (LATE‐NC) is not defined. We propose a set of clinical criteria for a limbic‐predominant amnestic neurodegenerative syndrome (LANS) that is highly associated with LATE‐NC. These criteria assess degree of certainty (highest, high, moderate, low) based on features that are measurable in vivo, including older age at evaluation, a mild clinical syndrome, impaired semantic knowledge, disproportionate hippocampal atrophy, limbic hypometabolism, absence of neocortical degeneration patterns and low likelihood of neocortical tau. We operationalized these criteria using two large datasets with clinical and pathologic outcomes.MethodWe screened autopsied patients from Mayo Clinic and ADNI cohorts and applied the LANS criteria to those with an antemortem predominant amnestic syndrome (Mayo, n = 165; ADNI, n = 53). We compared frequencies of neuropathological diagnoses across LANS likelihoods, compared longitudinal CDR‐SB trajectories across LANS likelihoods, and stratified ADNC/LATE‐NC patients according to their LANS likelihood and compared their longitudinal CDR‐SB trajectories to those with ADNC or LATE‐NC.ResultADNC, ADNC/LATE‐NC and LATE‐NC accounted for 35%, 37% and 4% of cases in the Mayo cohort, respectively, and 30%, 22%, and 9% of cases in the ADNI cohort, respectively (Fig. 1). ADNC cases had the lowest LANS likelihoods, LATE‐NC patients had the highest likelihoods, and ADNC/LATE‐NC patients had intermediate likelihoods. Patients with high LANS likelihoods had a milder and slower clinical course and more severe temporo‐limbic degeneration compared to those with low likelihoods (Fig. 2). ADNC/LATE‐NC patients with higher likelihoods had more temporo‐limbic degeneration and a slower rate of cognitive decline, and those with lower likelihoods had more lateral temporo‐parietal degeneration and a faster rate of cognitive decline (Fig. 3).ConclusionThe implementation of LANS criteria has implications for disambiguating the different driving etiologies of progressive amnestic presentations in older age to guide prognosis, treatment, and clinical trial design and enrollment. The development of in vivo biomarkers specific to TDP‐43 pathology are needed to further refine molecular associations between LANS and LATE‐NC and precise antemortem diagnoses of LATE.