Citations

Showing 10 of 107854 citations.

Risk of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Impact on Outcomes: A Multi‐Centre Matched Analysis
Eldesouki, Mohamed H. , Ibrahim, Ahmed , Marey, Muhammed M., Francis, Fadi, Alsakarneh, Saqr, Ayala, Ernesto, Shaukat, Aasma, Fa, Farraye, Hashash, Jana G., Francis, Fadi F, Eldesouki, Mohamed H. , Ibrahim, Ahmed , Alsakarneh, Saqr , Shaukat, Aasma, Hashash, Jana G.

Mayo Clinic

Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | July 3, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1111/apt.70779 | PMID 42394415 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) share chronic inflammation and immune dysregulation. Aim We evaluated the incidence of MPNs among patients with IBD and clinical outcomes of IBD–MPN coexistence. Methods Two retrospective cohort analyses were conducted using the TriNetX database. First, adults with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) were compared with matched non‐IBD controls to estimate incident MPN risk. A coexistence second analysis included patients with UC or CD who developed MPNs and then were matched to IBD without MPN controls to assess 5‐year outcomes, including IBD‐related complications, surgical interventions, colorectal cancer (CRC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Medication subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate associations with MPN risk. Results After matching, 3873 patients with UC–MPN and 3474 patients with CD–MPN were included. Compared with matched non‐IBD controls, incident MPN risk was higher in UC (HR 1.60, p = 0.01) and CD (HR 1.56, p < 0.001). In CD, MPN coexistence was associated with higher risks of CRC (HR 1.52, p = 0.012), intestinal fistula (HR 2.84, p < 0.001), obstruction (HR 2.05, p < 0.001), perforation (HR 2.37, p < 0.001), small bowel resection (HR 3.69, p < 0.001) and colectomy (HR 2.10, p < 0.001). In UC, MPN coexistence was associated with higher risks of CRC (HR 1.50, p = 0.001), PSC (HR 1.75, p = 0.03) and pouchitis (HR 1.68, p = 0.003). Exposure to thiopurines (HR 1.28, p < 0.001) was associated with increased MPN risk, whereas TNF, IL‐23 and JAK inhibitors were not. Conclusions IBD is associated with increased MPN risk, and IBD–MPNs coexistence is associated with worse IBD‐related complications and malignancy risk.
Amyloid exacerbates tau and alpha‐synuclein pathologies, behavioral impairments, and neuroinflammation in a mixed dementia model
Rabichow, Benjamin E. , Nixon, Lacey, Tallant, Lauren E., Gibson, Katelin A. , Nascari, David , Barnett, J. Hudson, Massa, Nashali , Fryer, John D., Barnett, J. Hudson , Nascari, David G , Tallant, Lauren , Fryer, John Denis

Mayo Clinic

Alzheimer's & Dementia | July 3, 2026 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 7 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.71639 | PMID 42394391 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Neurodegenerative diseases often involve overlapping alpha‐synuclein (asyn), amyloid beta, and tau proteinopathies, yet the mechanisms, impact, and directionality of their interactions remain unclear. METHODS We induced brain‐wide neuronal asyn/tau pathologies via viral expression of wild‐type asyn, mutant asyn E46K , mutant tau A152T , or both asyn E46K /tau A152T in adult amyloidosis knock‐in mice and controls, either post‐plaque deposition (6 months old) or pre‐plaque (3 months old). Open‐field behavior was assessed baseline and 3 and 6 months post‐transduction, followed by neuropathology and neuroinflammation analyses. RESULTS Post‐plaque induction in amyloid mice increased asyn/tau total and phosphorylated levels and exacerbated amyloid‐related hyperlocomotion/anxiety. Pre‐plaque induction produced robust phosphorylated pathologies irrespective of amyloid, while causing similar amyloid‐dependent behavioral synergy. Tau pathology drove LGALS3 + inflammatory glial responses in white‐matter fibers. DISCUSSION Amyloid context gates vulnerability, with certain synergies manifesting across stages. White‐matter gliosis is a novel mechanism of tau A152T risk. Together, our data argue for the development of stage‐aware, multitarget interventions and biomarkers.
Training the Next Generation of Minimally Invasive HPB Surgeons: Are Current Fellowships Crossing the Learning Curve?
Caldwell, Katharine E. , Sanford, Dominic, Leigh, Natasha, Sanford, Dominic E. , Leigh, Natasha L.

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | July 3, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-10070818/v1 Get It

Abstract Background Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) improved outcomes in hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) cases, yet adoption is slowed by technical complexity and steep learning curves. This retrospective review sought to characterize MIS training variations across three fellowship pathways: HPB, complex general surgical oncology (CGSO), and transplant (TXP). Methods We analyzed anonymized Fellowship Council case logs (2014-2023) for 146 HPB, 55 CGSO, and 51 TXP fellows seeking AHPBA certification. Procedures were categorized by platform and type. Results HPB fellows logged significantly more total robotic cases (HPB: 12.5, CGSO: 8.5, TXP: 1.0, p <0.01), including robotic pancreaticoduodenectomies (HPB 4.4, CGSO 3.0, TXP 0.2, p <0.01) and robotic distal pancreatectomies (HPB 3.8, CGSO 3.2, TXP 0.6, p <0.01). Although TXP fellows performed more open major liver resections (HPB 24.0, CGSO 24.7, TXP 35.2, p <0.01), robotic anatomic (HPB 2.1, CGSO 1.5, TXP 0.03, p 0.01) and non-anatomic liver resections (HPB 1.8, CGSO 1.4, TXP 0.2, p <0.01) were highest among HPB fellows. Discussion Meaningful differences in MIS operative exposure exist across training pathways, with TXP fellows trailing significantly in robotic experience. These findings highlight a critical need for standardized MIS curricula to ensure technical proficiency across all HPB surgery pipelines.
Acetazolamide‐Responsive Exertion‐Triggered Episodic Ataxia in DHDDS ‐Related Congenital Disorder of Glycosylation
Muniswamy, Jai Kumar Rajavoor , Selvido, Liam , Zele, Elise Van, Satyanarayana, Raj, Morava, Eva, Muthusamy, Karthik , Van Zele, Elise, Muthusamy, Karthik , Rajavoor Muniswamy, Jai Kumar , Morava, Éva

Mayo Clinic

Movement Disorders Clinical Practice | July 3, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1002/mdc3.70723 | PMID 42394283 Get It

The “Stamp‐n‐Tack” Technique: An Ink‐Guided Precision Method for Anchoring Tissue After Releasing Facial Retaining Ligaments in Large Facial Flap Reconstruction
Türk, Cemre Büşra , Vidal, Nahid Y. , Turk, Cemre B

Mayo Clinic

International Journal of Dermatology | July 3, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1111/ijd.70561 | PMID 42394118 Get It

Are Children with Disabilities Learning When Included in School? a Capability Approach to Participation in the Learning Process in Afghanistan and Pakistan: A Cluster Control Randomised Trial
Trani, Jean‐Francois , Taff, Steven D., Zhu, Yiqi, Bechara, Saria, Raghavan, Ramesh, Gupta, Isheeta, Babulal, Ganesh M., Taff, Steven D. , Bechara, Saria , Raghavan, Ramesh , Kaplan, Ian, Babulal, Ganesh M. , Bakhshi, Parul

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Human Development and Capabilities | July 3, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-25

10.1080/19452829.2026.2691737 Get It

Ethical Considerations in Premortem Heparin Use for Organ Donation after Circulatory Death: A Case Study
Svendsen, Molly, Trost, Lisa , Meltzer, Ellen, Traylor, Blaine, Ellis-Wittenhagen, Jamie , Etzioni, Shiri, Svendsen, Molly , Trost, Lisa, Meltzer, Ellen C. , Traylor, Blaine , Etzioni, Shiri

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Palliative Medicine | July 3, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/10966218261464666 | PMID 42392992 Get It

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has become a key avenue for expanding the organ donor pool. Many DCD protocols include premortem intravenous heparin to reduce microthrombus formation and preserve graft viability. This presents the plausible risk of premortem bleeding from an intervention that offers no direct therapeutic benefit to the donor. Ethical concerns and moral distress can arise when potential donors have a catastrophic intracranial hemorrhage with ongoing physiological concern for bleeding risk that is not survivable, but do not currently meet brain death criteria. While prior analyses describe premortem interventions in DCD in conceptual or protocol-driven terms, this case report considers the ethical concerns inherent in premortem heparin administration and illustrates how multidisciplinary teams can operationalize ethical safeguards, including transparent communication, attention to surrogate understanding, and separation of end-of-life decisions from donation-related interventions, to mitigate concerns and minimize moral distress. These issues are directly relevant to palliative care clinicians, who frequently support families during end-of-life crises and when there is consideration for organ donation. Through a multidisciplinary and ethically guided approach, this case illustrates how collaborative decision-making and transparent communication can uphold both donor dignity and transplant integrity.
Long‐Term Outcomes After Retropubic and Transobturator Sling Procedures: Reoperation for Recurrent Stress Urinary Incontinence
Trad, Ayssa Teles Abrão , Nashar, Sherif A. El, Madsen, Annetta M., Occhino, John A. , Gebhart, John B. , McGree, Michaela E. , Fought, Angela J. , Trabuco, Emanuel C. , El Nashar, Sherif A, Linder, Brian J , El‐Nashar, Sherif A. , Linder, Brian J. , Madsen, Annetta M.

Mayo Clinic

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology | July 3, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1111/1471-0528.70295 | PMID 42392760 Get It

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate long‐term failure rates and complications after retropubic and transobturator midurethral sling procedures for primary stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Academic medical centre. Population A previously described cohort of patients ( n = 1881) who underwent midurethral sling procedures (2002–2012) and a covariate‐matched cohort of patients with retropubic ( n = 570) or transobturator ( n = 317) slings. Methods Health record review with follow‐up extended by 9 years (through December 31, 2022). Main Outcome Measures Treatment failure (reoperation for recurrent SUI) and procedure‐associated complications. Results The duration of assessment was extended by 6.9 years for the retropubic group and by 6.4 years for the transobturator group. The median (IQR) follow‐up was 11.1 (5.1–14.5) years (retropubic, 11.4 [5.9–14.6]; transobturator, 9.6 [2.6–13.7]). Higher risk of reoperation was observed with transobturator (8.8%) than retropubic (4.4%) slings (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.29 [95% CI, 1.49–3.54]; p < 0.001; covariate‐matched analysis HR, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.15–3.17]; p = 0.01). The increased risk of reoperation with a transobturator sling was higher when the procedure was combined with prolapse repair (unadjusted HR, 6.34 [95% CI, 3.09–13.02]; p < 0.001; covariate‐matched analysis HR, 3.96 [95% CI, 1.35–11.58]; p = 0.01). Higher rates of reoperation for urinary retention were observed for the retropubic group than for the transobturator group (covariate‐matched analysis HR, 8.39 [95% CI, 1.11–63.22]; p = 0.04). Conclusion In this long‐term follow‐up study, midurethral slings had a low failure rate. Women with SUI undergoing transobturator sling placement plus prolapse repair had a greater risk of reoperation. However, women with retropubic slings had a greater risk of urinary retention requiring intervention.
Mammogram-Based Artificial Intelligence Risk Assessment in High-Risk Women Undergoing Supplemental Screening with MRI
Ogunlade, Samuel B. , Wang, Lian, Tavana, Anahita , Maimone, Santo , Robinson, Kristin A. , Moran, Kaitlin M., Leon, Amie , Morozov, Andrey P, Nwachukwu, Chidi T., Letter, Haley P, Maimone, Santo , Moran, Kaitlin M , Letter, Haley

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Breast Imaging | July 2, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jbi/wbag046 | PMID 42747416 Get It

Abstract Objective Current clinical risk models were developed for longer-term breast cancer risk stratification and therefore have limited utility for predicting short-term (1-year) breast cancer risk. This study evaluates the performance of a mammogram-based artificial intelligence (MB-AI) risk model for predicting breast cancer diagnosis within 1 year in high-risk women. Methods This retrospective case-control study included 340 women who underwent supplemental MRI screening within 1 year following a negative mammogram, of whom 101 (29.7%) developed breast cancer and 239 (70.3%) remained cancer-free during the same interval. Artificial-intelligence–assigned absolute 1-year risk scores, Tyrer–Cuzick (TC) lifetime and 10-year scores, and Gail lifetime and 5-year scores were analyzed. Model discrimination was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were estimated at optimal cutoffs. Subgroup analyses examined model performance across genetic, menopausal, reproductive, and tumor-based strata. Results The MB-AI model demonstrated the highest overall discriminative ability (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.812), with strong performance in extremely dense breasts (AUC = 0.976). By comparison, TC lifetime (AUC = 0.625) and Gail lifetime (AUC = 0.668) models showed modest discrimination, while TC 10-year and Gail 5-year models did not discriminate (AUCs ≤0.49). Subgroup analyses showed consistent performance across clinical and pathological categories. The MB-AI model also showed an AUC comparable to that of previously developed AI models. Conclusions A mammogram-based AI model demonstrated improved performance compared with traditional clinical risk models for predicting breast cancer diagnosis within 1 year in women undergoing supplemental screening. These findings support that AI-based approaches may reflect both short-term risk and early imaging features of occult disease and suggest further investigation of AI as a complement to existing risk stratification strategies.
Appetite Suppression by GLP ‐1 Receptor Agonists: Role of Delayed Gastric Emptying
Friedman, Mark I. , Harmsen, W. Scott, Camilleri, Michael

Mayo Clinic

Obesity | July 2, 2026 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1535-1540

10.1002/oby.70255 | PMID 42392577 Get It

ABSTRACT Objective This study aimed to evaluate relationships between delayed gastric emptying and appetite suppression during treatment with liraglutide, a glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist (GLP‐1RA). Methods We conducted a secondary data analysis from a 16‐week randomized, placebo‐controlled liraglutide trial in patients with obesity. We examined correlations between solid food gastric emptying and measurements of satiation and energy intake in the entire cohorts at baseline and end of treatment and separately in placebo‐ and liraglutide‐treated patients who completed the trial. We also compared appetitive measures among liraglutide‐treated participants who displayed either normal, persistently delayed, or transiently delayed emptying during treatment. Results In the entire cohorts at baseline and completion, gastric emptying correlated significantly with energy intake and, at baseline, with one parameter of satiation. Gastric emptying accounted for only 4%–6% of the variance in these appetitive measures. No such correlations were found in the placebo‐ or liraglutide‐treated groups alone. There were no differences in appetitive measures among the subgroups that displayed different gastric emptying patterns during liraglutide treatment. Conclusions Delayed gastric emptying appears to play little direct role in appetite suppression induced by liraglutide. Further research should explore whether delayed emptying or other gastrointestinal effects of other GLP‐1RAs affect appetite directly or indirectly. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02647944