Citations

Introduction: Teclistamab (Tec) is the first approved BCMA x CD3 bispecific antibody for the treatment of triple-class-exposed patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) based on the pivotal MajesTEC-1 study. Tec was associated with high overall response rate (ORR) of 63% in heavily pretreated patients. After a longer follow-up of 30.4 months, CR rate was 46.1%, median duration of response (DOR) was 24 months (95% CI, 17.0 - not estimable), and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.4 months (95% CI, 8.8 - 16.4). Herein, we present updated analysis of real-world outcomes and safety with tec in RRMM with extended follow-up of more than 12 months. Methods: This is an international multicenter retrospective study of patients with RRMM treated with tec on-label at 9 academic centers from 5 countries (United States, United Kingdom, Greece, Spain, and Canada) through the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Immunotherapy Committee. Patients with RRMM treated with commercial tec at the respective institutions between May 24, 2022 to January 4, 2024 were included. Median follow-up was 14 months with data collected until July 15, 2024. High-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCA) was defined as 1q+, t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), and/or del(17p). Response was assessed using the IMWG consensus criteria. Patient characteristics were summarized by frequency (percentage) or median (interquartile range [IQR] or range). PFS, overall survival (OS), DOR were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: There were 223 patients included in this analysis with the following characteristics: median age of 67 (range 33-91) with 24% ≥75 years; 45% female; 74% White, 10% Black, 9% Asian, and 7% other/unknown; 86 of 176 (49%) with high risk cytogenetics, including del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), and gain/amp 1q; 29.4% (37/126) with known extramedullary disease; 14% with creatinine clearance ≤30 ml/min. Patients received a median of 6 (IQR, 4-8) prior lines of therapy with 52% (107/206) being penta-drug refractory. Among 212 patients with available data, 161 (75.9%) patients would have been ineligible for MajesTEC-1. There were 94 (42%) patients who received prior BCMA-directed therapy (29.8% antibody-drug conjugate [ADC] alone; 45.7% CART alone; 6.3% bispecific antibody alone; 17.0% ADC and CART). Median time from diagnosis to tec initiation was 6.1 (range 0.6-29.2) years. For the 206 response-evaluable patients, ORR was 66%, including 25.2% ≥CR, 33.5% VGPR, and 7.3% PR. ORR for the 90 response-evaluable patients with prior BCMA-directed therapy was 54.5% (21.1% ≥CR, 26.7% VGPR, 6.7% PR). After a median follow-up of 14 (95%CI, 13-14) months, median PFS and OS were 8.8 (95% CI, 5.5-14) and 20 (95% CI, 18-not reached [NR]) months, respectively. 12-month PFS estimate was 46% (95% CI, 40%-54%), and 12-month OS rate was 65% (95% CI, 59%-72%). Median DOR was 17 (95% CI, 17-NR) months with 12-month estimate of 68% (95% CI, 60%-77%). Tec step-up dosing occurred in the outpatient setting for 57 (25.6%) patients. CRS occurred in 119 out of 222 (53.6%) patients with almost all being grade 1-2, except for 1 grade 4 event. ICANS occurred in 18 out of 216 (8.3%) patients (grade 1-2: 5.1%; grade 3-4: 2.8%). Any grade infection occurred in 130 (58.3%) patients; 25.1% of patients had grade ≥3 infection, including 10 patients with grade 5 infection. While receiving teclistamab, 79 (35.4%) patients had ≥2 infections. IVIG was given in 114 out of 164 (69.5%) patients. Conclusion: In this multicenter international real-world analysis of outcomes and safety associated with tec, ORR was high at 66% with 25.2% of patients achieving ≥CR. CR rates may be underestimated due to infrequent bone marrow confirmation in the real-world datasets. Encouragingly, ORR was 54.5% in BCMA exposed RRMM patients, including 21.1% with ≥CR. After a median follow-up of 14 months, heavily pretreated patients including patients with prior BCMA therapy had durable responses with median PFS of 8.8 months and median DOR of 17 months. There were no new safety signals noted in this real-world study. This is the largest real-world study to date of teclistamab with long-term follow-up of more than 12 months. Additional data including more patients, longer follow-up and results from difficult to treat subgroups will be presented at the meeting.

Background: Rituximab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin (R-GemOx) is a commonly utilized chemoimmunotherapy regimen for relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), especially for patients ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR T). R-GemOx is used as a comparator arm in several active phase III clinical trials for R/R DLBCL, including the POLARGO (polatuzumab vedotion and R-GemOx), STARGLO (glofitamab and GemOx), SUNMO (mosunetuzumab and polatuzumab vedotin), LOTIS-5 (loncastuximab tesirine and rituximab), and EPCORE DLBCL-1 (epcoritamab) studies. However, real-world data are limited to understand the patterns of use and outcomes of R-GemOx in the US. Methods: We developed a retrospective multicenter US cohort (known as LEO CReWE) of patients with R/R DLBCL and other aggressive B-cell lymphomas at the eight US academic centers participating in the LEO Cohort Study (NCT02736357). Patients first diagnosed with DLBCL (including transformed and high-grade B-cell lymphoma) from 2007 - 2022 who received second line (2L) or later therapy for R/R DLBCL with R-GemOx were included. Baseline characteristics, treatment, and follow-up data were abstracted by chart review. Index line of therapy was defined as the first receipt of R-GemOx therapy in the 2L or later setting. Intent for CAR T and/or ASCT was evaluated at each line of therapy based on medical records at the time of treatment initiation. Subgroup analyses were pre-planned in groups of special interest, including those treated with R-GemOx without intent for ASCT or CAR T, those treated as a bridge to CAR T, and those aged 70 and older. Results: 183 patients with R/R DLBCL treated with R-GemOx were included. At time of initiation of R-GemOx, median age was 68 years (range 21-88), with 71 patients (39%) aged 70+ and 18 (10%) aged 80+. Many patients had high risk features including 13% with high grade B-cell lymphoma and 56% with IPI 3 or greater. 21% had an ECOG performance status of 2 or greater. Patients received a median of 2 lines of therapy prior to the index line of R-GemOx (range 1-7). 52% of patients did not achieve a complete response (CR) to first-line therapy, and 20% relapsed <12 months from an initial CR. In all patients receiving R-GemOx, the overall response rate (ORR) was 45% (29% CR). At a median follow-up of 39 months, median EFS was 2.3 months (95% CI: 1.8-3.2), with 12-month EFS of 21% and a 24-month EFS of 15%. Median OS was 13.5 months (95% CI: 9.6-18.1), with a 12-month OS of 52% and a 24-month OS of 38%. In patients treated without intent for ASCT or CAR T, ORR was 33% (18% CR). Median EFS was 2.0 months (95% CI: 1.6-2.5) with 12- and 24-month EFS of 14% and 9%, respectively. Median OS was 9.5 months (95% CI: 6.6-16.1) with 12- and 24-month OS of 45% and 29%, respectively. In patients receiving R-GemOx as bridging to ASCT or CAR T, ORR was 57% (35% CR). 35% received CAR T and 14% received ASCT, while the remainder did not receive the intended therapy as part of this line. Median EFS was 3.6 months (95% CI: 1.8-5.2) with 12- and 24-month EFS of 28% and 25%, respectively. Median OS was 17.4 months (95% CI: 13.4-NR); 12- and 24-month OS were 61% and 50%, respectively. In patients aged 70+, ORR was 53% (33% CR). Median EFS was 2.3 months (95% CI: 1.6-5.2), with 12- and 24-month EFS of 20% and 18%, respectively. Median OS was 13.9 months (95% CI: 8.6-30.2); 12- and 24-month OS were 57% and 39%, respectively. Conclusion: This study represents the largest reported cohort of patients treated with R-GemOx in US academic centers to date. The ORR of 45% and CR rate of 29% CR, as well as median EFS and OS of 2.3 and 13.5 months, respectively, are consistent with findings from previous phase II studies; these results highlight that responses to R-GemOx are not durable and the vast majority of patients require additional therapy. This study demonstrates real-world evidence of the efficacy of R-GemOx in a large cohort of patients with R/R DLBCL from the US over a long period, including both transplant-eligible and -ineligible patients, and patients treated in the CAR T era. These data aid in providing a benchmark for active clinical trials in the rapidly evolving landscape of R/R DLBCL therapies and allow potential comparison to a real-world cohort of patients with a broad range of clinical characteristics.

Background: Mosunetuzumab (Mosun), a CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody, received accelerated approval for the intravenous treatment of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) who have received ≥2 prior lines of systemic therapy. Mosun can be administered in the outpatient setting with a fixed treatment duration. In an ongoing Phase I/II study, Mosun administered subcutaneously (SC) induced durable responses with a manageable safety profile in pts with previously untreated low-tumor burden FL (LTB; Flinn et al. ASH 2023). Efficacy, safety and pharmacodynamic profiles of Mosun SC are being evaluated in an open-label, multicenter, Phase II study (MorningSun; NCT05207670) in pts with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas, including previously untreated FL. Here we present >8-month follow-up efficacy, safety and biomarker data for Mosun SC in first-line, LTB FL. Methods: Pts had untreated Grade (Gr) 1 or 2 FL, LTB by Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires criteria, Ann Arbor stage III/IV disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0-2. Mosun SC injection was administered with step-up dosing in Cycle (C) 1 (Day [D] 1, 5mg; D8, 45mg; D15, 45mg), then 45mg on D1 of each 21-day cycle. Hospitalization was not mandatory. Pts with a complete metabolic response (CMR) after C8 could complete therapy. Pts with a partial metabolic response (PMR) or stable disease continued treatment for up to 17 cycles. Dexamethasone premedication was mandatory in C1 and C2 and optional thereafter. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 24 months. Exploratory analyses assessed cytokine levels in pts with versus without cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and pharmacodynamic changes in T and B cells in a subgroup of pts. Results: As of February 7, 2024, 65 pts were enrolled in US community (n=41) and academic (n=24) centers. At baseline, median age was 63 years (range: 34-82). Most pts had an ECOG PS of 0 (83.1%) or 1 (15.4%); 29 pts (44.6%) had extranodal involvement and 3 pts (4.6%) had B symptoms. Median duration of follow-up was 8.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.7-10.9). Median number of cycles was 8 (range: 1-17). Among 60 pts with ≥1 post-baseline tumor assessment, the objective response rate was 95.0% (95% CI: 86.1-99.0; n=57) and CMR was 83.3% (95% CI: 71.5-91.7; n=50). Median time to response was 2.8 months (range: 2.3-8.3). At data cut-off, responses were ongoing in 48 pts with a CMR and in 5 pts with a PMR. In 64 safety-evaluable pts, the most common adverse event (AE) was injection-site reaction (70.3%; Gr 1, 65.6%; Gr 2, 4.7%). CRS by ASTCT occurred in 30 pts (46.9%; Gr 1, 39.1%; Gr 2, 7.8%); CRS events presented early in C1 (53.1%; Gr1, 45.3%; Gr2, 7.8%) and C2 (Gr1, 1.6%). Nineteen pts received CRS treatment (tocilizumab, 7.8%; steroids, 7.8%; tocilizumab + steroids, 4.7%; fluids, 3.1%; low-flow oxygen, 1.6%); 8 pts had a serious AE and were hospitalized. All CRS events resolved. Other common AEs included headache (45.3%; Gr 1, 29.7%; Gr 2, 15.6%), fatigue (45.3%; Gr 1, 35.9%; Gr 2, 9.4%), maculo-papular rash (31.3%; Gr 1, 14.1%; Gr 2, 15.6%; Gr 3, 1.6%), and increased alanine aminotransferase (28.1%; Gr 1, 21.9%; Gr 2, 4.7%; Gr 3, 1.6%). Gr 3/4 AEs in ≥5% of pts were neutropenia without fever (12.5%; Gr 3, 4.7%; Gr 4, 7.8%) and lymphopenia (7.8%; Gr 3, 1.6%; Gr 4, 6.3%). Suspected immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome occurred in 2 pts (confusional state, Gr 1, n=1; Gr 2, n=1); all events resolved. Infections occurred in 30 pts (46.9%; Gr 1, 7.8%; Gr 2, 31.3%; Gr 3, 7.8%) with the most common (≥10%) being COVID-19 (17.2%; Gr 1, 7.8%; Gr 2, 7.8%; Gr 3, 1.6%) and upper respiratory tract infections (12.5%; Gr 1, 3.1%; Gr 2, 9.4%). One pt had a Gr 5 (fatal) AE 13.7 months after treatment was completed (reported as unrelated to Mosun; cause unknown). After the first Mosun dose, cytokine levels significantly increased on C1D2 (interleukin-6, n=44, p≤0.001; interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α, n=41, p≤0.001). This spike in cytokine levels did not differ in pts with (n=19) versus without (n=25) CRS events in C1. Conclusions: Mosun SC monotherapy shows encouraging high efficacy as a fixed-duration treatment in first-line LTB FL. A manageable safety profile was reported, supporting ease of access for patients with drug administration in outpatient settings. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm long-term durability of response and safety.

Abstract Systematic multiomic analysis has revealed ancestry-dependent molecular alterations, but their impact on the efficacy of anticancer treatment is yet largely unknown. In this study, we analyzed clinical trials from ClinicalTrials.gov and found that only 8,779/102,721 (8.5%) oncology clinical trials posted information on enrollment by race/ethnicity. The underrepresentation of non-White populations suggests that it remains challenging to determine differences in the efficacy of antitumor treatments among different racial groups. Through a comprehensive analysis of clinically actionable genes, imputed drug responses, and immune features, we identified potential differences in treatment responses to targeted therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy between different ancestral populations. Further analysis of multiple independent cohorts confirmed some of our key findings. Such potential ancestral effects are also identified in response to emerging new treatments like chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and proteolysis-targeting chimeras. These findings are made publicly available in a comprehensive web portal, Ancestral Differences of Efficacy in Cancers (https://hanlaboratory.com/ADEC), to facilitate their further investigation. Significance: Our study charts a global landscape of ancestry-associated differences in therapeutic efficacy, highlighting the importance of considering ancestry in anticancer therapies.

Introduction: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common complication of right ventricle lead extraction (RVLE) in 5 to 10% of cases. This study aims to identify clinical outcomes such as predictors of heart failure hospitalization, need for tricuspid valve intervention, and death among patients with new severe TR after device lead removal (DLR). Methods: Patients who underwent DLR (pacemaker/ICD) between 3/1997 and 3/2024 were identified. Those who had an echocardiogram before and after RVLE with evidence of new severe TR were included. Cox univariable regression controlling for current age was used to assess association with death. Prentice Williams Peterson total time (PWPTT) Cox univariable regression was used to determine the rate of heart failure hospitalization up to three events per subject. Bivariable cox regression was used to control for ejection fraction for ICD and coil removal. Analysis was conducted using Stata IC16. Results: We identified 2,122 people who underwent RVLE, of whom 90 (4.24%) developed new severe TR and were included in the analysis. There were 68 hospitalizations among 38 people at a median of 2 years following lead extraction (IQR 0.57 to 4.5 years). The rate of hospitalization was 11.60 [9.14 to 14.71] per 100 person-years. Removal of an ICD was associated with increased hospitalization (HR 5.48 p<0.001) but not mortality (HR 1.21, p=0.707). Removal of a single coil ICD lead was associated with increased hospitalization rate (HR 3.01, p=0.031) but not mortality (HR =0.51, p=0.380). Removal of dual coil ICD lead was associated with more than a tenfold increase in hospitalization rate (HR 11.55, p=0.001) and four times the mortality rate (HR 4.05, p=0.031) (Figures 1&2). The presence of an abandoned (pacemaker/ICD) lead was associated with increased hospitalization (HR 5.75, p=0.004) and mortality (HR4.95, p=0.034). There was no change in hospitalization rate following tricuspid valve replacement (HR 1.33, p=0.716, n=18). Conclusion: Among people with new severe TR following DLR, the characteristics of the leads are strongly correlated with morbidity and mortality.

Background: The optimal timing of pacemaker reimplantation following transvenous lead removal (TLR) of infected cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) remains unclear. Objective: Our study aimed to assess the impact of timing to pacemaker reimplantation after TLR of infected CIED on hospital outcomes. Method: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, patients aged ≥18 years who underwent new pacemaker implantation with percutaneous approach following TLR of infected CIED from 2017 to 2020 were identified. The study population was stratified based on the timing of pacemaker reimplantation following TLR of infected CIED: early (<5 days) vs delayed (≥5 days). Weighted-propensity-score matched conditional multivariable logistic regressions were performed to determine the impact of the timing on various outcomes. Results: In our study, 469 (66.9%) patients received early device reimplantation, and 232 (33.1%) patients received delayed device reimplantation (≥5 days). Post-procedurally, patients in the delayed group had a higher risk of prolonged hospital stay (95% CI OR: 42.37 (6.36 – 282.11); p<0.01) and non-home discharge (95% CI OR: 2.00 (1.35 – 2.95), p<0.01). There was no significant difference between both groups in the early mortality, 30-day readmission, and procedural complications. Conclusion: Our study suggests that time-to-device reimplantation from TLR of infected CIED did not affect the overall short-term in-hospital outcomes. However, delayed device reimplantation was associated with a higher rate of prolonged hospital stay and non-home discharge.

Abstract Study Objectives The majority of patients with insomnia exhibit abnormal sleep in objective testing (e.g. decreased sleep duration, decreased slow wave sleep [SWS]). Previous studies have suggested that some of these objective measures of poor sleep, such as decreased sleep duration, are associated with a higher risk of hypertension in insomnia. We examined the relationship between SWS and morning and evening blood pressure (BP) levels in patients with clinically diagnosed insomnia. Methods A total of 229 normal sleepers and 1378 insomnia patients were included in this study. Insomnia was defined based on standard diagnostic criteria with symptoms lasting ≥6 months. All participants underwent in-laboratory polysomnography. Patients were classified into quartiles of percent SWS. Evening and morning hypertension were defined using BP measurements taken in the evening before and in the morning after polysomnography, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between insomnia, SWS, and hypertension. Results Insomniacs with &lt;3.5% SWS (OR 3.27, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.31 to 7.66) and those with 3.5%–10.2% SWS (OR 2.38, 95% CI: 1.28 to 5.91) had significantly greater odds of morning hypertension compared to normal sleepers. No associations were seen in insomnia with 10.2%–15.8% SWS and with &gt;15.8% SWS. Significant effect modifications by sex (p = .043) were found, as decreased SWS was associated with morning hypertension only in men. Odds of evening hypertension were not significantly associated with SWS. Conclusions Decreased SWS is associated with morning hypertension in a dose-dependent manner in insomnia, especially in men.

AbstractBackgroundCrystal‐storing histiocytosis (CSH) is a rare form of histiocytosis with intralysosomal accumulations of immunoglobulins or paraproteins that aggregate as crystals. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement of CSH is uncommon but should be considered in cases of persistent parenchymal enhancement on neuroimaging.MethodsWe describe one local case of CNS CSH and 10 additional cases identified by literature review.ResultsAmong 11 CSH patients, lesions involved either the dura (2/11) or brain parenchyma (9/11). Two cases had leptomeningeal enhancement. One case had spinal cord involvement. Two cases were associated with marginal zone lymphoma; one case was associated with an immunoglobulin A‐plasma cell dyscrasia. Eight of 11 cases had outcome data available: 7/8 cases had clinical and/or radiological improvement and 1/8 had radiological stability.ConclusionsCentral nervous system involvement of CSH is rare. Potential cases should be comprehensively evaluated for lymphoma or myeloma with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT) of the body or alternatively, CT of the chest, abdomen, pelvis and nuclear bone scan, bone marrow biopsy, serum protein electrophoresis, and cerebrospinal fluid protein electrophoresis. Treatment is targeted toward the underlying malignancy.

Background Acute ischemic stroke arising from medium vessel occlusions (MeVO) poses substantial challenges in treatment and management. This study aims to elucidate the outcomes and factors contributing to achieving excellent recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] 2c–3) versus successful recanalization (mTICI 2b) in patients with MeVO stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Methods We conducted a multinational study analyzing data from the MAD‐MT (Multicenter Analysis of Distal Medium Vessel Occlusions: Effect of Mechanical Thrombectomy) registry, encompassing 37 centers across North America, Asia, and Europe, collected between September 2017 and July 2023. The study included acute ischemic stroke patients with MeVO treated with MT, with or without intravenous thrombolysis, who achieved mTICI 2b–3 post‐MT. Results Among 1463 patients with successful recanalization (mTICI 2b–3), 523 achieved mTICI 2b recanalization, and 940 achieved mTICI 2c–3. Distal occlusions exhibited higher odds of excellent recanalization compared with proximal MeVO vessel occlusions (odds ratio, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.17–2.15; P = 0.003). Cardioembolic stroke pathogenesis was associated with a higher likelihood of excellent recanalization (1.67; 95% CI, 1.07–2.59; P = 0.018). Patients achieving mTICI 2c–3 recanalization demonstrated lower initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, significant improvements in postprocedural National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale shift, and a higher percentage of favorable 90‐day outcomes compared with those with mTICI 2b. However, no significant difference in 90‐day mortality rates was observed. Conclusion This study underscores that among patients with MeVO stroke with successful recanalization (mTICI 2b–3) there is higher likelihood of achieving excellent recanalization (mTICI 2c–3) in distal occlusions and cardioembolic pathogenesis. mTICI 2c–3 scores post‐MT correlate with improved clinical outcomes compared with mTICI 2b, affirming the superiority of excellent recanalization over successful recanalization in patients with MeVO stroke. Further prospective studies and randomized controlled trials are warranted for validation.