Ang, Qi Xuan

ABSTRACTBackgroundChimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapy has arisen as a revolutionary treatment for hematologic malignancies. Our study aimed to evaluate how sex differences affect outcomes and complications following CAR T‐cell therapy.MethodsUtilizing the Nationwide Readmissions Database (2018–2020), we identified patients and divided them into male and female groups. Hospital outcomes and complications were compared among these two groups after propensity score matching to match groups based on comorbidities, producing two comparable cohorts.ResultsWe analyzed 2928 patients (1832 males, 62.6%, mean age 60.3 ± 13.7 years; 1096 females, 37.4%, mean age 59.1 ± 13.8 years). After propensity score matching (1:1ratio), 1092 males and females were compared. There were no significant sex differences in early mortality (adjusted odd ratios (aOR): 1.04 [95% CI 0.69–1.57]), 30‐day readmissions (aOR: 1.05 [95% CI 0.86–1.30]), or nonhome discharge (aOR: 0.89 [95% CI 0.60–1.31]). Females had higher odds of leukopenia (aOR: 1.26 [95% CI 1.06–1.50]) but lower odds of acute kidney injury (aOR: 0.68 [95% CI 0.52–0.88]).ConclusionsNo sex differences were found in hospital outcomes, including early mortality, 30‐day readmission, and nonhome discharge after CAR T‐cell therapy.

Background: The optimal timing of pacemaker reimplantation following transvenous lead removal (TLR) of infected cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) remains unclear. Objective: Our study aimed to assess the impact of timing to pacemaker reimplantation after TLR of infected CIED on hospital outcomes. Method: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, patients aged ≥18 years who underwent new pacemaker implantation with percutaneous approach following TLR of infected CIED from 2017 to 2020 were identified. The study population was stratified based on the timing of pacemaker reimplantation following TLR of infected CIED: early (<5 days) vs delayed (≥5 days). Weighted-propensity-score matched conditional multivariable logistic regressions were performed to determine the impact of the timing on various outcomes. Results: In our study, 469 (66.9%) patients received early device reimplantation, and 232 (33.1%) patients received delayed device reimplantation (≥5 days). Post-procedurally, patients in the delayed group had a higher risk of prolonged hospital stay (95% CI OR: 42.37 (6.36 – 282.11); p<0.01) and non-home discharge (95% CI OR: 2.00 (1.35 – 2.95), p<0.01). There was no significant difference between both groups in the early mortality, 30-day readmission, and procedural complications. Conclusion: Our study suggests that time-to-device reimplantation from TLR of infected CIED did not affect the overall short-term in-hospital outcomes. However, delayed device reimplantation was associated with a higher rate of prolonged hospital stay and non-home discharge.

AbstractBackgroundThe real‐world data on the safety profile of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) for infected cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) among elderly patients is not well‐established. This study aimed to evaluate the hospital outcomes between patients of different age groups who underwent TLE for infected CIED.MethodUsing the Nationwide Readmissions Database, our study included patients aged ≥18 years who underwent TLE for infected CIED between 2017 and 2020. We divided the patients into four groups: Group A. Young (<50 years), Group B. Young intermediate (50–69 years old), Group C. Older intermediate (70–79 years old), and Group D. Octogenarian (≥80 years old). We then analyzed the in‐hospital outcome and 30‐day readmission between these age groups.ResultsA total of 10,928 patients who were admitted for TLE of infected CIED were included in this study: 982 (9.0%) patients in group A, 4,234 (38.7%) patients in group B, 3,204 (29.3%) patients in group C and 2,508 (23.0%) of patients in group D. Our study demonstrated that the risk of early mortality increased with older age (Group B vs. Group A: OR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.19‐3.09, p < .01; Group C vs. Group A: OR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.51‐4.04, p < .01; Group D vs. Group A: OR: 2.82, 95% CI: 1.69‐4.72, p < .01). The risk of non‐home discharge also increased in elderly groups (Group B vs. Group A: OR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.52‐2.36; p < .01; Group C vs. Group A: OR: 2.82; 95% CI 2.24‐3.56; p < .01; Group D vs. Group A: OR: 4.16; 95% CI: 3.28‐5.28; p < .01). There was no significant difference in hospitalization length and 30‐day readmission between different age groups. Apart from a higher rate of open heart surgery in group A, the procedural complications were comparable between these age groups.ConclusionElderly patients had worse in‐hospital outcomes in early mortality and non‐home discharge following the TLE for infected CIED. There was no significant difference between elderly and non‐elderly groups in prolonged hospital stay and 30‐day readmission. Elderly patients did not have a higher risk of procedural complications.

AbstractBackgroundThe real‐world data on the safety profile of ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation among elderly patients is not well‐established. This study aimed to evaluate the procedural outcomes among those aged 18–64 years versus those aged ≥65 years who underwent catheter ablation of VT.MethodUsing the Nationwide Readmissions Database, our study included patients aged ≥18 years who underwent VT catheter ablation between 2017 and 2020. We divided the patients into non‐elderly (18–64 years old) and elderly age groups (≥65 years old). We then analyzed the in‐hospital procedural outcome and 30‐day readmission between these two groups.ResultsOur study included 2075 (49.1%) non‐elderly patients and 2153 (50.9%) elderly patients who underwent VT ablation. Post‐procedurally, elderly patients had significantly higher rates of prolonged index hospitalization (≥7 days; 35.5% vs. 29.3%, p < .01), non‐home discharge (13.4% vs. 6.0%, p < .01), 30‐day readmission (17.0% vs. 11.4%, p < .01), and early mortality (5.5% vs. 2.4%, p < .01). There was no significant difference in the procedural complications between two groups, namely vascular complications, hemopericardium/cardiac tamponade, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), major bleeding requiring blood transfusion, and systemic embolization. Through multivariable analysis, the elderly group was associated with higher odds of early mortality (OR: 7.50; CI 1.86–30.31, p = .01), non‐home discharge (OR: 2.41; CI: 1.93–3.00, p < .01) and 30‐day readmission (OR: 1.58; CI 1.32–1.89, p < .01).ConclusionElderly patients have worse in‐hospital outcome, early mortality, non‐home discharge, and 30‐day readmission following catheter ablation for VT. There was no significant difference between elderly and non‐elderly groups in the procedural complications.

Background: While spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) patients can present with ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), the in-hospital outcomes among these patients are not well-established. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the in-hospital outcomes of patients with SCAD and concurrent VAs, and to determine the predictors of VAs occurrence in this population. Methods: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, our study included patients aged 18 years or older who had SCAD between 2017 and 2020. We categorized the cohort into two groups depending on the presence of VAs during hospitalization. The in-hospital outcomes were assessed between two groups. Through multivariable analysis, we further analyzed the predictors of VAs occurrence among SCAD patients. Results: Our study included 160 (13.45%) SCAD patients with concurrent VAs and 1,030 (86.55%) SCAD patients without concurrent VAs between 2017 and 2020. SCAD patients with concurrent VA were associated with higher rates of early mortality (11.88% vs. 2.04%, p<0.01), prolonged index hospital stay (≥7 days) (31.25% vs. 12.82%, p<0.01), and non-home discharge (21.88% vs. 6.50%, p<0.01). The length of hospital stay was longer in the SCAD with concurrent VAs group (6.93 days vs. 3.73 days, p<0.01), and the median cumulative cost of hospitalization was also higher in this group ($31,450 vs. $14,664, p<0.01). SCAD with concurrent VAs patients also had poorer in-hospital adverse events. In multivariable analysis, the independent predictors for VAs occurrence among SCAD patients were chronic liver disease (aOR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.15- 4.12, p=0.02) and heart failure (aOR: 3.40; 95%CI: 2.30- 5.02, p<0.01). Conclusion: Ventricular arrhythmias among SCAD patients were associated with poorer in-hospital outcomes. Heart failure and chronic liver disease were the predictors of VAs in SCAD patients. This highlights the importance of closely monitor and aggressive VAs management among these high-risk patients.

Background: Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) has been increasingly performed. While it is estimated that 42% of adults in the United States are obese, the impact of obesity on VT ablation procedures remains unclear. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the procedural outcomes and 30-day readmission among non-obese and obese patients who underwent catheter ablation of VT. Method: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, our study included patients aged 18 years or older who underwent catheter ablation for VT between 2017 and 2020. The study cohort was stratified into non-obese (BMI < 30kg/m 2 ) and obese (BMI ≥ 30kg/m 2 ). The in-hospital procedural outcome and 30-day readmission were analyzed between these groups. Results: Our study included a total of 835 obese patients (19.7%) and 3393 non-obese patients (80.3%). Obese group had a higher rate of prolonged length of stay (>7 days) (37.6% vs 31.2%, p<0.01) and a higher cost of hospitalization ($39 983 vs $37 015, p<0.01). Overall, there were no significant differences in early mortality (4.5% vs 3.8%, p=0.45). Apart from increased vascular complications in the obese group (1.8% vs 0.9%, p=0.03), there were no significant differences in other procedural complications between both groups. There were no significant differences in 30-day readmission rates between obese and non-obese groups (15.5% vs 14.1%, p=0.38). Additional analysis performed in the obese group revealed a non-significant decreasing trend in early mortality rate post-procedurally (5.4% to 4.8%, P trend = 0.66). On multivariable analysis, heart failure was associated with a higher risk of 30-day readmission in obese patients (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.01-3.99; p=0.05). Conclusion: Our study suggests that catheter ablation for VT can be performed relatively safely in obese patients without significant differences in 30-day mortality and readmission outcomes. Patients should not be excluded from VT ablation on the basis of obesity.

Background: Despite the optimal efficacy of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT), recurrence of VT can occur post-procedurally. However, data on the high-risk population for VT recurrence and the in-hospital outcomes remain scarce. Objective: This study aimed to determine the predictors of 30-day readmission for recurrent VT after catheter ablation of VT and assess the in-hospital outcomes. Method: Using the all-payer, nationally representative Nationwide Readmissions Database, we identified the patients aged ≥18 years who underwent catheter ablation for VT and were readmitted within 30 days because of recurrent VT from 2017 to 2020. We performed unweighted univariable and multivariable analyses to determine the outcomes and to identify the patient and hospital variables that were predictive of 30-day readmissions for recurrent VT. A p-value of <0.05 is considered statistically significant. Results: In our analysis, a total of 4,102 patients were discharged alive after VT ablation, of which 278 (6.8%) were readmitted within 30 days for recurrent VT. Recurrent VT was also the most common cause of 30-day readmission (47.7%, n=278/583). Compared to non-recurrent VT readmission, readmission due to recurrent VT had higher mortality during rehospitalization (7.55% vs 3.72%, p<0.01) and higher cumulative hospitalization cost ($57584 vs $37846, p<0.01). Via multivariable analysis, congestive heart failure (aOR: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.07-3.17; P=0.03) and non-elective index admissions (aOR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.32-2.68; P<0.01) were the independent predictors of 30-day readmission for recurrent VT. Conclusion: Recurrent VT was the most common cause of 30-day readmission following VT ablation. Congestive heart failure and non-elective index admissions were the independent predictors of 30-day readmissions for recurrent VT. These highlight the importance of further research in ablation strategies to improve the efficacy of VT ablation.

Background: Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) has been increasingly performed over the past decades. However, the real-world data on the safety profile of this procedure among elderly patients is limited. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the procedural outcomes and 30-day readmission among those aged 18-64 years versus those aged ≥65 years who underwent catheter ablation of VT. Method: Using the all-payer, nationally representative Nationwide Readmissions Database, our study included patients aged 18 years or older who underwent VT catheter ablation between 2017 and 2020. We divided the patients into non-elderly (18-64 years old) and elderly age groups (≥65 years old). We then analyzed the in-hospital procedural outcome and 30-day readmission between these groups. Results: Our study included 2075 (49.1%) non-elderly patients and 2153 (50.9%) elderly patients who underwent VT ablation. Following the procedure, elderly patients had significantly higher rates of prolonged index hospitalization (≥7 days) (35.5% vs 29.3%, p<0.01), non-home discharge (13.4% vs 6.0%, p<0.01), 30-day readmission (17.0% vs 11.4%, p<0.01), and early mortality (5.5% v 2.4%, p<0.01). The median cumulative cost of hospitalization was significantly higher in the elder groups ($40,230 vs. $37,612, p ≤0.01). There was no significant difference in the procedural complications between the two groups. Through multivariable analysis, the elderly group was associated with significantly higher odds of early mortality (OR: 7.50; CI 1.86 - 30.31, p=0.01), non-home discharge (OR: 2.41; CI: 1.93 - 3.00, p<0.01) and 30-day readmissions (OR: 1.58; CI 1.32 - 1.89, p<0.01). Conclusion: Our study suggests that elderly patients have poorer in-hospital outcome in early mortality, non-home discharge and 30-day readmissions following catheter ablation for VT. There was no significant difference between elderly and non-elderly groups in the procedural complications.

AbstractBackgroundEvidence on the impact of obesity on catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) is scarce.Method and ResultsWe queried the Nationwide Readmissions Database to determine the hospital outcomes and procedural complications of VT ablation among the obese and nonobese populations. Obesity was associated with a more prolonged length of stay (p < .01), higher cost of hospitalization (p < .01), and higher rates of pericardial effusion or hemopericardium (p = .05) and vascular complications (p = .05). There was no significant difference in early mortality, 30‐day readmissions, and other procedural complications.ConclusionVT ablation could be performed relatively safely among patients with obesity.