Citations

727 Background: PARP inhibition (PARPi) is a standard maintenance therapy for patients (pts) with germline BRCA1/2 mutations in pancreatic cancer. Combination of PARPi therapy and immunotherapy has potential to increase efficacy and may offer benefit beyond germline BRCA1/2 . Methods: We performed a multisite single-arm phase 2 study using the highly potent PARPi niraparib with anti-PD1 drug dostarlimab in pts with germline or somatic HRD mutations in BRCA1/2, PALB2, RAD51C/D, or BARD1 . Pts were required to have metastasis, progressed on ≥1 regimen, and prior platinum-exposure unless refused/intolerant. Pts were treated with niraparib 200 mg orally once daily continuously. Dostarlimab 500 mg was administered IV every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, then 1000 mg IV every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR) at 12 weeks (DCR12) using iRECIST criteria. At least 8 pts with DCR12 in the first 19 eligible pts (41%) would be considered promising for further trials. Results: 22 pts were enrolled from Dec 2020 to Oct 2023. Two pts withdrew prior to receiving therapy, and 2 were later found to be ineligible, leaving 18 eligible pts for final analyses. Median age was 63.0 yrs, 39% male, 94% non-Hispanic white, 1 black (6%). 17 pts were platinum exposed, 7 were platinum-refractory, and 5 had previously progressed on PARPi maintenance. Mutation distribution was: BRCA2 13/18 (72%), BRCA1 4/18 (22%), BARD1 2/18 (11%). One pt had both BRCA1 (somatic) and BRCA2 (germline) mutations. Germline mutations were identified in 14/18 (78%). DCR12 was achieved in 5/18 (27.8%), so the primary endpoint (>41%) was not met. Pts received a median 2 cycles (range 1-8) of niraparib + dostarlimab. No clinical factors were significantly associated with improved DCR12 (all p > 0.05) in subgroup analyses, but we did observe the following statistically nonsignificant associations. Pts who were platinum-refractory had a lower DCR12 compared to those not (14.3% vs. 36.4%). Counterintuitively, PARPi exposed/refractory pts had a higher DCR12 than non-exposed/non-refractory (50 vs 17% exposed/nonexposed and 40% vs 23% refractory/nonrefractory). Pts with germline mutations had a higher DCR12 compared to those without (38.5% vs. 0%). Non- BRCA2 mutations had a higher DCR12 than those with BRCA2 mutations (50% vs.17%), with highest DCR12 rates among BRCA1 patients (67%). Tolerability was in line with similar combinations, with 60% non-hematologic Gr3 or higher, including fatigue (15%), AST increase (10%), nausea/vomiting (10%), sepsis (10%). Two grade 5 events were not attributed to treatment. Conclusions: PARPi plus anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibition was not sufficiently active as later line therapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer for the majority of patients with HRD mutations. Additional molecular analyses to elucidate predictive markers of sensitivity/resistance are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04493060 .

573 Background: Immunotherapy has shown great efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). No clear consensus exists on when to stop the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) after complete response (CR), and clinical course after stopping ICI remains unknown. Methods: We identified 138 HCC patients who received ICI at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and Mayo Clinic Rochester from 2016-2023. Modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (mRECIST) was used to assess treatment response. We further described the clinical course of patients who achieved CR after ICI discontinuation, including cancer recurrence, subsequent treatment, liver transplantation (LT) listing and outcomes. Results: The median age at ICI initiation was 68 years; 79% were male; 55.9% were white; 51.5% were BCLC stage C. 9.4% CRs, 25.4% partial responses, 39.9% stable diseases, and 25.4% progressive disease. Hepatitis C etiology was associated with higher likelihood of CR (P=0.005). Among 13 patients who achieved CR, 10 stopped ICI (60% for LT evaluation, 40% for toxicity). After stopping ICI, 40% had recurrence (Table). 3 patients underwent local therapy for recurrent HCC within Milan criteria and 1 patient restarted ICI for recurrence beyond Milan criteria. Among CR patients, 9 patients underwent LT evaluation after stopping ICI and 7 patients were waitlisted. After listing, 3 dropouts were observed, due to recurrent HCC beyond Milan criteria, sepsis leading to death, and personal preference. 4 patients underwent LT. 2 patients underwent local therapy before LT for recurrent HCC (Table). All transplanted patients had the last dose of ICI more than 1 year before LT (12, 21, 24, and 29 months). On explanted livers, 2 patients had no residual viable tumor and 2 patients had residual HCC within Milan criteria. 1 patient developed acute cellular rejection and was treated with immunosuppressants and maintained stable graft function. None had graft loss or evidence of HCC recurrence in the follow-up period at 8, 20, 28, and 51 months. Conclusions: Immunotherapy demonstrated excellent effects on a subset of HCC patients, including 9.4% who achieved CR. After stopping ICI, 40% had cancer recurrence but 3 out of 4 were within Milan criteria. 4 underwent successful LTs (2.9%) with excellent post LT outcome. Larger prospective data is needed to establish a protocol for ICI use, especially to determine the optimal timing for ICI discontinuation after CR. BCLC at ICI initiation ICI cycles before stopping, ICI Recurrence after last ICI (days) Within Milan at recurrence Treatment(s) received after recurrence and outcomes OS (days) Patient 1 B 7, Nivolumab 730 No Nivolumab. Died from GI bleeding 1065 Patient 2 B 64, Atezo/Bev 149 Yes TACE with CR, followed by LT without recurrence. 1203 Patient 3 A 8, Nivolumab 1393 Yes Y90 with CR. No recurrence. 1984 Patient 4 C NA, Pembrolizumab 407 Yes TACE and MWA with CR, followed by LT without recurrence. 1722

572 Background: Guidelines recommend systemic therapy for uHCC ineligible for locoregional therapy. Until the approval of tremelimumab + durvalumab for uHCC, in Oct 2022, 1L systemic therapies in the US included multikinase inhibitors and atezolizumab (A) + bevacizumab (B). It is crucial to understand factors driving real-world treatment decisions and outcomes in uHCC. Characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes were assessed in US pts with uHCC treated with 1L systemic therapy. Methods: Data were collected from electronic medical records from US Mayo Clinic sites. Pts with uHCC who initiated an NCCN-recommended 1L systemic therapy between Jun 2020–Oct 2022 (A + B was the only approved 1L immunotherapy (IO)-based regimen) with ≥2 follow-up visits, were included. Index was the date of first 1L systemic therapy. Pts were assessed by risk of post-index gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (pts with Child-Pugh class B or C, pre-index GI bleeding, uncontrolled hypertension [HTN] [≥2 anti-HTN drugs or ≥2 vital entries of SBP >140 mmHg or DBP >90 mmHg]), or significant varices and band ligation). Treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), and post-index GI bleeding were assessed. Results: A total of 186 pts met the inclusion criteria. Most common etiologies of liver disease were metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (42.7%) and hepatitis C virus (40.2%). Pre-index GI bleeding was reported in 29.0% of pts, of which 46.3% occurred within 6 months (mo) pre-index; 62.4% of pts had EGD, of which 72.4% had varices. There were 128 (68.8%) pts with GI bleeding risk and 58 (31.2%) pts without GI bleeding risk. The most common 1L systemic therapies for pts with GI bleeding risk were A + B (72.7%) and A only (9.4%), while for pts without GI bleeding risk, A + B (29.3%), nivolumab + ipilimumab (13.8%), and B + chemotherapy (13.8%) were the most common. Median OS and OS rates at 12, 18, and 24 mo were lower, and post-index GI bleeding rate was higher in pts with vs without GI bleeding risk (Table). For pts treated with A + B, median OS and OS rates at 12, 18, and 24 mo were lower in pts with vs without GI bleeding risk (Table). Conclusions: In this network, prior to the approval of other 1L IO-based regimens for uHCC, many pts received A + B, despite risk of post-index GI bleeding. Median OS with A + B was shorter in pts with vs without GI bleeding risk. Data highlight the complexity of uHCC and the unmet need for guidance on characteristics-driven treatment decisions. Full cohort A + B cohort All ptsN=186 GI bleeding risk N=128 No GI bleeding risk N=58 All pts N=110 GI bleeding risk N=93 No GI bleeding risk N=17 Median follow-up, mo 20.6 20.9 20.4 21.3 21.6 20.3 Median OS, mo 14.4 11.4 40.3 13.9 12.8 Not reached OS rates, % 12 mo 55.2 48.9 68.9 55.2 52.3 70.6 18 mo 45.3 38.1 61.1 44.1 41.6 57.8 24 mo 39.4 31.8 56.8 37.1 34.6 51.3 Post-index GI bleed, % 17.2 23.4 3.4 17.3 19.4 5.9

54 Background: The incidence of colorectal cancer is increasing rapidly, particularly amongst younger people. Despite a screening program being widely available, most patients are diagnosed with cancer through symptomatic presentation. Leveraging electronic medical records (EMRs) through clinical decision support platforms offers potential for identifying high-risk individuals before clinical suspicion develops. This study aims to explore the challenges associated with early colorectal cancer diagnosis and evaluate the effectiveness of the cancer case finding feature of a cancer management platform called C the Signs. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the Mayo Data Platform, comprising records of 894,275 patients, including 7,348 diagnosed with colorectal cancer. C the Signs was employed to identify patients at risk of colorectal cancer based on EMR data. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed to assess the platform's performance in identifying high-risk patients. Additionally, the study evaluated the temporal discrepancy in colorectal cancer diagnoses between those flagged by C the Signs and those detected by primary care physicians. Results: The C the Signs screening platform had a sensitivity of 93.8% and a specificity of 19.7% in identifying patients at risk of colorectal cancer. Notably, 29.4% of patients with colorectal cancer were identified as being at risk up to 5 years earlier by C the Signs compared to diagnoses made by primary care physicians, highlighting the platform's potential for early detection. Conclusions: Early identification of high-risk individuals holds promise for improving patient outcomes and reducing the burden of colorectal cancer. Whilst the specificity of the C the Signs platform for colorectal cancer is relatively low, the sensitivity is comparable to the most favorable rates reported for colonoscopy. In addition, if C the Signs was used in conjunction with a relatively cheap screening test such as Faecal Immunochemical Testing, this would significantly drive up the specificity whilst maintaining the sensitivity. Further studies are needed to assess its efficacy in conjunction with tests available in primary care.

45 Background: dMMR tumors are characterized by rapid primary tumor growth with reduced likelihood for nodal and distant metastases compared to MMR proficient (pMMR) tumors. Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated promising efficacy for localized colon cancer with high pathologic complete response rates and low relapse rates. This raises the question if surgical treatment could be avoided with accurate radiographic staging while avoiding overtreatment of early stage tumors. This study assesses the utility of radiographic staging by CT for dMMR tumors compared to pathologic staging. Methods: Patients with stage I-III colon cancer treated with upfront surgical resection were retrospectively reviewed from a single institution from 2012 to 2023 in two cohorts: 1) dMMR colon cancer and 2) pMMR colon cancer limited to similar sample size as matched controls. Clinical stage was determined based on CT scans prior to surgical resection by 2 independent radiologists blinded to pathologic stage, and the results were correlated to pathologic stage. Clinical characteristics were extracted from the electronic medical record. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. Results: We identified 80 patients with dMMR colon cancer and 66 with pMMR tumors. CT clinical tumor staging was discordant from pathologic staging for 68% of dMMR tumors and 61% for pMMR tumors. For T4 dMMR tumors, CT had a 74% sensitivity and 44% specificity. T4 tumors were understaged by radiology to less than T4 for 56% of cases. For dMMR nodal staging, CT had 89% sensitivity and 50% specificity (Table 1). For pathologic node positive tumors, 14% were understaged by radiologist CT read to node negative. For pathologic node negative tumors, 50% of tumors were overstaged to node positive by radiologist CT read. There was poor inter-rater reliability for both T stage and N stage for dMMR and pMMR tumors. The weakest agreement between radiologists was for T stage (dMMR kappa = 0.246, mMMR kappa = 0.145). Conclusions: Radiologic clinical staging of dMMR and pMMR colon cancer does not correlate well with pathologic staging. There were high rates of understaging by CT evaluation for patients who may be candidates for neoadjuvant treatment (T4, N+). Furthermore, there was poor inter-rater reliability between radiologists, indicating that CT staging alone may not be sufficient. Additional diagnostic modalities for nodal detection may be necessary to accurately clinically stage patients before neoadjuvant ICIs in patients with locally advanced disease. Comparing utility of pMMR versus dMMR tumors for T4 and node positive disease. pMMR (n = 66) dMMR (n = 80) T4 versus T3 or less Sensitivity (%) 92 74 Specificity (%) 51 47 PPV (%) 80 77 NPV (%) 82 63 Node positive versus node negative Sensitivity (%) 60 50 Specificity (%) 75 89 PPV (%) 81 89 NPV (%) 53 50 Abbreviations: PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value.

10 Background: Cell-free circulating tumor tissue modified viral DNA (ctDNA) has been used as a biomarker to detect recurrence for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). However, its value in informing treatment modification during definitive chemoradiation (CRT) has yet to be explored. We evaluated ctDNA response during and at completion of definitive CRT to establish patterns of disease response and inform future studies to personalize treatment. Methods: From 11/2022 to 6/2024, 13 consecutive patients with biopsy proven, non-metastatic ASCC received definitive CRT and had ctDNA testing using a commercially available droplet digital quantitative PCR assay. ctDNA testing was done at baseline (pre-CRT), week 4 of CRT, and/or end of CRT, 1-3 months post-CRT, and every 6 months thereafter. CRT included concurrent 5FU/MMC (or capecitabine/MMC) and radiotherapy according to RTOG 0529. Treatment response assessment included: physical exam, anoscopy, and imaging with PET/CT, CT C/A/P +/- MRI abdomen and pelvis. Results: 13 patients had ctDNA testing and 11 patients had HPV-positive ASCC and tested positive for ctDNA. The 11 patients with detectable baseline ctDNA were included in this analysis. The median age at diagnosis was 63 years old. Staging included: 1- Stage IIA, 7- Stage IIB, 1- Stage IIIA, 2- Stage IIIC. 1 patient was cN0, while 11 were cN1. With a median follow-up from completion of CRT of 13 months, 4 patients have persistent or recurrent disease: 2 with distant metastases, 1 with persistent local disease (1 month post-CRT), and 1 with local and distant recurrence. Baseline value of ctDNA did not correlate to stage at diagnosis, rate of clearance during CRT, or likelihood of recurrence. 5 of 11 patients cleared ctDNA by week 4 of CRT. Of 5 patients who cleared ctDNA by week 4 of CRT, 4 remain NED and 1 developed distant metastases. Of 6 patients with persistent ctDNA at week 4 of CRT, 3 have persistent or recurrent disease- 1 local persistence 1 month post-CRT, 1 local and distant recurrence 6 months post-CRT, and 1 with distant recurrence 12 months post- CRT. Among 6 patients who cleared ctDNA by the final week of CRT, 1 patient developed recurrent disease. Among the 4 patients in the series with residual/recurrent disease, 3 of them had not cleared ctDNA by the end of CRT. Of 10 patients with ctDNA testing at 1 month post-CRT, 8 had no detectable ctDNA. 2 patients with persistent (1) or recurrent (1) ctDNA at 1 month post-CRT developed disease recurrence- 1 with distant recurrence and 1 with local and distant recurrence. Conclusions: ctDNA assessment during CRT may provide insight into disease response that can predict patterns of failure and facilitate personalized therapy- treatment intensification, deintensification, or additional testing to detect early metastatic disease. Larger studies and clinical validation are needed.

TPS788 Background: MSLN is a desirable candidate for targeted therapy given its limited expression in normal tissues and its overexpression in several malignancies, including PANC, mesothelioma, non-small cell lung, and ovarian cancers (TCGA 2022). MSLN-targeted CAR T and T-cell receptor therapies have shown promising clinical activity; however, on-target, off-tumor toxicity, including fatal events, have occurred (1-3). Autologous logic-gated Tmod CAR T therapies address the challenges of on-target, off-tumor toxicity by combining 2 CARs: activating and blocking receptors. The activator recognizes a tumor-associated antigen present on the surface of both tumor and normal cells; the blocker prevents CAR T activity when it binds HLA-A*02, which is present in normal cells and often lost in tumor cells. Thus, in patients with tumor-associated HLA-A*02 LOH, the blocker prevents on-target, off-tumor toxicity on normal cells due to retained HLA-A*02 expression (4). HLA-A*02 LOH is observed in various solid tumors, including ~20% of PANC (5). Two autologous CAR T therapies are currently under investigation: A2B530, targeting carcinoembryonic antigen, in the EVEREST-1 trial, and A2B694, targeting MSLN, in the EVEREST-2 trial, described herein. A2B694 may provide a therapeutic window to treat patients with PANC and other MSLN-expressing solid tumors exhibiting HLA-A*02 LOH due to its unique discriminatory mechanism. Methods: EVEREST-2 (NCT06051695) is a first-in-human, phase 1/2, open-label, nonrandomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of A2B694 for recurrent unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic cancers with MSLN expression, including PANC. Eligible patients must have exhausted options of potentially curative therapy and have recurrent disease. Enrollment to EVEREST-2 occurs through the prescreening study BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119), in which patients with tumor-associated HLA-A*02 LOH are identified via next-generation sequencing (Tempus AI, Inc) and leukapheresis product is collected. A2B694 is manufactured from cryopreserved T cells when clinically appropriate for patients. The primary objective of phase 1 is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of A2B694 and identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The dose-expansion phase will confirm RP2D and collect biomarker data to further characterize A2B694. Phase 2 will assess the primary endpoint overall response rate per RECIST v1.1 and secondary endpoints progression-free survival and overall survival. The first patient was dosed on April 24, 2024 and dose escalation is ongoing. 1. Beatty, et al. Gastroenterology . 2018. 2. Haas, et al. Mol Ther . 2023. 3. Hong, et al. ESMO 2021. Abstr 9590. 4. Hamburger, et al. Mol Immunol . 2020. 5. Hecht, et al. J Clin Oncol . 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT06051695 .

TPS311 Background: Approximately 45% of dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the immunotherapy arm progressed at 12 mos (KEYNOTE 177). We hypothesize that dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients (pts) may be more effectively treated with the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 (PD-1) pathway blockade and mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab (bev) rather than with anti-PD-L1 therapy (atezo) alone. Preclinical work demonstrated synergistic effects between anti-PD-1/anti-VEGF as well as between oxaliplatin/anti-PD-1 in murine CRC models, and phase II data showed activity of anti-PD-1/anti-VEGF in chemotherapy refractory colon cancer. Within the AtezoTRIBE 8-pt dMMR CRC subgroup treated with FOLFOXIRI+bev+atezo, median PFS was not reached, with the first progression event at ~16 mos. Additionally, in other solid tumor malignancies, anti-PD-1 plus anti-VEGFr (i.e., HCC and RCC) as well as anti-PD-1 plus chemotherapy (i.e., gastroesophageal and lung cancers) combinations are standard first-line treatments. Methods: This two-arm prospective phase III open-label trial randomizes (1:1) mCRC dMMR/MSI-H to atezo monotherapy v mFOLFOX6/bev+atezo combination. Key inclusion criteria have been simplified on recent amendments to better mirror clinical practice for pts receiving mFOLFOX6/bev+atezo: One cycle of FOLFOX or CAPOX, with or without bev (or biosimilar) prior to enrollment allowed, dMMR tumor determined by local CLIA-certified IHC assay (MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2) or MSI-H by local CLIA-certified PCR or NGS panel; pts with total bilirubin ≤4.0 x ULN; duration of therapy for up to two years for both arms; imaging frequency on post-treatment follow-up has been reduced; as has measurable disease per RECIST. Primary endpoint is PFS. Assuming the atezo monotherapy control arm has a 48% PFS at 24 mos as assessed by site investigator, we have 80% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.6 (equivalent to 64.4% PFS at 24 mos) with alpha 0.025 one-sided. Stratification factors include BRAFV600E status, metastatic site, and prior adjuvant CRC therapy. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, objective response rate, safety profile, disease control rate, and duration of response. Archived tumor tissue and blood samples will be collected for correlative studies. Harmonization of translational analyses is planned between GI004 (COMMIT) and A021502 (ATOMIC). Sample size has been modified with the accrual goal of 120 pts randomized between the two immunotherapy arms needed for study completion. Enrollment actively continues at U.S. sites. Current accrual (as of 9-20-2024): 100/120. Clinical trial information: NCT02997228 .

TPS310 Background: Currently, there are no biomarkers validated prospectively in randomized studies for resected colon cancer (CC) to determine need for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a highly specific and sensitive approach (especially with serial monitoring) for identifying minimal/molecular residual disease (MRD) post-surgery in CC patients (pts), and may outperform traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. CC pts who do not have detectable ctDNA (ctDNA-) are at a much lower risk of recurrence and may be spared the toxicities associated with AC. Furthermore, for CC pts with detectable ctDNA (ctDNA+) who are at a very high risk of recurrence, the optimal AC regimen has not been established. We hypothesize that for pts whose CC has been resected, ctDNA status may be used to risk-stratify for making decisions about AC. Methods: In this prospective phase II/III trial, up to 1,912 pts with resected stage IIB, IIC, and III CC will be enrolled. Based on the post-operative ctDNA status using personalized and tumor-informed assay (Signatera, bespoke assay), those who are ctDNA- (Cohort A) will be randomized to immediate AC with fluoropyrimidine (FP)+oxaliplatin (Ox) for 3-6 mos per established guidelines v serial ctDNA monitoring. Patients who are ctDNA+ post-operatively, or with serial monitoring (Cohort B), will be randomized to FP+Ox v more intensive AC with addition of irinotecan (I) for 6 mos. One cycle of chemotherapy is allowed while awaiting ctDNA testing results for cohort assignment. The primary endpoints for Cohort A are time to ctDNA+ status (phase II) and disease-free survival (DFS) (phase III) in the immediate v delayed AC arms. The primary endpoint for Cohort B is DFS in the FP+Ox v FP+Ox+I arms for both phase II and phase III portions of the trial. Secondary endpoints include prevalence of detectable ctDNA post-operatively, time-to-event outcomes (overall survival and time to recurrence) by ctDNA status, and the assessment of compliance to adjuvant therapy. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, as well as post-operative plus serial matched/normal blood samples, will be collected for exploratory correlative research. Active enrollment across the NCTN started in June 2022 with CCTG sites joining in August 2023. Current accrual (as of 9-20-2024): 500/1,912. Clinical trial information: NCT05174169 .

TPS309 Background: Patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) often experience long-term progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) following aggressive local treatment of isolated metastases, especially in the liver. However, the effectiveness of local ablative therapies, such as microwave ablation (MWA) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), in patients with inoperable limited metastatic CRC or those with additional metastases outside the liver or lungs, remains uncertain. Despite the historical use of local therapy for oligometastatic CRC, often influenced by provider bias rather than strong evidence, questions persist about the potential benefits of applying this approach to patients with more extensive disease. This trial aims to address this clinical challenge by evaluating the safety and efficacy of adding total ablative therapy (TAT) of all disease sites to standard systemic treatment in patients with limited metastatic CRC. Methods: A022101/NRG-GI009 is a randomized phase III study within the National Clinical Trials Network, set to enroll 364 patients with newly diagnosed metastatic CRC (BRAF wild-type, microsatellite stable). Patients with liver-only metastatic disease are excluded. Pre-registration during first-line systemic therapy induction is encouraged. Eligible lesions must be treatable with surgical resection, MWA, and/or SBRT. Patients without significant radiographic progression after 12-39 weeks of first-line systemic therapy, with 4 or fewer disease sites post-induction chemotherapy, will be randomized 1:1. Randomization will be stratified by the number of metastatic organ sites (1-2 vs. 3-4), timing of metastatic disease diagnosis (de novo vs. secondary), and the presence of metastatic disease outside the liver/lungs in at least one site. Patients in Arm 1 will receive TAT, targeting all metastatic sites with a combination of surgical resection, MWA, and/or SBRT, followed by standard systemic therapy. Patients in Arm 2 will continue with standard systemic therapy alone. The choice of systemic therapy is at the discretion of the medical oncologist and may include continued therapy, maintenance chemotherapy, or observation. The primary endpoint is OS, with secondary endpoints including event-free survival, treatment-related toxicities, and local recurrence. Exploratory biomarker analyses will also be conducted. The study requires 346 evaluable patients across the two arms to demonstrate an OS improvement with a hazard ratio of 0.7, providing 80% power with a one-sided alpha of 5%. The trial employs a group sequential design with two interim analyses (at 25% and 50% of events) to assess futility. The trial began in January 2023, and patient recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05673148 .