Citations

Abstract Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumor and is universally fatal. Treatment involves maximal safe resection with adjuvant chemoradiation. Poor prognosis in glioblastoma is multifactorial, and local and systemic immunosuppression is an important factor. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are small, membrane-bound particles released by cells into the external environment. They play a key role in intercellular communication. In glioblastomas, EVs regulate immunosuppression through induction of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in a process dependent on the PD-1/PD-L1 and IL-6 axes. Primary cilia are microtubule-based organelles that play crucial roles in various cellular processes and signal transduction cascades. We recently showed that primary cilia modulate IL-6 expression and consequently, MDSC induction. Comparative proteomic analysis of EVs derived from human glioblastoma cells devoid of cilia showed loss of ICAM-1 expression compared to control glioblastoma cells. ICAM-1 (Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1) is a cell surface glycoprotein that mediates cell-cell adhesion and immune responses. In this study, we showed that depletion of primary cilia in human glioblastoma cells result in increased PD-L1 but loss of IL-6 and ICAM-1. RNAi-meidated loss of ICAM-1 was synergistic with primary cilia depletion in preventing MDSC inductionn normal human monocytes exposed to glioblastoma-derived EVs. Exogenous IFN-g was sufficient to restore IL-6 levels and MDSC induction despite loss of primary cilia and ICAM-1 suggesting that primary cilia act upstream of IFN-g, IL-6 and ICAM-1 in glioblastoma-mediated MDSC induction. This study is the first to connect primary cilia signal transduction to IL-6 and ICAM-1 expression and to MDSC induction. The evidence suggests a potential parallel primary cilia regulatory cascade independent of the PD-L1 axis that controls tumor-mediated immunosuppression. These results may inform novel therapeutic strategies aimed at increasing efficacy of immunotherapy in the glioblastoma and other neoplastic processes.

INTRODUCTION: Pouchitis and Crohn's-like disease of the pouch (CLDP) are common in patients who undergo ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. We conducted separate systematic reviews to evaluate the effectiveness of available interventions to prevent and treat pouchitis and CLDP. METHODS: Through systematic literature reviews, we identified studies that evaluated the effectiveness of probiotics, antibiotics, 5-aminosalicylates, nonsystemic oral corticosteroids, and advanced therapies for prevention and treatment of pouchitis and CLDP for meta-analysis. Primary outcomes were occurrence of pouchitis for pouchitis prevention and clinical response for pouchitis and CLDP treatment. We estimated the relative effectiveness of these interventions using the existing placebo response rates or hypothetical spontaneous improvement rates derived from clinical trials of pouchitis, ulcerative colitis, and Crohn's disease. RESULTS: Probiotics were effective for primary (relative risk [RR] 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05–0.62) and secondary prevention (RR 0.17; 95% CI 0.09–0.34) of pouchitis. Antibiotics were effective for treatment of acute and chronic pouchitis (12 cohorts; RR 1.67; 95% CI 1.34–2.01; response rate 65%; 95% CI 52–75) with ciprofloxacin and metronidazole-based regimens being more effective than rifaximin. Advanced therapies were effective for treatment of chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis (31 cohorts; RR 1.71; 95% CI 1.28–2.56; response rate 50%; 95% CI 43–57) and CLDP (10 cohorts; RR 2.49; 95% CI 1.87–3.73; response rate 74%; 95% CI 68–79) without significant difference between classes. DISCUSSION: Multiple medical interventions are effective for prevention and treatment of pouchitis and CLDP. Given the overall low quality of data, further research is needed to confirm these findings.

Background: Question prompt lists (QPLs) are structured sets of disease-specific questions intended to encourage question-asking by patients and enhance patient-physician communication. To date, an EoE-specific QPL has not been developed for EoE patients. Aim: To develop a preliminary QPL specific to adults with EoE by incorporating input from international esophageal experts. Methods: Sixteen experts were invited to generate QPL content through a modified Delphi (RAND/University of California, Los Angeles, CA) method consisting of 2 rounds of independent ratings. In round 1, experts provided 5 answers to the prompts “what general questions should patients ask when being seen for EoE?” and “what questions do I not hear patients asking but given my experience, I believe they should be asking?” In round 2, experts rated each question on a 5-point Likert scale, and responses rated as “essential” or “important” (determined by an a priori median threshold of ≥ 4.0) were accepted for the EoE QPL. Results: Ten esophageal experts participated in both rounds. Round 1 generated 100 questions. Questions were combined and modified to reduce redundancy, yielding 57 questions. After round 2, 51 questions (85%) were accepted for inclusion (median value ≥ 4.0) in the final QPL. Questions were then divided into 4 themes based on disease domains: (1) “What is EoE?,” (2) “Treatment Options,” (3) “Follow-up Surveillance and Long-term Risks,” and (4) “Allergy and Genetic Testing.” The largest number of questions covered was “What is EoE?” (16/51 or 31%). Questions with the highest agreement median (5.0) included examples such as “what should I do if I get a food impaction?” and “what are the treatment options?” Conclusion: This is the first preliminary EoE QPL developed in the field of medicine. We hope implementation enhances effective patient-physician communication by encouraging patients to ask relevant questions that experts prioritized. Future studies will aim to modify this communication tool by incorporating patient perspectives

The NCCN Guidelines for Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolic Disease provide strategies for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adult patients with cancer. VTE is a common and life-threatening condition in patients with cancer, and its management often requires multidisciplinary efforts. The NCCN panel is comprised of specialists spanning various fields, including cardiology, hematology, medical oncology, internal medicine, interventional radiology, and pharmacology. The content featured in this issue specifically addresses the evaluation and recommended treatment options outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for the diverse subtypes of cancer-associated VTE.