Citations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Symptomatic hydrocephalus (HCP) requiring cerebrospinal fluid diversion by shunting is routinely performed through ventriculoperitoneal or ventriculoatrial (VA) shunting. The optimal method of distal catheter placement for a VA shunt is not well defined. We detail a novel surgical technique for VA shunt placement using intraoperative digital subtraction angiography (DSA). METHODS: The aim of this single-institution, retrospective review was to describe a unique technique of distal catheter placement in a series of the initial 50 consecutive adult patients who underwent VA shunt placement with DSA at our institution between 2021 and 2024. Detailed procedural techniques and outcomes are described. RESULTS: Accurate surgical placement of the distal VA shunt was achieved in 48 patients (96%). Five patients required shunt revisions for delayed shearing of distal catheter (1), suboptimal distal catheter placement (3), and suboptimal proximal catheter placement (1). Four instances of post-VA shunt bacteremia were found when patients were routinely cultured for febrile episodes; all completed appropriate antibiotic course, and none resulted in meningitis or required shunt revision. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated overall VA shunt success of 92% at 3 years after initial surgery. CONCLUSION: This series of 50 consecutive patients demonstrated use of intraoperative DSA yields safe and accurate placement VA shunts with acceptable long-term outcomes. As more neurosurgeons have endovascular training, this surgical technique may be more readily adopted.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has limited role for large arteriovenous malformations (AVM). Volume-staged SRS (VS-SRS) is used to optimize outcomes, but studies reporting results are limited. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort of 378 patients from 21 centers reports results of VS-SRS for the entire AVM nidus. We report favorable outcome, obliteration, hemorrhage, and permanent symptomatic adverse radiation effect rates. RESULTS: The median age was 31 years (IQR: 19-44) at the first volume stage, with patients treated in 2–4 stages. The median total nidus volume was 21 cm 3 (IQR: 13.9-30.1 cm 3 ), and a median prescription dose of 17 Gy (IQR: 16-18 Gy) was used. The median radiographic and clinical follow-up were 48 and 55 months, respectively. Seventy-seven patients (20.4%) had a favorable outcome, with the 3-year and 5-year rates being 3.9% and 18%, respectively. 127 patients (33.6%) achieved obliteration, with the 3-year and 5-year rates being 6.8% and 26%, respectively. Obliteration rates of AVMs <15 cm 3 were 81% and 31%, respectively. The latency period hemorrhage incidence rate was 3.02 cases per 100 patient-years; 52 patients (13.8%) had a bleed. Seventy-two patients (19%) had symptomatic adverse radiation effect; in 38 patients (10.1%), these were permanent. Total nidus volume, prescription dose at first stage, diffuse nidus, and prior hemorrhage were all independent affecting outcome rates. CONCLUSION: VS-SRS can be used to treat large AVMs as a standalone treatment. Obliteration rates and favorable outcomes are lower than that with smaller AVMs, and repeat treatment is often required. Optimizing treatment plans, by increasing prescription doses, reducing treatment volume at each stage, and increasing the number of stages, may lead to better outcomes.

Purpose: To present our approach to zygomatic osteotomy and repositioning using technological aids: virtual surgical planning, custom guides, and implants. Background: The zygomatic complex is highly 3-dimensional, establishing cheek prominence, facial width, and orbital morphology. Functionally, the zygoma supports soft tissues and is vital to mastication. The zygoma may require reconstruction after a variety of congenital or acquired conditions; however, Zygomatic Osteotomy and Repositioning (ZyOaR) is a complex operation with many technical considerations. The advent of virtual surgical planning (VSP) has enhanced efficiency, accuracy, and reproducibility, while permitting utilization of custom-designed guides and implants. There remains a paucity of literature on ZyOaR and its unique challenges. Methods: This case series includes all patients older than 18 years old undergoing ZyOaR with VSP between 2010 and 2024. Demographics and clinical etiology were noted. Outcomes included fidelity to preoperative plan, facial symmetry, mastication defects, and globe malposition. Results: Eight patients age 18 to 60 years old (mean = 38) met inclusion criteria. Three patients had congenital deformities, and 5 were post-traumatic. Follow-up time ranged from 1 to 50 months (mean = 17 months). There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. No patient had visual changes at latest follow-up. Preoperative VSP plans were compared to postoperative CT scans, showing a high degree of fidelity. All patients underwent secondary reconstructive and/or soft tissue procedures to achieve final results. Conclusions: Zygomatic Osteotomy and Repositioning (ZyOaR) is inherently difficult, and there is a current gap in the literature on its unique technical challenges. We present 8 cases of ZyOaR using VSP for patients with a range of disease etiologies. The procedures were well tolerated and maintained high surgical fidelity. In our experience, keys to optimize ZyOaR include comprehensive analysis of regional bony and soft tissue anatomy, virtual planning with production and use of surgical transfer guides, and custom 3D printed patient-specific implants.

Objective Vacuoles E1 enzyme X‐linked autoinflammatory somatic syndrome (VEXAS) is a recently identified rare genetic disorder associated with somatic mutations in the UBA1 gene. VEXAS presents with a combination of inflammatory and hematologic manifestations, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Methods Given the variability in disease presentation and the limited number of studies to date, no clinical documents currently exist to provide guidance to health care providers about the management of VEXAS. To address this gap, we formed an international multidisciplinary panel of VEXAS experts. Results Through formalized meetings and a voting process, the group developed consensus clinical guidance considerations for the management of VEXAS. These considerations offer practical advice on several key topics: (1) clinical features of VEXAS, (2) UBA1 screening methods, (3) the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) in patients with VEXAS, and (4) prognosis and management. The aim is to provide expert guidance on which patients to test, how to test for VEXAS, how to approach MDS in the context of VEXAS, and considerations for management. Conclusion This work marks the first formal international consensus guidance for VEXAS and is intended to be used as a resource for clinicians seeking to understand the disease and its management.

ABSTRACTIntroductionInvestigation of an evacuation disorder is often pursued in patients with symptoms of obstructive defecation. High‐resolution anorectal manometry (HR‐ARM) is a simple, safe, and widely available test to diagnose pelvic floor dysfunction. A more costly and less accessible test is magnetic resonance defecography (MRD). This study aims to quantify the added value of MRD in diagnosing pelvic floor disorders.MethodsHR‐ARM and MRD performed in patients with a diagnosis of constipation between January 1, 2020 and May 15, 2022 at Mayo Clinic were identified using Epic Slicer Dicer. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare findings on MRD in patients with and without abnormal HR‐ARM. Categorical variables were compared using the Pearson's chi‐square test, and continuous variables were compared using the two‐sample t‐test.ResultsSeventy‐six consecutive patients (81.8% female, 94.8% White, ages 19–82) who underwent both HR‐ARM and MRD were included. The majority had evidence of dyssynergia on HR‐ARM (n = 49, 64.5%). Patients with dyssynergia on HR‐ARM were significantly more likely to have prolonged balloon expulsion at both > 60 and > 30 s (p < 0.001) and incomplete gel expulsion on MRD (p < 0.001). However, they were not more likely to have a clinically significant rectocele measuring > 2 cm (p = 0.17) or evidence of rectal prolapse (p = 0.07).DiscussionAnatomic findings on MRD were similar between patients with and without evidence of dyssynergia identified by HR‐ARM. In this retrospective review, simultaneously undergoing MRD in addition to HR‐ARM does not appear to provide significant additional diagnostic information to guide therapeutic recommendations. Large prospective studies to evaluate the added value of MRD are needed.

ABSTRACTBackgroundMetabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective and durable approach to treating obesity, yet recurrent weight gain occurs in a subset of patients. Primary care often serves as a routine point of contact for patients following MBS and is a potential gateway for addressing and/or preventing recurrent weight gain.MethodsAlthough guidelines for the management of recurrent weight gain after MBS exist, this narrative review was undertaken to clarify the role of the primary care providers in enhancing long‐term outcomes and preventing weight gain after MBS.FindingsRegular follow‐up in primary care provides an opportunity to identify challenges related to weight management and overall health outcomes, which may include concerns related to nutrition, mental or physical well‐being, body image, motivation, and behavior change, for example. The availability of multidisciplinary providers within primary care settings, including behavioral health specialists, dietitians, and physical therapists, is an important strength of this setting in addressing potential post‐MBS concerns such as recurrent weight gain.ConclusionThis review outlines clinical considerations for managing recurrent weight gain post‐MBS in primary care and includes recommendations for both primary care providers and specialty clinicians working in primary care to deliver care effectively and mitigate weight stigma post‐MBS.

ABSTRACT Accurately predicting vertebral fracture risk in metastatic spines remains a critical challenge in clinical practice. This study developed and validated a QCT‐based finite element analysis (QCT/FEA) approach to investigate the combined effects of baseline bone strength and tumor size on vertebral structural integrity. Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was also calculated from QCT data to evaluate the reduction in bone density with increasing defect size. Nine cadaveric vertebral bodies were analyzed under varying tumor sizes (0%, 20%, 35%, and 50%). The results demonstrated a strong correlation between experimentally measured and computationally predicted failure forces ( r = 0.97, p < 0.001) and aBMD values ( r = 0.96, p < 0.001). Vertebral strength decreased linearly with increasing tumor size. Importantly, the study revealed that baseline vertebral strength plays a crucial role in fracture risk assessment, often surpassing the impact of tumor size alone. Tumor size reduced vertebral strength at a rate 84% faster than bone density ( p = 0.009), highlighting a greater impact of tumor defects on bone fracture force than on bone density. These findings suggest that relying solely on tumor size for fracture risk prediction may be insufficient. Incorporating baseline bone strength into predictive models significantly enhances accuracy and reliability, providing valuable insights for clinical decision‐making and personalized treatment strategies. This study underscores the importance of advanced computational tools in improving vertebral fracture risk assessment in metastatic spine cases.

Background/Objectives: Esaxerenone, a novel non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, has shown promising results in the treatment of essential hypertension (HTN). This study aims to comprehensively analyze the effectiveness of esaxerenone to control BP in patients with essential HTN. Methods: A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), and Cochrane Library from inception until January 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing esaxerenone with standard HTN usual care. The primary outcome of interest was mean changes in sitting systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Other secondary outcomes were mean changes in 24 h-SBP and 24 h-DBP, and target BP achievement. Safety outcomes, such as adverse events and increased levels of potassium/uric acid, were also assessed. Results: Our meta-analysis included four studies with a total of 1981 patients, all conducted in Japan. Esaxerenone demonstrated dose-dependent blood pressure reductions. At 5 mg, sitting DBP decreased by 4.22 mmHg (95% CI −8.72 to 0.29; p = 0.07) and SBP by 9.07 mmHg (95% CI −17.69 to −0.45; p = 0.04), while the 1.25 mg dose showed smaller, non-significant reductions. For 24 h measurements, only the 5 mg dose achieved significant reductions. Target BP achievement increased by 48% overall (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.96; p = 0.007), with stronger effects at 5 mg (RR 2.05, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.08; p = 0.04). Esaxerenone significantly reduced nocturnal SBP by 10.62 mmHg (95% CI −14.01 to −7.23; p < 0.001). Conclusions: In patients with essential HTN, esaxerenone was shown to be safe and well-tolerated compared with usual care. Long-term data on safety is warranted.

Background Safety-net hospitals (SNH) provide care to a significant proportion of low-income, uninsured, and underserved populations disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated the impact of safety-net burden on outcomes of COVID-19 hospitalizations. Methods We identified patients aged ≥ 18 years hospitalized with COVID-19 from the nationwide inpatient database using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition (ICD-10-CM) code U07.1. The primary study outcomes were inpatient mortality, respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation, and tracheostomy use. Secondary outcomes were total hospitalization costs (THC) and length of hospital stay (LOS). Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare the primary and secondary outcomes in HBH and medium safety-net burden (MBH) with lower-burden hospitals (LBH) (reference). Results An estimated 2,608,232 COVID-19 hospitalizations met the inclusion criteria, with 68.7% occurring in HBH, 22.8% in MBH, and 8.5% in LBH. On adjusted multivariable analysis, HBH was associated with increased odds of inpatient mortality (aOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.28) compared with LBH. Both HBH (aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.21-1.40) and MBH (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.24) demonstrated increased odds of mechanical ventilation compared with LBH. THC was lower in HBH and MBH compared with LBH. The LOS was similar across safety net burden categories. Conclusion After adjusting for patient- and hospital-level factors, COVID-19 hospitalizations at HBH had inferior inpatient outcomes compared with LBH. Targeted policy reforms are needed to address the underlying causes of these disparities and increase our health systems’ readiness for future crises, particularly in underserved communities.

Hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection remains a major cause of severe liver disease among hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients, contributing to accelerated progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Pegylated interferon-α remains the first-line therapy for chronic HDV infection in most cases. However, despite its approval for HBV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, its use in HDV is largely driven by a lack of other options and is constrained by its limited efficacy, suboptimal durability of response, and a substantial side effect profile. Meanwhile, bulevirtide, an entry inhibitor, became the first agent to be approved for use in chronic HDV infections by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and several other therapies are currently being investigated as well. In this review, we provide updates on recent advancements in HDV treatment and novel therapies.