Mantziaris, Georgios

Stereotactic radiosurgery was associated with a higher obliteration rate compared with embolization in patients with eloquent brain arteriovenous malformations, whereas there was no evidence of a difference in functional outcomes or complications after adjustment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has limited role for large arteriovenous malformations (AVM). Volume-staged SRS (VS-SRS) is used to optimize outcomes, but studies reporting results are limited. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort of 378 patients from 21 centers reports results of VS-SRS for the entire AVM nidus. We report favorable outcome, obliteration, hemorrhage, and permanent symptomatic adverse radiation effect rates. RESULTS: The median age was 31 years (IQR: 19-44) at the first volume stage, with patients treated in 2–4 stages. The median total nidus volume was 21 cm 3 (IQR: 13.9-30.1 cm 3 ), and a median prescription dose of 17 Gy (IQR: 16-18 Gy) was used. The median radiographic and clinical follow-up were 48 and 55 months, respectively. Seventy-seven patients (20.4%) had a favorable outcome, with the 3-year and 5-year rates being 3.9% and 18%, respectively. 127 patients (33.6%) achieved obliteration, with the 3-year and 5-year rates being 6.8% and 26%, respectively. Obliteration rates of AVMs <15 cm 3 were 81% and 31%, respectively. The latency period hemorrhage incidence rate was 3.02 cases per 100 patient-years; 52 patients (13.8%) had a bleed. Seventy-two patients (19%) had symptomatic adverse radiation effect; in 38 patients (10.1%), these were permanent. Total nidus volume, prescription dose at first stage, diffuse nidus, and prior hemorrhage were all independent affecting outcome rates. CONCLUSION: VS-SRS can be used to treat large AVMs as a standalone treatment. Obliteration rates and favorable outcomes are lower than that with smaller AVMs, and repeat treatment is often required. Optimizing treatment plans, by increasing prescription doses, reducing treatment volume at each stage, and increasing the number of stages, may lead to better outcomes.

Abstract Pituitary tumors require a diverse, multidisciplinary approach in their management. Stereotactic radiosurgery (single or hypofractionated) and fractionated radiotherapy are integral parts of the armamentarium. With the introduction of highly conformal, stereotactic ionizing radiation approaches, the reported tumor control rates and clinical outcomes have improved significantly. This review details the indications, risks, and outcomes of pituitary radiosurgery and radiation therapy, and presents in brief the differences in treatment approaches between stereotactic radiosurgery, fractionated radiation therapy, and proton therapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for residual arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) can be considered as a salvage approach after failure of initial SRS. There are no published guidelines regarding patient selection, timing, or SRS parameters to guide clinical practice. This systematic review aimed to review outcomes and complications from the published literature to inform practice recommendations provided on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase was conducted. Fourteen studies with 925 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients were treated between 1985 and 2022. All studies were retrospective, except for one prospective cohort. RESULTS: The median patient age at repeat SRS ranged from 32 to 60 years. Four studies (630 patients) reported detailed information on Spetzler–Martin grade at the time of repeat SRS; 12.54% of patients had Spetzler–Martin grade I AVMs (79/630 patients), 46.51% had grade II (293/630), 34.92% had grade III (220/630), 5.08% had grade IV (32/630), and 0.95% had grade V (6/630). The median prescription doses varied between 15 and 25 Gy (mean, 13.06-22.8 Gy). The pooled overall obliteration rate at the last follow-up after repeat SRS was 59% (95% CI 51%-67%) with a median follow-up between 21 and 50 months. The pooled hemorrhage incidence at the last follow-up was 5% (95% CI 4%-7%), and the pooled overall radiation-induced change incidence was 12% (95% CI 7%-20%). CONCLUSION: For an incompletely obliterated AVM, repeat radiosurgery after 3 to 5 years of follow-up from the first SRS provides a reasonable benefit to the risk profile. After repeat SRS, obliteration is achieved in the majority of patients. The risk of hemorrhage or radiation-induced change appears low, and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society recommendations are presented.

OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to characterize local tumor control (LC), overall survival (OS), and safety of stereotactic radiosurgery for colorectal brain metastasis (CRBM). METHODS Ten international institutions participating in the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation provided data for this retrospective case series. This study included 187 patients with CRBM (281 tumors), with a median age of 62 years and 56.7% being male. Most patients (53.5%) had solitary tumors, although 10.7% had > 5 tumors. The median tumor volume was 2.7 cm3 (IQR 0.22–8.1 cm3), and the median margin dose was 20 Gy (IQR 18–22 Gy). RESULTS The 3-year LC and OS rates were 72% and 20%, respectively. Symptomatic adverse radiation effects occurred in 1.6% of patients. In the multivariate analysis, age > 65 years and tumor volume > 4.0 cm3 were significant predictors of tumor progression (hazard ratio [HR] 2.6, 95% CI 1.4–4.9; p = 0.003 and HR 3.4, 95% CI 1.7–6.9; p < 0.001, respectively). Better performance status (Karnofsky Performance Scale score > 80) was associated with a reduced risk of tumor progression (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19–0.73; p = 0.004). Patient age > 62 years (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1–2.3; p = 0.03) and the presence of active extracranial disease (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1–2.4; p = 0.009) were significantly associated with worse OS. CONCLUSIONS Stereotactic radiosurgery offers a high LC rate and a low rate of symptomatic adverse radiation effects for the majority of CRBMs. The OS and LC favored younger patients with high functional performance scores and inactive extracranial disease.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding outcomes for patients with gastrointestinal (GI) primaries and brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). OBJECTIVE: To examine clinical outcomes after SRS for patients with brain metastases from GI primaries and evaluate potential prognostic factors. METHODS: The International Radiosurgery Research Foundation centers were queried for patients with brain metastases from GI primaries managed with SRS. Primary outcomes were local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for univariate analysis (UVA) of prognostic factors. Factors significant on UVA were evaluated with a Cox multivariate analysis proportional hazards model. Logistic regressions were used to examine correlations with RN. RESULTS: We identified 263 eligible patients with 543 brain metastases. Common primary sites were rectal (31.2%), colon (31.2%), and esophagus (25.5%) with a median age of 61.6 years (range: 37-91.4 years) and a median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of 90% (range: 40%-100%). One-year and 2-year LC rates were 83.5% (95% CI: 78.9%-87.1%) and 73.0% (95% CI: 66.4%-78.5%), respectively. On UVA, age >65 years ( P = .001), dose <20 Gy ( P = .006) for single-fraction plans, KPS <90% ( P < .001), and planning target volume ≥2cc ( P = .007) were associated with inferior LC. All factors other than dose were significant on multivariate analysis ( P ≤ .002). One-year and 2-year OS rates were 68.0% (95% CI: 61.5%-73.6%) and 31.2% (95% CI: 24.6%-37.9%), respectively. Age > 65 years ( P = .006), KPS <90% ( P = .005), and extracranial metastases ( P = .05) were associated with inferior OS. CONCLUSION: SRS resulted in comparable LC with common primaries. Age and KPS were associated with both LC and OS with planning target volume and extracranial metastases correlating with LC and OS, respectively. These factors should be considered in GI cancer patient selection for SRS.

BACKGROUND: Intraventricular metastases (IVMs) are uncommon, and their optimal management remains debatable. OBJECTIVE: To define the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of IVMs. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study included patients managed with SRS for IVMs. SRS-induced adverse events, local tumor or intracranial progression, and the frequency of new-onset hydrocephalus or leptomeningeal spread were documented. Analyses of variables related to patient neuroimaging or clinical outcomes were also performed. RESULTS: The cohort included 160 patients from 11 centers who underwent SRS for treatment of 1045 intracranial metastases, of which 196 were IVMs. The median survival from SRS was 10 months. Of the 154 patients and 190 IVMs with imaging follow-up, 94 patients (61%) experienced distant intracranial disease progression and 16 IVMs (8.4%) progressed locally. The 12- and 24-month local IVM control rates were 91.4% and 86.1%, respectively. Sixteen (10%) and 27 (17.5%) patients developed hydrocephalus and leptomeningeal dissemination post-SRS, respectively. Adverse radiation effects were documented in 24 patients (15%). Eleven patients (6.9%) died because of intracranial disease progression. CONCLUSION: SRS is an effective treatment option for IVMs, with a local IVM control rate comparable with SRS for parenchymal brain metastases. Leptomeningeal spread and hydrocephalus in patients with IVM occur in a minority of patients, but these patients warrant careful follow-up to detect these changes.

Abstract Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and resection are treatment options for patients with facial nerve schwannomas without mass effect. Objective This article evaluates outcomes of patients treated with SRS versus resection + SRS. Method We retrospectively compared 43 patients treated with SRS to 12 patients treated with resection + SRS. The primary study outcome was unfavorable combined endpoint, defined as worsening or new clinical symptoms, and/or tumor radiological progression. SRS (38.81 ± 5.3) and resection + SRS (67.14 ± 11.8) groups had similar clinical follow-ups. Results At the time of SRS, the tumor volumes of SRS (mean ± standard error; 1.83 ± 0.35 mL) and resection + SRS (2.51 ± 0.75 mL) groups were similar. SRS (12.15 ± 0.08 Gy) and resection + SRS (12.16 ± 0.14 Gy) groups received similar radiation doses. SRS group (42/43, 98%) had better local tumor control than the resection + SRS group (10/12, 83%, p = 0.04). Most of SRS (32/43, 74%) and resection + SRS (10/12, 83%) group patients reached a favorable combined endpoint following SRS (p = 0.52). Considering surgical associated side effects, only 2/10 patients of the resection + SRS group reached a favorable endpoint (p < 0.001).Patients of SRS group, who are > 34 years old (p = 0.02), have larger tumors (> 4 mL, 0.04), internal auditory canal (IAC) segment tumor involvement (p = 0.01) were more likely to reach an unfavorable endpoint. Resection + SRS group patients did not show such a difference. Conclusion While resection is still needed for larger tumors, SRS offers better clinical and radiological outcomes compared to resection followed by SRS for facial schwannomas. Younger age, smaller tumors, and non-IAC situated tumors are factors that portend a favorable outcome.