Citations

AbstractIntroductionCardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) characterized by infiltration of noncaseating granulomas involving the heart with highly variable clinical manifestations that can include conduction abnormalities and systolic heart failure. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has shown significant promise in NICM, though little is known about its efficacy in patients with CS.ObjectiveTo determine if CRT improved cardiac remodeling in patients with CS.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all patients with a clinical or histological diagnosis of CS who underwent CRT implantation at the Mayo Clinic enterprise from 2000 to 2021. Baseline characteristics, imaging parameters, heart failure hospitalizations and need for advanced therapies, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were assessed.ResultsOur cohort was comprised of 55 patients with 61.8% male and a mean age of 58.7 ± 10.9 years. Eighteen (32.7%) patients had definite CS, 21 (38.2%) had probable CS, while 16 (29.1%) had presumed CS, and 26 (47.3%) with extracardiac sarcoidosis. The majority underwent CRT‐D implantation (n = 52, 94.5%) and 3 (5.5%) underwent CRT‐P implantation with 67.3% of implanted devices being upgrades from prior pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators. At 6 months postimplantation there was no significant improvement in ejection fraction (34.8 ± 10.9% vs. 37.7 ± 14.2%, p = .331) or left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter (58.5 ± 10.2 vs. 57.5 ± 8.1 mm, p = .236), though mild improvement in left ventricular end systolic diameter (49.1 ± 9.9 vs. 45.7± 9.9 mm, p < .0001). Within the first 6 months postimplantation, 5 (9.1%) patients sustained a heart failure hospitalization. At a mean follow‐up of 4.1± 3.7 years, 14 (25.5%) patients experienced a heart failure hospitalization, 11 (20.0%) underwent cardiac transplantation, 1 (1.8%) underwent left ventricular assist device implantation and 7 (12.7%) patients died.ConclusionsOur findings suggest variable response to CRT in patients with CS with no overall improvement in ventricular function within 6 months and a substantial proportion of patients progressing to advanced heart failure therapies.

Introduction: OAC are recommended for AF patients with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc ≥2 in men or ≥3 in women (high-risk group), may be considered in patients with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc 1 in men or 2 in women (medium-risk group), and are reasonable to omit in patients with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc 0 in men or 1 in women (low-risk group). Furthermore, NOACs are recommended over warfarin in most AF patients. This study aimed to investigate AF stroke prevention treatment patterns in patients managed in routine practice, in particular, the under-use of OAC in the high-risk group and over-use in the low-risk group. Methods: Adult patients with AF were identified using de-identified claims for commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees in the OptumLabs Data Warehouse. Prescription fills were assessed within 90 days of a patient’s AF encounter between 1/1/2016-12/31/2020. Patients with other indications for OAC, such as VTE, recent joint replacement, prior mechanical or bioprosthetic valve replacement, rheumatic mitral stenosis, and patients who underwent LAAO were excluded. Results: Among the 339,197 AF patients, 4.4%, 8.0%, and 87.6% were in the low-, medium-, and high-risk groups, respectively. The mean age was 51.2 ±10.5 yr, 59.9 ±9.4 yr, and 75.1 ±8.8 yr. In the low-risk group, 29.6% were treated with OAC, whereas in the high-risk group, 40.3% were not treated with any antithrombotic therapy and 7.5% used thienopyridine only. Although 71% of patients on OAC were on a NOAC, the proportion of patients on NOAC decreased from 91% in the low-risk group to 69% in the high-risk group. Conclusions: There are potentially both under-use of guideline-recommended stroke prevention therapies in the high-risk patients and over-use in the low-risk group. Because patients at a high risk of stroke are also at a high risk of major and intracranial bleeding who might benefit from NOACs, the decreased use of NOAC in high-risk patients might highlight the need for future quality improvement efforts.

AbstractIntroductionVentricular tachycardia (VT) in structurally normal hearts or nonischemic cardiomyopathy can originate from the aortic sinuses of Valsalva (SoV). It is unknown whether VT can originate from the SoVs in patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI).ObjectiveTo evaluate the prevalence, arrhythmogenic substrate, and ablation outcomes of postinfarction VT originating from the SoVs.MethodsAmong 217 consecutive patients with postinfarction VT undergoing ablation, we identified 13 (6%) patients who had ≥1 VT mapped in a SoV. Control groups of 13 patients with idiopathic SoV VT and 13 postinfarction patients without SoV VT were included.ResultsIn the study group, 17 VTs were mapped in a SoV (right n = 5, left‐right commissure n = 6, left n = 6). SoV VT target sites had low bipolar voltage during sinus rhythm [median 0.42 (IQR: 0.16–0.53) mV] which was significantly lower than target sites in patients with idiopathic SoV VTs [median 1.02 (IQR: 0.89–1.52) mV; p < .001]. An area of endocardial low voltage was found below the aortic valve in all patients with postinfarction SoV VTs compared to 9 (69%) of the patients in the postinfarction control group without SoV VT (p = .02). Morphology characteristics of postinfarction SoV VTs differed from idiopathic SoV VTs. None of the postinfarction SoV VTs were inducible after ablation and none recurred after a median follow‐up of 14 months.ConclusionIn patients with prior MI, VT can be targeted in an aortic SoV. The SoVs should be routinely investigated in postinfarction patients with inferior axis VT and an area of low voltage below the aortic valve.

AbstractWe report a case of alcohol ablation into a vein of Marshall for recurrent dormant conduction into the pulmonary veins with adenosine testing in a patient where two prior ablation attempts failed to isolate the left vein.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI)-based analysis of the electrocardiogram (ECG) can estimate the probability of having atrial fibrillation (AF) while in sinus rhythm. We evaluated the association between the probability of AF using AI-ECG and incident ischemic stroke (I-Stroke) and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Methods: We evaluated a community-based cohort of consecutive patients that sought primary care in Olmsted County, MN, from the years 1998 to 2000 followed-up through March 2016. Inclusion criteria were ages 40-79, an electrocardiogram within 2 years and complete CHA2DS2-VASc data. We excluded those with known atherosclerotic CV disease or AF. The AI network was developed in 180,000 patients (649,931 ECG). The primary endpoint was incident I-Stroke; secondary endpoint was I-Stroke or CV mortality; validated in duplicate. Multivariate cox models adjusted for age, sex, history of hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, and in CHA2DS2-VASc Score subgroups (categorized as low=0, moderate=1, and high risk ≥2). Results: We included 14,601 patients, mean age 53.2±13.08 (51% women, 95% whites), CHA2DS2-VASc score 1.3±1.2, median follow-up of 16.3 years, IQR 14.5-17.5, 727 (4.9%) had an I-Stroke and 1309 (8.9%) had I-Stroke or died from CV causes. When comparing the 5 th vs the 1 st quintile, those with high AI-ECG AF probability had increased risk for I-Stroke (HR 3.25, 95%CI 2.55-4.14, P-for trend <.0001 Figure-A ) and ischemic stroke or CV mortality (HR 5.73, 95%CI 4.69-6.99, P-for trend <.0001 Figure-B ). This remained significant after adjustments. Furthermore, AI-ECG AF probability was associated with I-Stroke across CHA2DS2-VASc risk levels (HR 2.43 for high, 2.33 for moderate, 1.98 for low CHA2DS2-VASc risk, all P<0.01). Conclusion: The AI-ECG AF algorithm predicts long-term I-Stroke and CV mortality and may refine CHA2DS2-VASc. These results highlight the utility of the AI enabled ECG when estimating I-Stroke or CV mortality risk.

Introduction: Cardiac Sarcoidosis (CS) is a non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) characterized by infiltration of non-caseating granulomas involving in the heart with highly variable clinical manifestations. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has shown significant promise in NICM, though little is known about its effectiveness in patients with CS. Hypothesis: We sought to determine if CRT improved cardiac remodeling and reduced hospitalizations in patients with CS. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with a clinical or histological diagnosis of CS who underwent CRT implantation at a Mayo Clinic site from 2000-2021. Baseline characteristics, echocardiographic parameters, heart failure hospitalization, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were assessed. Results: Our cohort was comprised of 55 patients with 61.8% male and a mean age of 58.7 ± 10.9 years. At baseline, 38 (69.1%) patients had isolated CS, while 17 (30.9%) had evidence of CS with extra-cardiac sarcoidosis. The overwhelming majority underwent CRT-D implantation (n=52, 94.5%) with 67.3% of implanted devices upgrades from prior pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator. At 6 months post-implantation there was no significant different in ejection fraction (34.8 ± 10.9 % vs. 37.7 ± 14.2 %, p = 0.237), left ventricular end systolic diameter (49.1 ± 9.9 mm vs. 45.7 ± 9.9 mm, p = 0.077) or left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (58.5 ± 10.2 mm vs. 57.5 ± 8.1 mm, p = 0.574). Within the first 6 months post-implantation, 5 (9.1%) patients sustained a heart failure hospitalization. At a mean follow up of 4.1 ± 3.7 years, 14 (25.5%) patients experienced a heart failure hospitalization, 11 (20.0%) underwent cardiac transplantation, 1 (1.8%) underwent LVAD implantation and 7 (12.7%) patients died. Conclusions: Our findings suggest a poor response to CRT in patients with CS with no significant evidence of reverse remodeling within 6 months and a substantial proportion of patients progressing to advanced heart failure therapies.

AbstractBackgroundData regarding ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular complex (PVC) ablation following mitral valve surgery (MVS) is limited. Catheter ablation (CA) can be challenging given perivalvular substrate in the setting of mitral annuloplasty or prosthetic valves.ObjectiveTo investigate the characteristics, safety, and outcomes of radiofrequency CA in patients with prior MVS and ventricular arrhythmias (VA).MethodsWe identified consecutive patients with prior MVS who underwent CA for VT or PVC between January 2013 and December 2018. We investigated the mechanism of arrhythmia, ablation approach, peri‐operative complications, and outcomes.ResultsIn our cohort, 31 patients (77% men, mean age 62.3 ± 10.8 years, left ventricular ejection fraction 39.2 ± 13.9%) with prior MVS underwent CA (16 VT; 15 PVC). Access to the left ventricle was via transseptal approach in 17 patients, and a retrograde aortic approach was used in 13 patients. A combined transseptal and retrograde aortic approach was used in one patient, and a percutaneous epicardial approach was combined with trans‐septal approach in one patient. Heterogenous scar regions were present in 94% of VT patients and scar‐related reentry was the dominant mechanism of VT. Forty‐seven percent of PVC patients had abnormal substrate at the site targeted for ablation. Clinical VA substrates involved the peri‐mitral area in six patients with VT and five patients with PVC ablation. No procedure‐related complications were reported. The overall recurrence‐free rate at 1‐year was 72.2%; 67% in the VT group and 78% in the PVC group. No arrhythmia‐related death was documented on long‐term follow‐up.ConclusionCA of VAs can be performed safely and effectively in patients with MVS.