Citations

135 Background: Black patients have a disproportionately high incidence and mortality from lung cancer. Despite the importance of clinical trials, there continue to be significant racial disparities in recruitment for pivotal registration studies. In 2016, the FDA recommended reporting racial enrollment with a minimum of 5 categories (White, Black, Asian, American Indian or Alaskan Native [AIAN] and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander [NHPI]). The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors also recommend reporting race and ethnicity. We evaluated race reporting and representation in registration trials for thoracic cancers. Methods: We reviewed the FDA website and identified all new drug licensing indications in thoracic malignancies (small cell lung cancer (SCLC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and mesothelioma) from 2006 to 2020. NSCLC was further classified as EGFR+, ALK+, other mutation and NOS (no driver mutation). Clinical trials cited on the licensing label for market authorization were recorded and the corresponding registration trial publication was identified. If race was unreported or underreported (defined as ≤3 groups) in the licensing study, then additional information was obtained from clinicaltrials.gov. We calculated the proportion of registration trials meeting FDA criteria and the proportion of each racial group in trials. Results: From 2006-2020, we identified 55 new licensing indications, involving 26 unique drugs; 5 approvals in SCLC, 49 approvals in NSCLC and 1 in mesothelioma. Prior to the FDA race reporting guidelines, 33% (6/18) of registration studies did not meet FDA requirements. This improved to 27% (10/37) after the guideline introduction. Overall 29,545 patients participated in thoracic registration trials; 66% White, 22% Asian, 2% Black, <1% AIAN, <1% NHPI, 1% other or multiple races and 9% unknown. Table shows race distribution by cancer subtype. Conclusions: Although improving, a substantial number of registrational clinical trials in thoracic oncology still do not report race per FDA guidance. In addition, Black individuals are disproportionately under-represented in registration trials. Greater efforts are needed for the inclusion of Black patients and other minorities in clinical trials.[Table: see text]

AbstractActivating receptor-tyrosine kinase rearranged during transfection (RET) mutations and fusions are potent drivers of oncogenesis. The recent FDA approvals of highly potent and selective RET inhibitors, selpercatinib and pralsetinib, has altered the therapeutic management of RET aberrant tumors. There is ample evidence of the role of RET signaling in certain cancers. RET aberrations as fusions or mutations occur in multiple cancers, however, there is considerable phenotypic diversity. There is emerging data on the lack of responsiveness of immunotherapy in RET-altered cancers. Herein, we review the registrational data from the selective RET-inhibitor trials, and comprehensively explore RET alterations in pan-cancer adult malignancies and their co-alterations. These co-occuring alterations may define the future of RET inhibition from specific selective targeting to customized combination therapies as data are rapidly emerging on both on-target and off-target acquired resistance mechanisms. Fascinatingly, oncogenic RET fusions have been reported to mediate resistance to EGFR inhibition and KRASG12C inhibition.

Introduction Salivary gland neoplasms (SGNs) respond poorly to the traditional chemotherapy agents limiting the availability of systemic treatment options in the metastatic setting. The recent identification of actionable molecular targets in SGNs has led to the evaluation of targeted therapies in non-approved advanced SGNs. Case Report We present the case of an elderly male with HER-2 Neu overexpressing metastatic mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) who demonstrated a prompt and sustained disease response to targeted therapies directed against HER-2 Neu with long survival interrupted by hepatoxicity to Trastuzumab emtansine (TDM-1) treatment. Management and Outcome: The patient was started on Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab on a clinical trial and resulted in an objective improvement sustained over 3 years. Following the disease progression, TDM-1 was started with a response until the patient developed severe hepatotoxicity as an adverse effect of TDM-1 therapy resulting in its discontinuation. Close follow-up post-treatment-discontinuation demonstrated continued clinical improvement until 6 months, when the patient developed brain metastasis. He passed away a few months later in hospice care. Discussion The metastatic MEC in our patient overexpressed HER-2 Neu. Owing to Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab response, Trastuzumab emtansine (TDM-1) was initiated on a compassionate basis which further extended the survival but had to be terminated owing to adverse effects. Given the paucity of data on targeted therapies in the treatment of metastatic SGNs and the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of TDM-1 therapy among the elderly, further studies are warranted to answer these important questions and to identify eligible patients for this novel treatment option.

Abstract Background: BRAF and MEK inhibitors are currently FDA approved for melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and anaplastic thyroid cancer. The lack of clinical benefit with BRAF inhibition in BRAF V600+ colorectal cancer (CRC) has prevented its tissue-agnostic drug development. However, updated results from Vemurafenib-Basket study (Cancer Discov. 2020 May;10(5):657-663 ) and the NCI-match trial ( J Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov 20;38(33):3895-3904) reveal that BRAF pathway inhibition is active in &gt; 20 unique cancer types. Objective: We aimed to describe the characteristics of BRAF V600 and study real-world outcomes using a clinico-genomic analysis using the AACR Genie database and the current medical literature. Methods: We reviewed the AACR GENIE database for the prevalence of BRAF V600 mutations across tumor types. We conducted a literature search (using PubMed from 2012-2019) for case reports of clinical response and outcomes in patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive non-melanoma cancers who received BRAF inhibitor therapy. Results: Among 96,324 samples, BRAF V600 mutations were seen in 43 different tumor types across 2,963 samples (3.07 %) in the AACR GENIE database. BRAF V600 was most commonly present in thyroid cancer (40.9%), parathyroid cancer (31.8%), melanoma (26.1%), histiocytosis (25.7%), and head and neck NOS (14.3%). Literature review revealed total of 178 cases across 69 tumor types. The most common cases included Erdheim-Chester disease (n = 30, 16.9%), papillary thyroid carcinoma (n=16, 8.9%), anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (n = 13, 7.3%), and hairy cell leukemia (n = 13, 7.3%). Furthermore, dabrafenib (BRAF), dabrafenib/trametinib (BRAF+MEK), trametinib(MEK), vemurafenib (BRAF), vemurafenib/trametinib (BRAF+MEK), vemurafenib/cobimetinib (BRAF+MEK) were used in 34% (n =56), 16% (n = 27), 4% (n = 6), 44% (n = 72), 1% (n = 1), 2% (n =3), respectively. Overall, median PFS was 6.5 months, and median OS was 28.5 months with a median duration of response (DOR) of 8 months. Conclusion: BRAF V600 mutations are prevalent across multiple non-melanoma cancers, lead to oncogene addiction and are clinically actionable in a broad range of non-melanoma cancers. Continued drug development is warranted beyond the current BRAF+/- MEK approved cancers. Citation Format: Jacob J. Adashek, Aakash P. Desai, Arjun K. Menta, Jason Roszik, Vivek Subbiah. Pan-cancer efficacy of BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors in BRAF V600-mutant multiple non-melanoma cancers: A clinico-genomic study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1479.

Abstract Background: Activating receptor-tyrosine kinase rearranged during transfection (RET) mutations and fusions have been recognized as potent drivers of oncogenesis in multiple malignancies. Recently, highly potent and selective RET inhibitors, selpercatinib and pralsetinib have been FDA approved for RET fusion+ NSCLC and selpercatinib for RET+ thyroid cancers. Here we present a comprehensive analysis of RET alterations in pan-cancer adult malignancies. Patients and methods: 96,324 samples from 89,754 patients available from AACR Project Genie database version 8 were analyzed for the prevalence of RET fusions, mutations, and copy number alterations in diverse cancer types accessed July 21, 2020. The races of the samples within the cohort were 69,962 (72.6%) white, 5,388 (5.6%) Black, 4,909 (5.1%) Asian, 163 (0.17%) Native American, 48 (0.05%) Pacific Islander, and 15,854 (16.5%) were unknown. Results: There were 56,382 (58.5%) samples from primary tumors, 24,204 (25.1%) samples from unspecified metastasis sites, 4,798 (5.0%) from distant organ metastasis, 1,379 (1.4%) from lymph node metastasis, 1,279 (1.3%) from local recurrence, and 8,282 (8.6%) unknown. In 96,324 tumor samples there were 2,706 (2.81%) RET alterations. This included 223 (0.23%) fusions, 1,689 RET mutations found (1.75%) in 21 tumor histologies, and 794 (0.82%) RET amplifications identified; where the most abundant tissues harboring RET fusions were NSCLC (n = 121), papillary thyroid cancer (n = 53), breast cancer (n = 8) and colorectal cancer (n = 7) and the most abundant tissues harboring RET missense mutations were NSCLC (n = 355), colorectal cancer (n = 292), melanoma (n = 236), and thyroid cancer (n = 127). NSCLC samples with RET fusions had significantly co-altered KRAS, SETD2, PVRL4, EZH1, and RRAGC. Conclusions: RET fusions represent extremely rate events in multiple cancers. RET missense mutations occur in 2% of malignancies. Most RET missense variants are described as variants of unknown significance, limiting the impact of precision oncology for the majority of patients with RET alterations. Further functional characterization of RET variants is warranted because RET is highly targetable with therapeutics. Citation Format: Jacob J. Adashek, Alexander Andreev-Drakhlin, Jason Roszik, Aakash P. Desai, Vivek Subbiah. The landscape of 2,706 RET alterations from 89,754 adult patients with cancer: Clinical implications [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1221.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to assess the impact of an interdisciplinary remote patient monitoring (RPM) program on clinical outcomes and acute care utilization in cancer patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analysis following a prospective observational study performed at Mayo Clinic Cancer Center. Adult patients receiving cancer-directed therapy or in recent remission on active surveillance with polymerase chain reaction–confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection between March 18 and July 31, 2020, were included. RPM was composed of in-home technology to assess symptoms and physiologic data with centralized nursing and physician oversight. RESULTS: During the study timeframe, 224 patients with cancer were diagnosed with COVID-19. Of the 187 patients (83%) initially managed in the outpatient setting, those who did not receive RPM were significantly more likely to experience hospitalization than those receiving RPM. Following balancing of patient characteristics by inverse propensity score weighting, rates of hospitalization for RPM and non-RPM patients were 2.8% and 13%, respectively, implying that the use of RPM was associated with a 78% relative risk reduction in hospital admission rate (95% CI, 54 to 102; P = .002). Furthermore, when hospitalized, these patients experienced a shorter length of stay and fewer prolonged hospitalizations, intensive care unit admissions, and deaths, although these trends did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The use of RPM and a centralized virtual care team was associated with a reduction in hospital admission rate and lower overall acute care resource utilization among cancer patients with COVID-19.