Borah, Bijan J.

Background: Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) may reduce preservation injury in donation-after-circulatory-death (DCD) liver transplantation, but its association with patient-centered recovery and longer-term graft survival remains uncertain. Study Design: We retrospectively analyzed 306 consecutive adult DCD liver transplant recipients at a single center from January 2019 through December 2022, comparing NMP (n=95) with static cold storage (SCS; n=211). The primary endpoint was days alive and out of hospital at 365 days (DAOH365). Quasi-Poisson regression evaluated factors associated with DAOH365, and Cox regression evaluated graft survival. Propensity-matched and calendar-year sensitivity analyses assessed measured confounding. Results: Median DAOH365 was 357.0 (352.0, 360.0) days with NMP versus 353.0 (336.0, 359.0) with SCS (p<0.001), but preservation strategy was not independently associated with DAOH365 (adjusted rate ratio 1.02; p=0.331). NMP recipients had less early allograft dysfunction (35.8% vs 59.7%; p<0.001), ischemic cholangiopathy (4.2% vs 23.7%; p<0.001), and retransplantation within 2 years (0.0% vs 6.6%; p=0.007). Two-year patient survival did not differ significantly. NMP was associated with improved twoF-year graft survival (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.23–6.87; p=0.015), an association maintained in propensity-matched and calendar-year sensitivity analyses. Adjusted total 1-year costs did not differ (p=0.512). Conclusions: In this single-center DCD cohort, NMP was associated with superior 2-year graft survival but not independently with DAOH365. These hypothesis-generating findings support multicenter prospective evaluation of NMP using both graft survival and patient-centered recovery endpoints.

Objective: To evaluate the relationship between race and social determinants of health and receipt of hysterectomy versus uterine-preserving fibroid treatment. Methods: A retrospective cohort study using deidentified claims and longitudinal health data from OptumLabs ® Data Warehouse. Patients aged 15–55 years with newly diagnosed fibroids between 2010 and 2023 were included. Menopausal individuals and those with gynecological cancer were excluded. The primary outcome was hysterectomy by any route versus uterine-preserving fibroid surgery within 180 days of fibroid diagnosis. We used logistic regression to assess associations between socioeconomic factors and receipt of hysterectomy after adjusting for pertinent covariates. Results: A total of 73,479 individuals were included; 50,645 received hysterectomy, 22,834 received a uterine-preserving treatment. Race, income, education level, and rurality were independently associated with the probability of hysterectomy. Odds of hysterectomy were lower for all people of color compared with White individuals (Asian odds ratio [OR] 0.61 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56–0.66], Black OR: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.67–0.73], and Hispanic OR: 0.90 [95% CI: 0.86–0.95]). Individuals with household income <$40,000, less than high school education, and rural address were more likely to undergo hysterectomy compared with those with income >$124,999 (OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.09–1.21), bachelor’s degree or higher (OR: 2.55, 95% CI: 1.78–3.65), and metropolitan address (OR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.44–2.01). All associations were significant at p < 0.05. Conclusion: People with fewer socioeconomic advantages, such as lower household income, lower educational attainment, and rural address were more likely to receive hysterectomy rather than uterine-preserving fibroid treatment. After controlling for age, surgery year, and socioeconomic factors, people of color were less likely to receive hysterectomy rather than uterine-preserving fibroid treatment.

This economic evaluation assesses the costs, reimbursements, and estimated net operating margin of single- and 2-stage strategies for managing bile duct stone clearance to compare the financial outcomes of both strategies.

Background: The economic burden associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is not well understood, especially since the approval of antifibrotic medications to treat IPF in 2014. Objective: This study assessed healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs for patients with and without IPF among insured patients in the United States. Methods: This retrospective study used claims data from the Optum Research Database from 01 January 2016 through 31 December 2023. The IPF cohort included patients with at least 2 claims for IPF within 365 days. A comparator cohort was exact matched to the IPF cohort in a 4:1 ratio on demographic characteristics. Follow-up all-cause and respiratory-related HCRU and costs were collected. Outcomes were presented as weighted per-patient per-month (wPPPM) to account for variable follow-up. Descriptive results were reported by cohort, overall, and stratified by insurance type. All-cause and respiratory-related wPPPM costs were modeled using generalized linear models and time to all-cause and respiratory-related inpatient visits were modeled using Cox proportional hazards regression models, adjusted for baseline comorbidities. Results: A total of 7582 patients were included in the IPF cohort; 10.4% were commercially insured and 89.6% insured by Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MAPD) plans. The comparator cohort included 30 328 demographically matched controls. Overall, mean all-cause wPPPM counts of HCRU during follow-up were significantly higher in the IPF cohort than the comparator cohort for all categories (all P < .001). Similarly, mean (SD) follow-up all-cause wPPPM total healthcare costs were higher for the IPF cohort than the comparator cohort ($4667 [$8252] vs $1196 [$2114], P < .001). After adjustment, the cost ratio for all-cause total healthcare costs between the IPF and comparator cohorts was 3.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.10-3.64), and patients in the IPF cohort were 2.1 times (95% CI, 1.97-2.15) more likely to be hospitalized for all causes than the comparator cohort. For both HCRU and costs, similar patterns were observed in both the commercial and MAPD populations. Conclusion: Patients with IPF incurred substantially higher HCRU and costs than the demographically matched comparator cohort. Study results suggest the need for treatment options to improve management of IPF and reduce costly HCRU.

Background SGLT2 (sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2) inhibitors reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in type 2 diabetes. However, no direct comparison of individual SGLT2 inhibitor drugs has been conducted, particularly among adults with moderate cardiovascular risk who comprise most people with type 2 diabetes. Methods We used data for commercial, Medicare Advantage, and Medicare fee‐for‐service beneficiaries to emulate a target trial of adults (≥21 years) with type 2 diabetes and moderate cardiovascular risk who started canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, or empagliflozin between 2015 and 2020. We estimated propensity scores using the super learner ensemble method and incorporated them as inverse probability of treatment weights into Cox models, estimating risk of MACE, expanded MACE, and hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic crises through December 31, 2022. Results The weighted cohort, balanced on all baseline covariates, included 137 232 patients (mean age 65.7 years [SD, 8.1], 75.3% non‐Hispanic White, 57.0% male, 81.9% on metformin, 11.4% on glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists) starting canagliflozin (N=42 877), dapagliflozin (N=17 871), or empagliflozin (N=7648). The risk of MACE was lower among patients starting empagliflozin versus canagliflozin (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.87–0.97]), driven by reduced risk of all‐cause mortality (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.80–0.94]). There was no difference in MACE between empagliflozin versus dapagliflozin or dapagliflozin versus canagliflozin therapy. There was no difference in remaining outcomes between the three drugs. Conclusions The 3 most used SGLT2 inhibitor medications demonstrate similar effectiveness on cardiovascular outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk, with differences between these drugs small in magnitude. Clinicians and health systems should prioritize enhancing access to these cardioprotective therapies.

Objective: The Complete Cochlear Implant Care (CCIC) model is a highly coordinated care delivery model reducing and condensing in-person visits for cochlear implant (CI) patients, leveraging telehealth and remote programming. Clinical, quality-of-life, implementation, patient experience, and financial outcomes of the clinical trial are reported. Study design: Prospective, nonrandomized, 2-arm clinical trial Setting: Tertiary referral CI center Patients: Adult CI candidates Interventions: Cochlear implantation Main outcome measures: Speech perception, quality of life, implementation, patient experience, and financial outcomes for both CCIC and traditional care delivery models. Results: Patients participating in the traditional and CCIC delivery models demonstrated 12-month postoperative speech perception scores comparable to nationally reported outcomes (CNC 61% and 72% and AzBio in quiet 75% and 87% for traditional and CCIC cohorts, respectively). Quality-of-life evaluation using the CIQOL-10 demonstrated similar 12-month postoperative scores between groups (52 and 54 for traditional and CCIC cohorts, respectively). The CI Patient Experience Survey demonstrated high satisfaction outcomes in ease of communication, preparedness for surgery, and overall care in both cohorts. Implementation analysis of the CCIC model revealed perceived benefits from staff and clinicians; however, support for expansion of the program was contingent upon the availability of app-based or web-based remote programming technology. Finally, financial analysis revealed decreased out-of-pocket costs for CCIC patients. Conclusion: The CCIC model has the potential to dramatically streamline hearing health care delivery and reduce out-of-pocket costs for CI recipients. Clinical outcomes between cohorts were comparable in this feasibility study; however, a sufficiently powered trial is required to definitively comment on clinical outcomes with the new care delivery model.