Citations

ABSTRACTOBJECTIVE:To describe the quality of life (QOL) over time for adults with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas and to examine the relationship between QOL and outcome data collected in three prospective cooperative group clinical trials.METHODS:The QOL study was a companion protocol for three Phase II high-grade glioma protocols. Five self-administered forms were completed by patients to assess QOL at study entry, 2 months, and 4 months after enrollment.RESULTS:QOL data were available for baseline, first, and second subsequent follow-up evaluations for 89%, 71%, and 69% of patients, respectively. A significant proportion of patients (47.1%) experienced impaired QOL (QOL ≤ 50) in at least one measure at subsequent evaluations, whereas most patients (88%) with impaired QOL at baseline continued to have impaired QOL at subsequent evaluations. On multivariable analyses, baseline QOL measures were predictive of QOL at the time of follow-up. In addition, patients who underwent a gross total resection were much less likely to have impaired QOL (P = 0.006), were less likely to experience worsening depression (P = 0.0008), and were more likely to have improved QOL (P = 0.003) at their first follow-up evaluation. Changes in QOL measures over time were not found to be associated with survival in multivariable analyses that adjusted for known prognostic variables; variables that were independently associated with improved survival were better performance status (P < 0.001), younger age (P < 0.001), and greater extent of resection (P < 0.001).CONCLUSION:Baseline QOL was predictive of QOL over time. Gross total resection was associated with longer survival and improved QOL over time for patients with high-grade gliomas.

AbstractWhile pancreaticoduodenectomy is today performed with an operative mortality of <5%, the incidence of significant operative morbidity remains at least 25%. Albeit rarely, completion pancreatectomy during the early postoperative period may be required to manage uncontrolled pancreatic anastomotic leaks. From 1964 to 1988, pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed on 479 patients at our institution, 178 (37%) of whom required re‐operation in the early postoperative period. Of these, 11 (6%) patients underwent completion pancreatectomy at a mean interval of 18 days following Whipple resection. The indications prompting re‐operation included a suspected pancreatic leak (n=8), intra‐abdominal hemorrhage (n=2), and pancreaticocutaneous fistula (n=1). Operative findings necessitating completion pancreatectomy included pancreatic anastomotic dehiscence with severe surrounding inflammation/necrosis prohibiting reanastomosis or repair (n=10) and necrotizing pancreatitis with uncontrolled hemorrhage (1). Seven (64%) of these 11 patients died postoperatively of sepsis and multiple organ failure. The mean hospital stay in the 4 surviving patients was 46 days (range, 26 to 53 days). These 4 patients survived for a mean period of 24 months following hospital dismissal.

AbstractSurgical resection continues to be the primary curative modality for patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum. However, local tumor recurrence in the pelvis and/or distant metastasis may occur in spite of complete excision of grossly visible malignant disease. Surgical and pathologic staging can identify a subset of surgically treated rectal cancer patients at high risk for tumor relapse and death. Irradiation and chemotherapy have been used as adjuvant therapy in conjunction with surgery as single modalities and in combination for patients with high risk rectal cancer. Evidence from controlled clinical trials indicates a significant decrease in local tumor recurrence, and a significant improvement in disease‐free and overall survival with the use of combined postoperative irradiation and chemotherapy in this setting. A current national clinical trial in the United States of America is studying whether irradiation can be combined with new chemotherapy regimens which have shown significant therapeutic benefit as surgical adjuvant therapy for patients with high risk colon cancer (5FU + levamisole) and for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (5FU + leucovorin) to further improve the efficacy of surgical adjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum.

AbstractUseful palliation can often be achieved when standard treatment approaches of external beam irradiation and chemotherapy with or without resection are used for locally advanced primary rectal malignancies. Local control and long‐term survival are achieved in only 10% to 50% of patients, however, due to the limited irradiation tolerance of surrounding organs and tissues. Encouraging trends exist in separate intra‐operative irradiation analyses from Massachusetts General Hospital and Mayo Clinic with regard to improvement in local control and possibly survival of locally advanced rectal lesions, warranting continued evaluation of such approaches. Disease control within the intra‐operative and external irradiation field is decreased, however, when the surgeon is unable to accomplish gross total resection. Therefore it seems reasonable to consistently add 5‐Fluorouracil with or without Leucovorin during external irradiation and to evaluate the use of dose modifiers, such as sensitizers or hyperthermia, in conjunction with intra‐operative irradiation. Since high systemic failure rates exist with both locally advanced primary and recurrent lesions, more effective chemotherapy needs to be evaluated during external irradiation as well as after completion of such. In view of survival advantages with 5‐Fluorouracil plus Leucovorin versus 5‐Fluorouracil alone for metastatic disease, this regimen is currently being employed. Even with locally recurrent lesions, the aggressive multimodality approaches including intra‐operative irradiation have resulted in improved local control, and long‐term survival rates of 20% to 25% versus an expected 5% with conventional techniques in historical series.

AbstractRelapses after “curative resection” of rectal cancer may be localized and thus amenable to surgical treatment. The risk of relapse may be higher than previously believed depending on adequacy and length of follow‐up, the diagnostic modalities used, and the number of autopsies performed. Technical refinements such as a distal margin >2 cm, radical pelvic lymphadenectomy, and high ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery at the aorta do not appear to diminish the risk of recurrence. A wider lateral margin and a more complete excision of the mesorectum may be beneficial, but this is yet unproven. Surgery for isolated, locally recurrent lesions should be limited to carefully selected patients and performed in tertiary centers using a team approach. Whether such radical “salvage” procedures are justifiable merits further careful evaluation.