Citations

A fracture healing monitoring system with external fixators was analysed using the finite element method. Pin displacement and side bar strain under axial and side loading were evaluated at various stages of simulated fracture healing. In general, a recovery of rigidity at the fracture site of up of 25 percent of intact bone could be sensitively predicted. Effects of cross-sectional distribution and length of callus at the fracture site on pin displacement and side bar strain were studied. Alterations of fixation configuration, such as component failure during the healing process, were found to have relatively little effect on pin displacement but a rather larger effect on side bar strain. In general, the assessment of fracture healing by monitoring the deformation of external fixation devices is a useful idea. However, in practice, great care must be taken to fully understand the implication of the monitoring system before drawing conclusions on such measurements.

Increasing application of expensive medical technologies, including joint replacement, is of concern in the current economic climate. Successful upper limb joint replacements (ULJRs) are being performed, but few detailed data about their utilization are available. To explore the resource implications of such surgery, the utilization of total shoulder replacement (TSR), total elbow replacement (TER) and total wrist replacement (TWR) were examined from the time these procedures first became available at the Mayo Clinic up to 1990. The age- and sex-adjusted utilization rate for TSR among Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents was 1.8 per 100000 person-years (p-y), 0.8 per 100000 p-y for TER and 1.1 per 100000 p-y for TWR. Overall utilization of primary ULJR among Olmsted County residents during the 19-year study period was 3.8 per 100000 p-y. The commonest indication for TSR was osteoarthritis (46 per cent) and for TER and TWR was rheumatoid arthritis (50 and 81 per cent respectively). There was no consistent trend in the utilization of these procedures among Olmsted County residents, but the number of referral patients receiving a ULJR at the Mayo Clinic increased steadily during the study period. The Mayo Clinic experience suggests an increasing demand for ULJR, particularly TSR and TER. With continued advances in, and diffusion of, the technology this demand may increase further.

Purpose We conducted a phase III randomized study of two adjuvant treatment schedules of doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) in early-stage breast cancer to determine if administration of sequential single agents (A → C) results in superior disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) versus the same total dose given in combination (AC). Patients and Methods High-risk node-negative or low-risk node-positive breast cancer patients received AC given: (arm I) concurrently (AC) doxorubicin 54 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 1.2 g/m2 intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks for six cycles; or (arm II) in sequence (A → C) doxorubicin 40.5 mg/m2 IV days 1 and 2 every 3 weeks for four cyles followed by cyclophosphamide 2.4 gm/m2 IV every 2 weeks for three cycles. Total dose and duration were identical, but the intensity of each drug was increased on A → C. Both arms included granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support and prophylactic antibiotics. All but premenopausal women with receptor negative tumors received tamoxifen after chemotherapy. Results Between 1994 and 1997, 3,176 patients were randomly assigned. Arms were well balanced; 48% of eligible patients were node-negative and 48% were estrogen receptor–positive. No significant differences in OS or DFS were observed; 5-year estimates of OS (95% CI) were 88% (87% to 90%) on AC and 89% (87% to 91%) on A → C. Grade 4 hematologic toxicity was greater on A → C, but nonhematological grade 4 was similar. Conclusion The overall result does not support superiority of dose-intense sequenced single agents. The greater toxicity of higher doses of single agents does not support their sequential use.