Citations

Abstract Background Delirium is a common complication of older people in hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities. Objective To assess the worldwide use of validated delirium assessment tools and the presence of delirium management protocols. Design Secondary analysis of a worldwide one-day point prevalence study on World Delirium Awareness Day, 15 March 2023. Setting Cross-sectional online survey including hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities. Methods Participating clinicians reported data on delirium, the presence of protocols, delirium assessments, delirium-awareness interventions, non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions, and ward/unit-specific barriers. Results Data from 44 countries, 1664 wards/units and 36 048 patients were analysed. Validated delirium assessments were used in 66.7% (n = 1110) of wards/units, 18.6% (n = 310) used personal judgement or no assessment, and 10% (n = 166) used other assessment methods. A delirium management protocol was reported in 66.8% (n = 1094) of wards/units. The presence of protocols for delirium management varied across continents, ranging from 21.6% (on 21/97 wards/units) in Africa to 90.4% (235/260) in Australia, similar to the use of validated delirium assessments with 29.6% (29/98) in Africa to 93.5% (116/124) in North America. Wards/units with a delirium management protocol [n = 1094/1664, 66.8%] were more likely to use a validated delirium test than those without a protocol [odds ratio 6.97 (95% confidence interval 5.289–9.185)]. The presence of a delirium protocol increased the chances for valid delirium assessment and, likely, evidence-based interventions. Conclusion Wards/units that reported the presence of delirium management protocols had a higher probability of using validated delirium assessments tools to assess for delirium.

Background: Acute cardiac injury (ACI) after COVID-19 has been linked with unfavorable clinical outcomes, but data on the clinical impact of elevated cardiac troponin on discharge during follow-up are scarce. Our objective is to elucidate the clinical outcome of patients with elevated troponin on discharge after surviving a COVID-19 hospitalization. Methods: We conducted an analysis in the prospective registry HOPE-2 (NCT04778020). Only patients discharged alive were selected for analysis, and all-cause death on follow-up was considered as the primary endpoint. As a secondary endpoint, we established any long-term COVID-19 symptoms. HOPE-2 stopped enrolling patients on 31 December 2021, with 9299 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, of which 1805 were deceased during the acute phase. Finally, 2382 patients alive on discharge underwent propensity score matching by relevant baseline variables in a 1:3 fashion, from 56 centers in 8 countries. Results: Patients with elevated troponin experienced significantly higher all-cause death during follow-up (log-rank = 27.23, p < 0.001), and had a higher chance of experiencing long-term COVID-19 cardiovascular symptoms. Specifically, fatigue and dyspnea (57.7% and 62.8%, with p-values of 0.009 and <0.001, respectively) are among the most common. Conclusions: After surviving the acute phase, patients with elevated troponin on discharge present increased mortality and long-term COVID-19 symptoms over time, which is clinically relevant in follow-up visits.

Abstract Background Numerous studies demonstrate associations between serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) and a variety of common disorders, including musculoskeletal, metabolic, cardiovascular, malignant, autoimmune, and infectious diseases. Although a causal link between serum 25(OH)D concentrations and many disorders has not been clearly established, these associations have led to widespread supplementation with vitamin D and increased laboratory testing for 25(OH)D in the general population. The benefit-risk ratio of this increase in vitamin D use is not clear, and the optimal vitamin D intake and the role of testing for 25(OH)D for disease prevention remain uncertain. Objective To develop clinical guidelines for the use of vitamin D (cholecalciferol [vitamin D3] or ergocalciferol [vitamin D2]) to lower the risk of disease in individuals without established indications for vitamin D treatment or 25(OH)D testing. Methods A multidisciplinary panel of clinical experts, along with experts in guideline methodology and systematic literature review, identified and prioritized 14 clinically relevant questions related to the use of vitamin D and 25(OH)D testing to lower the risk of disease. The panel prioritized randomized placebo-controlled trials in general populations (without an established indication for vitamin D treatment or 25[OH]D testing), evaluating the effects of empiric vitamin D administration throughout the lifespan, as well as in select conditions (pregnancy and prediabetes). The panel defined “empiric supplementation” as vitamin D intake that (a) exceeds the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI) and (b) is implemented without testing for 25(OH)D. Systematic reviews queried electronic databases for publications related to these 14 clinical questions. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence and guide recommendations. The approach incorporated perspectives from a patient representative and considered patient values, costs and resources required, acceptability and feasibility, and impact on health equity of the proposed recommendations. The process to develop this clinical guideline did not use a risk assessment framework and was not designed to replace current DRI for vitamin D. Results The panel suggests empiric vitamin D supplementation for children and adolescents aged 1 to 18 years to prevent nutritional rickets and because of its potential to lower the risk of respiratory tract infections; for those aged 75 years and older because of its potential to lower the risk of mortality; for those who are pregnant because of its potential to lower the risk of preeclampsia, intra-uterine mortality, preterm birth, small-for-gestational-age birth, and neonatal mortality; and for those with high-risk prediabetes because of its potential to reduce progression to diabetes. Because the vitamin D doses in the included clinical trials varied considerably and many trial participants were allowed to continue their own vitamin D–containing supplements, the optimal doses for empiric vitamin D supplementation remain unclear for the populations considered. For nonpregnant people older than 50 years for whom vitamin D is indicated, the panel suggests supplementation via daily administration of vitamin D, rather than intermittent use of high doses. The panel suggests against empiric vitamin D supplementation above the current DRI to lower the risk of disease in healthy adults younger than 75 years. No clinical trial evidence was found to support routine screening for 25(OH)D in the general population, nor in those with obesity or dark complexion, and there was no clear evidence defining the optimal target level of 25(OH)D required for disease prevention in the populations considered; thus, the panel suggests against routine 25(OH)D testing in all populations considered. The panel judged that, in most situations, empiric vitamin D supplementation is inexpensive, feasible, acceptable to both healthy individuals and health care professionals, and has no negative effect on health equity. Conclusion The panel suggests empiric vitamin D for those aged 1 to 18 years and adults over 75 years of age, those who are pregnant, and those with high-risk prediabetes. Due to the scarcity of natural food sources rich in vitamin D, empiric supplementation can be achieved through a combination of fortified foods and supplements that contain vitamin D. Based on the absence of supportive clinical trial evidence, the panel suggests against routine 25(OH)D testing in the absence of established indications. These recommendations are not meant to replace the current DRIs for vitamin D, nor do they apply to people with established indications for vitamin D treatment or 25(OH)D testing. Further research is needed to determine optimal 25(OH)D levels for specific health benefits.

Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is an idiopathic form of pregnancy-induced heart failure associated with preeclampsia. Circulating factors in late pregnancy are thought to contribute to both diseases, suggesting a common underlying pathophysiological process. However, what drives this process remains unclear. Using serum proteomics, we identified the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), a marker of cellular senescence associated with biological aging, as the most highly up-regulated pathway in young women with PPCM or preeclampsia. Placentas from women with preeclampsia displayed multiple markers of amplified senescence and tissue aging, as well as overall increased gene expression of 28 circulating proteins that contributed to SASP pathway enrichment in serum samples from patients with preeclampsia or PPCM. The most highly expressed placental SASP factor, activin A, was associated with cardiac dysfunction or heart failure severity in women with preeclampsia or PPCM. In a murine model of PPCM induced by cardiomyocyte-specific deletion of the gene encoding peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor γ coactivator-1α, inhibiting activin A signaling in the early postpartum period with a monoclonal antibody to the activin type II receptor improved heart function. In addition, attenuating placental senescence with the senolytic compound fisetin in late pregnancy improved cardiac function in these animals. These findings link senescence biology to cardiac dysfunction in pregnancy and help to elucidate the pathogenesis underlying cardiovascular diseases of pregnancy.

Moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a diagnosis that describes diverse patients with heterogeneity of primary injuries. Defined by a Glasgow Coma Scale between 9 and 12, this category includes patients who may neurologically worsen and require increasing intensive care resources and/or emergency neurosurgery. Despite the unique characteristics of these patients, there have not been specific guidelines published before this effort to support decision-making in these patients. A Delphi consensus group from the Latin American Brain Injury Consortium was established to generate recommendations related to the definition and categorization of moderate TBI. Before an in-person meeting, a systematic review of the literature was performed identifying evidence relevant to planned topics. Blinded voting assessed support for each recommendation. A priori the threshold for consensus was set at 80% agreement. Nine PICOT questions were generated by the panel, including definition, categorization, grouping, and diagnosis of moderate TBI. Here, we report the results of our work including relevant consensus statements and discussion for each question. Moderate TBI is an entity for which there is little published evidence available supporting definition, diagnosis, and management. Recommendations based on experts' opinion were informed by available evidence and aim to refine the definition and categorization of moderate TBI. Further studies evaluating the impact of these recommendations will be required.

Abstract Background Although CAR T-cell therapy has achieved remarkable response in patients (pts) with B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), 20-30% of pts still have primary refractory disease (PD1), and another 30-40% relapse (PD2). We and others have shown that monocytes can modulate T-cell functions and impact clinical response to chemoimmunotherapy in NHL. Given that monocytes nadir and recovery kinetics differ from lymphocytes post lymphodepletion chemotherapy, we hypothesize that monocyte phenotype at peak CAR-T expansion and in the early month post CAR-T can modulate immune responses. Methods scRNAseq were performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells of NHL pts prior to lymphodepletion chemotherapy (pre), at peak CAR-T expansion (peak), and one month following CAR-T (M1). Seurat v4.3.0 was used for unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis. Lugano criteria was used to determine clinical responses which were categorized as CR (complete remission), PD1, or PD2. Results We analyzed 129,981 monocytes from 77 samples of 32 pts (16 CR, 4 PD1, 12 PD2) and 5 healthy controls. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis identified 13 monocyte clusters: 4 classical monocyte (CM) clusters with transcriptome profiles for enriched signaling in IL-6, TGFβ, EMT, and p53; 2 intermediate monocyte (IM) clusters enriched for IL-1 or CD38 signaling; 2 non-classical monocytes (NM), one with increased CD36 expression; 3 monocytic MDSC clusters with enrichment of TGFβ, SIRPα, and HIF1α signaling; and 2 lymphoma-associated monocytes, expressing CD163 or CD169. At Pre and Peak, the distribution of the monocyte clusters was similar in pts with CR, PD2, or PD1, with only a slight decrease in the percent of NM in the PD2 group at Pre and slight increase of CD36 NM in PD1 at Peak. Compared to Pre, all pts had increased percent of CD36 NM and IL-1 IM at Peak. Interestingly, while the distribution of monocyte clusters was similar at Pre and Peak across clinical responses, GSEA showed that monocytes in CR pts, compared to PD1 and PD2, had gene expression enrichment of MYC target V2 pathway at Pre and TGFβ pathway at Peak. At M1, pts in PD1 had increased percent of p53 and TGFβ CM and decreased percent of NM. In contrast, pts with CR had decreased percent of IL-6 CM, p53 CM, TGFβ CM, IL-1 IM and increased percent of NM. Notably, as pts with CR and PD2 may appear similar clinically at M1, pts with PD2, compared to CR, have increased IL-6 CM, IL-1 IM, and decreased NM. In addition, GSEA showed that PD2 pts had increased IFNα response. Our results demonstrate that monocyte phenotype differences at Pre and Peak could be associated with CAR-T clinical response, and that persistent inflammatory monocyte signaling at M1 in pts with clinical response is associated with relapse. These data suggest a role for development of monocyte biomarkers to predict response and therapeutic targeting. Citation Format: Andre de Menezes Silva Corraes, Panwen Wang, Radhika Bansal, Henan Zhang, Zuoyi Shao, Kevin Regan, Eider Moreno Cortes, Arushi Khurana, Nora Bennani, Yucai Wang, Paul Hampel, Jonas Paludo, Patrick Johnston, Hemant Murthy, Madiha Iqbal, Stephen Ansell, Javier Munoz, Allison Rosenthal, Mohamed Kharfan-Dabaja, Januario Castro, Saad Kenderian, Haidong Dong, Ying Li, Yi Lin. Monocyte transcriptome profiles associated with clinical response in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma receiving CD19-directed CAR-T therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4001.

Abstract Background: Although CAR T-cell therapy has achieved remarkable response rates in adult patients (pts) with relapsed and refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), 20-30% of pts still have primary refractory disease, and 30-40% of pts relapse, often within 6 months of therapy. Given that durable clinical response can be achieved without CAR T cell persistence, we hypothesized that durable remission is correlated with the expansion of tumor-reactive T-cell receptor (TCR) clones following CAR T-cell infusion. To assess this, we examined the TCR repertoire of adult pts with B-NHL who received CD19 CAR T-cell (axi-cel) therapy to identify correlates of clinical response. Methods: Single-cell (sc) RNA sequencing (seq) and scTCR-seq were performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells from B-NHL pts before lymphodepletion chemotherapy (pre), at peak CAR-T expansion (peak), and one month following CAR-T (M1). scRNAseq and scTCR-seq data were processed using CellRanger v7.0.1, which were then analyzed using Immunarch (v0.9.0) for TCR clonality and sample diversity. Diversity was assessed using the Gini coefficient to indicate clone size inequality (0 = maximum diversity). TCR diversity and phenotype of expanded and emerged TCR clones post CAR-T were compared across clinical response categories: CR (complete remission for at least 6 months), PD1 (primary refractory), and PD2 (relapsed after partial or complete response). Results: We analyzed 107,035 T cells from 77 serial samples of 32 pts (16 CR, 4 PD1, 12 PD2) and 5 healthy controls. Compared to pts with PD1 and PD2, pts with CR had a larger Gini coefficient for TCR clones at M1 relative to Pre and Peak. The Gini coefficient was the largest for tumor recirculating CD8 T effector memory (Tem) and activated CD8 peripheral memory (Tpm) cells at M1 for pts with CR. Examining the repertoire of emerged and expanded TCR clones at Peak and M1 from Pre, pts with PD2, compared to pts with CR, had a higher percentage of activated CD8 T peripheral memory (Tpm) and T regulatory cells (Treg) among the emerged clones and activated CD8 Tpm among the expanded clones. Patients with PD1, relative to patients with CR, had more proliferating and non-activated CD8 Tpm among the expanded and emerged clones. Conclusion: NHL pts with CR after CAR-T had more robust clonal expansion of T cells, particularly tumor recirculating CD8 Tem and activated CD8 Tpm, compared to pts with relapsed or refractory disease. In contrast, pts with relapsed or refractory disease had an expansion of TCR clones with a larger proportion of CD8 Tpm and Tregs. Endogenous tumor-reactive TCR expansion may help predict favorable clinical response following CAR T-cell therapy. Citation Format: Aiman J. Faruqi, Panwen Wang, Radhika Bansal, Andre De Menezes Silva Corraes, Henan Zhang, Zuoyi Shao, Kevin Regan, Eider Moreno Cortes, Arushi Khurana, Nora Bennani, Yucai Wang, Paul Hampel, Jonas Paludo, Patrick Johnston, Hemant Murthy, Madiha Iqbal, Stephen Ansell, Javier Munoz, Allison Rosenthal, Mohamed Kharfan Dabaja, Januario E. Castro, Saad Kenderian, Haidong Dong, Ying Li, Yi Lin. T-cell receptor repertoire changes associated with clinical response in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma receiving CD19 CAR-T therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 53.