Citations

Abstract Background and Aims EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is an effective option to palliate symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). While the jejunum is conventionally targeted (EUS-GJ), targeting the duodenum (EUS-GD) may offer clinical advantages. Outcomes were compared for EUS-GJ and EUS-GD. Methods Adult patients who underwent EUS-GE for GOO between 2020 and 2024 were included and categorized as an EUS-GD if the stent entered the transverse or ascending duodenum or an EUS-GJ if the stent entered more distally. The primary outcome was clinical success (soft diet tolerance at 7 days). Secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs), stent misdeployment, and unplanned endoscopic reintervention. Baseline demographic variables and outcomes were compared with statistical significance at p < 0.05. Results Of the 139 included patients (median age 67 years (IQR 61–74); 41% female), 105 underwent EUS-GJ and 34 underwent EUS-GD. Clinical success was 98% for EUS-GJ and 94% for EUS-GD (p = 0.25). The misdeployment rate was 7% for EUS-GJ and 0% for EUS-GD (p = 0.19). The AE rate was 22% for EUS-GJ and 12% for EUS-GD (p = 0.23). There were no significant differences for stent obstruction (EUS-GJ 12% vs. EUS-GD 6%), bleeding (2% vs. 6%), perforation (4% vs. 0%), stent migration (1% vs. 0%), infection (3% vs. 0%), and unplanned reintervention (14% vs. 9%). Conclusion Both EUS-GJ and EUS-GD demonstrate high clinical success with no significant differences in adverse event rates. These data can support intraprocedural decision-making for endoscopists performing EUS-GE.

Background: Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are recommended for the endoscopic palliation of distal malignant biliary obstruction (DMBO). Placement of SEMS during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been associated with an increased risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate rates of PEP in patients who underwent SEMS placement for pancreatic versus non-pancreatic malignancy. Design: Retrospective Cohort Study. Methods: Patients who underwent SEMS placement for DMBO between June 2017 and May 2021 were identified retrospectively from a procedural billing database. PEP incidence was compared between pancreatic and non-pancreatic DMBO groups and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for PEP. Results: A total of 488 individuals were identified, with 395 (80.9%) cases of DMBO due to pancreatic and 93 (19.1%) due to non-pancreatic malignancy. Stent types included 124 (25.4%) fully covered (FCSEMS) and 364 (74.6%) uncovered metal stents (UCSEMS). The overall rate of PEP in the cohort was 6.3% with no significant difference between pancreatic and non-pancreatic etiologies (6.1% vs 7.5%, p = 0.606). When adjusted for age <50 years old, female sex, and pancreatic stent placement, a non-pancreatic malignancy was not associated with an increased risk of PEP (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.36–2.15). Conclusion: No statistically significant difference in PEP rates was seen after biliary sphincterotomy and SEMS placement for palliation of DMBO in patients with pancreatic versus non-pancreatic malignancies.

Objectives: Smoking is a key risk factor for pancreatitis, contributing to pathogenesis and disease progression. Data regarding second-hand smoking, or passive smoking (PS) exposure, are lacking. We therefore aimed to assess the impact of PS exposure across the pancreatitis spectrum. Methods: We analyzed baseline data from the PROCEED study, a multicenter study in the United States including patients with acute (AP), recurrent acute (RAP), and chronic (CP) pancreatitis. Participants detailed their individual smoking history and PS exposure, which was compared between AP, RAP, and CP subgroups. Participant factors and clinical characteristics were compared by level of individual and PS exposure. Results: Among 1369 participants (190 AP, 498 RAP, 681 CP), 346 (25.3%) were current and 409 (29.9%) were former smokers. The CP subgroup had the highest proportion of current smokers (36.7% CP vs 15.1% RAP, 11.1% AP, P < 0.001). PS exposure was also significantly higher in the CP subgroup (68.6% CP vs 58.2% RAP, 55.3% AP, P < 0.001). A minority (16.3%) with CP reported no smoking exposure (by self or passive) while nearly half smoked ≥20 pack-years. The mean PS duration was significantly higher in CP participants (21.8 y) compared with those with AP (17.8 y) or RAP (18.9 y) ( P < 0.0166). Conclusions: In this multicenter study, we affirmed an association with smoking use and intensity with CP-related complications. For the first time, we report a high prevalence of prior exposure to passive smoking in all pancreatitis subtypes, which requires further study to understand the impact on disease outcomes.

Objectives: Participant retention is essential in prospective studies to minimize bias and maintain validity. This study aimed to estimate retention rates and identify factors influencing attrition in a multicenter cohort (PROCEED) of US adults with acute/recurrent acute pancreatitis (AP/RAP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP). Methods: Participants from the PROCEED study with AP/RAP or CP eligible for follow-up within the designated visit window were included. Retention was defined as completing at least one follow-up visit during the observation period. Retention was analyzed by follow-up mode (in-person and/or medical record review) and disease type (AP/RAP and CP). Retention factors were assessed using univariate analyses (Wilcoxon rank-sum for continuous variables, χ 2 /Fisher's exact for categorical) and multivariable logistic regression. Missing data were adjusted using multiple imputations in statistical modeling. Results: Among 1279 participants (AP/RAP: n=632, median age 47, 48.9% female; CP: n=647, median age 54, 46.5% female), we observed high cumulative and annualized retention rates, with improved retention when incorporating medical record reviews. In multivariable regression analyses, older age was statistically significantly associated with in-person retention in the AP/RAP group ( P =0.0001), while a higher self-reported physical health (assessed with PROMIS Global Health Physical Health T-score) was a key predictor of retention in CP ( P =0.034). Conclusions: Integrating medical records review substantially enhanced retention rates, enabling robust analyses of pancreatitis outcomes and disease progression. Older age and better self-reported physical health were key predictors of retention, highlighting the need for targeted strategies to enhance engagement among younger participants and those with poorer health in long-term studies.

Background: The impact of multiple substance use on the risk of pancreatitis remains underexplored. Objective: To systematically review peer-reviewed observational studies assessing the association of multiple substance use with the risk of acute pancreatitis (AP) or chronic pancreatitis (CP) in adults. Design: We conducted a systematic review informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guideline. Data sources and methods: EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO were searched up to March 2024. Reference lists of included studies were reviewed. From 5205 records identified, 181 relevant records were evaluated in full text. Studies evaluating the association of ⩾2 substances, including tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, and illicit substances, with AP or CP were included. Data were extracted by one reviewer, with quality control by a second reviewer. Quality assessments were independently conducted by two reviewers, with differences resolved by a third. Results: Of 11 included studies, 6 investigated AP as the outcome and 5 examined CP. Among AP studies, 5 comparing smoking and alcohol to alcohol-only use showed high heterogeneity ( I 2 = 90.9%), with relative risks (RRs) from 1.40 to 11.40. One study examining cannabis and alcohol versus alcohol found a lower risk of AP in cannabis users. Among CP studies, four comparing smoking and alcohol to alcohol-only use were heterogeneous ( I 2 = 81%) with odds ratios 1.21–31.50. Where examined, smoking increases the risk of AP and CP in a dose-dependent fashion. Heavy alcohol users demonstrated a significant increase in CP risk across all smoking categories in one study. Conclusion: Combined alcohol and tobacco use increases pancreatitis risk compared to single substance use, despite heterogeneity in RRs and exposure definitions. Evidence suggests a dose-dependent impact of smoking on pancreatitis risk when added to alcohol. Studies on the impact of a combination of other substance use on pancreatitis risk are needed. Trial registration (PROSPERO): CRD42024503677.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a disease associated with chronic inflammation, fibrosis, and pain. There is a lack of tools available that facilitate early diagnosis, when intervention could prevent irreversible damage. Pilot data suggested prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) as a candidate biomarker for early CP. PGE2 activates signaling pathways that promote inflammation, pain, and fibrosis. METHODS: We assessed PGE2, metabolites, and downstream targets in pancreatic fluid collected endoscopically 0–10 (n = 110) and 10–20 (n = 111) minutes after intravenous secretin administration. PGE2 and metabolites were measured in plasma (n = 75) and urine (n = 71) from the same subjects. Subjects were enrolled in the PROCEED study and classified symptomatic controls, acute/recurrent acute pancreatitis (AP/RAP), or CP. RESULTS: A significant main effect was detected in 10–20 minutes pancreas fluid ( P = 0.027) and plasma ( P = 0.046); post hoc testing showed PGE2 was lower in the AP/RAP group compared with symptomatic controls. There was also trend toward lower PGE2 in urine ( P = 0.062). To elucidate the active downstream pathways, calcitonin gene-related peptide, substance P, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) 1, 2, 3, 7, 9, and 13 were measured in pancreas fluid. A significant difference between the 3 groups was detected for both MMP7 and MMP9. MMP7 was elevated in individuals with CP vs AP/RAP ( P = 0.012) for samples collected early but both time points for MMP9 ( P = 0.027, P = 0.002). DISCUSSION: While PGE2 is detectable in pancreas fluid, these data suggest that it may not be sensitive enough to distinguish between AP/RAP and CP. However, MMPs may distinguish between stages of pancreatitis and require further testing as potential diagnostic biomarkers.

Background: EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is an effective option for the management of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Due to the poor prognosis of patients undergoing it, data on its long-term adverse events (AE) is scarce. Herein, we describe a cohort of patients with gastro-entero-colic fistula (GECF) as a late AE of previously successful EUS-GE. Methods: Patients who developed a GECF after EUS-GE from 10 high-volume centers were analyzed. Information collected included demographic characteristics, indications, clinical and technical success rates, stent type and size, fistula characteristics, management, and outcomes. Results: Sixteen cases were identified. The mean interval from index EUS-GE to the diagnosis of GECF was 4 to 8 weeks. The most common cause of GOO was pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The transverse colon was the most common site for the GECF (14 patients). A 20×10 mm lumen apposing metal stent (LAMS) was utilized in 10 patients. Endoscopic management with a variety of modalities was successful in 13 cases. Follow-up interval after endoscopic management of the fistula averaged 2 to 4 weeks. At the time of the manuscript elaboration, 10 patients had died, 5 were alive, and 1 was lost to follow-up. Conclusions: This is the first description of a cohort of patients with GECF after EUS-GE. The exact mechanisms leading to GECF in these cases are unknown. Possible explanations include inadvertent colon puncture during the index procedure and/or entrapment of mesocolon. More data is needed to further characterize this AE.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) remains difficult to manage with few treatment options. Prior studies have implicated prostaglandin E 2 (PGE 2 ) in mediating chronic inflammation in the pancreas. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether indomethacin, a cyclooxygenase-2 enzyme inhibitor, would reduce PGE 2 levels in CP. METHODS: In this pilot multicenter randomized controlled trial, participants with CP received oral indomethacin (50 mg) or placebo twice daily for 28 days. Measurement of PGE 2 levels in pancreatic fluid collected endoscopically after secretin administration at baseline and posttreatment (day 28) was performed. Quality of life and pain were also assessed at baseline and posttreatment. RESULTS: A total of 27 participants were randomized (indomethacin = 13, placebo = 14). Although PGE 2 levels decreased after treatment in pancreas fluid, plasma, and saliva in the indomethacin group, there was no significant difference in mean change in pancreas fluid PGE 2 levels between the indomethacin and placebo groups (−457.7 pg/mL vs −840.4 pg/mL, P = 0.25). There was also no significant change in pain severity composite score (−1.3 indomethacin vs −0.5 placebo, P = 0.33), but the improvement in pain interference score (−2.9 indomethacin vs −0.4, P = 0.058) trended toward significance. There was no difference in adverse events between the 2 groups. DISCUSSION: In this phase 1/2 study, oral indomethacin was safe and well tolerated by patients with CP. Although there was no significant difference in change in PGE 2 levels, further studies are needed to determine the effect of indomethacin on the inflammatory pathway of CP and patient-centered outcomes.