Chandrasekhara, Vinay

Background: The optimal self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) choice for endoscopic drainage of unresectable extrahepatic malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) remains unclear due to limited randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence. Prior meta-analyses have relied on observational data, introducing heterogeneity and bias. To overcome these limitations, an RCT-only network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SEMS types. Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify RCTs assessing fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS), partially covered SEMS (PCSEMS), and/or uncovered SEMS (UCSEMS) for ERCP drainage of unresectable extrahepatic MBO. Study outcomes included recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO), specific causes of RBO, overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). A frequentist NMA was performed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with their 95% confidence intervals and overall P-scores. Results: Ten RCTs (1,659 patients) were included. There were no significant differences in time to RBO, incidence of any RBO, or OS between stent types. UCSEMS had the lowest rates of stent migration, tumor overgrowth, and sludge occlusion, whereas FCSEMS most effectively prevented tumor ingrowth. AE rates were similar across groups; however, only FCSEMS, but not PCSEMS, had significantly higher rates of acute cholecystitis than UCSEMS in patients with an intact gallbladder. Conclusion: There were no differences in RBO, OS, or AE excluding acute cholecystitis between each SEMS type, although each type has its advantages and disadvantages. FCSEMS was associated with a higher risk of acute cholecystitis, emphasizing careful patient selection, particularly regarding gallbladder status.

Abstract Background and Aims EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is an effective option to palliate symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). While the jejunum is conventionally targeted (EUS-GJ), targeting the duodenum (EUS-GD) may offer clinical advantages. Outcomes were compared for EUS-GJ and EUS-GD. Methods Adult patients who underwent EUS-GE for GOO between 2020 and 2024 were included and categorized as an EUS-GD if the stent entered the transverse or ascending duodenum or an EUS-GJ if the stent entered more distally. The primary outcome was clinical success (soft diet tolerance at 7 days). Secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs), stent misdeployment, and unplanned endoscopic reintervention. Baseline demographic variables and outcomes were compared with statistical significance at p < 0.05. Results Of the 139 included patients (median age 67 years (IQR 61–74); 41% female), 105 underwent EUS-GJ and 34 underwent EUS-GD. Clinical success was 98% for EUS-GJ and 94% for EUS-GD (p = 0.25). The misdeployment rate was 7% for EUS-GJ and 0% for EUS-GD (p = 0.19). The AE rate was 22% for EUS-GJ and 12% for EUS-GD (p = 0.23). There were no significant differences for stent obstruction (EUS-GJ 12% vs. EUS-GD 6%), bleeding (2% vs. 6%), perforation (4% vs. 0%), stent migration (1% vs. 0%), infection (3% vs. 0%), and unplanned reintervention (14% vs. 9%). Conclusion Both EUS-GJ and EUS-GD demonstrate high clinical success with no significant differences in adverse event rates. These data can support intraprocedural decision-making for endoscopists performing EUS-GE.

Abstract Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based tissue acquisition is the cornerstone for assessment of suspected malignant biliary strictures. Conventional techniques, including biliary brush cytology and transpapillary forceps biopsy, are highly specific but are limited by modest sensitivity for detection of malignancy, often leaving a substantial proportion of individuals without a definitive diagnosis. To improve diagnostic sensitivity for cancer, several adjunctive approaches have been integrated into ERCP-based sampling. Peroral cholangioscopy (POC)-guided biopsies have become a reliable ERCP-based adjunctive modality, allowing direct visualization and targeted sampling, particularly in individuals with prior nondiagnostic procedures. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a technique used to improve diagnostic yield with biliary brushings by detecting chromosomal abnormalities, but is limited to specialized centers due to the need for specialized processing and training. Next-generation sequencing provides high sensitivity and can enable identification of actionable genomic alterations, while methylated DNA markers represent a promising, scalable molecular approach with strong diagnostic performance. Additional techniques include artificial intelligence–augmented direct visualization by POC and bile-based liquid biopsy. Current guidelines recommend multimodal ERCP-based sampling, combining at least two modalities where feasible, to optimize diagnostic accuracy. This review highlights the clinical performance, strengths, and limitations of established and emerging ERCP-guided techniques, emphasizing their evolving role in improving the diagnosis and management of malignant biliary strictures.

Background: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is recommended as part of multimodality sampling in the evaluation of biliary strictures, but can be false negative in 40%–50% cases. The aim of this study was to comprehensively assess predictors of false-negative FISH in patients with biliary strictures. Methods: Patients undergoing tissue sampling for biliary strictures from October 20 to February 22 were prospectively enrolled (NCT04572711). Procedural factors such as sampling techniques, order, and utilization of combination sampling were recorded. Results of an optimized pancreatobiliary FISH panel with locus-specific probes for 1q21, 7p12, 8q24, and 9p21 were reported per guidelines. Statistical analyses were performed using BlueSky Statistics v.10.3.1, R package v8.81. Results: Of 327 patients, 93 (28.5%) were diagnosed with malignancy. A false-negative pancreatobiliary fluorescence in situ hybridization (PB-FISH) was reported in 40 (43.1%) patients. A history of primary sclerosing cholangitis was associated with lower odds of having a false-negative PB-FISH (aOR=0.38, 95% CI=0.16–0.82, p=0.02), whereas a hilar stricture was associated with a significantly higher false-negative PB-FISH in those with cholangiocarcinoma (aOR=3.2 [1.4–7.9], p=0.009). Dilation of biliary strictures prior to brushing was not associated with a lower rate of false-negative PB-FISH. Conclusions: In this prospective study, hilar strictures were more likely to have false-negative PB-FISH. Dilation of strictures did not affect PB-FISH performance. These results can help guide PB-FISH interpretation.

Background and Aims: Early identification of malignant biliary strictures (MBSs) is challenging, with up to 20% classified as indeterminants after preliminary testing and tissue sampling with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. We aimed to evaluate the use of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) from biliary brushings to enhance MBS detection in a prospective cohort. Approach: Candidate MDMs were evaluated for their utility in MBS diagnosis through a series of discovery and validation phases. DNA was extracted from biliary brushing samples, quantified, bisulfite-converted, and then subjected to methylation-specific droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. Patients were considered to have no malignancy if the sampling was negative and there was no evidence of malignancy after 1 year or definitive negative surgical histopathology. Results: Fourteen candidate MDMs were evaluated in the discovery phase, with top-performing and new markers evaluated in the technical validation phase. The top 4 MDMs were TWIST1, HOXA1, VSTM2B, and CLEC11A, which individually achieved AUC values of 0.82, 0.81, 0.83, and 0.78, respectively, with sensitivities of 59.4%, 53.1%, 62.5%, and 50.0%, respectively, at high specificities for malignancy of 95.2%–95.3% for the final biologic validation phase. When combined as a panel, the AUC was 0.86, achieving 73.4% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity, which outperformed cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Conclusions: The selected MDMs demonstrated improved performance characteristics for the detection of MBS compared to cytology and FISH. Therefore, MDMs should be considered viable candidates for inclusion in diagnostic testing algorithms.

Abstract Background Visceral fat represents a metabolically active entity linked to adverse metabolic sequelae of obesity. We aimed to determine if celiac artery mesenteric fat thickness can be reliably measured during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and if these measurements correlate with metabolic disease burden. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent celiac artery mesenteric fat measurement with endosonography (CAMEUS) measurement at a tertiary referral center, and a validation prospective trial of patients with obesity and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis who received paired EUS exams with CAMEUS measurement before and after six months of treatment with an intragastric balloon. Results CAMEUS was measured in 154 patients [56.5% females, mean age 56.5 ± 18.0 years, body mass index (BMI) 29.8 ± 8.0 kg/m2] and was estimated at 14.7 ± 6.5 mm. CAMEUS better correlated with the presence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (R2 = 0.248, P &lt; 0.001) than BMI (R2 = 0.153, P &lt; 0.001), and significantly correlated with metabolic parameters and diseases. After six months of intragastric balloon placement, the prospective cohort experienced 11.7% total body weight loss, 1.3 points improvement in hemoglobin A1c (P = 0.001), and a 29.4% average decrease in CAMEUS (−6.4 ± 5.2 mm, P &lt; 0.001). CAMEUS correlated with improvements in weight (R2 = 0.368), aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (R2 = 0.138), and NAFLD activity score (R2 = 0.156) (all P &lt; 0.05). Conclusions CAMEUS is a novel measure that is significantly correlated with critical metabolic indices and can be easily captured during routine EUS to risk-stratify susceptible patients. This station could allow for EUS access to sampling and therapeutics of this metabolic region.

Abstract Gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy has witnessed a Cambrian explosion of techniques, indications, and expanding target populations. GI endoscopy encompasses traditional domains that include preventive measures, palliation, as alternative therapies in patients with prohibitive risks of more invasive procedures, and indicated primary treatments. But, it has expanded to include therapeutic and diagnostic interventional endosonography, luminal endoscopic resection, third space endotherapy, endohepatology, and endobariatrics. The lines between surgery and endoscopy are blurred on many occasions within this paradigm. Moreover, patients with high degrees of co-morbidity and complex physiology require more nuanced peri-endoscopic management. The rising demand for endoscopy services has resulted in the development of endoscopy referral centers that offer these invasive procedures as directly booked referrals for regional and rural patients. This further necessitates specialized programs to ensure appropriate evaluation, risk stratification, and optimization for safe sedation and general anesthesia if needed. This landscape is conducive to the organic evolution of endo-anesthesia to meet the needs of these focused and evolving practices. In this primer, we delineate important aspects of endo-anesthesia care and provide relevant clinical and logistical considerations pertaining to the breadth of procedures.

Abstract Background Abdominal pain is a debilitating symptom affecting ∼80% of pancreatic cancer (PC) patients. Pancreatic duct (PD) decompression has been reported to alleviate this pain, although this practice has not been widely adopted. We aimed to evaluate the role, efficacy, and safety of endoscopic PD decompression for palliation of PC post-prandial obstructive-type pain. Methods A systematic review until 7 October 2020 was performed. Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality. Results We identified 12 publications with a total of 192 patients with PC presenting with abdominal pain, in whom PD decompression was attempted, and was successful in 167 patients (mean age 62.5 years, 58.7% males). The use of plastic stents was reported in 159 patients (95.2%). All included studies reported partial or complete improvement in pain levels after PD stenting, with an improvement rate of 93% (95% confidence interval, 79%–100%). The mean duration of pain improvement was 94 ± 16 days. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related adverse events (AEs) were post-sphincterotomy bleeding (1.8%), post-ERCP pancreatitis (0.6%), and hemosuccus pancreaticus (0.6%). AEs were not reported in two patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided PD decompression. In the 167 patients with technical success, the stent-migration and stent-occlusion rates were 3.6% and 3.0%, respectively. No AE-related mortality was reported. The methodological quality assessment showed the majority of the studies having low or unclear quality. Conclusion In this exploratory analysis, endoscopic PD drainage may be an effective and safe option in selected patients for the management of obstructive-type PC pain. However, a randomized–controlled trial is needed to delineate the role of this invasive practice.

Abstract Background Most incidental gastric polyps identified during upper endoscopy are considered low-risk. However, current guidelines recommend sampling all gastric polyps for histopathologic analysis. We aimed to devise a simple narrow-band imaging (NBI) classification to reduce the need for routine biopsies of low-risk gastric polyps. Methods Pairs of NBI and white-light images were collected from 73 gastric polyps for which concurrent histopathologic diagnosis was available. A diagnostic accuracy cohort study was performed. Two blinded endoscopists independently analysed NBI features of each polyp for color, vessel pattern, surface pattern, and any combinations thereof to develop a classification scheme to differentiate low-risk polyps (fundic-gland or hyperplastic) from high-risk polyps (adenomatous or adenocarcinoma) and fundic-gland polyps (FGPs) from non-FGPs. Results An isolated lacy vessel pattern and a homogenous absence of surface pattern successfully differentiated low-risk from high-risk gastric polyps. Combining both descriptors into a single algorithm resulted in a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% [95% confidence interval (CI): 100%–100%], positive predictive value (PPV) of 13.7% (95% CI: 2.6–24.8), sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 100%–100%), and specificity of 53.7% (95% CI: 45.3%–62.0%) for high-risk polyps. This would reduce the number of polyps requiring biopsy by 50%, while still capturing all high-risk polyps. Regarding FGPs, using a rule not to biopsy polyps with isolated lacy vessels resulted in a 94.9% NPV (95% CI: 89.2%–100%), 63.2% PPV (95% CI: 47.2%–79.2%), 94.8% sensitivity (95% CI: 89.5%–100%), and 63.6% specificity (95% CI: 51.3%–76.0%) for non-FGPs. Conclusion In this derivation cohort study, NBI is helpful for differentiating between high-risk and low-risk gastric polyps, thereby reducing the need for routine sampling of low-risk polyps. These results need to be validated in a separate test population.