Citations

Introduction Patient dehumanization when caring for critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is commonplace. The Get to Know Me board (GTKMB) has been identified as a valuable tool for promoting humanized care and communication in the ICU; however, its implementation is highly variable. This study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators influencing consistent implementation of the GTKMB in the ICU. Materials and methods We conducted multidisciplinary focus groups via teleconference with ICU clinicians at a large quaternary care academic medical center. A thematic content analysis was performed to identify key themes and concepts related to GTKMB implementation. Results Thirty-eight clinicians participated across six focus groups, including 10 nurses, 7 physicians, 6 advanced practice providers, 5 rehabilitation therapists (allied health clinicians), 1 respiratory therapist and 1 social worker. Major themes related to barriers and facilitators of GTKMB implementation included, (1) identifying appropriate patients and optimal timing for completing the GTKMB, (2) logistical challenges such as access to the board, visibility and unclear responsibility for completion, (3) the importance of clinician role modeling supporting the board completion, and (4) opportunities to improve the design and functionality of the board itself. Conclusion Although clinicians recognize the GTKMB as a meaningful tool to support humanized care in the ICU, inconsistent implementation limits its potential impact. This study highlights several key barriers and facilitators to its use. Future efforts should focus on targeted quality improvement initiatives to enhance consistent completion and integration of the GTKMB into ICU practice.

ABSTRACT The most common infectious disease responsible for paediatric developmental disability is congenital infection with human cytomegalovirus (cCMV). Many serious sequelae are caused by cCMV, including microcephaly, intracranial calcifications, neuronal migration defects, seizure disorders, developmental delay, and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Although long‐term neurodevelopmental impairment is clearly more common in newborns with clinically apparent disease at birth, more knowledge is needed about management in the era of universal cCMV screening, since screening identifies infants that, in the past, would not have been discovered during routine newborn care—infants that we reference in this review as having clinically inapparent cCMV (CICMV) infections. For newborns identified with CICMV infections by universal cCMV screening, longitudinal audiologic assessment is needed, but other necessary laboratory and neuroimaging studies, as well as indications for antiviral therapy, are uncertain. This review summarises current concepts about the approach to cCMV infections identified by universal screening, with emphasis on the CICMV infant. We identify areas for future research that should inform and direct future evaluation and management of these infants.

Mediastinal radiation potentiates aortic stenosis and complicates its treatment. We compared the short and midterm-outcomes with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with prior mediastinal radiation. Electronic databases were searched from inception through December 2024. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RRs), and continuous outcomes were pooled as mean differences (MDs) with respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Six observational studies were identified, including 2458 TAVR patients and 1873 SAVR patients. In the short-term, TAVR was associated with lower rate of mortality (RR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.34–0.88), atrial fibrillation (RR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.15–0.65), acute kidney injury (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.59–0.95), bleeding (RR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.33–0.42), and shorter length of hospital stay (MD: −4.30; 95% CI: −5.45 to −3.15). One-year mortality was comparable between the 2 groups (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.50–2.13). This meta-analysis of observational studies of patients with prior mediastinal radiation demonstrated that TAVR was associated with better short-term outcomes compared to SAVR. While 1-year mortality appeared similar between the 2 interventions, this finding should be interpreted with caution. However, randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.

ABSTRACT We report on the 2025 International ICU Diary Conference that provided a comprehensive update on current knowledge, innovations and global practices related to ICU diaries. Held in a 6‐week online format, the event featured 23 speakers and was attended by mean 69.7 (SD 20.5) participants per session. Topics included development of ICU diaries, use in special settings, digital diaries, survivors' and families' experiences, Post‐Intensive‐Care Syndrome and follow‐up and implementation projects. Highlights were innovative solutions for digital diaries and the report of persons with lived and living experiences with diaries, changing the focus on humanising critical care. Relevance for Practice ICU diaries support patient‐ and family‐centred care and should be implemented more widely across healthcare systems. Their successful adoption requires contextual adaptation and policy support, with future development likely to be shaped by the increasing use of digital ICU diaries.

Abstract Background The van Herk margin formula, derived for 3‐D conformal radiotherapy with a uniform 3.2 mm dose penumbra and no intrinsic dose buffer, remains widely used to design CTV‐to‐PTV expansions in contemporary image‐guided prostate radiotherapy. However, coplanar VMAT techniques often feature broader penumbrae and explicit PTV–isodose clearances, potentially violating the assumptions underlying the original formulation and leading to overly conservative margins. Purpose We investigated whether the widely adopted van Herk margin formula overestimates clinical target volume (CTV)‐to‐planning target volume (PTV) expansions for contemporary coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) prostate treatments. Methods Fifty consecutive intact‐prostate VMAT radiotherapy plans (two coplanar arcs; clinical margins 3 mm, except for 2 mm posterior) were exported. Direction‐specific 90% isodose–to‐PTV gaps and penumbra widths were measured. Candidate anisotropic margins were tested by eroding the PTV to create CTV_eval. Monte‐Carlo simulations combined systematic (Σ) shifts with Gaussian random (σ′) blurring kernels of 0–2 mm were performed. Acceptability criteria of (i) CTV Dmin0.03 cc ≥ 90% Rx in ≥ 90% of simulated scenarios or (ii) population tumor‐control probability (TCP) loss < 1 % were used. Results VMAT plans exhibited intrinsic 90% isodose clearances of 3–5 mm laterally/anteriorly and 1–2 mm superior–inferiorly, while axial‐plane penumbras were up to fivefold broader than van Herk's assumption. With a [0, 0, 2] mm (LR/AP/SI) margin, ≥ 90% of patients maintained Dmin0.03 cc ≥ 90% Rx provided Σ lay within an ellipsoid of [2.0, 1.5, 1.8] mm and σ′ ≤ [1.5, 2.0, 1.5] mm. Under TCP criteria the safe Σ ellipsoid for high‐risk disease was [2.5, 1.9, 2.2] mm, while low‐intermediate risk was even less sensitive. Conclusions For image‐guided coplanar VMAT prostate radiotherapy, an anisotropic [0, 0, 2] mm CTV‐to‐PTV margin is sufficient for target coverage. A modified margin expression that subtracts the measured isodose–to‐PTV gap and uses reduced random‐error coefficients better reflects modern practice.

Background and Aims: Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is a progressive liver disease that poses significant public health challenges. Although liver biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnostic and prognostic use in patients with MASH, its invasiveness limits its practical application in routine care and large-scale trials. This narrative review explores the growing role of noninvasive tests in the assessment of disease progression and treatment efficacy in MASH. Approach and Results: This review represents expert opinion synthesizing current literature on the most widely used noninvasive tests being assessed as frontline biomarkers for identification of patients with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease at risk of outcomes and/or in need of pharmacological intervention, and that are being used to assess treatment response in the context of clinical trials, and how they may be translated into clinical practice. Among these, elastography and the enhanced liver fibrosis test are highlighted for their potential to replace liver biopsy in clinical settings and trials. These methods are analyzed for their accuracy and ability to monitor therapeutic response, emphasizing their growing importance in providing reliable measures of clinical improvement as drug development efforts for MASH intensify. Conclusions: This synthetic review aims to provide a roadmap for federal regulators updating and potentially revising the requirements for demonstrating histologic improvement in MASH clinical trials, and for practitioners to translate this information into clinical practice. The ultimate goal is to reduce the reliance on liver biopsy while maintaining the rigor necessary to evaluate therapeutic efficacy, thus accelerating the path to approval for new MASH treatments.

PURPOSE Artificial intelligence (AI) has been rapidly evolving in medicine. While there are existing data about the perceptions and concerns of health care workers regarding AI, those of the hematology and oncology (HemOnc) workforce remain unknown. We assessed opinions of physicians (faculty and fellows), advanced practice providers (APPs), and nurses in HemOnc on integrating AI in medical education (MedEd) and clinical practice (CP). METHODS Group-specific electronic surveys were developed. The HemOnc workforce from the three Mayo Clinic sites was invited to participate. Participation was anonymous, with data collection between November 7, 2024, and January 20, 2025. Results were reported as proportions, with 95% binomial CI when appropriate. RESULTS A total of 344 participants responded, 118 physicians (77 faculty, 41 fellows), 49 APPs, and 177 nurses. Most had used AI although less than half felt very or moderately knowledgeable about it. A total of 95% of fellows, 97% of faculty physicians, 96% of APP, and 92% of nurses believe that AI will be integrated in MedEd. A total of 94% of physicians and 88% of nonphysicians believe that this integration would be beneficial. In CP, 98% of fellows, 96% of faculty physicians, 100% of APPs, and 92% of nurses believe in AI's integration. However, 51% of physicians and 68% of nonphysicians had some concerns, including technology time, medical costs, and burnout. Nonetheless, 85% of fellows, 94% of faculty physicians, 98% of APPs, and 86% of nurses would embrace AI. CONCLUSION The majority of this single health system HemOnc's workforce endorsed AI integration into MedEd and CP but highlighted relevant concerns. Proper education, effective partnership among all stakeholders, and well-organized integration are essential for optimizing AI's incorporation into HemOnc's MedEd and CP and ensuring that it fully supports the mission of providing high-quality patient care.