Citations

Objective: To synthesize the available evidence on medical therapies investigated for the management of NF2-related vestibular schwannomas (VS). Study design: Systematic review. Setting: Not applicable. Patients: NF2-related VS patients. Interventions: Systemic medical therapies. Main outcome measures: Tumor control and hearing outcomes. Results: Thirty studies met inclusion criteria: 18 investigated bevacizumab, 5 mTOR inhibitors, 5 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and 2 the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) vaccine. Bevacizumab demonstrated the most consistent activity, with hearing improvement in up to 61% of patients, stable hearing in up to 84%, and tumor response in up to 60% (Level 4 evidence). Outcomes for mTOR inhibitors were variable, with 1 study stopped for futility, while others reported up to 100% hearing and tumor stability (Level 4 evidence). Five different TKIs showed hearing improvement rates ranging from 17 to 60% and tumor responses of 10 to 23.5% (Level 4 evidence). The VEGFR vaccine appeared safe and immunologically active, with radiologic and hearing improvement in one-third of patients (Level 4 evidence). Conclusions: Bevacizumab remains the most studied and clinically active systemic therapy for NF2-related VS, although evidence is largely nonrandomized. Other systemic therapies have demonstrated variable results in terms of hearing outcomes or tumor control. High-quality prospective and randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify efficacy, durability, and comparative effectiveness.

ABSTRACT Objective Management of vestibular schwannoma (VS) remains controversial. Very small VSs represent a pivotal group: on one hand, they pose the least risk to the patient from the perspective of being small; yet, not recommending treatment may result in missing a critical window for achieving the best outcome. This debate fundamentally hinges on whether treatment improves upon the natural history of the disease. There is an unproven assumption that very small tumors behave similarly to the broader observed population. To address this central question, we conducted a multicenter retrospective review to compare the natural history of tumor growth and hearing for patients with very small VS (1–3 mm) with a referent cohort with larger tumors. Methods All patients diagnosed with sporadic VS 1–3 mm were reviewed at 3 large skull base referral centers and compared with a referent cohort of patients with tumors > 3 mm. Tumor growth‐free survival rates, treatment‐free survival rates, and rates of maintenance of class A, B, or C hearing were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results In total, 123 patients with very small VS and a referent cohort of 326 patients were studied. Seventeen patients with very small VS experienced tumor growth at a median of 3.2 years after diagnosis (IQR 2.6–5.1), demonstrating a median growth rate of 1.0 mm per year (IQR 0.9–1.8). In comparison, 167 of the patients in the referent cohort experienced tumor growth at a median of 1.7 years after diagnosis (IQR 0.8–3.1). Tumor growth‐free survival rates (95% CI, number still at risk) at 5 years after diagnosis for the 2 cohorts were 84% (75–93, 39) and 45% (40–52, 100), respectively ( p < 0.001). Six patients with very small VS underwent treatment after tumor growth at a median of 3.2 years after diagnosis (IQR 3.2–3.8), compared with 138 patients in the referent cohort at a median of 2.2 years after diagnosis (IQR 1.4–3.6). Treatment‐free survival rates (95% CI, number still at risk) at 5 years after diagnosis for the 2 cohorts were 92% (86–98, 55) and 54% (49–61, 125), respectively ( p < 0.001). Among the 105 patients with very small VS and class A, B, or C hearing at diagnosis, 3 progressed to class D. Comparatively, among the 225 patients in the referent cohort with class A, B, or C hearing at diagnosis, 70 progressed to class D at a median of 2.6 years after diagnosis (IQR 1.0–4.8). Rates of maintenance of class A, B, or C hearing (95% CI, number still at risk) at 5 years after diagnosis were 96% (92–100, 28) for patients with very small VS and 65% (57–73, 70) for the referent cohort ( p < 0.001). Conclusions The natural history of tumor growth and hearing for very small VS diverges favorably from the cumulative natural history data and provides a more appropriate benchmark to compare clinical outcomes of upfront surgery or radiosurgery for this population. At 5 years after diagnosis, 96% of very small VS maintained class A, B, or C hearing and only 8% received treatment for growth within this multicenter cohort. Cumulatively, these data substantiate initial wait‐and‐scan management via size threshold surveillance in this population. Level of Evidence 3.

Objective: To systematically review studies evaluating systemic medical therapies for sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) and perform meta-analyses to assess associations with tumor control. Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting: Not applicable. Patients: Sporadic VS patients. Interventions: Systemic medical therapies. Main outcome measures: Tumor growth. Results: Nine retrospective studies met criteria: 5 on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), 3 on metformin, and 1 on losartan (all level 3 evidence). A meta-analysis of ORs from 5 studies demonstrated no significant association between aspirin use and tumor growth (pooled OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.48-1.23; I²: 76%). Conversely, a meta-analysis of ORs from 3 studies on metformin showed significantly lower odds of tumor growth (pooled OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.30-0.72; I²: 0%). The study on losartan did not identify a statistically significant association of losartan with tumor growth. Less than half of the studies reported HRs to appropriately reflect the inherently time-dependent nature of tumor growth. Conclusions: Evidence for systemic therapies in sporadic VS remains preliminary. Our meta-analysis of ORs demonstrates that NSAID use is not significantly associated with tumor growth, metformin users had lower odds of tumor growth, and evidence for losartan remains limited; however, all available studies provide only level 3 evidence. At present, there is insufficient data to recommend routine use of aspirin, metformin, or losartan with the intent of mitigating VS tumor growth during wait-and-scan management. High-quality prospective studies with appropriate time-to-event methodology to assess tumor growth are required to establish the clinical utility of systemic therapies in the management of patients with sporadic VS.

Objective: Quality of life (QOL) is an important consideration in vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients when assessing management options. Understanding sex-based differences in QOL may facilitate patient counseling. Study design: Prospective cohort. Setting: Tertiary academic medical center and Acoustic Neuroma Association. Patients: Sporadic VS patients. Interventions: Observation, microsurgery, or radiation. Main outcome measures: Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life (PANQOL) scores. Results: A total of 481 patients were analyzed. In the observation group, women reported worse anxiety, facial function, and total PANQOL scores at baseline. At follow-up, men declined more in facial function (−5 vs. +3, P =0.01). For microsurgery, women reported worse facial function and balance scores at baseline. At follow-up, men declined more in facial function (−16 vs. −3, P <0.001), balance (−7 vs. +2, P =0.04), energy (−4 vs. +5, P =0.03), and total (−5 vs. +2, P =0.02) PANQOL scores. For radiation, women reported worse anxiety, balance, pain, and total scores at baseline. At follow-up, anxiety improved in women but worsened in men (+5 vs. −6, P =0.008). Sex-based differences exceeding the minimally important difference thresholds established for the PANQOL were observed for the following: anxiety at baseline in the observation group, anxiety and pain at baseline in the radiation group, and change in anxiety from baseline to follow-up in the radiation group. Conclusions: Women had worse anxiety, balance, facial function, pain, and overall QOL at baseline assessed using the PANQOL, whereas men declined more with treatment and observation. The largest difference in PANQOL change between sexes occurred after microsurgery, with men experiencing greater losses in facial function, balance, energy, and total scores.

ABSTRACT Background Preoperative vascular embolization (PVE) is commonly used in managing juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA) to improve outcomes. However, few studies have evaluated how embolization patterns and vascular features affect prognosis. Methods A 15‐year retrospective review was performed on 44 patients with JNA undergoing surgery at one institution. Data included demographics, vascular supply, embolization techniques, surgical outcomes, and recurrence. Results Forty‐three patients underwent PVE. Most tumors were embolized transarterially (93.0%) using polyvinyl alcohol‐based agents (79.1%). The internal maxillary artery was most commonly embolized (93.0%). Internal carotid artery supply was present in 34.9%, and more than two vessels were embolized in 23.3%. Postembolization tumor blush occurred in 60.5%, with a median of 5% of the pre‐embolization blush remaining after embolization. Neither internal carotid involvement, number of vessels embolized, nor residual blush significantly impacted operative time, surgical outcomes, or recurrence. Conclusion With effective embolization, vascular complexity might not affect JNA resection outcomes. Multicenter studies are required to confirm those findings.

Objective: To explore the existing evidence on novel imaging modalities that may aid in prognostication of vestibular schwannoma (VS) clinical outcomes across various management approaches. Study design: Scoping review. Setting: Not applicable. Patients: Individuals diagnosed with VS. Interventions: Novel imaging techniques. Main outcome measures: Tumor growth and response to medical therapy. Results: A total of 18 articles were included in this review. Of these, 7 focused on pretreatment prognosis, 6 evaluated radiosurgery outcomes, 4 examined microsurgery outcomes, and 1 assessed response to bevacizumab. The imaging modalities investigated included radiomics (n = 10), positron emission tomography (PET; n = 2), dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI; n = 2), both PET and DCE-MRI (n = 1), magnetic resonance elastography (MRE; n = 1), contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT; n = 1), and slip interface imaging (SII; n = 1). Radiomic studies yielded encouraging results in predicting tumor growth after wait-and-scan and radiosurgery, with reported accuracies ranging from 52% to 88%, sensitivities from 13% to 95%, specificities from 50% to 94%, and area under the curves from 0.65 to 0.99. PET studies identified several promising ligands associated with tumor growth during wait-and-scan, suggesting a potential role in prognostication. DCE-MRI also demonstrated associations with tumor growth and treatment response to bevacizumab. Studies on MRE, CE-CT, and SII identified novel imaging parameters associated with tumor stiffness and adhesion. Conclusions: Several emerging imaging modalities hold potential for improving clinical outcome prognostication in VS. Techniques such as radiomics, PET, and DCE-MRI have shown promising results; however, the supporting evidence is still limited and heterogeneous. Further research is necessary to validate and refine these approaches to enhance their clinical utility.

ImportanceUnderstanding the global barriers to otolaryngology–head and neck surgery (OHNS) care is crucial in addressing disparities in access to care, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).ObjectiveTo characterize barriers to comprehensive otolaryngology care across World Bank income groups.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsUsing an online cross-sectional survey that was administered by the Global OHNS Initiative via international and national professional societies, personal contacts, and social media, this study captured the perceptions of otolaryngologists regarding barriers to OHNS care at the levels of the country, health sector, clinician, and patient. Participants included otolaryngologists from the 194 World Health Organization member states and Taiwan. Eligibility criteria included a medical degree and specialized training in managing conditions of the ear, nose, and throat. The nonresponse rate was not recorded. The data collection period spanned from October 2022 to June 2023.ExposuresExposures included World Bank income group classification.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcomes were Likert scale responses regarding frequency of barriers to OHNS care. The a priori hypothesis was that LMICs would report more frequent barriers to OHNS care.ResultsThe study involved 146 otolaryngologists (47 female individuals [32%]), with 69 (47%) from high-income countries and 77 (53%) from LMICs. Male individuals represented 45 high-income country respondents (65%) and 54 LMIC respondents (70%). Barriers were reported across income groups at all levels of the health system, with a higher frequency in LMICs. Several barriers were reported to be more substantial in LMICs, such as the national volume and distribution of otolaryngologists, financial compensation for clinicians, and patient stigma, and others were common across income settings, such as the availability of operating rooms and inflexible working hours. Common concerns included national and health sector barriers: OHNS workforce, referral networks, government support; clinician barriers: excessive clinician workloads, understaffing, poor administration support; patient barriers: distance to health care facilities, financial burdens such as medical costs and foregone wages, stigma, and health literacy.Conclusions and RelevanceThe results of this cross-sectional study suggest that there are barriers to otolaryngology care globally that affected all levels of the health care system. This work may inform prioritization of otolaryngology within research and policy, and it emphasizes the need for effective strategies to expand access to otolaryngology care, particularly in lower-income settings.