Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

4 citation(s) found for "Yu, Shaoqing".

Identification of Nuclear Matrix Protein 4 (Nmp4) as a novel regulator of innate immunity
Bidwell, Joseph P. , Adaway, Michele, Huang, Shengping , Wek, Ronald C, Sun, Jie , Morris, David Lee , Yu, Shaoqing , Wek, Ronald C

The Journal of Immunology | January 1, 2023 | Volume: 198 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: 67.4-67.4

10.4049/jimmunol.198.supp.67.4 Get It

Abstract Mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells (MSPCs) have immunomodulatory activity. We previously observed that osteoprogenitors and CD8+T cells are increased in the bone marrow (BM) of mice lacking the transcription factor Nmp4. Transcriptome analysis of MSPCs from Nmp4−/− and wild type (WT) mice revealed significant changes in genes related to innate immune responses, including reduced expression of Tlr3 and Mda5 in the null MSPCs. Loss of Nmp4 increased mRNA translation, ribosomal biogenesis, and Gadd34 expression in MSPCs; collectively, these processes likely promote the unfolded protein response (UPR), expanding the processing capacity of the endoplasmic reticulum. Therefore, we hypothesized that disabling Nmp4 would improve innate immune cell function. To test this, Nmp4−/− mice (C57BL6) were infected intranasally with influenza A/PR8 (H1N1; 150pfu). Despite having similar virus load in the lung, H1N1-infected Nmp4−/− mice lost less body weight than WT mice post infection and had improved survival. Infected Nmp4−/− mice had fewer infiltrating neutrophils (PMNs; CD11b+/Ly6G+) and monocytes (CD11b+/SiglecFNeg/Ly6GNeg/Ly6C+) in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) but more BAL macrophages (CD11c+/SiglecF+); CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were not different between genotypes. Ex vivo, Nmp4-deficiency did not alter the differentiation of BM marrow-derived macrophages; however, Chil3/Ym1 and Alox15 mRNA expression was reduced in Nmp4−/− macrophages polarized with IL-4/IL-13, suggesting cell-autonomous regulation of M2 macrophage activation by Nmp4. Our data point to Nmp4 as a novel regulator of innate immunity and influenza response in mice.
Machine Learning to Predict the Likelihood of Acute Myocardial Infarction
Than, Martin , Sandoval, Yader , Shah, Anoop , Apple, Fred S. , Blankenberg, Stefan , Cullen, Louise , Mueller, Christian, Neumann, Franz–Josef , Twerenbold, Raphael , Westermann, Dirk , Beshiri, Agim , Mills, Nicholas L. , Collaborative, On behalf of the MI, George, Peter M., Richards, Mark , Aldous, Sally, Chapman, Andrew R. , Boeddinghaus, Jasper , Huang, Janel, Cullen, Louise , Mills, Nicholas L , Westermann, Dirk , Richards, Arthur M , Than, Martin , Pickering, John W. , Tsanas, Athanasios , Collaborative, On behalf of the MI, Troughton, Richard W. , Anand, Atul , Greenslade, Jaimi , Parsonage, William , Wildi, Karin , Nestelberger, Thomas , Badertscher, Patrick , Du, Shaoqing, Smith, Stephen W. , Sörensen, Nils Arne , Ojeda, Francisco , Boeddinghaus, Jasper , Blankenberg, Stefan , Neumann, Johannes T , Twerenbold, Raphael

Circulation | August 16, 2019 | Volume: 140 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 899-909

10.1161/circulationaha.119.041980 | PMID 31416346 Get It

Background: Variations in cardiac troponin concentrations by age, sex, and time between samples in patients with suspected myocardial infarction are not currently accounted for in diagnostic approaches. We aimed to combine these variables through machine learning to improve the assessment of risk for individual patients. Methods: A machine learning algorithm (myocardial-ischemic-injury-index [MI 3 ]) incorporating age, sex, and paired high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I concentrations, was trained on 3013 patients and tested on 7998 patients with suspected myocardial infarction. MI 3 uses gradient boosting to compute a value (0–100) reflecting an individual’s likelihood of a diagnosis of type 1 myocardial infarction and estimates the sensitivity, negative predictive value, specificity and positive predictive value for that individual. Assessment was by calibration and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Secondary analysis evaluated example MI 3 thresholds from the training set that identified patients as low risk (99% sensitivity) and high risk (75% positive predictive value), and performance at these thresholds was compared in the test set to the 99th percentile and European Society of Cardiology rule-out pathways. Results: Myocardial infarction occurred in 404 (13.4%) patients in the training set and 849 (10.6%) patients in the test set. MI 3 was well calibrated with a very high area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.963 [0.956–0.971] in the test set and similar performance in early and late presenters. Example MI 3 thresholds identifying low- and high-risk patients in the training set were 1.6 and 49.7, respectively. In the test set, MI 3 values were <1.6 in 69.5% with a negative predictive value of 99.7% (99.5–99.8%) and sensitivity of 97.8% (96.7–98.7%), and were ≥49.7 in 10.6% with a positive predictive value of 71.8% (68.9–75.0%) and specificity of 96.7% (96.3–97.1%). Using these thresholds, MI 3 performed better than the European Society of Cardiology 0/3-hour pathway (sensitivity, 82.5% [74.5–88.8%]; specificity, 92.2% [90.7–93.5%]) and the 99th percentile at any time point (sensitivity, 89.6% [87.4–91.6%]); specificity, 89.3% [88.6–90.0%]). Conclusions: Using machine learning, MI 3 provides an individualized and objective assessment of the likelihood of myocardial infarction, which can be used to identify low- and high-risk patients who may benefit from earlier clinical decisions. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au . Unique identifier: ACTRN12616001441404.
Decreased Expression of Sulfatase 2 in the Brains of Alzheimer’s Disease Patients: Implications for Regulation of Neuronal Cell Signaling
Roberts, Rosebud O., Kang, Yoo Na , Moser, Catherine D., Wang, Shaoqing , Moore, Michael J. , Lai, Jinping , Petersen, Ronald C. , Roberts, Lewis R. , Chen, Chen , Lai, Jin-Ping, Chen, C , Roberts, Lewis R , Hu, Chunling , Moore, Michael J. B. , Graham, Rondell P.

Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Reports | December 20, 2017 | Volume: 1 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 115-124

10.3233/adr-170028 | PMID 30035253 Get It

Background: The human sulfatase 1 (SULF1) and sulfatase 2 (SULF2) genes modulate cell signaling and homeostasis in many tissues. Gene expression analyses have implicated SULF2 in disease pathogenesis, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but changes in brain SULF2 expression have not been directly established. Objective: To investigate the expression of SULF1 and SULF2 in brain tissues from AD cases and cognitively normal controls. Methods: Autopsy tissue from AD cases ( n = 20) and age-and gender-matched cognitively normal controls ( n = 20) were identified from the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer’s Disease Patient Registry neuropathology database. Tissue slides were stained for SULF1 and SULF2 protein expression in the hippocampus and frontal lobe and an expression score computed from the proportion of cells stained and the intensity of staining (range 0 [no expression] to 9 [marked expression]). Results: SULF2 expression was reduced in AD cases. Compared to cognitively normal controls, SULF2 expression in AD cases was significantly decreased in the hippocampal Cornu Ammonis (CA) (mean score of 6.5 in cases versus 8.3 in controls; p = 0.003), in the gray matter of the parahippocampal gyrus (5.6 in cases versus 7.6 in controls; p = 0.003), and in the frontal lobe gray matter (5.4 in cases versus 7.4 in controls; p = 0.002). There was no difference in SULF1 expression in the hippocampus or frontal lobe of AD cases and controls. As expected there were no differences in SULF1 or SULF2 expression in white matter in AD cases compared to cognitively normal controls. Conclusion: Decreased SULF2 in specific regions of the brain occurs in AD.
Transcriptional Induction of Periostin by a Sulfatase 2–TGFβ1–SMAD Signaling Axis Mediates Tumor Angiogenesis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Chen, Gang , Nakamura, Ikuo , Dhanasekaran, Renumathy , Iguchi, Eriko , Tolosa, Ezequiel J. , Romecín, Paola , Vera, Renzo E., Almada, Luciana L. , Miamen, Alexander G., Chaiteerakij, Roongruedee , Zhou, Mengtao , Moser, Catherine D., Han, Shaoshan , Hu, Chunling , Banini, Bubu A. , Oseini, Abdul M., Fang, Yong , Yang, Dongye , Shaleh, Hassan M., Wang, Shaoqing , Wu, Dehai, Song, Tao , Lee, Ju‐Seog , Thorgeirsson, Snorri S., Chevet, Éric , Shah, Vijay H. , Fernández-Zapico, Martín E. , Roberts, Lewis R. , Romecin, Paola A, Asiedu, Michael K. , Chen, Yichun, Nakamura, Ikuo, Chaiteerakij, Roongruedee , Chen, Yi‐Chun , Roberts, Lewis R , Dhanasekaran, Renumathy , Hu, Chunling , Chen, Gang , Chevet, Eric

Cancer Research | November 21, 2016 | Volume: 77 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 632-645

10.1158/0008-5472.can-15-2556 | PMID 27872089 Get It

Abstract Existing antiangiogenic approaches to treat metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are weakly effectual, prompting further study of tumor angiogenesis in this disease setting. Here, we report a novel role for sulfatase 2 (SULF2) in driving HCC angiogenesis. Sulf2-deficient mice (Sulf2 KO) exhibited resistance to diethylnitrosamine-induced HCC and did not develop metastases like wild-type mice (Sulf2 WT). The smaller and less numerous tumors formed in Sulf2 KO mice exhibited a markedly lower microvascular density. In human HCC cells, SULF2 overexpression increased endothelial proliferation, adhesion, chemotaxis, and tube formation in a paracrine fashion. Mechanistic analyses identified the extracellular matrix protein periostin (POSTN), a ligand of αvβ3/5 integrins, as an effector protein in SULF2-induced angiogenesis. POSTN silencing in HCC cells attenuated SULF2-induced angiogenesis and tumor growth in vivo. The TGFβ1/SMAD pathway was identified as a critical signaling axis between SULF2 and upregulation of POSTN transcription. In clinical HCC specimens, elevated levels of SULF2 correlated with increased microvascular density, POSTN levels, and relatively poorer patient survival. Together, our findings define an important axis controlling angiogenesis in HCC and a mechanistic foundation for rational drug development. Cancer Res; 77(3); 632–45. ©2016 AACR.