Citations

Abstract Context Salivary cortisol and cortisone provide non-invasive measures of biologically active cortisol, but their performance during dynamic testing remains incompletely defined. The utility of salivary dexamethasone to confirm exposure during dexamethasone suppression testing (DST) is unknown. Objective To compare salivary cortisol, cortisone, and dexamethasone with serum measurements during dynamic adrenal testing and to derive salivary cortisol and cortisone thresholds corresponding to clinically relevant serum cortisol concentrations. Design and Setting Cross-sectional study at a tertiary referral center. Participants Adults undergoing DST (n = 473), cosyntropin stimulation testing (CST; n = 163), or overnight metyrapone testing (OMT; n = 11). Measurements Serum cortisol was measured by immunoassay. Serum and salivary dexamethasone, salivary cortisol and cortisone were quantified by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Results Among 640 participants, 815 paired serum and salivary samples were analyzed. Salivary cortisol and cortisone correlated well with serum cortisol across dynamic testing, with the greatest difference following 1-mg DST (r = 0.86 vs 0.53 for cortisone and cortisol, respectively; both P < 0.001). During CST, correlations ranged from r = 0.75–0.87 for both analytes (all P < 0.001). Salivary dexamethasone correlated with serum dexamethasone (r = 0.61, P < 0.001). Salivary cortisone thresholds corresponding to prespecified clinically relevant serum cortisol concentrations of 1.8, 5, 10, and 18 µg/dL (50, 138, 276, and 497 nmol/L) were 117, 329, 585, and 1262 ng/dL (3.25, 9.13, 16.23, and 35.01 nmol/L), respectively; corresponding salivary cortisol thresholds were 16.5, 38, 80, and 278 ng/dL (0.46, 1.05, 2.21, and 7.67 nmol/L). Conclusions These findings support saliva-based dynamic adrenal testing and identify clinically relevant salivary thresholds.

Abstract Accurate, noninvasive biomarkers for diagnosis and longitudinal monitoring of metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis (MASH) remain an urgent unmet clinical need. Here, we describe an electrochemical immunoassay that involves capturing hepatic extracellular vesicles (EVs) on antibody-modified electrodes followed by detecting EV-borne biomarkers using redox active gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). The intensity of electrochemical redox signal represents a quantitative measure of biomarker abundance. Three MASH-associated biomarkers—S100A11, TNF-α, and TGF-β1—were analyzed on hepatic EVs to assess steatotic, inflammatory, and fibrotic states of the diseased liver. The electrochemical signals for individual biomarkers were added into a composite EV MASH score. Plasma samples from 28 patients with MASH, 22 healthy controls, and 27 patients with non-MASH liver disease were scored in this manner, revealing 100% accuracy in the training cohort and >90% accuracy in an independent validation cohort. Our electrochemical immunosensor represents a minimally invasive liquid liver biopsy, offering a promising alternative to solid liver biopsies for screening and monitoring of MASH. One Sentence Summary Circulating hepatic extracellular vesicles carry biomarkers of liver injury enabling accurate, minimally invasive MASH diagnosis in blood.

Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome is a complex disease that affects up to 90% of US adults. This work characterized the renal transcriptomic landscape of a novel model of CKM in aging swine. The cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic parameters in pigs are very similar to those in humans, and our work may guide future studies aimed at modulating specific age-related renal abnormalities in CKM to slow disease progression and reduce mortality.

OBJECTIVE Multisegmental pathological autofusion is a hallmark feature of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH), creating a rigid, brittle spine highly susceptible to three-column fractures and devastating neurological injury. This study aimed to evaluate survival outcomes in this patient population and identify clinical and demographic predictors of mortality. METHODS Adults with DISH or AS who sustained a fracture and were admitted to a single tertiary care center for spinal fracture were retrospectively identified using ICD-10 diagnostic codes. Data were extracted on demographics, clinical presentation, fracture characteristics, and details of treatment. RESULTS A total of 383 patients (median age 78 years, 75.2% male) were included. Over a median follow-up of 17.3 months, overall mortality was 38.1%, in-hospital mortality was 5.2%, 30-day mortality was 5.7%, and 1-year mortality was 18.0%. Initial treatment consisted of external orthosis in 220 (57.4%) and surgery in 144 (37.6%), while 19 (5.0%) were left untreated. Patients who died were older (median 83 vs 74 years, p < 0.001), had a lower BMI (29.4 vs 32.3 kg/m 2 , p < 0.001), had higher frailty on the 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5), and more commonly had congestive heart failure (CHF), cancer, functional dependency, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) (all p < 0.01). Mortality was not associated with fracture location, mechanism of injury, fracture number, or the presence of neurological deficits. Univariable time-to-event analysis showed that decreased survival was predicted by older age (HR 1.08, p < 0.0001), lower BMI (HR per kg/m 2 0.93, p < 0.0001), functional dependency (HR 2.05, p < 0.001), cancer (HR 1.55 p = 0.01), CKD (HR 1.48, p = 0.019), CHF (HR 2.18, p < 0.001), and higher mFI-5 score (HR per point 1.34, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, older age (HR 1.06 per year, p < 0.001), lower BMI (HR per kg/m 2 0.95, p < 0.001), and mFI-5 score (HR per patient 1.37, p < 0.001) remained significant independent predictors of mortality. Treatment modality did not predict mortality. CONCLUSIONS AS- or DISH-associated spinal fractures have a high associated mortality, regardless of mechanism or severity. Treatment modality did not affect odds of survival, suggesting that nonoperative management with an external orthosis may be an appropriate option, particularly in older and medically complex patients.

Introduction: Autosomal-dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease (ADTKD) is characterized by chronic kidney disease (CKD) with an average age of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) of approximately 45 years, bland urinary sediment, the absence of proteinuria and autosomal dominant inheritance. While several causative genes have been found, there remain families in whom no molecular diagnosis has been identified (ADTKD-NMD). Methods: We identified BICC1 truncating variants in several families with ADTKD-NMD in the Wake Forest Rare Inherited Kidney Disease Registry and then screened families in our database and other referred families for BICC1 truncating variants. We performed segregation analysis and characterized affected individuals for clinical and histopathologic phenotypes. We analyzed oligomer formation of BICC1 mutants with wild-type BICC1-, ANKS3- and ANKS6 proteins through co-immunoprecipitation and Western blotting, and we tested for posttranscriptional regulation of the BICC1 target mRNA, Dand5, in a Luciferase reporter assay. Results: We found 6 heterozygous truncating mutations in BICC1 segregating with the ADTKD phenotype in 8 independent pedigrees worldwide. Affected individuals developed kidney failure in the 6th to 7th decade of life that was characterized pathologically by tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis. The truncated gene products localized to cytoplasmic bodies and demonstrated various degrees of self-association or binding to the known interaction partners, ANKS3 and ANKS6. While the wild-type BICC1 gene product acts as a posttranscriptional repressor of target mRNAs, all truncation variants exhibited increased expression of substrate mRNA. Conclusions: Truncating variants in BICC1 are a novel cause of ADTKD, segregating with the disease phenotype and upregulating BICC1 target gene expression through a dominant-negative- or a gain-of-function mode of action.

Low diagnostic yield of presurgical genetic testing in adult patients with epilepsy Jünemann C, Stuart A, Kaur N, Wiebe S, Jette N, Singh S, Borlot F, Knake S; Calgary Comprehensive Epilepsy Program Collaborators; Billie Au PY, Klein KM. Epilepsia . 2026 May 20. doi: 10.1002/epi.70291. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 42157695. Objective: To determine the diagnostic yield of genetic testing in patients undergoing presurgical evaluation for epilepsy. Methods: We conducted a cohort study including 115 adult patients who underwent presurgical evaluation in the Calgary Epilepsy Program between 2019 and 2023 and who had undergone research exome sequencing. A curated epilepsy gene panel comprising 765 Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM)-listed epilepsy-associated genes was applied. Variants were classified according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines and assessed for clinical relevance and association with postsurgical outcomes. Results: Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in DEPDC5, NPRL2, KCNT2, and PRRT2 were identified, respectively, in 4 individuals (3.5%, 4/115). All variants met stringent quality criteria with high pathogenicity scores (Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion (CADD) 34–37) and absent or extremely low population frequencies in gnomAD v4.1. None of these patients had intellectual disability, and only 1 patient (PRRT2) had a positive family history. The patient with the KCNT2 variant underwent epilepsy surgery with good outcome (Engel class ID). Significance: This presurgical cohort demonstrates a low diagnostic yield of genetic testing in adult epilepsy surgery candidates. However, 3 of 4 patients with (likely) pathogenic variants did not have features that would have prompted clinical genetic testing, indicating that their genetic diagnosis would have been missed based on typical clinical genetic testing criteria in many jurisdictions.

Zorevunersen in Children and Adolescents with Dravet Syndrome. Laux L, Sullivan J, Perry MS, Brunklaus A, Desurkar A, Schreiber JM, Roberts CM, Knupp KG, Wheless JW, Wirrell EC, Ventola P, Wang F, Meena, Lynch J, Parkerson KA, Ticho B, Cross JH; MONARCH, ADMIRAL, SWALLOWTAIL, and LONGWING Study Groups. N Engl J Med. 2026 Mar 5;394(10):969–982. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2506295. PMID: 41780062. Background: Dravet syndrome is a severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathy caused primarily by SCN1A haploinsufficiency. Risks of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy and cognitive deficits are higher among patients with this syndrome than in the general population with epilepsy. The effects of zorevunersen, an antisense oligonucleotide designed to up-regulate Na V 1.1 sodium channels, in patients with Dravet syndrome are not known. Methods: We enrolled patients 2 to 18 years of age with Dravet syndrome who were receiving standard antiseizure medications in two phase 1–2a, open-label, multicenter studies (MONARCH and ADMIRAL). Patients were included in either a single-ascending-dose cohort, in which zorevunersen (10 to 70 mg) was administered on day 1 only, or a multiple-ascending-dose cohort, in which zorevunersen (20 to 70 mg) was administered two or three times in a 3-month period. Patients eligible for rollover to the two open-label extension studies (SWALLOWTAIL and LONGWING) continued to receive zorevunersen (≤45 mg) every 4 months. The safety and pharmacokinetics of zorevunersen were assessed in the primary analysis; clinical effects were also evaluated. Results: A total of 81 patients were enrolled in the phase 1–2a studies. As of May 30, 2025, a total of 75 patients had entered the extension studies. Most adverse events were mild or moderate. The most common adverse event was post-lumbar puncture syndrome (in 25% of patients) in the phase 1–2a studies and was an elevated protein level in cerebrospinal fluid (in 45%) in the extension studies. One patient had suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions, 1 had an adverse event that led to study withdrawal, 2 died from sudden unexpected death in epilepsy, and 1 died from malnutrition. Patients who received 70 mg of zorevunersen (one, two, or three doses) in the phase 1–2a studies, followed by up to 45 mg in the extension studies, had a median change from baseline in convulsive-seizure frequency ranging from −58.82% to −90.91% across 1-month intervals during the first 20 months of the extension studies. The data supported improvements in overall clinical status, quality of life, and adaptive behavior with continued treatment for up to 36 months in the extension studies. Conclusions: The safety profile and initial clinical improvement support the continued development of zorevunersen as a potential disease-modifying treatment for Dravet syndrome. (Supported by Stoke Therapeutics; MONARCH and SWALLOWTAIL ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT04442295 and NCT04740476, respectively; ADMIRAL and LONGWING ISRCTN Registry numbers, ISRCTN99651026 and ISRCTN12811235, respectively.).

Background : Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality. Optimal treatment decisions are challenging, and existing treatment allocation frameworks may not fully reflect the evolving therapeutic landscape or contemporary clinical practices in North America. Methods : Using a modified Delphi process, a multidisciplinary panel of 20 North American experts in hepatology, medical oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology developed a consensus-based treatment framework for HCC, termed the BEACON-HCC system. The framework was informed by current evidence and expert opinion through iterative discussion and voting. In a pilot study using 29 real-world patient cases, we assessed concordance between external expert recommendations and BEACON-HCC recommendations and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) 2025 treatment recommendations. Results : The BEACON-HCC treatment allocation framework diverges from prior frameworks by incorporating nuanced clinical features such as degree of intrahepatic tumor burden and vascular invasion, and adverse tumor prognostic markers, to align treatment allocation with tumor biology and therapeutic potential. Key innovations include the incorporation of emerging modalities such as external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), and systemic-locoregional combination therapies. In the pilot exercise, expert treatment decisions showed 96.6% concordance with BEACON-HCC recommendations and 72.4% concordance with BCLC recommendations. Conclusions : BEACON-HCC is a consensus-based framework for treatment allocation that incorporates the expanding range of therapeutic options available to patients in the North American HCC population. Expert treatment decisions showed a high concordance with the BEACON-HCC system; further validation using empiric clinical data is planned through the HCC-Live Consortium.