Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

2 citation(s) found for "Xu, Yajing".

Extrachromosomal DNA Couples with ATM-mediated DNA Damage Response for Genome Instability in Tumors
Gan, Haiyun , Zhou, Jiaqi , Zhang, Yang , Hu, Suili, Deng, Zhiwen , Xu, Yajing, Chen, Jinyi , Yue, Zhen , Yao, Sitong , Tian, Congcong , Wen, Qing , Yan, Lixia , Depies, Olivia M , Liang, Xiao‐Huan , Liu, Xiangyu , Kang, Xing, Li, Xinran , Deng, Zhiwen, Wu, Yu-Chun , Wang, Nan , Chen, Liangming , Yue, Zhen, Yao, Yuan , Yang, Xinran , Tian, Congcong, Liang, Xiaoyan , Chan, Kui Ming , Dai, Junbiao , Wang, Zhiquan , Yu, Chuanhe , Li, Gang

No container title available | January 23, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-3708982/v1 Get It

Abstract Extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) drives the evolution of cancer cells by conferring survival advantages over normal cells. However, the functional importance of ecDNA replication and maintenance is yet to be evaluated, and the molecular components that contributed to these processes remain largely unknown. Here, using CRISPR-C (circularization of genes and chromosomes by CRISPR) technology and synthetic circular DNA mimicking ecDNA identified in tumors, we generated ecDNA-positive (ecDNA+) cell models. Using these models, we identified the proteins involved in ecDNA replication and maintenance and found DNA damage response (DDR)-related pathways were significantly enriched. We further demonstrated that ecDNA replication led to increased DDR and genome instability and DDR was also essential for ecDNA maintenance, consistent with observations that ecDNA+ tumors exhibited higher DDR scores than ecDNA-negative (ecDNA–) tumors in patients. ATM, MDC1, and CHK2, but not ATR, were activated in ecDNA+ cells compared to ecDNA– cells. Moreover, ecDNA+ cells were more sensitive to ATM and CHK2 inhibition. We further found that type II topoisomerase TOP2B and DNA ligase III (LIG3) were critical regulators for ecDNA replication and maintenance and related DDR. In summary, our findings of the reciprocal interactions between ecDNA and DDR provide new insights into detection and therapy for ecDNA+ tumors.
Large Cancer Pedigree Involving Multiple Cancer Genes including Likely Digenic MSH2 and MSH6 Lynch Syndrome (LS) and an Instance of Recombinational Rescue from LS
Greer, Stephanie , Wang, Fan , Shin, Gi Won , Lau, Billy T. , Hu, Yajing, Alvarez, Rocio , Hazelett, Dennis J. , Nguyen, Peter , Aguirre, Francesca Paola, Hendifar, Andrew , Balcom, Jessica R. , Leininger, Anna, Fairbank, Beth, Ji, Hanlee P. , Hitchins, Megan P. , Wang, Fan , Alvarez, Rocio , Balcom, Jessica, Hitchins, Megan P , Hazelett, Dennis J , Vogelaar, Ingrid P. , Haraldsdóttir, Sigurdís , Aguirre, Francesca Paola, Guindi, Maha M.

Cancers | December 30, 2022 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 228

10.3390/cancers15010228 | PMID 36612224 Get It

Lynch syndrome (LS), caused by heterozygous pathogenic variants affecting one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes (MSH2, MLH1, MSH6, PMS2), confers moderate to high risks for colorectal, endometrial, and other cancers. We describe a four-generation, 13-branched pedigree in which multiple LS branches carry the MSH2 pathogenic variant c.2006G>T (p.Gly669Val), one branch has this and an additional novel MSH6 variant c.3936_4001+8dup (intronic), and other non-LS branches carry variants within other cancer-relevant genes (NBN, MC1R, PTPRJ). Both MSH2 c.2006G>T and MSH6 c.3936_4001+8dup caused aberrant RNA splicing in carriers, including out-of-frame exon-skipping, providing functional evidence of their pathogenicity. MSH2 and MSH6 are co-located on Chr2p21, but the two variants segregated independently (mapped in trans) within the digenic branch, with carriers of either or both variants. Thus, MSH2 c.2006G>T and MSH6 c.3936_4001+8dup independently confer LS with differing cancer risks among family members in the same branch. Carriers of both variants have near 100% risk of transmitting either one to offspring. Nevertheless, a female carrier of both variants did not transmit either to one son, due to a germline recombination within the intervening region. Genetic diagnosis, risk stratification, and counseling for cancer and inheritance were highly individualized in this family. The finding of multiple cancer-associated variants in this pedigree illustrates a need to consider offering multicancer gene panel testing, as opposed to targeted cascade testing, as additional cancer variants may be uncovered in relatives.