Haraldsdóttir, Sigurdís

76 Background: The prevalence of Lynch syndrome in Iceland is the highest described so far or 1:226 with three founder mutations, one in MSH6 and two in PMS2, and was first reported in 2017. Lynch syndrome predisposes carriers to colorectal cancer and metachronous primaries. Most data on metachronous colorectal cancer reflects on MLH1 and MSH2 carriers and is not well described in MSH6 and PMS2 carriers. The purpose of this study was to examine the cumulative incidence of metachronous colorectal cancer in Icelandic Lynch syndrome carriers diagnosed with colorectal cancer from 1955-2017. Methods: This retrospective study included all individuals with pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes identified in a nationwide genotype database and a colorectal cancer diagnosis in the Icelandic Cancer Registry from 1955-2017. DeCODE genetics has collected extensive genotypic information on the Icelandic population sequencing the whole genomes of 49,708 Icelanders and imputing genotypes into 116,573 Icelanders whose DNA had been genotyped with SNP chips. Cancer information was obtained from patient charts and cause of death obtained from the Cause of Death Register. All polyp pathology was accessed in the pathology registry and reassessed by two pathologists. Results: A total of 65 individuals developed colorectal cancer during the study period with 34 (52.3%) PMS2 carriers and 25 (38.5%) MSH6 carriers. The cumulative incidence of metachronous colorectal cancer was low or one case (1.5%) in an MSH2 carrier with a median follow-up time of 58 months (Q1 8.0, Q3 167.0, range 0-365 months) in the cohort. Only two (3.1%) individuals, one with MSH2 and one with MSH6 pathogenic variants, underwent a total colectomy. Median age at first colorectal cancer diagnosis was 63 years (Q1 54.0, Q3 72.5, range 28-94). Thirty-one (47.7%) individuals had polyps resected during the study period with adenomas (67.1%) being the most common. Significantly more MSH6 carriers had a history of advanced adenomas as compared to PMS2 carriers (36.0 % vs 11.8%, p = 0.026). Five-year colorectal cancer survival was 81.4% for PMS2 carriers and 71.5% for MSH6 carriers. Conclusions: The incidence of metachronous colorectal cancer was zero in Lynch syndrome carriers with MSH6 or PMS2 pathogenic variants from 1955-2017 despite these individuals not undergoing rigorous Lynch syndrome screening. This would support performing segmental colectomies and following European screening guidelines for MSH6 and PMS2 carriers in Iceland.

Lynch syndrome (LS), caused by heterozygous pathogenic variants affecting one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes (MSH2, MLH1, MSH6, PMS2), confers moderate to high risks for colorectal, endometrial, and other cancers. We describe a four-generation, 13-branched pedigree in which multiple LS branches carry the MSH2 pathogenic variant c.2006G>T (p.Gly669Val), one branch has this and an additional novel MSH6 variant c.3936_4001+8dup (intronic), and other non-LS branches carry variants within other cancer-relevant genes (NBN, MC1R, PTPRJ). Both MSH2 c.2006G>T and MSH6 c.3936_4001+8dup caused aberrant RNA splicing in carriers, including out-of-frame exon-skipping, providing functional evidence of their pathogenicity. MSH2 and MSH6 are co-located on Chr2p21, but the two variants segregated independently (mapped in trans) within the digenic branch, with carriers of either or both variants. Thus, MSH2 c.2006G>T and MSH6 c.3936_4001+8dup independently confer LS with differing cancer risks among family members in the same branch. Carriers of both variants have near 100% risk of transmitting either one to offspring. Nevertheless, a female carrier of both variants did not transmit either to one son, due to a germline recombination within the intervening region. Genetic diagnosis, risk stratification, and counseling for cancer and inheritance were highly individualized in this family. The finding of multiple cancer-associated variants in this pedigree illustrates a need to consider offering multicancer gene panel testing, as opposed to targeted cascade testing, as additional cancer variants may be uncovered in relatives.

Abstract Background Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is highly effective in metastatic mismatch repair-deficient (MMR-D) colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study, we evaluated molecular and clinical predictors of ICI response in MMR-D CRC. Materials and Methods Patient databases at four cancer institutions were queried. The Fisher exact test was performed to test the association of clinical and molecular markers. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and compared by the log-rank test. Twelve- and 24-month PFS rates were compared by the Z test. Results A total of 60 patients with CRC with MMR-D/microsatellite instability-high who previously received ICIs were identified. Patients with liver metastasis had a lower overall response rate as compared with other sites of metastasis (36.4% vs. 68.7%; p = .081). Patients with MLH1/PMS2 loss had worse 1-year and 2-year PFS rates compared with patients with MSH2/MSH6 loss (84.2% vs. 57.8% and 78.2% vs. 54.2%, respectively; p < .001). There were improved 1-year and 2-year PFS rates in patients with wild-type BRAF when compared with patients with BRAF V600E mutation (73.3% vs. 40%, and 73.3% vs. 26.7%; respectively; p < .001). Patients aged >65 had significantly worse PFS rates as compared with patients aged ≤65 (p < .001). Conclusion BRAF V600E mutation, MLH1 and/or PMS2 loss, as well as age >65 years and liver metastasis, may be predictive of duration of ICI response in patients with MMR-D CRC. Larger cohorts are needed to confirm our findings. Implications for Practice The results of this study reveal clinically important biomarkers that potentially predict immune checkpoint inhibitor response in patients with mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer.

225 Background: ICIs induce durable responses in dMMR CRC patients. However, clinical and molecular biomarkers of response to ICIs have not been well-established. In this study, we investigated impact of specific MMR gene loss, BRAF V600E mutation and clinical characteristics of pts on clinical outcomes of ICIs. Methods: Pts were eligible if they had confirmed dMMR CRC by IHC or MSI-H by PCR and received ICIs between 01/01/2012 and 05/01/2019 at Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Mayo Clinic, Vanderbilt or Stanford University. Due to the functional dependency, the groups were categorized as protein loss of MLH1+PMS2 vs MSH2+MSH6. Log-rank test, Cox hazard model and Fisher’s exact test were used for survival outcomes, the best response and the distribution of variables among the subgroups. Results: A total of 66 pts with dMMR CRC were identified and BRAF status was available for 41 pts. ORRs in MLH1+PMS2 and MSH2+MSH6 groups were 72.9% and 56.5% respectively (P = 0.189). At 2 years, PFS rates were 55.6% and 78.2% for MLH1+PMS2 and MSH2+MSH6 groups respectively (P < 0.001). Pts with BRAF V600E mutations had significantly worse outcomes as compared to pts with wild-type BRAF (2-year PFS rate of 35.0% and 73.3% respectively; P < 0.001). Notably pts < 65 had better 2-year disease control rates when compared to > 65 (71.1% and 41.5% respectively; P < 0.001). We also observed worse 2-year PFS rates in pts with liver metastases (P = 0.014). CRC side and tumor volume did not impact 2-year PFS rates in our cohort. Conclusions: Our data suggest that pts with loss of function in MSH2+MSH6 may have better 2 year-PFS rates compared pts with MLH1+PMS2 even though ORR favored MLH1+PMS2 group suggesting that ORR may not reflect the durability of ICI response in dMMR CRC patients. Consistently, pts with BRAF V600E mutation which is associated with MLH1 promoter methylation had significantly worse 2-year PFS rates. Overall, our findings suggest that BRAFV600E mutation, the affected MMR proteins, pt age, and site of metastasis may impact durability of ICI response in dMMR CRC patients.