Citations

Abstract Background Electrophoretic methods to detect, characterize and quantify M-proteins play an important role in the management of patients with monoclonal gammopathies (MGs). Significant uncertainty in the quantification and limit of detection (LOD) is documented when M-proteins are <10 g/L. Using spiked sera, we aimed to assess the variability in intact M-protein quantification and LOD across 16 laboratories. Methods Sera with normal, hypo- or hyper-gammaglobulinemia were spiked with daratumumab or elotuzumab, with concentrations from 0.125 to 10 g/L (n = 62) along with a beta-migrating sample (n = 9). Laboratories blindly analyzed samples according to their serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP)/isotyping standard operating procedures. LOD and intra-laboratory percent coefficient of variation (%CV) were calculated and further specified with regard to the method (gel/capillary electrophoresis [CZE]), gating strategy (perpendicular drop [PD]/tangent skimming [TS]), isotyping (immunofixation/immunosubtraction [ISUB]) and manufacturer (Helena/Sebia). Results All M-proteins ≥1 g/L were detected by SPEP. With isotyping the LOD was moderately more sensitive than with SPEP. The intensity of polyclonal background had the biggest negative impact on LOD. Independent of the method used, the intra-laboratory imprecision of M-protein quantification was small (mean CV = 5.0%). Low M-protein concentration and high polyclonal background had the strongest negative impact on intra-laboratory precision. All laboratories were able to follow trend of M-protein concentrations down to 1 g/L. Conclusions In this study, we describe a large variation in the reported LOD for both SPEP and isotyping; overall LOD is most affected by the polyclonal immunoglobulin background. Satisfactory intra-laboratory precision was demonstrated. This indicates that the quantification of small M-proteins to monitor patients over time is appropriate, when subsequent testing is performed within the same laboratory.

Abstract Background Serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) is used to quantify the serum monoclonal component or M-protein, for diagnosis and monitoring of monoclonal gammopathies. Significant imprecision and inaccuracy pose challenges in reporting small M-proteins. Using therapeutic monoclonal antibody-spiked sera and a pooled beta-migrating M-protein, we aimed to assess SPEP limitations and variability across 16 laboratories in three continents. Methods Sera with normal, hypo- or hypergammaglobulinemia were spiked with daratumumab, Dara (cathodal migrating), or elotuzumab, Elo (central-gamma migrating), with concentrations from 0.125 to 10 g/L (n = 62) along with a beta-migrating sample (n = 9). Provided with total protein (reverse biuret, Siemens), laboratories blindly analyzed samples according to their SPEP and immunofixation (IFE) or immunosubtraction (ISUB) standard operating procedures. Sixteen laboratories reported the perpendicular drop (PD) method of gating the M-protein, while 10 used tangent skimming (TS). A mean percent recovery range of 80%–120% was set as acceptable. The inter-laboratory %CV was calculated. Results Gamma globulin background, migration pattern and concentration all affect the precision and accuracy of quantifying M-proteins by SPEP. As the background increases, imprecision increases and accuracy decreases leading to overestimation of M-protein quantitation especially evident in hypergamma samples, and more prominent with PD. Cathodal migrating M-proteins were associated with less imprecision and higher accuracy compared to central-gamma migrating M-proteins, which is attributed to the increased gamma background contribution in M-proteins migrating in the middle of the gamma fraction. There is greater imprecision and loss of accuracy at lower M-protein concentrations. Conclusions This study suggests that quantifying exceedingly low concentrations of M-proteins, although possible, may not yield adequate accuracy and precision between laboratories.

Abstract Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) assays are used for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarctions and require serial measurements. Hemolysis is a common analytical interference for cTnT immunoassays, causing a false decrease in analyte concentration. Recollection of specimens that do not meet the recommended hemolysis threshold (H-index = 100) causes reporting delays and mistiming of serial measurements. This has been particularly disruptive to our emergency department and creates significant risk for patients whose diagnosis could be delayed by recollection due to hemolysis. Here we aimed to reevaluate the limits for acceptable hemolysis by determining the magnitude of cTnT concentration depression from hemolysis to evaluate whether more detailed thresholds could be established. To quantify the effects of hemolysis on cTnT, patient pools were prepared from residual serum with cTnT concentrations ranging from 10 to 100 ng/L and spiked with hemolysate prepared from lysed red blood cells to create H-indices ranging from 120 to 200. Samples were run in triplicate by the Elecsys Troponin T Gen. 5 STAT assay. Results demonstrated consistent percent decreases in cTnT across all concentrations tested for each level of hemolysis. The mean percent changes in cTnT concentrations in the presence of hemolysis for H-indices of 120, 140, 160, 180, and 200 were –3.4 ± 1.3%, –4.1 ± 1.2%, –6.3 ± 1.2%, –8.0 ± 1.7%, and –10.7 ± 1.22%, respectively. The observed decrease in cTnT was linearly related to the H index; predicted differences at higher H-indices (>200) agreed well with prior publications evaluating greater degrees of hemolysis. In our practice, a 2-hour delta ≥10 ng/L is considered significant for acute cardiac injury, <4 ng/L is a nonsignificant delta, and a delta of 4 to 9 ng/L is considered indeterminate. Baseline cTnT results of ≥100 ng/L result in immediate triage to cardiology. Approximately one-third of our patients with cTnT testing have baseline results within the reference range (≤15 ng/L males, ≤10 ng/L females). Based on the spiking data, H-index cutoffs were chosen to minimize recollections for low-risk and high-risk patients. Cutoffs for intermediate cTnT results were more restrictive to ensure delta interpretation would not change significantly. This resulted in a H-index of 300 for samples ≤8 ng/L, 200 for 9 to 40 ng/L, 160 for 41 to 70 ng/L, 140 for 71 to 99 ng/L, and 300 for ≥100 ng/L. These data quantify the percent change for cTnT in the presence of varying levels of hemolysis. At lower cTnT values, a larger degree of hemolysis can be tolerated because the percentage of depression results in a small absolute change, thus leading to less impact on the delta. The tiered H-index cutoffs allow minimal disruption to patient care for low- and high-risk patients, while maintaining the integrity of serial measurements for those with intermediate cTnT concentrations. Therefore, laboratories may consider releasing some hemolyzed cTnT specimens with a comment to decrease redraws and mistiming of serial measurements.

Abstract Background Cardiac troponin (cTn) assays are used for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction and frequently require serial measurements. Recollection of unacceptable specimens for hemolysis can delay results and disrupt timing of serial measurements. This study was designed to assess the influence of hemolysis on a high-sensitivity cTnT assay in granular detail at clinically important concentrations. These were used in consultation with the clinical practice to evaluate risk-based thresholds for acceptable amounts of hemolysis. Methods Plasma pools ranging from &lt;10 to &gt;100 ng/L cTnT were spiked with hemolysate to various degrees of hemolysis and measured using the Elecsys Troponin T Gen 5 STAT assay. The impact of accepting expanded hemolysis thresholds was completed using retrospective data of 12225 serial cTnT results and an additional 4651 baseline cTnT results. Results The mean percent change in cTnT was consistent for a given degree of hemolysis regardless of the initial nonhemolyzed cTnT concentration. Tiered hemolysis thresholds were evaluated for low-risk patients (apparent cTnT ≤8 ng/L), intermediate-risk patients (thresholds for 9–37 ng/L, 38–66 ng/L, and 67–99 ng/L cTnT), and high-risk patients (≥100 ng/L cTnT). The influence of tiered hemolysis thresholds was calculated for patients with serial (0 and 2 h) cTnT results, which demonstrated that the majority of 2-h delta interpretations were unchanged. Implementation of tiered thresholds dramatically decreased recollections for hemolyzed cTnT samples. Conclusion Tiered hemolysis cutoffs minimized disruption to patient care for low- and high-risk patients, while maintaining the integrity of serial measurements for those with intermediate cTnT concentrations.