Citations

ABSTRACT Background Current staging systems for head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HNCSCC), such as AJCC8 and BWH, often fail to adequately stratify high‐risk patients, particularly due to the exclusion of important biological and host factors. This study aimed to identify independent prognostic factors for HNCSCC outcomes in the largest multi‐institutional retrospective series to date. Methods De‐identified data from 8,610 primary HNCSCC tumors, treated with curative intent surgery across multiple international centers, were analyzed. Outcomes included local recurrence (LR), locoregional metastasis (LM), distant metastasis (DM), and disease‐specific death (DSD). Multivariable Fine–Gray subdistribution hazard regression models with robust standard errors clustered at the patient level were fitted to generate exploratory hypotheses regarding independent hazard determinants. Results During a median follow‐up of 31.4 months (IQR 14.2–52.8), the cumulative incidence was 3.3% for LR, 2.7% for LM, 0.5% for DM, and 1.2% for DSD. Multivariable analysis confirmed that tumor diameter, poor differentiation, deep invasion, and large‐caliber perineural invasion (LCPNI) were the strongest predictors, being significantly associated with at least three of the four outcomes. Notably, factors currently excluded from or weighted differently in staging systems also proved critical: Immunosuppression was significantly associated with LR (SHR 2.03) and DSD (SHR 1.70); and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was independently associated with LM (SHR 3.00). Poor differentiation demonstrated high prognostic impact, being a significant predictor for all four endpoints. Conclusion Tumor diameter, poor differentiation, deep invasion, LCPNI, immunosuppression status, and LVI are the most critical independent factors for HNCSCC prognosis. Our multi‐institutional data provide a robust framework for hypothesis generation, highlighting that incorporating host biological features and non‐anatomic variables could significantly refine future staging system discussions.

Importance There is no consensus on staging and surveillance imaging for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). Although imaging has been shown to affect management, broad recommendations from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network have led to variability in clinical practice. Objective To develop multidisciplinary consensus recommendations on the use of staging and surveillance imaging of localized CSCC. Evidence Review A multidisciplinary expert panel across academic and clinical practice settings convened a Delphi consensus, with 3 iterative survey rounds from January to June 2025. Data were analyzed from February 2025 to January 2026. Eligibility defined by at least 1 to 2 CSCC publications during the previous 5 years, involvement in a relevant clinical trial, experience treating at least 3 patients monthly with CSCC, and/or 5 years or longer of clinical practice. Fifty-four experts were invited and 45 (83%) completed all 3 rounds and were included in the final analysis. Structured Delphi surveys evaluated clinical scenarios, imaging modalities, and surveillance strategies for CSCC. Consensus and near-consensus recommendations were generated, defined as 80% or greater and 70% to 79% agreement, respectively. Findings The 45 participants (21 female individuals [47%] and 24 male individuals [53%]; 14 Asian individuals [31%], 1 multiracial individual [2%], and 30 White individuals [67%]) consisted of dermatology (15 [33%]), medical oncology (7 [16%]), radiation oncology (9 [20%]), radiology (9 [20%]), surgery (3 [7%]), and otolaryngology specialists (2 [4%]). The Delphi panel recommended staging and surveillance for CSCCs with at least a 15% risk of metastasis. Consensus or near consensus was reached to recommend staging and surveillance imaging for tumors with a concern for metastasis, bone invasion, invasion beyond subcutaneous fat, large-caliber nerve invasion, or a diameter of 4 cm or larger or the combination of tumors with poorly differentiated histology and any of the following: diameter of 2 cm or larger, lymphovascular invasion and subcutaneous fat invasion, or lymphovascular invasion and small-caliber perineural invasion. Computed tomography imaging was the preferred modality for nodal staging (38 [84%]) and surveillance (35 [78%]). For surveillance duration, consensus was reached to provide imaging for at least 2 years, and near consensus was reached for at least 3 years. Conclusions and Relevance This study provides an expert consensus–based framework to standardize imaging in localized CSCC that may inform future guidelines.

Background: Among the 1.5 million cases of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) diagnosed annually in the United States, a subset of aggressive tumors recur or metastasize. Treatment options include total margin-controlled surgery, such as Mohs micrographic surgery or other forms of peripheral and deep en face margin assessment (MMS/PDEMA), and standard excision with postoperative vertical section margin assessment (SEVMA). NCCN Guidelines recommend MMS/PDEMA for the management of cSCC classified as very high risk based on NCCN risk stratification criteria. This study aims to validate the recommendation of MMS/PDEMA as the preferred surgical approach for NCCN very high-risk cSCCs, using data from a multicenter, multinational cohort. Methods: A multicenter cohort study was conducted across 12 sites, including 10 in the United States, 1 in Spain, and 1 in Brazil, comprising 2,752 primary NCCN very high-risk cSCCs treated with MMS/PDEMA or SEVMA. Propensity score–weighted analysis was used to balance baseline characteristics. Outcomes included local recurrence (LR), nodal metastasis (NM), distant metastasis (DM), and disease-specific death (DSD). Results: After balancing baseline characteristics, SEVMA was associated with a 2-fold higher rate of poor outcomes, including recurrence, metastasis, and DSD, compared with MMS/PDEMA. The 3-year cumulative incidence of poor outcomes was higher for SEVMA: LR (12.5% vs 5.9%), NM (11.6% vs 6.0%), DM (4.3% vs 1.9%), and DSD (6.2% vs 3.3%). Conclusions: This study supports the NCCN recommendation of MMS/PDEMA for NCCN very high-risk cSCC, showing reduced recurrence, metastasis, and cSCC-specific mortality compared with SEVMA.

ABSTRACT Importance Risk stratification of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is central to effective management. Despite advancements in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC8) staging system, the distinctiveness of T‐stages remains limited. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of the Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) and the AJCC8 staging systems in predicting poor outcomes in head and neck (HN) CSCC. Design A retrospective, multinational cohort study of CSCCs diagnosed between January 10, 1991, and December 31, 2023. Setting Twelve centers across the United States (10), Spain (1), and Brazil (1). Participants Patients with invasive CSCC who underwent curative‐intent surgical treatment. Exclusions included cases of lip CSCC, cases with prior HN cancer with associated regional disease, patients with a history of chemotherapy/radiotherapy for other HN neoplasms, and recurrent primary tumors. Exposure Tumors were staged according to both the AJCC8 TNM staging system and the BWH tumor classification. Main Outcomes and Measures Local recurrence (LR), nodal recurrence (NR), distant recurrence (DR), and disease‐specific death (DSD). Results A total of 9852 excised tumors from 3168 patients were included. The 2 systems had comparable monotonicity and homogeneity. Significant differences could be observed in 5‐year cumulative incidence for DSD in both BWH and AJCC8, and also for LR in BWH. Higher T‐stages exhibited similar curves regarding NR and DR for both AJCC8 and BWH staging systems. Overall, we observed high specificity and NPV, low sensitivity and PPV, and moderately high c‐indices for both the BWH and AJCC8 staging systems in predicting the main outcomes for HNCSCC. Conclusion and Relevance Current AJCC8 and BWH staging systems can accurately predict survival in HNCSCC, although there are still important characteristics to be addressed in future staging systems for better stratification according to the other main outcomes.

ImportanceCutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) risk stratification is central to management, and physicians rely on tumor staging systems to estimate risk. The Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) T staging system predicts risk based on 4 tumor risk factors (RFs). However, stage is not precisely associated with the number of RFs, as BWH stage T2b includes CSCCs with 2 and 3 RFs.ObjectiveTo determine how RF number is associated with the risk of recurrence, metastasis, and disease-related death.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective multination cohort study of CSCCs diagnosed between October 1, 1991, and July 19, 2023, was conducted at 12 centers in the US (10), Spain (1), and Brazil (1). Invasive CSCCs with confirmed negative margins longer than 14 days were included. Tumors were excluded if they were metastatic at presentation or received adjuvant therapy. Data were analyzed from October 2023 to August 2024.Interventions or ExposuresCSCCs were stratified by the number of the following RFs (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4): a diameter of 2 cm or larger, poorly differentiated histology, tumor extension beyond subcutaneous fat, and large caliber nerve invasion.Main Outcomes and MeasuresFive-year cumulative incidences of local recurrence, nodal metastasis, distant metastasis, and disease-specific death.ResultsA total of 16 844 CSCCs were included (5978 female individuals [35.5%]; median [IQR] age, 73.9 [65.7-81.8] years), with 0 (12 657 [75.1%]), 1 (2892 [17.2%]), 2 (1015 [6.0%]), 3 ( 225 [1.3%]) or 4 (55 [0.3%]) RFs. Median (IQ) follow up time was 33.6 (14.5-60.3) months. For local recurrence, the risk increased as the number of RF increased from 0 (1.7%; 95% CI, 1.5%-2.0%) to 1 (5.0%; 95% CI, 4.1%-5.9%) to 2 (8.8%; 95% CI, 7.0%-11.0%) to 3 (16.0%; 95% CI, 11.0%-22.0%) to 4 (33.0%; 95% CI, 19.0%-47.0%; P < .001 for between-group differences). This increase was also observed for nodal metastasis (0.6% [95% CI, 0.4%-0.7%] vs 3.6% [95% CI, 2.9%-4.4%] vs 11.0% [95% CI, 9.2%-13.0%] vs 20.0% [95% CI, 15.0%-26.0%] vs 28.0% [95% CI, 15.0%-42.0%], respectively; P < .001), distant metastasis (0.2% [95% CI, 0.1%-0.3%] vs 1.1% [95% CI, 0.7%-1.6%] vs 2.3% [95% CI, 1.4%-3.4%] vs 7.9% [95% CI, 4.6%-12.0%] vs 8.4% [95% CI, 2.6%-19.0%], respectively; P < .001), and disease-specific death (0.3% [95% CI, 0.2%-0.4%] vs 1.9% [95% CI, 1.4%-2.7%] vs 5.4% [95% CI, 4.0%-7.0%] vs 11.0% [95% CI, 6.7%-16.0%] vs 25% [95% CI, 12%-39%], respectively; P < .001). CSCCs with 3 RFs had higher cumulative incidences of local recurrence (1.6-fold), nodal metastasis (1.9-fold), distant metastasis (4.3-fold), and disease-specific death (1.9-fold) compared with those with 2 RFs.Conclusions and RelevanceThe results of this cohort study suggest that the number of RFs is an indicator of risk, and among BWH T2b tumors, those with 3 RFs represent a higher risk subset.

ImportanceCutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is the second most common malignant disease in the US. Although it typically carries a good prognosis, a subset of CSCCs are highly aggressive, carrying regional and distant metastatic potential. Due to its high incidence, this aggressive subset is responsible for considerable mortality, with an overall annual mortality estimated to equal or even surpass melanoma. Despite this morbidity, CSCC is excluded from national cancer registries, making it difficult to study its epidemiology and outcomes. Therefore, the bulk of the CSCC literature is composed of single-center and multi-institutional retrospective cohort analyses. Given variations in reporting measures and analyses in these studies, interpretability between studies and the ability to pool results are limited.ObjectiveTo define standardized reporting measures for retrospective CSCC studies.FindingsAn expert panel was convened to determine standardized guidelines for recording and analyzing retrospective CSCC data. A total of 13 dermatologists and dermatologic surgeons with more than 5 years of posttraining experience and considerable experience with performing CSCC outcomes research were recruited to the panel. Consensus recommendations were achieved for CSCC retrospective study reporting measures, definitions, and analyses.Conclusions and RelevanceThe recommendations in this report present the potential to standardize future CSCC retrospective studies. With such standardization, future work may have greater interstudy interpretability and allow for pooled analyses.

Abstract Background: Cemiplimab is the first treatment approved in the US (as cemiplimab-rwlc) for patients with metastatic basal cell carcinoma (mBCC) or locally advanced disease (laBCC) after hedgehog inhibitor (HHI) treatment or for whom an HHI is not appropriate. Cemiplimab provided substantial clinical benefit and an acceptable safety profile in patients with laBCC who discontinued HHI therapy due to progressive disease (PD), intolerance, or no better than stable disease (SD) after 9 months (NCT03132636). Here, we present the primary analysis of the mBCC cohort. Methods: Patients with mBCC (nodal or distant) post-HHI treatment received cemiplimab 350 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 93 weeks or until PD. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review (ICR). Key secondary endpoints included safety and tolerability, ORR per investigator (INV) assessment, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and complete response (CR) rate (data cutoff date: May 20, 2021). Results: Fifty-four patients were enrolled (70.4% male; median age 63.5 years [range, 38−90]; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 [66.7%] and 1 [33.3%]). Median duration of follow-up was 8.4 months (range 1.5-36.2). ORR per ICR was 24.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.5-37.6); with 1 CR and 12 partial responses (PRs). ORR per INV was 25.9% (95% CI, 15.0-39.7), with 2 CRs and 12 PRs. Among responders, median time to response per ICR was 4.0 months (range, 2.0−10.5). Estimated median DOR per ICR was 16.7 months (95% CI, 9.8-not evaluable). Disease control rate was 63.0% (95% CI, 48.7-75.7) per ICR and 70.4% (95% CI, 56.4-82.0) per INV. Median OS was not reached. Median PFS per ICR was 8.3 months (95% CI, 4.2-15.9). The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (37.0%), diarrhea (14.8%), pruritus (13.0%), hyperthyroidism (9.3%), and arthralgia (9.3%) as well as hypothyroidism, asthenia, constipation, and maculo-papular rash (7.4% each). There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: Cemiplimab provided clinically meaningful antitumor activity, including durable responses, and an acceptable safety profile in patients with mBCC who had progressed on or were intolerant to HHI therapy. Citation Format: Karl Lewis, Ketty Peris, Aleksander Sekulic, Alexander J. Stratigos, Lara Dunn, Zeynep Eroglu, Anne Lynn S. Chang, Michael R. Migden, Suk-Young Yoo, Kosalai Mohan, Ebony Coates, Emmanuel Okoye, Timothy Bowler, Jean-François Baurain, Oliver Bechter, Axel Hauschild, Marcus O. Butler, Leonel Hernandez-Aya, Lisa Licitra, Rogerio I. Neves, Emily S. Ruiz, Frank Seebach, David M. Weinreich, George D. Yancopoulos, Israel Lowy, Priscila Goncalves, Matthew G. Fury. Primary analysis of phase 2 results for cemiplimab in patients with metastatic basal cell carcinoma who progressed on or were intolerant to hedgehog inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT165.