Citations

AbstractBackgroundRecent studies highlight distinct patterns of cortical atrophy between amnestic (typical) and non‐amnestic (atypical, with subtypes: behavioural, dysexecutive, logopenic and visuospatial) clinical phenotypes of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The current study aimed to assess regional MRI patterns of cortical atrophy across AD phenotypes, and their association with amyloid‐beta (Aß), phosphorylated tau (pTau), axonal degeneration (NfL) and microvascular deterioration (COLIV).MethodPostmortem In‐situ 3DT1 3T‐MRI data was collected for 33 AD (17 typical, 16 atypical) and 16 control brain donors. Images were segmented and AAL3 atlas regional volumes were obtained using QyScore®. At subsequent autopsy, eight brain regions were selected, immunostained for Aß (4G8), pTau (AT8), Neurofilament‐light (NFL), and Collagen‐IV (COLIV), and quantified using qupath. Group comparisons and volume‐pathology associations were analyzed using linear models and partial correlations with covariates age, sex, postmortem delay, and intracranial volume.ResultsCompared to controls, AD phenotype groups showed overall lower cortical volume, while only minor volume differences were observed between AD phenotype groups, observed primarily in limbic regions (Figure 1). Across pathological markers, AD phenotype groups showed consistently higher immunoreactivity than controls, while atypical AD showed consistently higher immunoreactivity than typical AD (Figure 2). Moreover, different patterns of pathology could be observed between atypical subtypes (e.g. distinctly higher pTau load in the occipital gyrus of the visuospatial subtype). In typical AD, global volume loss was associated with lower Aß and higher pTau, NFL and COLIV immunoreactivity, while in atypical AD, global volume loss was primarily associated with higher NFL immunoreactivity (Figure 3a). Regionally, AD phenotype differences in atrophy‐pathology association were most pronounced in the (para)hippocampal regions. This distinction was mainly characterized by negative associations for NFL and COLIV, which was only observed in typical AD (Figure 3b‐c).ConclusionAtrophy patterns between AD phenotypes showed only minor differences, potentially attributable to the on average later disease stage of the study cohort. The higher immunoreactivity for pathological markers found in atypical AD might suggest a more severe disease burden. (Para)hippocampal volume decline was associated with axonal and microvascular deterioration in typical AD, but not in the higher pathologically burdened atypical AD group, suggesting a differential susceptibility between AD phenotypes.

AbstractBackgroundRecent studies highlight distinct patterns of cortical atrophy between amnestic (typical) and non‐amnestic (atypical, with subtypes: behavioural, dysexecutive, logopenic and visuospatial) clinical phenotypes of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The current study aimed to assess regional MRI patterns of cortical atrophy across AD phenotypes, and their association with amyloid‐beta (Aβ), phosphorylated tau (pTau), axonal degeneration (NfL) and microvascular deterioration (COLIV).MethodPostmortem In‐situ 3DT1 3T‐MRI data was collected for 33 AD (17 typical, 16 atypical) and 16 control brain donors. Images were segmented and AAL3 atlas regional volumes were obtained using QyScore®. At subsequent autopsy, eight brain regions were selected, immunostained for Aβ (4G8), pTau (AT8), Neurofilament‐light (NFL), and Collagen‐IV (COLIV), and quantified using qupath. Group comparisons and volume‐pathology associations were analyzed using linear models and partial correlations with covariates age, sex, postmortem delay, and intracranial volume.ResultsCompared to controls, AD phenotype groups showed overall lower cortical volume, while only minor volume differences were observed between AD phenotype groups, observed primarily in limbic regions (Fig. 1). Across pathological markers, AD phenotype groups showed consistently higher immunoreactivity than controls, while atypical AD showed consistently higher immunoreactivity than typical AD (Fig. 2). Moreover, different patterns of pathology could be observed between atypical subtypes (e.g. distinctly higher pTau load in the occipital gyrus of the visuospatial subtype). In typical AD, global volume loss was associated with lower Aβ and higher pTau, NFL and COLIV immunoreactivity, while in atypical AD, global volume loss was primarily associated with higher NFL immunoreactivity (Fig. 3a). Regionally, AD phenotype differences in atrophy‐pathology association were most pronounced in the (para) hippocampal regions. This distinction was mainly characterized by negative associations for NFL and COLIV, which was only observed in typical AD (Fig. 3b‐c).ConclusionAtrophy patterns between AD phenotypes showed only minor differences, potentially attributable to the on average later disease stage of the study cohort. The higher immunoreactivity for pathological markers found in atypical AD might suggest a more severe disease burden. (Para) hippocampal volume decline was associated with axonal and microvascular deterioration in typical AD, but not in the higher pathologically burdened atypical AD group, suggesting a differential susceptibility between AD phenotypes.

Abstract Aims Although the neuroanatomical distribution of tau and amyloid‐β is well studied in Alzheimer's disease (AD) (non)‐amnestic clinical variants, that of neuroinflammation remains unexplored. We investigate the neuroanatomical distribution of activated myeloid cells, astrocytes, and complement alongside amyloid‐β and phosphorylated tau in a clinically well‐defined prospectively collected AD cohort. Methods Clinical variants were diagnosed antemortem, and brain tissue was collected post‐mortem. Typical AD ( n = 10), behavioural/dysexecutive AD ( n = 6), posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) AD ( n = 3), and controls ( n = 10) were neuropathologically assessed for AD neuropathology, concurrent pathology including Lewy body disease, limbic‐predominant age‐related TDP‐43 encephalopathy neuropathologic change (LATE‐NC), and vascular pathology. For quantitative assessment, we analysed the corticolimbic distribution of phosphorylated tau, amyloid‐β, CD68, MHC‐II, C4b, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) using digital pathology. Results Phosphorylated tau was distinctly distributed in each variant. In all variants, amyloid‐β was neocortical‐dominant, with a notable increase in the middle frontal cortex of behavioural/dysexecutive AD. Typical AD and PCA AD had no concurrent Lewy body disease, whereas three out of six cases with behavioural/dysexecutive AD did. LATE‐NC stage >0 was observed in three AD cases, two typical AD (stage 1/3), and one behavioural/dysexecutive AD (stage 2/3). Vascular pathology was present in each variant. In typical AD, CD68 and MHC‐II were hippocampal‐dominant. In behavioural/dysexecutive AD, C4b was elevated in the middle frontal and inferior parietal cortex. In PCA AD, MHC‐II was increased in the fusiform gyrus, and GFAP in parietal cortices. Correlations between AD neuropathology and neuroinflammation were distinct within variants. Conclusions Our data suggests that different involvement of neuroinflammation may add to clinical heterogeneity in AD, which has implications for neuroinflammation‐based biomarkers and future therapeutics.

AbstractBackgroundWhite matter hyper‐intensities (WMH) are observed on FLAIR MRI, increase with age and are more prominent in neurodegenerative diseases such as in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). The aim of this study was to assess the association between WMH and neuropathological staging of amyloid‐beta, neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) and α‐synuclein (α‐syn).MethodIn‐situ 3T‐MRI 3DT1‐weighted and 3D‐FLAIR data were collected for 77 clinically defined and pathologically‐confirmed brain donors; 31 AD, 21 PD and PD dementia (PDD), and 25 controls. WMH were segmented on FLAIR using an in‐house developed multiview convolutional neural network, followed by manual checking, and volume was obtained with FSL. Fifteen brain regions were dissected at autopsy, immunostained and evaluated for neuropathological diagnosis, including Thal amyloid phase, CAA type, and Braak stages for NFT and α‐syn. Group differences were assessed with linear models (corrected for age, gender, post‐mortem delay), and associations with Spearman and Pearson partial correlations.ResultCompared to controls, WMH load was higher in AD (p<0.001), specifically amnestic AD (p = 0.003) rather than non‐amnestic AD (p = 0.053), and higher in PD (p = 0.016), specifically non‐demented PD (p = 0.015) rather than PDD (p = 1.0). No difference in gender was observed (p = 0.38). Without the influence of pathology (in controls), WMH was associated with age (r = 0.49,p = 0.016).In the whole cohort, WMH was associated with Fazekas score (r = 0.67; p<0.001), normalized brain volume (NBV; r = ‐0.31,p = 0.007), gray matter volume (NGMV; r = ‐0.36,p = 0.002), Thal phase (r = 0.24,p0.034), Braak NFT stage (r = 0.33,p = 0.004), and Braak α‐syn stage (r = 0.27, p0.018).Across controls and AD, WMH associated with NBV (r = ‐0.39,p = 0.004), NGMV (r = ‐0.42,p = 0.002), left and right hippocampal volume (r = ‐0.36,p = 0.008 and r = ‐0.32,p = 0.022), Braak NFT (r = 0.41,p<0.001), Thal phase (r = 0.41,p = 0.002), and CAA (r = 0.34,p = 0.01). Amnestic and non‐amnestic AD showed similar results, except for CAA, which was associated with WMH in non‐amnestic AD only (r = 0.33,p = 0.04).Across controls and PD(D), WMH associated with Braak NFT stage (r = 0.39,p = 0.008) and Braak α‐syn stage (r = 0.60,p<0.001), but not with MRI outcome measures. In this respect PD and PDD showed different results; in PD WMH associated with NGMV (r = ‐0.37,p = 0.031), in PDD with left and right hippocampal volume (r = ‐0.44,p = 0.014 and r = ‐0.44,p = 0.015).ConclusionWMH associate with pathological stages of AD and PD(D), and contributes to MRI atrophy.

AbstractBackgroundWhite matter hyper‐intensities (WMH) are observed on FLAIR MRI, increase with age and are more prominent in neurodegenerative diseases such as in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). The aim of this study was to assess the association between WMH and neuropathological staging of amyloid‐beta, neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) and a‐synuclein (a‐syn).MethodIn‐situ 3T‐MRI 3DT1‐weighted and 3D‐FLAIR data were collected for 77 clinically defined and pathologically‐confirmed brain donors; 31 AD, 21 PD and PD dementia (PDD), and 25 controls. WMH were segmented on FLAIR using an in‐house developed multiview convolutional neural network, followed by manual checking, and volume was obtained with FSL. Fifteen brain regions were dissected at autopsy, immunostained and evaluated for neuropathological diagnosis, including Thal amyloid phase, CAA type, and Braak stages for NFT and a‐syn. Group differences were assessed with linear models (corrected for age, gender, post‐mortem delay), and associations with Spearman and Pearson partial correlations.ResultCompared to controls, WMH load was higher in AD (p<0.001), specifically amnestic AD (p = 0.003) rather than non‐amnestic AD (p = 0.053), and higher in PD (p = 0.016), specifically non‐demented PD (p = 0.015) rather than PDD (p = 1.0). No difference in gender was observed (p = 0.38). Without the influence of pathology (in controls), WMH was associated with age (r = 0.49,p = 0.016). In the whole cohort, WMH was associated with Fazekas score (r = 0.67; p<0.001), normalized brain volume (NBV; r = ‐0.31,p = 0.007), gray matter volume (NGMV; r = ‐0.36,p = 0.002), Thal phase (r = 0.24,p0.034), Braak NFT stage (r = 0.33,p = 0.004), and Braak a‐syn stage (r = 0.27, p0.018). Across controls and AD, WMH associated with NBV (r = ‐0.39,p = 0.004), NGMV (r = ‐0.42,p = 0.002), left and right hippocampal volume (r = ‐0.36,p = 0.008 and r = ‐0.32,p = 0.022), Braak NFT (r = 0.41,p<0.001), Thal phase (r = 0.41,p = 0.002), and CAA (r = 0.34,p = 0.01). Amnestic and non‐amnestic AD showed similar results, except for CAA, which was associated with WMH in non‐amnestic AD only (r = 0.33,p = 0.04). Across controls and PD(D), WMH associated with Braak NFT stage (r = 0.39,p = 0.008) and Braak a‐syn stage (r = 0.60,p<0.001), but not with MRI outcome measures. In this respect PD and PDD showed different results; in PD WMH associated with NGMV (r = ‐0.37,p = 0.031), in PDD with left and right hippocampal volume (r = ‐0.44,p = 0.014 and r = ‐0.44,p = 0.015).ConclusionWMH associate with pathological stages of AD and PD(D), and contributes to MRI atrophy.

AbstractIntraneuronal accumulation of misfolded α-synuclein is the pathological hallmark of Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies, often co-occurring with variable degrees of Alzheimer’s disease related neuropathology. Genetic association studies have successfully identified common variants associated with disease risk and phenotypic traits in Lewy body disease, yet little is known about the genetic contribution to neuropathological heterogeneity.Using summary statistics from Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease genome-wide association studies, we calculated polygenic risk scores and investigated the relationship with Lewy, amyloid-β and tau pathology. Associations were nominated in neuropathologically defined samples with Lewy body disease from the Netherlands Brain Bank (n = 217) and followed up in an independent sample series from the Mayo Clinic Brain Bank (n = 394). We also generated stratified polygenic risk scores based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms annotated to eight functional pathways or cell types previously implicated in Parkinson’s disease and assessed for association with Lewy pathology in subgroups with and without significant Alzheimer’s disease co-pathology.In an ordinal logistic regression model, the Alzheimer’s disease polygenic risk score was associated with concomitant amyloid-β and tau pathology in both cohorts. Moreover, both cohorts showed a significant association between lysosomal pathway polygenic risk and Lewy pathology, which was more consistent than the association with a general Parkinson’s disease risk score and specific to the subset of samples without significant concomitant Alzheimer’s disease related neuropathology.Our findings provide proof of principle that the specific risk alleles a patient carries for Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease also influence key aspects of the underlying neuropathology in Lewy body disease. The interrelations between genetic architecture and neuropathology are complex, as our results implicate lysosomal risk loci specifically in the subset of samples without Alzheimer’s disease co-pathology. Our findings hold promise that genetic profiling may help predict the vulnerability to specific neuropathologies in Lewy body disease, with potential relevance for the further development of precision medicine in these disorders.

AbstractBackgroundOther than the typical (memory‐dominant) variant, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) can present as posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) and behavioral/dysexecutive AD. Tangle distribution differs amongst clinical variants. Neuroinflammation is important in AD pathogenesis and may contribute to Aβ and p‐tau distribution. The relationship between pathological hallmarks, neuroinflammation and, APOE genotype in (a)typical AD is still largely unknown.MethodI will discuss our most recent studies on neuroinflammation in (a)typical AD from cohorts derived from the Netherlands Brain Bank and the Mayo Clinic. Atypicality is investigated from both a neuropathological perspective(N=19) and a clinical perspective (N=30, unpublished data). Additionally, the association ofAPOE ε4 with specific Aβ deposits (i.e., the ‘coarse‐grained plaque’ and the classic cored plaque) and their underlying neuroinflammatory response is investigated (N=60, unpublished data).ResultIn neuropathologically‐defined atypical AD, microglia, and complement show an atypical distribution across regions, resembling that of p‐tau. Clinical atypical AD variants show in addition to a distinct distribution for p‐tau and Aβ, a distinct distribution for activated microglia (CD68, MHC‐II), complement (C4b), and astrocytes (GFAP) (p<.05) (Fig. 1). Furthermore, when investigating Aβ in detail, we observed an atypical plaque, defined as the ‘coarse‐grained plaque’. This APOE ε4+ plaque is associated with increased neuroinflammation and p‐tau burden (ρ(58)=0.5 and 0.6;p<.05) in contrast to the classic cored plaque.ConclusionOur data supports that not all types of Aβ deposits are associated to p‐tau damage. Neuroinflammation, a process that is differently activated within AD variants, may be the link between Aβ aggregation and subsequent neurodegeneration and contribute to clinical variability.

Valosin-containing protein ( VCP) is involved in multiple cellular activities. Mutations in VCP lead to heterogeneous clinical presentations including inclusion body myopathy with Paget’s disease of the bone, frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, even in patients carrying the same mutation. We screened a cohort of 48 patients with familial frontotemporal dementia (FTD) negative for MAPT, GRN, and C9orf72 mutations for other known FTD genes by using whole exome sequencing. In addition, we carried out targeted sequencing of a cohort of 37 patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration with Transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) subtype from the Netherlands Brain bank. Two novel (p.Thr262Ser and p.Arg159Ser) and one reported (p.Met158Val) VCP mutations in three patients with a clinical diagnosis of FTD were identified, and were absence in population-match controls. All three patients presented with behavioral changes, with additional semantic deficits in one. No signs of Paget or muscle disease were observed. Pathological examination of the patient with VCP p.Arg159Ser mutation showed numerous TDP-43 immunoreactive (IR) neuronal intranuclear inclusions (NII) and dystrophic neurites (DN), while a lower number of NII and DN were observed in the patient with the VCP p.Thr262Ser mutation. Pathological findings of both patients were consistent with FTLD-TDP subtype D. Furthermore, only rare VCP-IR NII was observed in both cases. Our study expands the clinical heterogeneity of VCP mutations carriers, and indicates that other additional factors, such as genetic modifiers, may determine the clinical phenotype.