Bouwman, Maud M.A.

AbstractBackgroundRecent studies highlight distinct patterns of cortical atrophy between amnestic (typical) and non‐amnestic (atypical, with subtypes: behavioural, dysexecutive, logopenic and visuospatial) clinical phenotypes of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The current study aimed to assess regional MRI patterns of cortical atrophy across AD phenotypes, and their association with amyloid‐beta (Aß), phosphorylated tau (pTau), axonal degeneration (NfL) and microvascular deterioration (COLIV).MethodPostmortem In‐situ 3DT1 3T‐MRI data was collected for 33 AD (17 typical, 16 atypical) and 16 control brain donors. Images were segmented and AAL3 atlas regional volumes were obtained using QyScore®. At subsequent autopsy, eight brain regions were selected, immunostained for Aß (4G8), pTau (AT8), Neurofilament‐light (NFL), and Collagen‐IV (COLIV), and quantified using qupath. Group comparisons and volume‐pathology associations were analyzed using linear models and partial correlations with covariates age, sex, postmortem delay, and intracranial volume.ResultsCompared to controls, AD phenotype groups showed overall lower cortical volume, while only minor volume differences were observed between AD phenotype groups, observed primarily in limbic regions (Figure 1). Across pathological markers, AD phenotype groups showed consistently higher immunoreactivity than controls, while atypical AD showed consistently higher immunoreactivity than typical AD (Figure 2). Moreover, different patterns of pathology could be observed between atypical subtypes (e.g. distinctly higher pTau load in the occipital gyrus of the visuospatial subtype). In typical AD, global volume loss was associated with lower Aß and higher pTau, NFL and COLIV immunoreactivity, while in atypical AD, global volume loss was primarily associated with higher NFL immunoreactivity (Figure 3a). Regionally, AD phenotype differences in atrophy‐pathology association were most pronounced in the (para)hippocampal regions. This distinction was mainly characterized by negative associations for NFL and COLIV, which was only observed in typical AD (Figure 3b‐c).ConclusionAtrophy patterns between AD phenotypes showed only minor differences, potentially attributable to the on average later disease stage of the study cohort. The higher immunoreactivity for pathological markers found in atypical AD might suggest a more severe disease burden. (Para)hippocampal volume decline was associated with axonal and microvascular deterioration in typical AD, but not in the higher pathologically burdened atypical AD group, suggesting a differential susceptibility between AD phenotypes.

AbstractBackgroundRecent studies highlight distinct patterns of cortical atrophy between amnestic (typical) and non‐amnestic (atypical, with subtypes: behavioural, dysexecutive, logopenic and visuospatial) clinical phenotypes of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The current study aimed to assess regional MRI patterns of cortical atrophy across AD phenotypes, and their association with amyloid‐beta (Aβ), phosphorylated tau (pTau), axonal degeneration (NfL) and microvascular deterioration (COLIV).MethodPostmortem In‐situ 3DT1 3T‐MRI data was collected for 33 AD (17 typical, 16 atypical) and 16 control brain donors. Images were segmented and AAL3 atlas regional volumes were obtained using QyScore®. At subsequent autopsy, eight brain regions were selected, immunostained for Aβ (4G8), pTau (AT8), Neurofilament‐light (NFL), and Collagen‐IV (COLIV), and quantified using qupath. Group comparisons and volume‐pathology associations were analyzed using linear models and partial correlations with covariates age, sex, postmortem delay, and intracranial volume.ResultsCompared to controls, AD phenotype groups showed overall lower cortical volume, while only minor volume differences were observed between AD phenotype groups, observed primarily in limbic regions (Fig. 1). Across pathological markers, AD phenotype groups showed consistently higher immunoreactivity than controls, while atypical AD showed consistently higher immunoreactivity than typical AD (Fig. 2). Moreover, different patterns of pathology could be observed between atypical subtypes (e.g. distinctly higher pTau load in the occipital gyrus of the visuospatial subtype). In typical AD, global volume loss was associated with lower Aβ and higher pTau, NFL and COLIV immunoreactivity, while in atypical AD, global volume loss was primarily associated with higher NFL immunoreactivity (Fig. 3a). Regionally, AD phenotype differences in atrophy‐pathology association were most pronounced in the (para) hippocampal regions. This distinction was mainly characterized by negative associations for NFL and COLIV, which was only observed in typical AD (Fig. 3b‐c).ConclusionAtrophy patterns between AD phenotypes showed only minor differences, potentially attributable to the on average later disease stage of the study cohort. The higher immunoreactivity for pathological markers found in atypical AD might suggest a more severe disease burden. (Para) hippocampal volume decline was associated with axonal and microvascular deterioration in typical AD, but not in the higher pathologically burdened atypical AD group, suggesting a differential susceptibility between AD phenotypes.

AbstractBackgroundWhite matter hyper‐intensities (WMH) are observed on FLAIR MRI, increase with age and are more prominent in neurodegenerative diseases such as in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). The aim of this study was to assess the association between WMH and neuropathological staging of amyloid‐beta, neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) and α‐synuclein (α‐syn).MethodIn‐situ 3T‐MRI 3DT1‐weighted and 3D‐FLAIR data were collected for 77 clinically defined and pathologically‐confirmed brain donors; 31 AD, 21 PD and PD dementia (PDD), and 25 controls. WMH were segmented on FLAIR using an in‐house developed multiview convolutional neural network, followed by manual checking, and volume was obtained with FSL. Fifteen brain regions were dissected at autopsy, immunostained and evaluated for neuropathological diagnosis, including Thal amyloid phase, CAA type, and Braak stages for NFT and α‐syn. Group differences were assessed with linear models (corrected for age, gender, post‐mortem delay), and associations with Spearman and Pearson partial correlations.ResultCompared to controls, WMH load was higher in AD (p<0.001), specifically amnestic AD (p = 0.003) rather than non‐amnestic AD (p = 0.053), and higher in PD (p = 0.016), specifically non‐demented PD (p = 0.015) rather than PDD (p = 1.0). No difference in gender was observed (p = 0.38). Without the influence of pathology (in controls), WMH was associated with age (r = 0.49,p = 0.016).In the whole cohort, WMH was associated with Fazekas score (r = 0.67; p<0.001), normalized brain volume (NBV; r = ‐0.31,p = 0.007), gray matter volume (NGMV; r = ‐0.36,p = 0.002), Thal phase (r = 0.24,p0.034), Braak NFT stage (r = 0.33,p = 0.004), and Braak α‐syn stage (r = 0.27, p0.018).Across controls and AD, WMH associated with NBV (r = ‐0.39,p = 0.004), NGMV (r = ‐0.42,p = 0.002), left and right hippocampal volume (r = ‐0.36,p = 0.008 and r = ‐0.32,p = 0.022), Braak NFT (r = 0.41,p<0.001), Thal phase (r = 0.41,p = 0.002), and CAA (r = 0.34,p = 0.01). Amnestic and non‐amnestic AD showed similar results, except for CAA, which was associated with WMH in non‐amnestic AD only (r = 0.33,p = 0.04).Across controls and PD(D), WMH associated with Braak NFT stage (r = 0.39,p = 0.008) and Braak α‐syn stage (r = 0.60,p<0.001), but not with MRI outcome measures. In this respect PD and PDD showed different results; in PD WMH associated with NGMV (r = ‐0.37,p = 0.031), in PDD with left and right hippocampal volume (r = ‐0.44,p = 0.014 and r = ‐0.44,p = 0.015).ConclusionWMH associate with pathological stages of AD and PD(D), and contributes to MRI atrophy.

AbstractBackgroundWhite matter hyper‐intensities (WMH) are observed on FLAIR MRI, increase with age and are more prominent in neurodegenerative diseases such as in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). The aim of this study was to assess the association between WMH and neuropathological staging of amyloid‐beta, neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) and a‐synuclein (a‐syn).MethodIn‐situ 3T‐MRI 3DT1‐weighted and 3D‐FLAIR data were collected for 77 clinically defined and pathologically‐confirmed brain donors; 31 AD, 21 PD and PD dementia (PDD), and 25 controls. WMH were segmented on FLAIR using an in‐house developed multiview convolutional neural network, followed by manual checking, and volume was obtained with FSL. Fifteen brain regions were dissected at autopsy, immunostained and evaluated for neuropathological diagnosis, including Thal amyloid phase, CAA type, and Braak stages for NFT and a‐syn. Group differences were assessed with linear models (corrected for age, gender, post‐mortem delay), and associations with Spearman and Pearson partial correlations.ResultCompared to controls, WMH load was higher in AD (p<0.001), specifically amnestic AD (p = 0.003) rather than non‐amnestic AD (p = 0.053), and higher in PD (p = 0.016), specifically non‐demented PD (p = 0.015) rather than PDD (p = 1.0). No difference in gender was observed (p = 0.38). Without the influence of pathology (in controls), WMH was associated with age (r = 0.49,p = 0.016). In the whole cohort, WMH was associated with Fazekas score (r = 0.67; p<0.001), normalized brain volume (NBV; r = ‐0.31,p = 0.007), gray matter volume (NGMV; r = ‐0.36,p = 0.002), Thal phase (r = 0.24,p0.034), Braak NFT stage (r = 0.33,p = 0.004), and Braak a‐syn stage (r = 0.27, p0.018). Across controls and AD, WMH associated with NBV (r = ‐0.39,p = 0.004), NGMV (r = ‐0.42,p = 0.002), left and right hippocampal volume (r = ‐0.36,p = 0.008 and r = ‐0.32,p = 0.022), Braak NFT (r = 0.41,p<0.001), Thal phase (r = 0.41,p = 0.002), and CAA (r = 0.34,p = 0.01). Amnestic and non‐amnestic AD showed similar results, except for CAA, which was associated with WMH in non‐amnestic AD only (r = 0.33,p = 0.04). Across controls and PD(D), WMH associated with Braak NFT stage (r = 0.39,p = 0.008) and Braak a‐syn stage (r = 0.60,p<0.001), but not with MRI outcome measures. In this respect PD and PDD showed different results; in PD WMH associated with NGMV (r = ‐0.37,p = 0.031), in PDD with left and right hippocampal volume (r = ‐0.44,p = 0.014 and r = ‐0.44,p = 0.015).ConclusionWMH associate with pathological stages of AD and PD(D), and contributes to MRI atrophy.