Citations

Abstract Embryonal tumors with multilayered rosettes (ETMR) are rare, highly aggressive tumors of infancy with extremely poor outcomes and no established standard of care therapy. ETMRs were recognized as a distinct molecular entity in 2016, however, the absence of prospective, biology-driven clinical trials has limited translation of these insights into standardized, risk-adapted treatment approaches for this vulnerable population. To address this gap, the Collaborative Network for Neuro-oncology Clinical Trials (CONNECT) developed CURE(Clinical trial advancing Understanding of Rare Embryonal Brain Tumors), an international, multi-institutional, molecularly guided umbrella trial. All patients enroll through the centralized CURE-Screening protocol, which provides rapid comprehensive molecular profiling with real-time central pathology, molecular, and radiographic review to confirm diagnosis, define molecular subtype, and determine eligibility and assignment to disease-specific treatment arms. CURE-ETMR represents the first disease-specific arm to open within this platform. Following centralized screening, children with newly diagnosed ETMR are assigned to clinically defined risk strata using integrated molecular, radiographic, and clinical criteria. Patients will be treated using a risk-adapted multimodal approach in which we prioritize maximal safe surgical resection with consideration of second-look surgery based on centralized imaging review; administer induction chemotherapy followed by consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic cell rescue or dose-intensified chemotherapy, selectively incorporate radiation sparing approach or early focal radiotherapy for patients with unresectable residual disease or brainstem involvement; deliver intrathecal chemotherapy for leptomeningeal prophylaxis; and include biologically informed maintenance therapy. In parallel, protocol-required longitudinal collection of tumor tissue, cerebrospinal fluid, blood, and advanced neuroimaging supports integrated molecular, liquid biopsy, and imaging biomarker analyses to identify predictors of treatment response, resistance, and relapse. Primary objectives include evaluation of feasibility, safety, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared with molecularly annotated historical cohorts. This centralized screening to assignment framework establishes a scalable model for prospective, biology-driven trials in rare embryonal brain tumors.

Abstract Pediatric high-grade gliomas (HGGs), including diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), are among the most aggressive childhood brain tumors, with five-year survival rates below 10%. Current treatment options are limited to radiation, highlighting the urgent need for novel therapies. Telomere maintenance via telomerase activation is a hallmark of cancer, enabling replicative immortality. Our prior studies demonstrate telomerase activity in 73% of HGGs and 47% of DIPG, implicating telomere biology as a critical therapeutic target. 6-thio-dG (THIO) is a first-in-class telomere-targeting agent that incorporates into telomeres of telomerase-positive cells, inducing telomere uncapping, genomic instability, and apoptosis. THIO crosses the blood–brain barrier and exhibits synergy with radiation in preclinical DIPG models. Telomere dysfunction is confirmed by telomere dysfunction-induced foci (TIFs), marked by colocalization of DNA damage response proteins (ATM S1981-P, γH2AX, 53BP1) at telomeres. Historical pediatric leukemia trials established THIO’s safety profile, and recent adult studies in non-small cell lung cancer demonstrated efficacy at lower doses. As part of the biologically-guided umbrella trial CONNECT TarGeT [NCT05839379], we are developing TarGeT-H, a phase 1/2 and surgical study to evaluate THIO combined with focal radiation in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients with newly diagnosed HGG or DIPG harboring telomerase activation, confirmed by hTERT mRNA expression—assessed via tumor submission, profiling, and rapid central screening through TarGeT-SCR. Specific aims include: (1) determining pharmacokinetics and safety to establish the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D); (2) estimating efficacy by progression-free survival (HGG) and overall survival (DIPG) compared to historical controls; and (3) assessing telomere dysfunction in resected HGG tumors via TIF analysis. Up to 90 patients will receive THIO intravenously during radiation and maintenance cycles for up to two years. By leveraging a selective telomere-targeting mechanism distinct from current therapies and demonstrating synergy with radiation, THIO represents a promising strategy to improve outcomes in devastating pediatric cancers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pediatric large-volume brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) carry a substantial lifelong hemorrhage risk, neurological symptoms, and treatment morbidity. Single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is often unsuitable due to constraints on dose-volume toxicity. Volume-staged SRS (VS-SRS) enables sequential dosing of large nidus volumes, potentially enhancing safety while maintaining efficacy. Evidence in children remains limited. We aimed to evaluate outcomes of VS-SRS for large AVMs in pediatric patients. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cohort was assembled from 21 centers, including patients aged younger than 21 years treated with VS-SRS for AVMs >10 cm 3 . Clinical and radiological end points included obliteration, hemorrhage, and permanent symptomatic radiation-induced changes (RIC). RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included (median age 14 years; IQR, 12-17). The median nidus volume at first stage was 18.2 cm 3 (IQR, 12.3-25.6). Median prescription dose per stage was 17 Gy (IQR, 16-18). The median clinical follow-up from the first stage was 57.5 months (IQR, 25-138). Obliteration occurred in 42 of 103 patients (40.8%), with actuarial rates of 6.9% (95% CI: 2.8-14) at 3 years and 29% (95% CI: 20-39) at 5 years. Hemorrhage occurred in 17 of 103 patients (16.5%) during follow-up, and permanent RIC was observed in 9 of 103 patients (8.7%). CONCLUSION: VS-SRS is a reasonably safe, selected option for pediatric large-volume AVMs when microsurgical or endovascular cure is not feasible or prudent. Delivering ≥17 Gy per stage while limiting each treatment volume to <15 cm 3 supports durable nidus control with acceptable toxicity. VS-SRS represents a key modality in multidisciplinary management of this historically difficult-to-treat population.

OBJECTIVE Ruptured, large pediatric arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) pose a significant management challenge due to high rerupture risk and the morbidity of conventional treatments. Volume-staged stereotactic radiosurgery (VS-SRS) has emerged as an alternative; however, evidence for its use in this specific population is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of VS-SRS for ruptured, large AVMs in a dedicated pediatric cohort. METHODS This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study from 21 centers analyzed outcomes for 42 pediatric patients (age < 18 years) with previously ruptured, large AVMs treated with VS-SRS. The primary outcome was complete AVM obliteration, and secondary outcomes included post-SRS hemorrhage, radiation-induced changes (RICs), and favorable outcome. Favorable outcome in this study was defined as obliteration without post-SRS hemorrhage or permanent RIC. RESULTS At the initial SRS, the median patient age was 14.5 years, and the median AVM volume was 15.0 cm 3 ; most AVMs were high grade (Spetzler-Martin grades IV and V). With a median follow-up of 41.5 months, complete AVM obliteration was achieved in 21 patients (50.0%). The cumulative obliteration rate was 37% at 5 years and 56% at 10 years. Patients with a nidus volume of ≤ 10 cm 3 had significantly higher cumulative obliteration rates than those with a nidus volume > 10 cm 3 (log-rank test, p = 0.021). Similarly, patients treated with a prescription dose > 17 Gy showed significantly higher cumulative obliteration rates compared to those treated with a dose ≤ 17 Gy (log-rank test, p = 0.012). The cumulative 5-year incidences of hemorrhage and RICs following VS-SRS were 19% and 7%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, only larger total AVM volume was an independent predictor of a lower likelihood of favorable outcome (hazard ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.80–0.99; p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS In this multicenter pediatric cohort, VS-SRS for ruptured, large AVMs provides a reasonable chance of long-term obliteration, but generally acceptable risks of post-SRS hemorrhage and RICs exist. VS-SRS should be considered as an option for pediatric patients with large, ruptured AVMs.

OBJECTIVE Historically, craniopharyngioma (CP) was divided into adamantinomatous CP (ACP) and papillary CP (PCP) subtypes based on histopathological features. However, each harbors a unique genetic profile and progressively differing treatment paradigms, leading to their reclassification by the WHO in 2016 as two distinct entities. Descriptive in nature, this large multi-institutional study aimed to establish current differences between the presentation, treatment patterns, and clinical course of these pathologies to serve as a baseline for future studies as new treatment paradigms emerge. METHODS The authors queried the Registry for Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders (RAPID) database, which encompassed patients from 14 participating institutions across the United States between 2000 and 2024. The database was screened for adult patients who underwent initial CP treatment with a confirmed histopathological diagnosis of ACP or PCP. Patient demographic characteristics, clinical course, tumor treatment, and outcomes data were collected and compared by CP type. RESULTS The final analysis included 273 ACP and 99 PCP adult patients who underwent initial surgical treatment. ACP patients presented younger on average (mean 48.3 vs 52.8 years, p = 0.034). PCP patients were more likely to present with hypothyroidism (33.3% vs 20.5%, p = 0.010), hyperlipidemia (25.3% vs 15.8%, p = 0.036), fatigue (28.3% vs 17.6%, p = 0.024), temperature intolerance (9.1% vs 1.5%, p < 0.001), and cardiac arrhythmia (6.1% vs 1.1%, p = 0.006). The groups demonstrated similar postsurgical and neuroendocrinological outcomes. Postoperative median (IQR) progression-free survival did not significantly differ between groups (19.0 [7.0–37.0] for ACP vs 5.0 [3.5–7.5] months for PCP, p = 0.972). ACP patients were more likely to receive radiation after surgery (27.8% vs 15.2%, p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS This large multicenter descriptive study aimed to characterize similarities and differences between the clinical courses of molecularly distinct ACP and PCP, which has not previously been described. The findings should serve as a baseline to inform future studies, particularly with the recent introduction of targeted therapy for PCP.

Background: Sinonasal malignancies (SNM) are rare cancers associated with poor prognosis and impaired quality of life (QOL). The 22-question Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) has been used to assess QOL in patients with SNM. Objective: To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the SNOT-22 in patients with SNM. Methods: About 264 patients with SNM were drawn from a prospective, longitudinal, multi-institutional study. SNOT-22 scores were collected at pre-treatment baseline and follow-up through 5 years post-treatment. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess the internal consistency of the SNOT-22. Distribution-based approaches were used to estimate the MCID. Multivariable regression identified factors associated with SNOT-22 improvement exceeding the determined MCID. Results: Cronbach’s alpha was >.85. The estimated MCIDs were: 1.44 (Cohen’s effect size), 1.32 (standard error of the mean), 10.45 (1/2 of baseline standard deviation), and 3.67 (minimum detectable change). The mean MCID across methods was 4.22. Multivariable regression demonstrated higher odds of clinically meaningful improvement from baseline in patients with early-stage disease (odds ratio (OR) 3.510, P = .035), no neck irradiation (OR 11.050, P = .014), and neoadjuvant therapy (OR 16.667, P = .047). Conclusions: The SNOT-22 MCID was estimated as 4.22 in a large multi-center cohort of patients with SNM, suggesting that relatively small QOL changes are clinically relevant. When applying the MCID to the current cohort, advanced stage, treatment of neck disease, and not requiring neoadjuvant therapy were predictive of worse QOL.

ABSTRACT Introduction Sinonasal sarcomas are exceedingly rare entities, constituting less than 7% of head and neck sarcomas. Their complex histology needs specialized treatment, which is often based on multimodal approaches including surgery, radiation therapy, and/or chemotherapy. This manuscript aims to gather expert opinions to establish common management principles for sinonasal sarcomas. Methods This international consensus followed a modified Delphi method in seven steps, including statements definition by the core group, expert panel recruitment, and a two‐round survey. Sixty‐two statements on sinonasal sarcoma management were developed. Experts from multiple continents participated, and results were anonymized and analyzed between March and May 2025. Results A total of 44 invited experts were recruited, 43.2% otorhinolaryngologists/head and neck surgeons, 31.8% medical oncologists, and 25% radiation oncologists. Participants varied in age and experience, representing Europe (70.5%), North America (18.2%), South America (6.8%), and Asia (4.5%). Among all histologies, biphenotypic sarcoma, chondrosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and myofibrosarcoma are principally treated with an upfront surgical management, differently from Ewing sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma in which chemotherapy, eventually associated with radiotherapy, is often chosen. In the remaining histologies (angiosarcoma, liposarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor [MPNST], osteosarcoma, and synovial sarcoma), a precise multimodal treatment is less standardized and needs to be discussed on a case‐by‐case basis. Conclusion Sinonasal sarcomas require a histology‐driven approach to determine upfront treatment, whether surgical, medical, or multimodal. Despite this structured strategy, prognosis remains highly variable across subtypes. Multidisciplinary evaluation and individualized management in referral centers are crucial to address the biological diversity and anatomical complexity of these rare malignancies.