Citations

Abstract Inflammation is a key driver of coronary syndromes across the continuum from chronic coronary syndromes to acute coronary syndromes. It contributes to atherogenesis, plaque destabilization, and ischaemic events and influences myocardial injury, repair, and remodelling. Inflammatory activity is further amplified by metabolic and autoimmune comorbidities such as diabetes, obesity, and connective tissue diseases, with obesity representing a major driver of chronic low-grade inflammation through adipose tissue dysfunction and cytokine activation, while psychosocial stress and environmental exposures including air pollution serve as additional triggers. Genetic variations, including human leucocyte antigen genotypes, modulate individual susceptibility to vascular inflammation and myocardial injury. This expert consensus from the European Society of Cardiology’s Association for Acute CardioVascular Care summarizes the current understanding of inflammation across the full spectrum of coronary syndromes, including underlying mechanisms, relevant biomarkers, and imaging approaches that characterize vascular inflammation, and integrates insights from experimental and clinical studies. Importantly, this document provides explicit consensus-based guidance on when, how, and in whom inflammation should be assessed and treated in routine clinical practice. While the causal association between inflammation and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is well established, pharmacological modification of inflammation has produced conflicting evidence. Some agents, such as low-dose colchicine, have demonstrated modest reductions in cardiovascular events, although results across trials have been inconsistent. Other anti-inflammatory therapies have not shown clinical benefit, whereas selective cytokine inhibition with canakinumab has reduced cardiovascular risk at the cost of increased infection rates. The present manuscript also focuses on the evaluation of inflammatory activity in cardiovascular patients in routine clinical practice. It further discusses criteria for patient selection and clinical decision-making regarding the introduction of anti-inflammatory therapy in individuals with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Since its US Food and Drug Administration approval in 2016, magnetic resonance–guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy has grown into one of the procedures of choice among patients with essential tremor (ET). Approved applications for the procedure have expanded over time from unilateral thalamotomy to treat ET and Parkinson disease tremor to bilateral staged thalamotomy for ET. As the procedure expands to healthcare environments beyond large academic centers, guidance is required to ensure that the responsible clinicians are appropriately trained to undertake this operative procedure. Although multidisciplinary movement disorder teams are important for the optimal management of patients, MRgFUS lesions are inherently surgical interventions. Neurosurgeons are trained to evaluate these patients, consider surgical alternatives and conduct these operations, particularly after completing a fellowship in the subspecialty of stereotactic and functional neurosurgery. At present, all high-level evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of MRgFUS lesions to treat movement disorders derives from procedures performed by neurosurgeons, so those results may not be generalizable to other physicians. Based on these considerations and potential liability issues, the American Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, which acts as the joint section representing the field of stereotactic and functional neurosurgery on behalf of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, puts forth this position statement that only neurosurgeons appropriately trained to conduct functional neurosurgery procedures should conduct MRgFUS surgical lesions.

Itraconazole is the recommended first-line antifungal agent in blastomycosis treatment. However, pharmacokinetic limitations and adverse drug events may necessitate the use of alternative antifungal agents. The primary objective of the study was to retrospectively describe a cohort of patients with blastomycosis who received voriconazole (as partial or complete therapy), for complete or partial treatment, compared to those who received itraconazole alone. Secondary objectives included rationale for voriconazole selection, treatment response, mortality, and adverse drug events. This retrospective multicenter cohort study included adult patients with proven/probable blastomycosis who received itraconazole or voriconazole. Treatment response was evaluated at one year or end of therapy, whichever came first. Mortality outcomes were assessed within 7 days of the last documented azole dose. Propensity score weighting and subgroup analysis were utilized to control confounding variables between cohorts. A total of 119 patients receiving itraconazole and 25 receiving voriconazole as complete or partial treatment were included. Voriconazole was often selected for CNS involvement or after intolerance to alternative azoles. After propensity score weighting, no significant difference in complete or partial treatment response was observed. Rates of all-cause mortality and blastomycosis-related mortality were numerically higher in the voriconazole cohort. Adverse drug event rates were similar between cohorts; however, discontinuation due to adverse events was more common in the voriconazole cohort. Voriconazole was most utilized for the treatment of blastomycosis in cases with CNS involvement or intolerance to other azoles. A statistically significant difference in response rate was not identified between voriconazole-containing or itraconazole-treated patients; however, given limited sample sizes, further data is needed to assess the equivalency of these agents in the treatment of blastomycosis.

Background Psychiatric disorders are increasingly contributing to global disability. Despite advances in conservative management, the prevalence of treatment-resistant cases remains high. Meanwhile, neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders (NPD) remains underused, largely due to strict regulations and historical concerns, particularly those related to neuropsychological side effects (NPSE). Objective To address this issue, we conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to compare NPSE associated with radiofrequency ablative NPD to those observed in neuro-oncological, neurovascular and epilepsy surgeries. Methods PubMed, Embase and LILACS databases were searched in April 2024 for articles published in English/Spanish from 1990 to 2022, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Results A total of 48 articles with 2678 participants were included. The frequency of transient and permanent NPSE in the NPD group ranged from 0.94% to 11.50% and 0.94% to 2.03%, respectively, comparable to the other surgical groups (epilepsy: 0.31–11.70%; vascular: 0.52–22.90%; oncology: 0.94–17.60% for transient NPSE; epilepsy: 0.31–12%; vascular: 0.40–1.96% and oncology: 0.84–1.48% for permanent NPSE). Regarding permanent NPSE, arguably the most critical consideration, the NPD group showed better outcomes in memory, language and social cognition than the epilepsy group, but worse outcomes in executive and perceptual-motor functions. Compared with the vascular group, the NPD group had better executive function but worse complex attention. Finally, the NPD group had fewer permanent deficits than the oncology group in executive function, complex attention and perceptual-motor domains, although language performance was lower. Conclusions Contemporary NPD apparently carries a similar risk of NPSE as other conventional neurosurgical procedures, challenging misconceptions and this unjustified barrier to its broader use.

OBJECTIVE Magnetic resonance–guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thalamotomy has become a popular tool in the neurosurgical armamentarium for managing tremor in patients with essential tremor (ET) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). METHODS Given the recent exponential growth in the use of this technology, the American Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, which acts as the joint section representing the field of stereotactic and functional neurosurgery on behalf of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, provides an update on treatment indications and the efficacy and safety of MRgFUS for the treatment of tremor. RESULTS In ET, the efficacy of MRgFUS thalamotomy is supported by several open-label and 1 prospective, double-blind, sham-controlled randomized clinical trial (RCT) that showed a 47% improvement in hand tremor in the short term. Follow-up studies demonstrated that the benefits of MRgFUS for ET are sustained in the long term. Studies investigating the effects of bilateral staged MRgFUS thalamotomy in patients with ET have shown that tremor improvement on the second side was as significant as that observed after the first procedure. The efficacy of MRgFUS thalamotomy for PD tremor is supported by a systematic meta-analysis that consisted predominantly of smaller, nonrandomized studies; 1 RCT; and 1 prospective cohort study. Despite a significant short-term improvement in PD tremor, the long-term effects of this therapy remain unknown. Common early adverse effects of MRgFUS thalamotomy include gait disturbance and paresthesias. These, however, tend to subside over time. Other reported side effects are dysarthria, ataxia, taste disturbance, motor deficits, and speech difficulty. CONCLUSIONS MRgFUS thalamotomy is a safe, effective, and durable intervention for refractory ET in appropriately selected patients. The procedure appears to be safe and effective for PD tremor, although the long-term durability of the technique remains a concern. Early experience with bilateral staged lesions for ET suggests the procedure to be safe and effective.

Background Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are widely employed for chronic pain. These injections include peripheral nerve blocks and trigger point injections, injections of large appendicular joints, the axial facet and sacroiliac joints, and the epidural space. These injections may be performed in patients who have been recently vaccinated or plan to be vaccinated. This multisociety multispecialty position statement aims to develop evidence-based statements and recommendations (SRs) on the safe interval between CSIs and COVID-19 and influenza vaccine administration. Methods Development of the position statement was approved by the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Board of Directors and several other societies that agreed to participate. The scope of the SRs was agreed on to include the efficacy of COVID-19 and influenza vaccines, adverse events related to the CSIs, specifically the effect of CSIs on the hypothalamic–pituitary axis, incidence of COVID-19 in patients who had CSIs during the pandemic, incidence of influenza in patients who had CSIs during the influenza season, and recommend a reasonable interval between CSIs and COVID-19 and influenza vaccination 20 mg/day of prednisone s. Experts were assigned topics to perform a comprehensive literature review and draft SRs, which were refined and voted for consensus (≥75% agreement) using a modified Delphi process. A modified version of the US Preventive Services Task Force grading of evidence and strength of recommendation was followed. Results All SRs were approved by all participants after four rounds of discussion. The Practice Guidelines Committees and Boards of Directors of the participating societies also approved all SRs. If a vaccine has been recently administered or planned, then for non-urgent indications, the CSI should be offered at least 1 week before or after vaccine administration. For healthy patient(s), CSI, or vaccine administration may be performed without a 7-day interval after informed discussion with the patient and consent regarding the risk of blunted vaccine efficacy. For non-healthy patients, shared decision-making should include discussion of diminished vaccine effectiveness and the possibility of influenza or COVID-19 infection. Conclusions In this position statement, we provide recommendations on the optimal timing between CSIs and COVID-19 or influenza vaccine.

Background Corticosteroid injections (CSIs) are widely employed in facet and sacroiliac joint pain. Similar to CSIs at other sites (peripheral nerve blocks, joints, epidural), these injections are associated with potential adverse events. These multisociety consensus recommendations aim to develop evidence-based statements and recommendations on the safe use of CSIs in facet joint and sacroiliac joint injections. Methods Development of the consensus recommendations was approved by the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Board of Directors and several other societies that agreed to participate. The scope of statements and recommendations was agreed on to include safety of the injection technique (landmark-guided, ultrasound, or radiology-aided injections); effect of the addition of the corticosteroid on effectiveness (vs local anesthetic or saline); and adverse events related to the injection. Experts were assigned topics to perform a comprehensive literature review and draft statements and recommendations, which were refined and voted for consensus (>75% agreement) using a modified Delphi process. A modified version of the US Preventive Services Task Force grading of evidence and strength of recommendation was followed. Results All statements and recommendations were approved by all participants after four rounds of discussion. The Practice Guidelines Committees and Boards of Directors of the participating societies also approved all statements and recommendations. Injection of corticosteroid into the facet joint in patients with joint inflammation may relieve pain and improves function. Intra-articular, extra-articular (periarticular), and combined administration are effective for sacroiliac joint injections. No dose-response studies exist, but CSIs containing 10 mg of methylprednisolone or triamcinolone per facet joint and 40 mg per sacroiliac joint (SIJ) (or their respective pharmacologic equivalents) are reasonable. Conclusions In this practice recommendation, we provide statements and recommendations on facet and sacroiliac joint CSIs, the optimal doses, and intervals and criteria for repeating the CSIs in patients with facet joint and sacroiliac joint pain.

Importance Patients with recurrent prostate cancer after previous radiotherapy typically have poor survival. Those with recurrences prostate confined might be suitable for salvage focal therapy (sFT) or salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP). sFT may offer good cancer control with comparatively less toxic effects, but outcomes beyond 5 years have not been reported, and no study has compared sFT to sRP. Objective To compare cancer control and perioperative complications among patients after sFT vs sRP. Design, Setting, and Participants In this international, multicenter cohort study of matched comparison data, patients undergoing sFT were derived from the prospective UK HIFU (high-intensity focused ultrasound) Evaluation and Treatment and International Cryotherapy Evaluation registries (9 centers; 2006-2024) and the prospective UK Focal Recurrent Assessment and Salvage Treatment cohort study (6 centers; 2014-2018). Patients undergoing sRP were derived from an international retrospective registry (12 centers in 8 countries; 2000-2021). Patients with biopsy-confirmed, localized recurrent prostate cancer postradiotherapy, either external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, or both, were included. Data were analyzed from March to July 2025. Exposures sFT using HIFU or cryotherapy vs sRP. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was cancer-specific survival up to 10 years. Secondary outcomes were overall survival, any perioperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grades 1-5), and major perioperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grades 3-5). Comparisons were made on matched patients following 1:1 cardinality matching within individual multiply-imputed datasets. Matching variables used were radiotherapeutic treatment, years between primary and salvage treatments, European Association of Urology recurrence risk group, and presalvage age, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, grade group, T stage, and androgen-deprivation therapy use. Results A total of 923 patients were eligible for matching (419 undergoing sFT and 504 undergoing sRP). Of the patients undergoing sFT, 325 (77.6%) underwent HIFU and the remainder cryotherapy, with 241 (57.5%) treated with quadrant ablation. Of patients treated with sRP, 376 (74.6%) underwent open surgery and the remainder robot-assisted surgery. For sFT vs sRP, 10-year cancer-specific survival was 92% (95% CI, 86%-98%) vs 99% (95% CI, 97%-100%), with no statistically significant difference (restricted mean time lost, −0.09 years; 95% CI, −0.22 to 0.03 years; P = .15; subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.05-4.00; P = .47). There was no statistically significant difference in 10-year overall survival (restricted mean survival time, −0.13 years; 95% CI, −0.86 to 0.60 years; P = .72). Undergoing sRP was associated with statistically significant higher odds of any complication (adjusted odds ratio, 24.20; 95% CI, 12.94-45.27; P < .001) and major complication (adjusted odds ratio, 9.31; 95% CI, 3.42-25.36; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, sFT and sRP were effective for treating localized radiorecurrent prostate cancer, while sFT was associated with fewer perioperative complications. sFT may provide a favorable therapeutic ratio for many patients with localized radiorecurrent prostate cancer.

Abstract Background: As with most Sub-Saharan African countries, Nigeria has a rising incidence of cancer, with disproportionate mortality rates. The financial burden of cancer care often results in catastrophic healthcare spending, leading to treatment refusal, disruption, and discontinuation. This is particularly significant in Nigeria, where nearly all patients are uninsured, and out-of-pocket costs often exceed households’ ability to pay. Financial Navigation Programs (FNPs) have been shown to mitigate treatment-related financial toxicity in cancer care and reduce treatment abandonment, but there is a paucity of high-quality data on this intervention in resource-constrained settings. Here, we present a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a novel FNP in Nigeria. Methods: We designed the COST-FIN trial, a multi-site pragmatic single-blinded randomized controlled trial of newly diagnosed (<6 weeks from diagnosis) adults (≥18 years) with breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer at two tertiary cancer centers in Nigeria. Participants (n=200) will be randomized (1:1) to either the intervention (FNP) or the control arm and followed for 12 months. Data on key individual, treatment, and financial parameters will be collected via structured interviews and chart abstraction at baseline, 3, 6, and 12-month follow-up. In addition, participants randomized to the FNP will receive a tailored financial literacy assessment, financial planning support, and enhanced access to resources by trained financial navigators. Primary and secondary outcomes are Financial Catastrophe (FC) and Financial Distress (FD), respectively. Exploratory outcomes will include cost-related non-adherence and cost-effectiveness of the program. An interim analysis will be conducted when 50% of the estimated accruals reach 6 months of follow-up, with crossover if compelling evidence of benefit is demonstrated at that time point. All participants will be followed for 12 months from recruitment. Discussion: This first-of-its-kind study will provide evidence on the role of FNP in potentially eliminating financial barriers to cancer care in Nigeria. Given the country’s renewed interest in cancer control through the passage of the National Cancer Control Plan, findings from this study have the potential to influence policy reform and set the stage for further studies to evaluate the scalability and implementation of similar interventions in resource-limited settings. Trial registration : ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06630962. Oct 8, 2024 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06630962)

Abstract Introduction Cannabidiol has been shown to exert significant anti-inflammatory effects and has demonstrated efficacy in murine models of autoimmune myocarditis, pericarditis, and heart failure. The ARCHER Study assessed whether a pharmaceutically produced cannabidiol formulation showed beneficial effects on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) endpoints known to predict prognosis in this patient population. Methods In a multicentre international double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2 study, we randomly assigned 109 patients within 10 days of CMR confirmed diagnosis of acute myocarditis to 12 weeks of pharmaceutically produced oral cannabidiol (active) or placebo. Dose was titrated up to 10 mg/kg of body weight twice daily. Primary endpoints were the difference in extracellular volume (ECV) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) measured by CMR at week 12. Other CMR endpoints included left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), LV mass, intracellular volume (ICV), LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (LVEDV, LVESV), and left-atrial end-systolic volume (LAESV). Results All randomized patients (56 active/53 placebo) completed the study with no loss to follow-up. Study drug appeared safe and well tolerated. Baseline mean ECV 38.9 ± 10.9 ml, GLS −15.3 ± 3.6%, and LVEF 60.6 ± 9.9% were consistent with mild to moderate myocarditis and predominantly intact LV function. Week 12 mean ECV was 33.6 ml in the active group and 37.3 ml in the placebo group, a difference of −3.7 ml, confidence interval (CI): −7.4 to 0.1; P = .0538; GLS was −16.0% in the active group and −15.9% in the placebo group, difference of −0.1, CI: −1.2 to 1.1; P = .90. Left ventricular mass was significantly reduced in the active group at 121.1 g compared to placebo 130.3 g, a difference of −9.2, CI: −16.4 to −2.1; P = .0117. In terms of remodelling, LAESV was significantly reduced in the active group (−8.1 ml; P = .0376) while the reduction in LVEDV failed to reach significance (−7.4 ml; P = .098). Conclusion In mild-to-moderate acute myocarditis, treatment with pharmaceutically manufactured cannabidiol was not associated with a statistically significant change in myocardial ECV or GLS, although a trend towards reduction in ECV was observed. In addition, improvement in other potential markers of myocardial recovery, including a significant reduction in LV mass, was seen in the active treatment group. Further investigation of the therapeutic potential of this therapy in inflammatory cardiac conditions is warranted.