Citations

Importance The Breast Cancer Index (BCI) previously identified premenopausal patients with tumors in which the ratio of expression of HOXB13 relative to IL17BR (hereafter, BCI [H/I]–low tumors) as likely to derive greatest benefit from ovarian function suppression (OFS)–containing adjuvant therapy in the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT) trial. Objectives To assess BCI as a predictive biomarker of benefit from exemestane plus OFS vs tamoxifen plus OFS and to validate BCI as a prognostic biomarker for premenopausal patients. Design, Setting, and Participants This prognostic study used a prospective-retrospective translational design within the Tamoxifen and Exemestane (TEXT) and SOFT trials (enrolled November 2003 to April 2011). Blinded BCI testing in all available tumor samples was completed in March 2024. Premenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer randomized to tamoxifen plus OFS or exemestane plus OFS who had BCI assessed were included. Analysis occurred from March to August 2024. Exposure 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen plus OFS or exemestane plus OFS. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) for predictive analyses and distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) for prognostic analyses after a median follow-up of 13 years in the TEXT cohort. Secondary objectives examined the predictive performance of BCI (H/I) in the combined TEXT and SOFT cohort overall and in prespecified clinical subgroups. Results Of 1782 patients in the TEXT study, 1034 (58.0%) had BCI (H/I)–low tumors; 915 (51.3%) of patients had N0 disease and 1077 (60.4%) were younger than 45 years. Patients with BCI (H/I)–low tumors had a 6.6% absolute benefit in 12-year BCFI (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.44-0.85) for exemestane plus OFS vs tamoxifen plus OFS, while those with BCI (H/I)–high tumors had a 6.3% absolute benefit (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57-1.07; P for interaction = .29). Results were consistent in the combined TEXT plus SOFT cohort (2896 patients) and adjusting for clinicopathological variables. Clinical subgroup analyses consistently showed benefit of exemestane plus OFS vs tamoxifen plus OFS for BCI (H/I)–low tumors, and more variable relative treatment effects among BCI (H/I)–high tumors, including by age. Post hoc exploratory time-varying estimates suggested the treatment × BCI associations may differ in years 0 to 5 vs greater than 5 years. BCI and BCI N+ as continuous indices were prognostic for distant recurrence in N0 (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.11-1.44; P < .001) and N1 (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.21-2.05; P < .001) cancers. The 12-year DRFI was 96.3%, 90.3%, and 84.9% for BCI low-, intermediate-, and high-risk N0 cancers, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance In this study of premenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer, BCI (H/I) status did not clearly predict greater benefit of adjuvant exemestane plus OFS vs tamoxifen plus OFS for women with BCI (H/I)–low tumors than for those with BCI (H/I)–high tumors; BCI continuous indices were reconfirmed as prognostic for premenopausal women. These findings support prior results of SOFT, which compared tamoxifen-alone vs OFS with either exemestane or tamoxifen, indicating premenopausal patients with BCI (H/I)–low tumors may benefit from more intensive endocrine therapy.

ImportanceAdjuvant ovarian function suppression (OFS) with oral endocrine therapy improves outcomes for premenopausal patients with hormone receptor–positive (HR+) breast cancer but adds adverse effects. A genomic biomarker for selecting patients most likely to benefit from OFS-based treatment is lacking.ObjectiveTo assess the predictive and prognostic performance of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI) for OFS benefit in premenopausal women with HR+ breast cancer.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis prospective-retrospective translational study used all available tumor tissue samples from female patients from the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT). These individuals were randomized to receive 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen alone, tamoxifen plus OFS, or exemestane plus OFS. BCI testing was performed blinded to clinical data and outcome. The a priori hypothesis was that BCI HOXB13/IL17BR ratio (BCI[H/I])–high tumors would benefit more from OFS and high BCI portended poorer prognosis in this population. Settings spanned multiple centers internationally. Participants included premenopausal female patients with HR+ early breast cancer with specimens in the International Breast Cancer Study Group tumor repository available for RNA extraction. Data were collected from December 2003 to April 2021 and were analyzed from May 2022 to October 2022.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPrimary end points were breast cancer–free interval (BCFI) for the predictive analysis and distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) for the prognostic analyses.ResultsTumor specimens were available for 1718 of the 3047 female patients in the SOFT intention-to-treat population. The 1687 patients (98.2%) who had specimens that yielded sufficient RNA for BCI testing represented the parent trial population. The median (IQR) follow-up time was 12 (10.5-13.4) years, and 512 patients (30.3%) were younger than 40 years. Tumors were BCI(H/I)-low for 972 patients (57.6%) and BCI(H/I)-high for 715 patients (42.4%). Patients with tumors classified as BCI(H/I)-low exhibited a 12-year absolute benefit in BCFI of 11.6% from exemestane plus OFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48 [95% CI, 0.33-0.71]) and an absolute benefit of 7.3% from tamoxifen plus OFS (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.48-0.97]) relative to tamoxifen alone. In contrast, patients with BCI(H/I)-high tumors did not benefit from either exemestane plus OFS (absolute benefit, −0.4%; HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.70-1.53]; P for interaction = .006) or tamoxifen plus OFS (absolute benefit, −1.2%; HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.72-1.54]; P for interaction = .11) compared with tamoxifen alone. BCI continuous index was significantly prognostic in the N0 subgroup for DRFI (n = 1110; P = .004), with 12-year DRFI of 95.9%, 90.8%, and 86.3% in BCI low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk N0 cancers, respectively.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this prospective-retrospective translational study of patients enrolled in SOFT, BCI was confirmed as prognostic in premenopausal women with HR+ breast cancer. The benefit from OFS-containing adjuvant endocrine therapy was greater for patients with BCI(H/I)-low tumors than BCI(H/I)-high tumors. BCI(H/I)-low status may identify premenopausal patients who are likely to benefit from this more intensive endocrine therapy.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. The combined analysis of SOFT-TEXT compared outcomes in 4,690 premenopausal women with estrogen/progesterone receptor–positive (ER/PgR+) early breast cancer randomly assigned to 5 years of exemestane + ovarian function suppression (OFS) versus tamoxifen + OFS. After a median follow-up of 9 years, exemestane + OFS significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) and distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI), but not overall survival, compared with tamoxifen + OFS. We now report DFS, DRFI, and overall survival after a median follow-up of 13 years. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, the 12-year DFS (4.6% absolute improvement, hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.90; P < .001) and DRFI (1.8% absolute improvement, HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.98; P = .03), but not overall survival (90.1% v 89.1%, HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.11), continued to be significantly improved for patients assigned exemestane + OFS over tamoxifen + OFS. Among patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative tumors (86.0% of the ITT population), the absolute improvement in 12-year overall survival with exemestane + OFS was 2.0% (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.04) and 3.3% in those who received chemotherapy (45.9% of the ITT population). Overall survival benefit was clinically significant in high-risk patients, eg, women age < 35 years (4.0%) and those with > 2 cm (4.5%) or grade 3 tumors (5.5%). These sustained reductions of the risk of recurrence with adjuvant exemestane + OFS, compared with tamoxifen + OFS, provide guidance for selecting patients for whom exemestane should be preferred over tamoxifen in the setting of OFS. [Media: see text]

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. The Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00066690 ) randomly assigned premenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer to 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, tamoxifen plus ovarian function suppression (OFS), or exemestane plus OFS. The primary analysis compared disease-free survival (DFS) between tamoxifen plus OFS versus tamoxifen alone; exemestane plus OFS versus tamoxifen was a secondary objective. After 8 years, SOFT reported a significant reduction in recurrence and improved overall survival (OS) with adjuvant tamoxifen plus OFS versus tamoxifen alone. Here, we report outcomes after median follow-up of 12 years. DFS remained significantly improved with tamoxifen plus OFS versus tamoxifen (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.98) with a 12-year DFS of 71.9% with tamoxifen, 76.1% with tamoxifen plus OFS, and 79.0% with exemestane plus OFS. OS was improved with tamoxifen plus OFS versus tamoxifen (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.01) and was 86.8% with tamoxifen, 89.0% with tamoxifen plus OFS, and 89.4% with exemestane plus OFS at 12 years. Among those who received prior chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2–negative tumors, OS was 78.8% with tamoxifen, 81.1% with tamoxifen plus OFS, and 84.4% with exemestane plus OFS. In conclusion, after 12 years, there remains a benefit from including OFS in adjuvant endocrine therapy, with an absolute improvement in OS more apparent with higher baseline risk of recurrence. [Media: see text]

Abstract Background: The level of immune suppression in an individual breast cancer (BC) patient is relevant for having a major benefit from treatments that act via or are directed to the immune response, such as anti-HER2 agents and immune checkpoint molecules, respectively. The link(s) between the tumor immune microenvironment and treatment responses has been investigated in HER2-positive BC. This study analyzed the association between baseline expression of genes regulating T cell activities (PD1, CTLA4, LAG3, TIM3, PDL1, PDL2, FOXP3, IL10, TGFβ (1-3), FOXP1 and other related genes) and pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in the NeoALTTO trial. Methods: NeoALTTO randomized early-stage HER2-positive BC patients to neoadjuvant trastuzumab (T), lapatinib (L) or T+L for 6 weeks followed by 12 weeks of concurrent paclitaxel. Anthracyclines were given after surgery (FEC). Patients with RNA sequencing data from their baseline tumor samples (N=254 patients out of 455 from the original cohort) were included in the current study. The primary endpoint, pCR, was defined as ypT0/is ypN0. Logistic regression was used for analysis of pCR. Cox regression univariate and multivariate (adjusted for clinicopathological parameters and treatment arms) analyses were performed. Results: In the total cohort analyzed, high PD1 (odds ratio, OR: 1.4, P=0.03), PDL2 (OR: 1.4, P=0.04), CTLA4 (OR: 1.4, P=0.03) and TGFβ3 (OR: 1.4, P=0.02) expression was associated with an increased probability of achieving pCR at the multivariate analysis. ERBB2 (HER2) expression was associated with pCR in the three arms (T: OR: 2.7, P=0.02; L: OR: 2.3, P=0.01; T+L: OR: 5, P&lt;0.001). Additionally in the T+L arm, PAM50 HER2-enriched subtype (OR: 2.9, P=0.03), as well as immune genes PD1 (OR: 2.1, P=0.01), PDL1 (OR: 1.8, P=0.03) and CTLA4 (OR: 2; P=0.01), were also associated with pCR. Conclusions: In the NeoALTTO population examined, PD1, PDL2, CTLA-4 and TGFβ3 expression at diagnosis were all associated with improved pCR rates after anti-HER2 treatment. The effect of these treatments seemed to be dependent on HER2 expression levels, which was particularly relevant in the T+L arm. These observations confirm previous findings that link immune infiltrates to higher pCR rates, demonstrate the clinical significance of the PD-1 pathway and additionally show that CTLA-4 and TGFβ3 could also be important in early stage HER2-positive BC. The association of tumors linked with immune regulatory gene expression with positive responses to neoadjuvant anti-HER2 agents suggests that they act in a way that reinvigorates the antitumor immunity in the face of tumor-mediated suppression. Patients whose tumors highly express these genes may be good candidates for immunotherapy before the start or after the neoadjuvant treatment when residual disease is detected at surgery, although these hypotheses require further confirmation. Citation Format: Cinzia Solinas, Pushpamali De Silva, David Venet, Soizic Garaud, Chunyan Gu-Trantien, Florentine Hilbers, Evandro de Azambuja, Olena Werner, Lorena De la Peña, Amylou Dueck, Serena Di Cosimo, Istvan Lang, Jens Huober, Sherko Küemmel, Carsten Denkert, Roberto Salgado, Christos Sotiriou, Martine Piccart-Gebhart, Debora Fumagalli, Karen Willard-Gallo. Immune regulatory gene expression and clinical outcome in the NeoALTTO trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3132.

502 Background: Pre-specified 5-year analyses of the phase III Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimisation (ALTTO) Trial defined in Amendments 11&12. Methods: From June 2007 to July 2011, 8381 patients (pts) were randomised from 946 sites in 44 countries to receive either L+T, T→L, L, or T. In 2011, due to futility the L arm was closed and is not included in this analysis. The primary end point is disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary objectives include treatment comparisons with respect to overall survival (OS), time to recurrence (TTR), time to distant recurrence (TDR), cardiac and overall safety and tolerability. Primary analysis results of the study were published in JCO 2015 34:1034-1042. This updated analysis occurs at a 6.9 yrs median follow up (MFU). Results: All patients have reached 5-years of follow-up. 705 DFS events for L+T vs T have been observed. HR for DFS was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.74-1.00; 6-yr DFS%=85% vs 82%) for L+T vs T and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.81-1.08; 6-yr DFS%=84% vs 82%) for T→L vs. T. The 6-year OS was 93%, 92%, and 91% for L+T, T→L, and T, respectively. HR for OS was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.70-1.06) for L+T vs. T and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.71-1.08) for T→L vs. T. DFS differences for L+T vs. T were slightly higher for the hormone-receptor(ER)-negative [HR 0.80 (95% CI, 0.64-1.00; 6-yr DFS%=84% vs. 80%)] and the sequential chemotherapy [HR 0.83 (95% CI, 0.69-1.00; 6-yr DFS%=83% vs.79%)] subgroups. There were no differences in sites of first DFS events according to treatment arm for CNS, loco-regional, or distant recurrences. There were more AEs related to study treatment (L+T 93% vs T 64%). The incidence of primary cardiac end points was low: 1% for L+T, 0.5% for T→L and 0.9% for T. Conclusions: The HRs for this updated analysis are similar to those from the Primary Analysis and the event rate remains lower than anticipated (705 vs 850 planned). Cardiac toxicity remains low. This analysis suggests that HER2+/ER- tumors may have a different biology than HER2+/ER+ and may benefit more from dual HER2 blockade. Long-term follow up continues. Clinical trial information: NCT00490139.

Nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal‐IRI) is a liposomal formulation of irinotecan with a longer half‐life (t1/2), higher plasma total irinotecan (tIRI), and lower SN‐38 maximum concentration (Cmax) compared with nonliposomal irinotecan. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of nal‐IRI was performed for tIRI and total SN‐38 (tSN38) using patient samples from six studies. PK‐safety association was evaluated for neutropenia and diarrhea in 353 patients. PK‐efficacy association was evaluated from a phase III study in pancreatic cancer NAPOLI1. Efficacy was associated with longer duration of unencapsulated SN‐38 (uSN38) above a threshold and higher Cavgof tIRI, tSN38, and uSN38. Neutropenia was associated with uSN38Cmaxand diarrhea with tIRICmax. Baseline predictive factors were race, body surface area, and bilirubin. Analysis identified PK factors associated with efficacy, safety, and predictive baseline factors. The results support the benefit of nal‐IRI dose of 70 mg/m2(free‐base; equivalent to 80 mg/m2salt base) Q2W over 100 mg/m2Q3W.