Citations

AbstractThe Alzheimer's Association hosted the second Latinos & Alzheimer's Symposium in May 2021. Due to the COVID‐19 pandemic, the meeting was held online over 2 days, with virtual presentations, discussions, mentoring sessions, and posters. The Latino population in the United States is projected to have the steepest increase in Alzheimer's disease (AD) in the next 40 years, compared to other ethnic groups. Latinos have increased risk for AD and other dementias, limited access to quality care, and are severely underrepresented in AD and dementia research and clinical trials. The symposium highlighted developments in AD research with Latino populations, including advances in AD biomarkers, and novel cognitive assessments for Spanish‐speaking populations, as well as the need to effectively recruit and retain Latinos in clinical research, and how best to deliver health‐care services and to aid caregivers of Latinos living with AD.

Abstract Background: CLL is still an incurable lymphoid malignancy. The current standard of care is to treat only patients with obvious clinical progression as defined by the National Cancer Institute Working Group in 1996 (NCI–WG 1996). High risk CLL can be identified at diagnosis by a variety of tests including fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region (IgVH) analysis, and expression of ZAP-70 or CD38. With this information we can identify patients with high risk, early stage disease who are candidates for novel low toxicity therapies that could alter the natural course of their disease. Our hypothesis was that combination monoclonal antibody (MoAb) therapy using alemtuzumab and rituximab would significantly reduce the high risk clone in early stage CLL. Methods: This phase II trial was conducted with IRB approval and accrued the planned 30 patients between January 2005 and July 2007 at Mayo Clinic Rochester. The study enrolled consenting patients with Rai stage 0–II CLL without NCI–WG 1996 criteria for treatment who had high risk CLL as defined as one or more of the following 17p13–, 11q22–, unmutated (UM) IgVH (< 2%) and expression of ZAP–70 (≥ 30%) and/or CD38 (≥20%). Treatment was one 30 day cycle (alemtuzumab 3 mg, 10 mg, 30 mg days 1–3 then 30 mg 3 × week × 4 weeks with all doses subcutaneously and rituximab at 375 mg/m2/week IV × 4 doses from day 8). Patients received 7 days of allopurinol and antimicrobial prophylaxis against PCP and herpes virus infections for 7 months. CMV testing by PCR was done weekly during treatment, then monthly × 6. Results: All 30 patients have completed therapy and 27 have been evaluated for response. The median age of these 27 patients was 62 yr (range 29–77) with 8 patients > 70 years. There was a male predominance (67%) with median time from diagnosis to treatment of 0.7 yr (range 0.1 – 6.1). Stage (Rai) at the start of therapy was 0 in 7 (26%), I in 19 (70%), and II in 1. High risk markers were 17p13– in 9 (33%), 11q22– in 7 (26%), UM IgV and expression of either ZAP–70 or CD38 in 11 (41%). All 27 patients completed therapy without interruption. Non hematological grade 3–4 toxicity occurred in 3 patients (2 drug reactions caused by SMX/TMP, 1 CMV reactivation responsive to IV therapy). Response evaluation at 2 months after completion of therapy using NCI–WG 1996 criteria showed an ORR of 93% with 12 (44%) CR, 8 (30%) nPR, and 5 (19%) PR. Two (7%) patients had disease progression. Median duration of follow up was 14.1 months (range 1.9 – 27.2). Median time to disease progression in the 25 responding patients was 14.4 months (95% CI 5.9 – 22.4). Seven (26%) patients have received subsequent treatment for CLL (median 5.2 months, range 2.4 – 20.1). A minimal residual disease assay using 3-color flow cytometry on peripheral blood was negative in 6 of the 7 patients with CR who had no evidence of residual CLL on immunohistochemical examination of the bone marrow. These 6 patients all remain in sustained CR (median follow up 15 months, range 2 – 27.2). Conclusion: Alemtuzumab and rituximab is an effective and tolerable therapy in patients with high risk early stage CLL. A randomized controlled trial is now required to test if this intervention is better than the standard observation approach. In addition, this combination MoAb regimen could be used as a platform to develop even more effective combination treatments for patients with CLL.

Abstract Importance: It is essential to refine the populations most likely to benefit from targeted chemotherapy combinations. Background: MINDACT showed that molecularly low risk patients, as assessed by the Amsterdam 70-gene profile MammaPrint® (Agendia) (MP), did not benefit from chemotherapy. In the I-SPY2 trial, MP low risk Hormone Receptor (HR) positive/HER2 negative patients are not eligible; however, HR negative or HER2 positive patients were considered high risk and included for treatment with chemotherapy plus novel agents. The neoadjuvant setting provides an opportunity to evaluate whether molecularly low risk HER2 positive patients are good candidates for neoadjuvant chemo/anti-HER2 therapy, where pathologic complete response (pCR) and 3-year outcomes are measured. Objective: To evaluate and further characterize the fraction of and outcomes for patients molecular low-risk disease in the I-SPY2 trial. Methods: The I-SPY2 platform trial is an ongoing multicenter phase 2 multi-arm study utilizing adaptive design and evaluating efficacy and tolerability of investigational agents in combination with standard-of-care chemotherapy for patients with high-risk anatomic stage II/III breast cancer. Patients with HR+HER2- MP low-risk tumors are not eligible. All enrolled patients undergo pretreatment biopsy for genomic evaluation of early recurrence risk with MP for risk stratification and with the 80-gene BluePrint® (Agendia) test for intrinsic subtype classification. Primary endpoint of the study is pCR in breast and lymph nodes (ypT0/is, ypN0). Secondary outcomes included event-free survival (EFS) and distant-recurrence free survival (DRFS). Following standard neoadjuvant treatment with or without a concomitant investigational agent, patients are followed for long-term outcomes. EFS and DRFS at 3 and 5 years in the pCR vs non-pCR groups within histologic and molecular subtypes are determined using the Kaplan Meier method. Results: Of the 1038 enrolled patients by November 2016, 24 patients (3.2%) had molecular low-risk disease as determined by MP. Of these, 21 (87.5%) had HR+HER2+, 1 (4.2%) had HR-HER2+, and 2 (8.4%) had HR-HER2-. BluePrint expression subtyping classified 17 as luminal-type, 6 HER2 enriched-type and 1 basal type. One patient withdrew consent for follow-up. Of the 23 remaining, none achieved pCR and only one (HR+/HER2+) had an EFS event (with median follow-up of 4.3 years). Overall, EFS and DRFS data were available for 950 of the 1038 patients (as of February 2019), with median follow-up of 3.8 years. Of the 173 HR+HER2+ in this cohort, 20 (11.6%) had molecular low-risk tumors. The EFS and DRFS for the 173 HER2+HR+ pCR group is 97% and 98% (non-pCR group 89% and 94%), respectively at 3 years. Removing the molecular low-risk HER2+ patients from the denominator reveals the worse outcome for patients with non pCR: EFS 86% and DRFS 92% at 3 years. The difference is more apparent at 5 years, changing from 74% to 66% for EFS and from 81% to 75% for DRFS. Intrinsic subtypes vary and do not predict early risk. Conclusions: I-SPY2 focuses on women with high clinical risk with only 3.2% of enrolled patients having low molecular risk tumors. However, 12% of HER+ breast cancer enrolled patients had molecular low risk tumors of which 95% were also HR+. In this group, early recurrence is very low despite absence of pCR and irrespective of intrinsic subtype. Refining the population using molecular high-risk classification of patients reveals a greater difference between the pCR and non-pCR groups within the HR+HER2+ subtype in the EFS and DRFS analysis. Clinical trial designs could address the opportunity to find more targeted and less toxic treatments for the HER2+ low molecular risk patient population. Citation Format: Paula R Pohlmann, Christina Yau, Angela DeMichele, Claudine Isaacs, Judy C Boughey, Nola Hylton, Michelle E Melisko, Jane Perlmutter, Hope S Rugo, W. Fraser Symmans, I-SPY 2 TRIAL Consortium, Donald A Berry, Laura Esserman. Amsterdam 70-gene profile (MammaPrint) low risk, even in the HER2 positive subset, identifies a population of women with lower early risk for recurrence despite low response rates to chemotherapy and to HER2 targeted therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-10-06.