Citations

Background: Concerns exist regarding orthotropic heart transplantation (OHT) in hepatitis C (HCV) seropositive recipients. The UNOS national registry was accessed to evaluate HCV recipient sero-positivity and outcomes. Method: Retrospective analysis of the UNOS registry (2000-2014) to evaluate recipient profile and clinical outcome of HCV sero-positive (HCV+ve) and sero-negative (HCV -ve) pts. Early and late adjusted survival and adverse events at follow-up were compared. Results: From 23,507 patients (mean age 52 yrs; 75% male), 481 (2%) were HCV +ve (mean age 52 yrs; 77% male). Annual proportion of HCV +ve recipients was comparable over the study period (range 1.3-2.7%; p=0.2). The HCV +ve cohort had more African American (22% vs 17%; p=0.01), pts with a prior LVAD (21 vs 14%; p<0.01 and more hepatitis B core Ag+ve recipients (17% vs 5%; p<0.01). However, ECMO (p=0.7), inotropic (p=0.2), and intra-aortic balloon pump (p=0.7) support, serum creatinine (p=0.7) and serum bilirubin (p=0.7) were similar. Proportion of Status 1A pts was similar (24% HCV+ vs 21% HCV -); however wait-time for HCV + recipients was longer (mean 23 vs 19 days; p<0.01). Among donor variables, age (p=0.8), hepatitis B status (p=0.4) and CDC high risk status (p=0.9) were comparable. At a median follow up of 4 years, 67.1% patients were alive, 28.4% died and 1.1% were re-transplanted (3.4% missing). Overall survival was worse in the HCV+ cohort (64.3 vs 72.9 % and 43.2 vs 55% at five and ten years; p<0.01). Late renal [OR 1.2(1-1.6); p = 0.02] and liver dysfunction [OR 4.5 (1.2-15.7); p=0.01] occur in HCV +ve recipients. On adjusted analysis, HCV sero-positivity is associated with poorer survival [HR0.6 (0.5-0.8); p<0.01]. Conclusion: A small proportion of patients receiving a heart transplant in the United States have hepatitis C. In spite of comparable pre-operative hepatic function, hepatitis C sero-positive recipients develop late liver dysfunction and have poorer long-term survival.

Background: Left ventricle assist device (LVAD) support, a well established therapy in advanced CHF, improves renal function assessed by creatinine. While renal function in large numbers of continuous flow (CF) LVADs vs pulsatile flow (PF) LVADs has been evaluated at 3 mo., long term studies are needed with large numbers of CF vs PF devices. To date longer term analysis comparing renal function in CF vs PF devices have relied on a small number of CF devices. We evaluated renal function assessed by creatinine in a large number of CF (HM II) (n=119) devices and compared this to renal function in a group of subjects treated with PF devices (HM XVE) (n=8) at 6 mo. post implant. Our aim was to evaluate change in creatinine between 3 and 6 months in these groups. Methods and Results: Plasma creatinine was evaluated at 3 and 6 months in two groups: subjects with CF HM II (n=119) and PF LVAD (HM XVE, n=8). The data were collected from two centers in patients undergoing implant for destination or bridge to transplant therapy. Baseline creatinine was higher in the HM XVE group at baseline (BL), and decreased at 3 mo. (1.7 [1.1-2.1] vs 1.1 [0.8-1.5] mg/dL, p<0.05). BL creatine in the HM II group decreased at 3 mo as well (1.2 [1-1.5] vs 1.1 [0.9-1.3] mg/dL, p,0.05). Between 3 and 6 months there was no difference in degree of creatinine change in CF vs PF, however both groups had an increase in Creatinine in this time frame: PF (1.1 [0.8-1.5] vs 1.35 [1.05-1.9] mg/dL, p<0.05); CF (1.1 [0.9-1.3] vs 1.2 [0.92-1.4] mg/dL, p<0.05). Conclusion: This is the first study to demonstrate with large numbers of CF LVAD that creatinine does not incrementally increase between 3 and 6 mo. in comparison to PF LVAD. Further studies are required with large numbers of continuos flow LVADs evaluating the comparative effect of long term continuous flow vs pulsatile flow. Additionally, it remains important to identify surrogates of pulsatility in subjects with continuous flow devices and evaluate prognostic impact on renal function long term.

BACKGROUND: The immunologic risk associated with preformed donor-specific allo-antibodies (DSA) against human leukocyte antigens (HLA) in heart transplant (HTX) recipients is unclear. The goal of this study was to evaluate potential role of DSA on the progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) in HTX recipients. METHODS: The presence of DSA against HLA was evaluated using solid phase Single Antigen Bead assay (One Lambda, Inc., Canoga Park, CA; Luminex platform) before transplant in 35 HTX recipients. Using alloantibody specification analysis, 11% (4/35) and 20% (7/35) had DSA against donor Class I and II HLA respectively including the one patient who had both (DSA I & II+) . 71% (25/35) of patients had no demonstrable DSA (DSA-). All patients had negative cytotoxicity cross match. Baseline three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound studies (3D IVUS) were performed at 1.0 [0.18, 1.4] year after transplant. Follow up 3D IVUS exams were performed 0.92 [0.85, 1.04] years after the baseline exam. RESULTS: The increase in mean plaque (media and intima) volume (PV) was accelerated in the DSA II+ group as compared to the DSA- group (0.87±1.9 mm (3)/mm vs. 0.16±1.8 mm (3)/mm) but the vessel volume index (follow up vessel volume/ baseline vessel volume) was similar between groups (1.08±0.5 vs. 1.09± 0.4; p=0.9). Plaque index (PI) (PV/vessel volume x 100 [%]) increased significantly in the DSA II+ group (17.9±6.3%) but not in the DSA- group (-13.6±13.2%, P=0.02). None of these values were significant in the DSA I+ only group. Treatment with Sirolimus did not affect PI progression between the DSA II+ and DSA- groups (PI progression: 15.9±8.7% vs. -11.7±7.1%, P=0.03). Age, gender, lipid and uric acid levels, prevalence of diabetes, ischemic time, time between IVUS examinations, the use of steroids, mycophenolate vs. azathioprine or calcineurin inhibitors vs. sirolimus were not different between the groups (P>0.4 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Heart transplant recipients with clearly defined anti-Class II DSA are at risk for accelerated cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Whether interventions to minimize the risk of DSA such as virtual crossmatch, desensitization and complement inhibition will retard CAV remains to be proven.

Abstract Aims Recently, deep learning artificial intelligence (AI) models have been trained to detect cardiovascular conditions, including hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), from the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). In this external validation study, we sought to assess the performance of an AI-ECG algorithm for detecting HCM in diverse international cohorts. Methods and results A convolutional neural network-based AI-ECG algorithm was developed previously in a single-centre North American HCM cohort (Mayo Clinic). This algorithm was applied to the raw 12-lead ECG data of patients with HCM and non-HCM controls from three external cohorts (Bern, Switzerland; Oxford, UK; and Seoul, South Korea). The algorithm’s ability to distinguish HCM vs. non-HCM status from the ECG alone was examined. A total of 773 patients with HCM and 3867 non-HCM controls were included across three sites in the merged external validation cohort. The HCM study sample comprised 54.6% East Asian, 43.2% White, and 2.2% Black patients. Median AI-ECG probabilities of HCM were 85% for patients with HCM and 0.3% for controls (P &lt; 0.001). Overall, the AI-ECG algorithm had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.922 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.910–0.934], with diagnostic accuracy 86.9%, sensitivity 82.8%, and specificity 87.7% for HCM detection. In age- and sex-matched analysis (case–control ratio 1:2), the AUC was 0.921 (95% CI 0.909–0.934) with accuracy 88.5%, sensitivity 82.8%, and specificity 90.4%. Conclusion The AI-ECG algorithm determined HCM status from the 12-lead ECG with high accuracy in diverse international cohorts, providing evidence for external validity. The value of this algorithm in improving HCM detection in clinical practice and screening settings requires prospective evaluation.

Renal function improves early after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation but later decline has been observed. We sought to determine the occurrence and evaluate possible causes for this decline. In 62 consecutive patients with HeartMateII LVAD with available calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR, ml/min/1.73 m2) 1 year after implant, GFR was assessed repeatedly and possible predictors for decline from 3 to 12 months were investigated. Post-mortem renal specimens for patients supported with an LVAD were evaluated. GFR 54.5 ± 19.5 at admission increased to 66.4 ± 22.3 preoperatively and to 79.2 ± 30.1 ~1 month after implantation. Subsequently at ~3 months GFR declined to 74.7 ± 25.4, at ~6 months to 68.8 ± 23.1, and ~1 year after implant to 63.9 ± 17.7. Glomerular filtration rate at 1 year was significantly lower (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, p = 0.005) than GFR 1, 3, and 6 months after implant. Early rise in GFR after surgery was not associated with late decline. Shorter bypass time (β = −0.09, p = 0.048) and higher albumin 3 months after LVAD (β = 14.4, p = 0.025) were significantly associated with less later decline in GFR. Arteriosclerosis was identified in autopsy renal specimens. In conclusion, early gains in renal function after LVAD implant are not sustained in many patients. Patient, device, and operative factors may influence long-term renal function in these patients.