Citations

Background: The heterogeneity of ischemic stroke has relevance for determination of risk for recurrence, prediction of outcomes, and identification of genetic risk factors. Among the many systems created for classifying patients into subtypes of stroke, the Trial of Org10172 Acute Stroke Trial (TOAST) and Causative Classification of Stroke (CCS) systems are among the most commonly used. Both systems generate similar subtype diagnoses although the two systems use different criteria for subtype assignment. The purpose of this study was to assess the level of agreement between subtype classification made using these two systems. Methods: Study subjects included 14,106 adult men and women accrued in the NINDS Stroke Genetics Network (SiGN) across 21 centers in the US and Europe classified independently using both with TOAST and CCS. Kappa statistics were calculated for the five major ischemic stroke subtypes common to both systems. Results: The overall agreement between TOAST and CCS was moderate (agreement rate, 70%; kappa = 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.61). Agreement varied widely across study sites, ranging from 28% to 90%. Agreement on specific subtypes was highest for large artery atherosclerosis (kappa, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.73) and lowest for small artery occlusion (kappa = 0.56, 95%CI, 0.54 to 0.58). Conclusion: Agreement between TOAST and CCS diagnoses was only moderate. Caution is warranted when comparing or combining results based upon the two systems. Re-phenotyping using one system should be encouraged when possible to ensure valid results. Table: Cross-classification of stroke subtypes by TOAST and CCS

Objectives: Genetic and environmental influences contribute to differences in ischemic stroke phenotype across race-ethnic groups. The Causative Classification System (CSS) is an ischemic stroke phenotype characterization tool developed for etiological and causative classification. The CCS phenotypes across ethnic groups were analyzed and compared. Methods: The NINDS S troke G enetics N etwork (SiGN) is a large consortium aimed at identifying subtype-specific ischemic stroke susceptibility genes. Over 12,000 subjects at 22 sites across US and Europe were enrolled, with CSS locally adjudicated. Central CCS quality control was performed on all participants. Analysis was performed on 7,674 patients with complete workups. Findings: Significant ethnic differences were found in stroke etiology across ethnic groups (p <0.0001) with large artery atherosclerosis present most commonly in Asians, cardioembolic sources among Caucasian Europeans, and lacunar strokes among African Americans. African Americans were the youngest ethnic cohort analyzed (see Table 1). Conclusion: Significant differences in stroke subtypes are present across ethnic groups. Future genetic analyses may contribute to our understanding of these differences.

Background: Considerable disagreement exists among experts regarding the appropriate extent of diagnostic testing after ischemic stroke (IS). Evidence-based data guiding stroke evaluation for individual patients according to the underlying phenotype are unknown. We sought to determine the yield of cardiac and arterial evaluations for identifying an alternative major stroke etiology in patients with a given phenotype in the NINDS Stroke Genetics Network (SiGN). Methods: SiGN is a consortium of IS studies at 22 US and European sites aiming to identify stroke susceptibility genes. Adjudicators certified in Causative Classification of Stroke (CCS) system determined major etiologic stroke phenotypes based on chart review. All diagnostic data entered into the CCS software were stored in a confidential database. We determined the probability of identifying an alternative major abnormality based on cardiac (history, EKG, echocardiography) and arterial [intracranial (IC), extracranial (EC)] evaluations in 3 stroke phenotypes: lacunar infarct (LI), large artery atherosclerosis (LAA), and cardiac embolism (CE). Proportions of alternative major etiologies were calculated in patients with complete evaluations in each phenotype. Results: The analyses included 15720 patients. Among these, 2299 had phenotypic subtype of LI (1660 with cardiac and 1691 with arterial evaluations); 4228 had CE (2451 with arterial evaluation); and 2613 had LAA (2047 with cardiac evaluation). Cardiac evaluation revealed a major cardiac source of embolism in 12.3% of patients with LI and 20.3% with LAA. Echocardiography demonstrated an additional major structural cardiac source not seen by history/examination/EKG in 1.9% and 1.6% in LI and LAA respectively. Arterial evaluation led to the identification of ≥50%ipsilateral stenosis in 13.5% (IC: 8.9%, EC: 5.8%) of patients with LI and 17% (IC: 8.1%, EC: 11.3%) of those with CE. In LI patients with complete cardiac and vascular evaluations, 24.1% had an alternative major stroke etiology. Conclusions: A considerable proportion of IS patients with LI, LAA, and CE harbor an alternative major etiology. In the future, these results can be used to generate evidence-based and cost-effective evaluation and management strategies.

Stroke subtype classification, applying standard criteria to clinical data, can reduce the heterogeneity of ischemic stroke for genetics studies. To date, most of the replicated genetic loci for ischemic stroke appear subtype-specific. Increasing homogeneity of phenotype comes with a trade-off in sample size, which influences the potential for successful identification of new loci. We estimated genetic associations using the union and intersection of two widely used stroke subtyping systems to assess the influence of sample size and homogeneity on test statistics. Methods: The Stroke Genetics Network (SiGN) study used both the Causative Classification of Stroke (CCS) and the Trial of ORG10172 Acute Stroke Trial (TOAST) classification systems. The CCS generates both a causal and a phenotypic subtype. Using all available data from case-control strata from the a previously performed GWAS, we focused on three main stroke subtypes: cardioembolic (CE), large artery atherosclerosis (LAA), and small artery occlusion (SAO). We estimated genetic associations with the union of the two CCS outputs and TOAST ( eg called CE by at least one method) and the intersection ( eg called CE by all three methods). Our modelling approach included a fixed-effects meta-analysis, i.e. pooling stratum specific estimates from logistic regression models using 10 principle components to account for genetic ancestry responsible for population stratification. Results: The majority of confirmatory findings from SiGN ( PITX2 and ZFHX3 for CE and HDAC9 for LAA) were evident in both models and in both the union and intersection of the subtyping systems. Some findings ( TSPAN2 in LAA) showed up best in the intersection with stronger corresponding p-values and odds ratios whereas other findings (12q24 for SAO) appear stronger in all of the union analyses, but were also evident in intersection analyses. We identify 16 potential novel loci, 6 of which appear in numerous analyses. Conclusion: Both expanding and refining stroke subtypes may help in the identification of additional stroke genetic risk variants and should be considered as complementary to a single classification system. We are pursuing replication of the novel findings.