Citations

Abstract Background Identification of individuals at increased risk for synucleinopathies is becoming more feasible with advances in biomarkers. However, the ethical and practical aspects of communicating disease risk remain unresolved, particularly across diagnostic groups and cultural contexts. Objectives We aimed to evaluate attitudes toward disclosure of future synucleinopathy risk among individuals with isolated/idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD), as well as in individuals who developed Parkinson's disease (PD), or multiple system atrophy (MSA), in a large non‐Western registry. Methods This nationwide survey study included participants from 28 movement disorders and sleep centers across Türkiye. Questionnaires assessing attitudes toward risk disclosure, additional testing, and clinical trial participation were administered face‐to‐face. Responses were analyzed using contingency tables and regression models. Results are reported following the Consensus‐Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) guideline. Results Among 1385 participants (1039 PD, 107 MSA, 239 iRBD), individuals with iRBD showed the highest support for risk disclosure (88.3%), exceeding PD (64.4%) and MSA (51.9%). Approval declined modestly (3–8%) when framed within the absence of disease‐modifying treatment. iRBD participants were more willing for additional testing but less willing to join clinical trials (31.8%) than PD (45.3%) or MSA (48%). MSA patients expressed the greatest concern about psychological impact. Male sex had more favorable views on disclosure and trial participation, while younger and better‐educated participants favored additional testing. Conclusions Attitudes toward risk disclosure differ markedly across the synucleinopathy spectrum and demographic characteristics. Culturally informed and diagnosis‐specific disclosure strategies will be essential for trial recruitment and patient‐centered care.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective neuromodulatory therapy for Parkinson’s disease (PD). Early studies using globus pallidus internus (GPi) DBS for PD profiled the nucleus as having two functional zones. This concept disseminated throughout the neuromodulation community as the “GPi triangle”. Although our understanding of the pallidum has greatly evolved over the past 20 years, we continue to reference the triangle in our clinical decision-making process. We propose a new direction, termed the spatial boundary hypothesis, to build upon the 2-dimensional outlook on GPi DBS. We believe an updated 3-D GPi model can produce more consistent, positive patient outcomes.