Citations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Medical management options for nontraumatic subdural hematoma (SDH) remain limited, with only atorvastatin demonstrating benefit in a single phase 2 randomized clinical trial and mixed evidence for dexamethasone. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) may benefit SDH outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between GLP-1 RA use and rescue surgery rates and mortality in patients with medically managed nontraumatic SDH. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX database from 2016 to 2025, including adults with SDH who were managed conservatively without surgical evacuation or middle meningeal artery embolization. Patients prescribed GLP-1 RAs were compared with nonusers. After propensity matching, rescue surgical evacuation, all-cause mortality at 1 year, and GLP-1 RA–associated adverse events were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 134 901 patients with conservatively managed nontraumatic SDH were identified, of whom 1470 (1.1%) were GLP-1 RA users. After propensity score matching, 2922 patients remained, with 1461 in each group. At 1 year, GLP-1 RA users experienced significantly lower rates of rescue surgery (2.23% vs 3.51%; P = .046), culminating in an overall 38% reduction in relative hazard. All-cause mortality was also significantly lower for GLP-1 RA users at 1 year (16.1% vs 23.7%, P < .001), reflecting a 33% reduction in hazards. GLP-1 RA users did not experience different rates of adverse events, such as pancreatitis, gallbladder disease, or ileus/bowel obstruction (all P > .05). CONCLUSION: Among patients with medically managed nontraumatic SDH, GLP-1 RA use was associated with significantly lower rates of rescue surgery and all-cause mortality without significantly increased risk of common GLP-1 RA–related complications.

Background: Asymptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic arterial stenosis (ICAS) is an underrecognized entity for which vascular risk-factor optimization is the primary management strategy, with no current indication for routine antiplatelet therapy or endovascular intervention for primary stroke prevention. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) reduce major adverse cardiovascular events, including stroke, in high-risk cardiometabolic populations, but their association with outcomes in asymptomatic ICAS is yet to be evaluated. The present study aims to evaluate the association between GLP-1RA use and cerebrovascular outcomes in adults with asymptomatic ICAS. Materials and Methods: We used the TriNetX US Collaborative Network (71 healthcare organizations) to identify adults (≥18 years) with ICAS between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2025, and excluded patients with prior cerebral infarction, intracranial hemorrhage, or cerebrovascular ischemic syndromes. Exposure was defined as initiation of any GLP-1 receptor agonist (lixisenatide, semaglutide, liraglutide, tirzepatide, dulaglutide) during the 6 months before or on the date of index ICAS diagnosis. Outcomes were assessed at 1 year, and included ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality, and a composite of ischemic stroke or mortality. Propensity-score matching (1:1) was performed, including demographics, vascular risk factors, comorbidities, antithrombotics, lipid/diabetes therapies, and cardiometabolic laboratory/physiologic measures. Results: Before matching, 1746 GLP-1RA users and 71,792 non-users met inclusion criteria; after matching, 1728 patients remained in each cohort. GLP-1RA use was associated with lower 1-year risk of ischemic stroke (4.40% vs. 6.10%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.70, 95% CI 0.52–0.95; p = 0.044), lower all-cause mortality (3.40% vs. 9.40%; HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.26–0.47; p < 0.001), and lower composite outcome risk (7.50% vs. 15.00%; HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.39–0.59; p < 0.001). Notably, these associations were observed despite matching for HbA1c, LDL cholesterol, BMI, and systolic blood pressure, suggesting potential effects beyond measured cardiometabolic risk profiles. Conclusions: In this large, propensity-matched cohort of adults with a-ICAS, GLP-1RA use was associated with lower ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality, and composite outcome at 1 year. These findings are hypothesis-generating and require further prospective studies to confirm this observation.

BACKGROUND: Unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) affect up to 5% of the population, and rupture can lead to devastating subarachnoid hemorrhage. GLP-1RAs (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists) have anti-inflammatory and vasculoprotective effects, but their impact on aneurysm stability and subarachnoid hemorrhage outcomes is unexplored. This study evaluated whether GLP-1RA use is associated with reduced rupture risk and attenuated severity in the event of a rupture. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network (2016–2024). Cohort 1 included patients with newly diagnosed, untreated UIA; cohort 2 included those who suffered aneurysm rupture. GLP-1RA exposure was defined as use before or within 3 months of UIA diagnosis (cohort 1) or before rupture (cohort 2). The primary outcome was aneurysm rupture risk in cohort 1. Secondary outcomes include presentation severity, vasospasm, and mortality in cohort 2. Propensity score matching balanced demographics, comorbidities, and medications. RESULTS: After propensity score match, cohort 1 of patients with untreated UIA included 8088 GLP-1RA users and 8088 nonusers. GLP-1RA use was associated with significantly lower probabilities of aneurysm rupture at 1-year (0.65% versus 1.51%; P <0.001), 3-year (1.18% versus 1.85%; P <0.001), and 5-year (1.49% versus 2.10%; P <0.001) timepoints, representing a 48% decrease in hazards (hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.38–0.69]). Among patients who suffered aneurysm rupture (cohort 2, N=298 after propensity score match), prerupture GLP-1RA use (n=149) was associated with lower rates of intraparenchymal hemorrhage (17.4% versus 33.6%; P <0.001), intraventricular hemorrhage (10.1% versus 23.5%; P <0.001), and clinically significant vasospasm (10.7% versus 24.2%; P =0.002), as well as numerically lower rates of 30-day mortality (9.4% versus 14.1%; P =0.21). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with untreated UIA, GLP-1RA use was associated with a 48% reduction in aneurysm rupture risk and, among those who suffered aneurysm rupture, milder clinical and radiographic severity. These findings suggest possible neuroprotective and vascular stabilizing effects of GLP-1RAs for patients with UIA.

Background Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is recommended around carotid artery stenting (CAS) to reduce periprocedural stroke risk. Clopidogrel is widely used, but response variability related to pharmacokinetics and CYP2C19 polymorphisms may limit its effectiveness. Ticagrelor is a more potent, direct acting P2Y12 inhibitor, but its comparative effectiveness in CAS remains uncertain. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study in the TriNetX database, identifying adults with carotid artery stenosis who underwent CAS between January 2016 and August 2025 and received either ticagrelor or clopidogrel. Primary outcomes at 180 days included ischemic stroke, major hemorrhage, intracranial hemorrhage, and all cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included inpatient readmission and emergency department (ED) visits. Propensity score matching (1:1), Kaplan–Meier survival, and Cox proportional hazards analysis were used. Results Among 6996 patients, 378 received ticagrelor and 6618 received clopidogrel; aspirin co-use was similar (89.7% vs 91.7%). After matching, 377 patients remained in each cohort. Ischemic stroke (2.7% vs 4.2%; HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.27; P=0.159) and major hemorrhage (2.9% vs 4.8%; HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.30; P=0.197) were numerically lower with ticagrelor. Rates of intracranial hemorrhage were similar (2.7% vs 2.7%; HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.14 to 2.53; P=0.488). Mortality was numerically higher with ticagrelor (3.4% vs 2.7%; HR 1.64, 95% CI 0.68 to 3.97; P=0.263). ED visits were similar (14.3% vs 14.6%; HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.42; P=0.895). Inpatient readmission was numerically lower with ticagrelor (15.9% vs 19.1%; HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.14; P=0.223). Conclusion Ticagrelor and clopidogrel showed comparable safety and effectiveness following CAS. Future prospective genotype informed trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

Abstract BACKGROUND Both stent-assisted coiling (SAC) and flow diversion with the Pipeline Embolization device (PED; Medtronic Inc) have been shown to be safe and clinically effective for treatment of small (<10 mm) unruptured aneurysms. However, the economic impact of these different techniques has not been established. OBJECTIVE To analyze the cost-effectiveness between stent-assisted coiling and flow diversion using PED, including procedural costs, long-term outcomes, and aneurysm recurrence. METHODS A decision-analytical study was performed with Markov modeling methods to simulate patients undergoing SAC or PED for treatment for unruptured aneurysms of sizes 5 and 7 mm. Input probabilities were derived from prior literature, and 1-way, 2-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed. RESULTS In base case calculation and PSA, PED was the dominant strategy for both the size groups, with and without consideration of indirect costs. One-way sensitivity analyses show that the conclusion remained robust when varying the retreatment rate of SAC from 0% to 50%, and only changes when the retreatment rate of PED > 49%. PED remained the more cost-effective strategy when the morbidity and mortality of PED increased by <55% and when those of SAC decreased by <37%. SAC only became cost-effective when the total cost of PED is >$73000 more expensive than the total cost of SAC. CONCLUSION With increasing use of PED for treatment of small unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms, our study indicates that PED is cost-effective relative to stent coiling irrespective of aneurysm size. This is due to lower aneurysm recurrence rate, as well as better health outcomes.

Background and Purpose— Previous studies have suggested that family members with intracranial aneurysms (IAs) often harbor IAs in similar anatomic locations. IA location is important because of its association with rupture. We tested the hypothesis that anatomic susceptibility to IA location exists using a family-based IA study. Methods— We identified all affected probands and first-degree relatives (FDRs) with a definite or probable phenotype in each family. We stratified each IA of the probands by major arterial territory and calculated each family’s proband-FDR territory concordance and overall contribution to the concordance analysis. We then matched each family unit to an unrelated family unit selected randomly with replacement and performed 1001 simulations. The median concordance proportions, odds ratios (ORs), and P values from the 1001 logistic regression analyses were used to represent the final results of the analysis. Results— There were 323 family units available for analysis, including 323 probands and 448 FDRs, with a total of 1176 IAs. IA territorial concordance was higher in the internal carotid artery (55.4% versus 45.6%; OR, 1.54 [1.04–2.27]; P =0.032), middle cerebral artery (45.8% versus 30.5%; OR, 1.99 [1.22–3.22]; P =0.006), and vertebrobasilar system (26.6% versus 11.3%; OR, 2.90 [1.05–8.24], P =0.04) distributions in the true family compared with the comparison family. Concordance was also higher when any location was considered (53.0% versus 40.7%; OR, 1.82 [1.34–2.46]; P <0.001). Conclusions— In a highly enriched sample with familial predisposition to IA development, we found that IA territorial concordance was higher when probands were compared with their own affected FDRs than with comparison FDRs, which suggests that anatomic vulnerability to IA formation exists. Future studies of IA genetics should consider stratifying cases by IA location.

Object Familial predisposition is a recognized nonmodifiable risk factor for the formation and rupture of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). However, data regarding the characteristics of familial IAs are limited. The authors sought to describe familial IAs more fully, and to compare their characteristics with a large cohort of nonfamilial IAs. Methods The Familial Intracranial Aneurysm (FIA) study is a multicenter international study with the goal of identifying genetic and other risk factors for formation and rupture of IAs in a highly enriched population. The authors compared the FIA study cohort with the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (ISUIA) cohort with regard to patient demographic data, IA location, and IA multiplicity. To improve comparability, all patients in the ISUIA who had a family history of IAs or subarachnoid hemorrhage were excluded, as well as all patients in both cohorts who had a ruptured IA prior to study entry. Results Of 983 patients enrolled in the FIA study with definite or probable IAs, 511 met the inclusion criteria for this analysis. Of the 4059 patients in the ISUIA study, 983 had a previous IA rupture and 657 of the remainder had a positive family history, leaving 2419 individuals in the analysis. Multiplicity was more common in the FIA patients (35.6% vs 27.9%, p < 0.001). The FIA patients had a higher proportion of IAs located in the middle cerebral artery (28.6% vs 24.9%), whereas ISUIA patients had a higher proportion of posterior communicating artery IAs (13.7% vs 8.2%, p = 0.016). Conclusions Heritable structural vulnerability may account for differences in IA multiplicity and location. Important investigations into the underlying genetic mechanisms of IA formation are ongoing.