Citations

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore the use of mobile device technology to measure postural stability and to assess the preliminary effect of an added dynamic vestibular task in the 4-Stage Balance Test (4SBT) in adults over 65 years. It was hypothesized that adding a dynamic vestibular task would make the 4SBT more sensitive in identifying fall risk. Method: Twenty-eight adults aged 70–100 years completed the 4SBT with and without an added vestibular challenge (i.e., with and without a headshake). Postural sway was measured using a mobile device. Participants also completed the Stay Independent Questionnaire (SIQ) and provided self-reported fall and health history. Differences in sway score were compared between conditions. Correlational analyses assessed the association between fall history, fall risk, and sway scores. Results: The addition of a headshake task significantly increased postural sway across all 4SBT stages. Self-reported fall risk was not predicted by sway score; however, significant correlations were observed between self-reported fall risk and sway in more challenging balance conditions, and these relationships were largely unchanged with the added dynamic vestibular task. Although sway score did not reliably distinguish between individuals who did and did not report a fall, fall history was moderately associated with self-reported fall risk and fear of falling. Conclusions: Significant correlations were observed between SIQ and sway score measured in the more challenging balance conditions. These relationships generally remained stable even with the added dynamic vestibular task, suggesting that the SIQ may reflect real-world balance challenges involving vestibular input. Self-reported fear of falling or perceived fall risk likely captures aspects of imbalance not directly reflected in sway scores. Further research with larger, more diverse samples is warranted to assess added the clinical utility of sway score beyond perceived aspects of imbalance to identify fall risk.

Introduction: Ureteral stones are a common cause of emergency presentations. Definitive stone removal at the index encounter can reduce delays and repeat interventions. It is unknown whether fellowship-trained endourologists are more likely to perform definitive management than general/other subspecialist urologists. This multicenter retrospective cohort study evaluated the influence of endourology subspecialty training on the choice between upfront definitive stone treatment and initial ureteral decompression at first presentation. Patients managed with medical expulsive therapy alone were not included. Methods: Adults (≥18 years) presenting at 2022 to seven North American academic centers with symptomatic, noninfected, computed tomography-confirmed ureteral stones were included. Patients with infection, sepsis, positive nitrites, or intraoperative pyelonephritis were excluded from the study. Variables included demographics, stone size and location, subspecialty of the on-call urologist, and management type (definitive [ureteroscopy or shockwave lithotripsy] vs deferred [(initial stent]). Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of definitive treatment. Results: Among the 395 patients, 190 (48.0%) underwent definitive management and 205 (52.0%) underwent deferred treatment. Distal stones were treated definitively more often than proximal stones were (51.1% vs 36.6%). An endourologist was on call for 150 encounters (38.0%); 64.7% of these patients received definitive treatment, compared with 38.0% under general/other subspecialist urologists. On multivariate analysis, endourologist on-call remained independently associated with definitive management (odds ratio [OR] 3.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.19–5.47, p < 0.0001), as did distal stone location (OR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.21–5.00, p = 0.013). Severe complications are rare, and none of the patients developed sepsis. Conclusions: Endourologists were more than three times more likely to perform definitive interventions for symptomatic, noninfected ureteral stones at initial presentation. Subspecialty expertise and timely operative access enable safe, efficient, single-stage management.

BACKGROUND Acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) is a biologically distinct, inherently aggressive, and understudied melanoma subtype without a unified surgical approach. OBJECTIVE To provide an updated review of ALM and offer practical, surgeon-focused guidance on diagnosis, biopsy, margin-controlled excision, and Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS)-based management of ALM. METHODS & MATERIALS A PubMed/MEDLINE search of ALM, with an emphasis on articles published after 2015. RESULTS ALM demonstrates inherent biological aggressiveness characterized by extensive subclinical spread, delayed diagnosis, and higher stage-adjusted recurrence compared with nonacral cutaneous melanomas. Anatomic constraints additionally necessitate specialized surgical approaches, although current management is extrapolated from nonacral melanoma data. Retrospective data support MMS and margin-controlled excision and tissue preservation in ALM, with the benefit of digit-sparing surgery and functional preservation. No randomized trials have included ALM, highlighting a key evidence gap. CONCLUSION Margin-controlled approaches such as MMS may improve local control and tissue preservation in select ALM patients. Prospective ALM-specific research and standardized diagnostic and surgical protocols are strongly needed.

Abstract Objective Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of pain and disability worldwide. Recent studies demonstrate a vertebrogenic model involving the basivertebral nerve (BVN) as a cause of chronic LBP. Vertebral endplates are highly innervated by the BVN, and literature shows type 1 and 2 Modic changes at vertebral endplates are a source of vertebrogenic low back pain (VBP). As a result, intraosseous radiofrequency ablation of the BVN is a minimally invasive outpatient procedure used to treat VBP. We conducted a retrospective review of 1,145 patients that have undergone BVN ablation to assess for safety and complication management. Methods Chart reviews were conducted to obtain demographic and pre-procedural information regarding patient gender, age at the time of BVN ablation, duration of LBP, and BMI. Post-procedure information derived from chart notes included vertebral levels ablated and post-BVN ablation complications, which were categorized as increased LBP &gt; 7 days, increased radicular pain &gt; 7 days, lower extremity weakness, infection, vertebral compression fracture, superficial bleeding, spinal or epidural hematoma, serious neurological injury, visit to the ER, and deep vein thrombosis/clot. Results 1,145 patient charts were reviewed showing an overall complication rate of 3.2% (37 complications). Increased radicular pain was the most common complication at 2.2% (25 complications) and resolved completely in all but one patient. The overall complication rate fell to 1.1% (13 complications) when the 24 cases of transient radicular pain were not counted as adverse events. Conclusions In this multicenter retrospective review, the overall rate of complications related to BVN ablation was low (3.2%). The most common complication was temporary radicular pain that resolved with conservative care. These findings suggest that BVN ablation is a safe treatment for VBP in real-world clinical settings.