Choudry, Mouneeb M

Introduction: Ureteral stones are a common cause of emergency presentations. Definitive stone removal at the index encounter can reduce delays and repeat interventions. It is unknown whether fellowship-trained endourologists are more likely to perform definitive management than general/other subspecialist urologists. This multicenter retrospective cohort study evaluated the influence of endourology subspecialty training on the choice between upfront definitive stone treatment and initial ureteral decompression at first presentation. Patients managed with medical expulsive therapy alone were not included. Methods: Adults (≥18 years) presenting at 2022 to seven North American academic centers with symptomatic, noninfected, computed tomography-confirmed ureteral stones were included. Patients with infection, sepsis, positive nitrites, or intraoperative pyelonephritis were excluded from the study. Variables included demographics, stone size and location, subspecialty of the on-call urologist, and management type (definitive [ureteroscopy or shockwave lithotripsy] vs deferred [(initial stent]). Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of definitive treatment. Results: Among the 395 patients, 190 (48.0%) underwent definitive management and 205 (52.0%) underwent deferred treatment. Distal stones were treated definitively more often than proximal stones were (51.1% vs 36.6%). An endourologist was on call for 150 encounters (38.0%); 64.7% of these patients received definitive treatment, compared with 38.0% under general/other subspecialist urologists. On multivariate analysis, endourologist on-call remained independently associated with definitive management (odds ratio [OR] 3.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.19–5.47, p < 0.0001), as did distal stone location (OR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.21–5.00, p = 0.013). Severe complications are rare, and none of the patients developed sepsis. Conclusions: Endourologists were more than three times more likely to perform definitive interventions for symptomatic, noninfected ureteral stones at initial presentation. Subspecialty expertise and timely operative access enable safe, efficient, single-stage management.

Purpose: Compared with white-light cystoscopy (WLC), blue-light cystoscopy (BLC) enhances detection of non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), especially carcinoma in situ (CIS). However, its effects on health care resource utilization and cost burden have not been fully elucidated. This study assessed the economic implications of BLC vs WLC. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis with claims data from the Optum Research Database between June 2011 and May 2023. Patients who underwent BLC or WLC were identified, and white-light patients were matched 6:1 to blue-light patients by index year and time between bladder cancer diagnosis and cystoscopy. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for baseline differences. Health care resource utilization and total and bladder cancer–specific costs were calculated on a per-patient-per-month basis. Results: The final cohort included 794 blue-light and 4764 white-light patients. Before weighting, claims coded for CIS were more frequent in blue-light patients (19.6% vs 8.8%; P < .001). Blue-light patients underwent more upper-tract imaging (71.8% vs 57.8%; P < .001), BCG (24.2% vs 15.8%; P < .001), and biomarker testing (65.0% vs 34.9%; P < .001). After weighting, blue-light patients had a higher mean number of bladder cancer–related ambulatory visits per month (1.3 vs 1.0; P = .004). However, neither all-cause health care resource utilization (3.47 vs 3.21; P = .11) nor total cost ($2987.93 vs $2886.16, per patient per month, P = .65) differed significantly between cohorts. Conclusions: BLC is associated with greater health care resource utilization for NMIBC without significantly elevating health care costs, suggesting that enhanced diagnostic strategies can be implemented without added financial burden in real-world practice.