Cooper, Amanda

Abstract Objective Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of pain and disability worldwide. Recent studies demonstrate a vertebrogenic model involving the basivertebral nerve (BVN) as a cause of chronic LBP. Vertebral endplates are highly innervated by the BVN, and literature shows type 1 and 2 Modic changes at vertebral endplates are a source of vertebrogenic low back pain (VBP). As a result, intraosseous radiofrequency ablation of the BVN is a minimally invasive outpatient procedure used to treat VBP. We conducted a retrospective review of 1,145 patients that have undergone BVN ablation to assess for safety and complication management. Methods Chart reviews were conducted to obtain demographic and pre-procedural information regarding patient gender, age at the time of BVN ablation, duration of LBP, and BMI. Post-procedure information derived from chart notes included vertebral levels ablated and post-BVN ablation complications, which were categorized as increased LBP > 7 days, increased radicular pain > 7 days, lower extremity weakness, infection, vertebral compression fracture, superficial bleeding, spinal or epidural hematoma, serious neurological injury, visit to the ER, and deep vein thrombosis/clot. Results 1,145 patient charts were reviewed showing an overall complication rate of 3.2% (37 complications). Increased radicular pain was the most common complication at 2.2% (25 complications) and resolved completely in all but one patient. The overall complication rate fell to 1.1% (13 complications) when the 24 cases of transient radicular pain were not counted as adverse events. Conclusions In this multicenter retrospective review, the overall rate of complications related to BVN ablation was low (3.2%). The most common complication was temporary radicular pain that resolved with conservative care. These findings suggest that BVN ablation is a safe treatment for VBP in real-world clinical settings.

Abstract Background Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of neuromas has emerged as a potential treatment option for refractory neuroma‐associated postamputation pain (PAP). Objective To evaluate the feasibility of using internally cooled radiofrequency ablation (C‐RFA) for treating neuroma‐associated PAP. Design Prospective single‐arm pilot study. Setting Tertiary academic medical center. Participants Eight participants with neuroma‐associated PAP (mean age 56.5 [ interquartile range, 50.5–68.5] years; mean body mass index 30.2 [ interquartile range, 26.3–34.8] kg/m 2 ). Intervention Participants were recruited and treated with C‐RFA between 2019 and 2023. Main Outcome Measures Pain and functional outcomes were assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after C‐RFA using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Groningen Activity Restriction Scale (GARS), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and Medication Quantification Scale III (MQS‐III). Responder definitions for each outcome measure were ≥50% NRS reduction, ≥30% GARS improvement, ≥6 on PGIC, and ≥6.8‐point MQS‐III reduction. Results NRS responder rates at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 25.0% (95% CI, 7.0%–59.1%), 50.0% (95% CI, 21.5%–78.5%), 37.5% (95% CI, 13.7%–69.4%), and 50.0% (95% CI, 21.5%–78.5%), respectively. Responder rates for GARS were 25.0% (95% CI, 7.1%–59.1%) at 1 month and 12.5% (95% CI, 2.2%–47.1%) at 3, 6, and 12 months. The proportion of PGIC responders was 37.5% (95% CI, 13.7%–69.4%) at 1 and 3 months and 12.5% (95% CI, 2.2%–47.1%) at 6 and 12 months. MQS‐III responder rates were 25.0% (95% CI, 7.1%–59.1%) at 1 month, 12.5% (95% CI, 2.2%–47.1%) at 3 months, and 37.5% (95% CI, 13.7%–69.4%) at 6 and 12 months. There were no complications associated with the C‐RFA procedure. Conclusions These findings indicate the feasibility of neuroma C‐RFA as a treatment for refractory neuroma‐associated PAP but also suggest that further patient selection and C‐RFA technique optimization are warranted before investigating this treatment paradigm in a larger prospective study.

Abstract Background Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) is an effective treatment for chronic knee pain. However, there has been minimal investigation of real-world, long-term outcomes and factors that predict treatment success after GNRFA. Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of GNRFA for chronic knee pain in a real-world population and identify predictive factors. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent GNRFA at a tertiary academic center were identified. Demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics were collected from the medical record. Outcome data were numeric rating scale (NRS) pain reduction and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Data were collected by standardized telephone survey. Predictors of success were evaluated with logistic and Poisson regression analyses. Results Of the 226 total patients identified, 134 (65.6 ± 12.7; 59.7% female) were successfully contacted and analyzed, with a mean follow-up time of 23.3 ± 11.0 months. Of those, 47.8% (n = 64; 95% CI: 39.5%–56.2%) and 61.2% (n = 82; 95% CI: 52.7%–69.0%) reported ≥50% NRS score reduction and ≥2-point NRS score reduction, respectively, and 59.0% (n = 79; 95% CI: 50.5%–66.9%) reported “much improved” on the PGIC questionnaire. Factors associated with a greater likelihood of treatment success (P < .05) were higher Kellgren–Lawrence osteoarthritis grade (2–4 vs 0–1); no baseline opioid, antidepressant, or anxiolytic medication use; and >3 nerves targeted. Conclusion In this real-world cohort, approximately half of the participants experienced clinically meaningful improvements in knee pain after GNRFA at an average follow-up time of nearly 2 years. Factors associated with higher likelihood of treatment success were more advanced osteoarthritis (Kellgren–Lawrence Grade 2–4); no opioid, antidepressant, or anxiolytic medication use; and >3 nerves targeted.