Citations

Background: Stable osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions are primarily treated nonoperatively. Nonoperative treatment includes several recommendations, including the use of an unloader brace. However, little is known about the clinical effectiveness of unloader bracing and its influence on OCD healing, return to sports, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the impact of unloader bracing on patients with stable medial femoral condyle (MFC) OCD lesions treated nonoperatively. Purpose: To investigate the influence of valgus unloader bracing on the success of treating stable MFC OCD with nonoperative treatment strategies. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The authors used a prospective cohort of patients receiving nonoperative care for stable MFC knee OCD lesions. The primary variable of interest was the efficacy of bracing. The primary outcomes were transition from nonoperative care to surgical intervention, return-to-play (RTP) clearance, and PROs. Bivariate testing was used to determine if there were differences between groups. Chi-square testing was used to determine if there were differences in rates of transition to surgery by group. The timing of the transition by each group was assessed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test, given the nonparametric nature of the data. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate time at risk, incidence rate, and survival times for each group. Results: A total of 185 knees (bracing group: 123 [66.5%] knees; no-bracing group: 62 [33.5%] knees) were analyzed. Overall, 142 (76.8%) knees were successfully treated nonoperatively. Transition to surgery occurred in 43 (23.2%) knees. There were no differences in transition to surgery by groups, with no differences seen by group. Of the knees that did not transition to surgical care, 65 (71.4%) in the bracing group and 38 (74.5%) in the no-bracing group received RTP clearance ( P = .693). PRO scores were similar between the 2 groups at the time of RTP clearance. Conclusion: The inclusion of an unloader brace in the nonoperative treatment for stable MFC OCD lesions did not decrease the likelihood of patients undergoing surgical intervention or improve their PRO scores at the time of RTP clearance. Registration: NCT02771496 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Background: There are limited evidence-based guidelines to predict which osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions will heal with nonoperative treatment. Purpose: To train a set of classification algorithms to predict nonoperative OCD healing while identifying new clinically meaningful predictors. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients with OCD of the knee with open physes undergoing nonoperative management were prospectively queried from the Research on OCD of the Knee (ROCK) cohort ( https://kneeocd.org ) in April 2022. Patients were included if they met the study criteria for nonoperative treatment success or failure. Nonoperative treatment success was defined as complete healing on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and total return to sports participation. Failure was defined as the crossover from nonoperative management to surgery at any point at or beyond the 3-month follow-up. If a patient did not meet one of these criteria, they were not included. Normalized lesion size, lesion location, patient characteristics, and symptoms were used as clinically relevant predictors. Results: A total of 64 patients were included, of whom 24 (37.5%) patients successfully healed with nonoperative management. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that a 1% increase in normalized lesion width was associated with an increase in the likelihood of nonoperative failure (odds ratio [OR], 1.41 [95% CI, 1.17-1.81]; P < .01). By contrast, lesions in the posterior sagittal zone (OR, 0.08 [95% CI, 0.009-0.43]; P < .01) or the medial-most coronal zone (for lesions of the medial femoral) and lateral-most coronal zone (for lesions of the lateral femoral condyle) on MRI (OR, 0.05 [95% CI, 0.004-0.44]; P < .01) were associated with a decrease in the likelihood of nonoperative treatment failure. Support vector machines had a cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.89 and a classification accuracy of 83.3%. Conclusion: Lesion location in the posterior aspect of the condyle on sagittal MRI and lesion location in the medial-most or lateral-most locations on coronal MRI were identified as statistically significant predictors of increased nonoperative treatment success on multivariate analysis. Machine learning models can predict which OCD lesions will heal with nonoperative management with superior accuracy compared with previously published models.

Background: Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the knee is a focal idiopathic alteration of subchondral bone and/or its precursor with risk for instability and disruption of adjacent cartilage. Treatment options focused on preventing premature osteoarthritis vary depending on multiple patient and lesion characteristics, including lesion mobility. Purpose: To differentiate lesion mobility before arthroscopy using a multivariable model that includes patient demographic characteristics and physical examination findings. Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Demographic, preoperative physical examination, and radiographic data were collected from a multicenter national prospective cohort of patients with OCD of the knee. Inclusion criteria included patients <19 years of age and patients with arthroscopically confirmed mobility status based on the Research on Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee arthroscopy classification. Multivariable logistic regression analysis using stepwise model selection was used to determine factors associated with the likelihood of a mobile versus an immobile lesion. A 75% partition of the data was used for model training, and 25% was used as a validation cohort. Quantitative model fit statistics were computed using the holdout data, including sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), along with the corresponding 95% CI. Results: A total of 407 patients in the prospective cohort met inclusion criteria, and 62% were male. The mean ± SD age was 13.7 ± 2.2 years, height 161.8 ± 5.3 cm, and weight 59.2 ± 42.2 kg. Arthroscopic evaluation yielded 235 immobile and 172 mobile lesions. Multivariable analysis determined that the best model to predict lesion mobility included chronologic age ≥14 years ( P < .001), effusion on physical examination ( P < .001), and any loss of range of motion on physical examination ( P = .07), while controlling for male sex ( P = .38) and weight >54.4 kg ( P = .12). In the 25% holdout validation sample (n = 102), a sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 82%, and an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.82-0.95) were achieved with these predictive factors. Conclusion: Age, effusion, and loss of motion can predict knee OCD lesion mobility at the time of arthroscopy. Education about lesion mobility can help with surgical planning and patient and family counseling.

Background: Type I tibial spine fractures are non-displaced or minimally displaced (≤ 2mm displacement) fractures of the tibial eminence and ACL insertion traditionally managed nonoperatively with immobilization. Hypothesis/Purpose: We hypothesized that type I fractures do not carry significant risk of associated injuries and therefore do not require additional interventions aside from immobilization. Methods: We reviewed 52 patients classified by their treating institution with type I tibial spine fractures presenting between January 1, 2000 and January 31, 2019 at 10 institutions. Patients of age ≤ 18 years with pre-treatment plain radiographs and at least one year of follow-up were included. Data was collected on patient demographics, injury mechanism, treatment details, presence of concomitant injuries, range of motion (ROM) at final follow-up, treatment complications, and any return to the operating room for the injured knee. Pre-treatment imaging was reviewed by four authors to assess agreement of classification among the treating institutions. Patients were subclassified into two groups to ensure outcomes represented classic type I fracture patterns. Any patient with universal agreement among the four authors that the fracture did not appear consistent with a type I classification were assigned to Type 1+ Group (T1+). All other patients were assigned to the True Type I Group (TT1). We evaluated concomitant injury, need for operative intervention, and treatment outcomes overall and for each group independently. Results: 48 patients met inclusion criteria. 40/48 were TT1 fractures, while 8/48 were T1+ fractures, indicating less than universal agreement among sports specialists in classification of these fractures. Among TT1 patients, 7 of 40 (18.4%) underwent surgical treatment, though this represented 35.7% (5/14) of those who had undergone pretreatment advanced imaging. In the T1+ group, 6 of 8 (75%) underwent surgical treatment, 50% of whom (3/6) had pretreatment advanced imaging. Overall, twelve of 48 patients (25%) had concomitant injuries, nine TT1 patients and three T1+ patients (p=0.77), with 7 concomitant injuries requiring additional surgical management. Conclusions: Classification of type I fractures can be challenging. Nonetheless, a substantial percentage of patients with these fractures (>20%) were found to have concomitant injuries by advanced pretreatment imaging, with surgical management indicated in 58.3% of these patients. Contrary to traditional thought, type I tibial spine fractures do carry a risk of associated injuries. Simple cast immobilization may not be the ideal treatment in all cases. Advanced imaging would be beneficial for those whose plan of care may initially be non-operative treatment.

Background: When operative treatment is indicated, tibial spine fractures can be successfully managed with open or arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation. Hypothesis/Purpose: We hypothesized both approaches can lead to satisfactory outcomes for fracture healing, but that open treatment without preoperative advanced imaging can potentially lead to missed concomitant injuries. Methods: We performed an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved retrospective cohort study of pediatric tibial spine fractures presenting between January 1, 2000 and January 31, 2019 at 10 institutions. Patients were categorized into two cohorts based on treatment: arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Surgical outcomes, the incidence of concomitant injuries, and surgeon demographics were compared between groups. Results: There were 477 patients with tibial spine fractures who met inclusion criteria, 420 of whom (88.1%) were treated with ARIF, while 57 (11.9%) were treated with ORIF. Patients treated with ARIF were more likely to have an identified concomitant injury (41.4%) compared to those treated with ORIF (24.6%, p=0.021). Patients treated with ARIF were also more likely to have pre-treatment MRI (41.7% vs. 22.8%, p =0.010). Most concomitant injuries (74.5%) required surgical intervention. The most common treatment complications included arthrofibrosis (6.9% in ARIF patients, 7.0% in ORIF patients, p=1.00) and subsequent ACL injury (2.1% in ARIF patients and 3.5% in ORIF, p=0.86). The rate of complications, return to the operating room, and failure to return to full range of motion were similar between groups. Twenty surgeons with sports subspecialty training completed 85.0% of ARIF cases; the remaining 15.0% were performed by 12 surgeons without additional sports training. The majority (56.1%) of ORIF cases were completed by 14 surgeons without sports subspecialty training. Conclusion: This is the largest study comparing ARIF to ORIF in pediatric tibial spine fractures. This study demonstrated no difference in outcomes or nonunion following ARIF or ORIF for pediatric tibial spine fractures. There were significantly higher rates of concomitant injuries in patients treated with ARIF, however, these patients also had a higher rate of pre-treatment MRI. The majority of these concomitant injuries (74.5%) required surgical intervention. Pre-treatment MRI should be considered in the workup of tibial spine fractures to increase identification of concomitant injury. Concomitant injuries may be missed in tibial spine fractures treated with an open approach, especially in cases where preoperative advanced imaging is not obtained. Surgeon preference and training may impact treatment approach and identification and treatment of concomitant injury.

Background: An increased posterior tibial slope (PTS) results in greater force on the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and is a risk factor for ACL injuries. Biomechanical studies have suggested that a reduction in the PTS angle may lower the risk of ACL injuries. However, the majority of these investigations have been in the adult population. Purpose: To assess the mean medial and lateral PTS on pediatric cadaveric specimens without known knee injuries. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 39 pediatric knee specimens with computed tomography scans were analyzed. Specimens analyzed were between the ages of 2 and 12 years. The PTS of each specimen was measured on sagittal computed tomography slices at 2 locations for the medial and lateral angles. The measurements were plotted graphically by age to account for the variability in development within age groups. The anterior medial and lateral tibial plateau widths were measured. The distance between the top of the tibial plateau and the physis was measured. The independent-samples t test and analysis of variance were used to analyze the measurements. Results: The mean PTS angle for the medial and lateral tibial plateaus was 5.53° ± 4.17° and 5.95° ± 3.96°, respectively. The difference between the PTS angles of the medial and lateral tibial plateaus was not statistically significant ( P > .05). When plotted graphically by age, no trend between age and PTS was identified. Conclusion: This data set offers values for the PTS in skeletally immature specimens without a history of ACL injury and suggests that age may not be an accurate predictive factor for PTS.

Background: Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) occurs most commonly in the knees of young individuals. This condition is known to cause pain and discomfort in the knee and can lead to disability and early knee osteoarthritis. The cause is not well understood, and treatment plans are not well delineated. The Research in Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee (ROCK) group established a multicenter, prospective cohort to better understand this disease. Purpose: To provide a baseline report of the ROCK multicenter prospective cohort and present a descriptive analysis of baseline data for patient characteristics, lesion characteristics, and clinical findings of the first 1000 cases enrolled into the prospective cohort. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients were recruited from centers throughout the United States. Baseline data were obtained for patient characteristics, sports participation, patient-reported measures of functional capabilities and limitations, physical examination, diagnostic imaging results, and initial treatment plan. Descriptive statistics were completed for all outcomes of interest. Results: As of November 2020, a total of 27 orthopaedic surgeons from 17 institutions had enrolled 1004 knees with OCD, representing 903 patients (68.9% males; median age, 13.1 years; range, 6.3-25.4 years), into the prospective cohort. Lesions were located on the medial femoral condyle (66.2%), lateral femoral condyle (18.1%), trochlea (9.5%), patella (6.0%), and tibial plateau (0.2%). Most cases involved multisport athletes (68.1%), with the most common primary sport being basketball for males (27.3% of cases) and soccer for females (27.6% of cases). The median Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee (Pedi-IKCD) score was 59.9 (IQR, 45.6-73.9), and the median Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (Pedi-FABS) score was 21.0 (IQR, 5.0-28.0). Initial treatments were surgical intervention (55.4%) and activity restriction (44.0%). When surgery was performed, surgeons deemed the lesion to be stable at intraoperative assessment in 48.1% of cases. Conclusion: The multicenter ROCK group has been able to enroll the largest knee OCD cohort to date. This information is being used to further understand the pathology of OCD, including its cause, associated comorbidities, and initial presentation and symptoms. The cohort having been established is now being followed longitudinally to better define and elucidate the best treatment algorithms based on these presenting signs and symptoms.

Background: Microfracture (MF) has been used historically to treat osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs), with favorable outcomes reported in approximately 80% to 85% of cases. However, MF repairs have been shown to degrade over time at long-term follow-up, suggesting that further study into optimal OLT treatment is warranted. The use of adjuvant extracellular matrix with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (ECM-BMAC) has not been extensively evaluated in the literature. We present a comparison of patient-reported and radiographic outcomes following ECM-BMAC repair vs traditional MF. Methods: Patients who underwent MF (n = 67) or ECM-BMAC (n = 62) treatment for an OLT were identified and their charts were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was evaluated and patient-reported outcome scores, either Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS) or Patient-Reported Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores, were collected. MRIs were scored by a radiologist, fellowship trained in musculoskeletal radiology, using the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) system. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Results: On average, patients treated with ECM-BMAC demonstrated a higher total MOCART score compared to the MF group (73 ± SD 11.5 vs 54.0 ± 24.1; P = .0015). ECM-BMAC patients also had significantly better scores for the Infill, Integration, and Signal MOCART subcategories. Last, patients treated with ECM-BMAC had a lower rate of revision compared to those treated with MF (4.8% vs 20.9%; P = .007). FAOS scores were compared between groups, with no significant differences observed. Conclusion: When comparing outcomes between patients treated for an OLT with ECM-BMAC vs traditional MF, we observed superior MRI results for ECM-BMAC patients. The rate of revision surgery was higher for MF patients, although patient-reported outcomes were similar between groups. The use of ECM-BMAC as an adjuvant therapy in the treatment of OLTs may result in improved reparative tissue when compared to MF. Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative series.