Citations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Some Minnesota clinicians perceive that the incidence of prophylactic vitamin K refusal is increasing, yet the actual incidence and which populations are most likely to refuse is unknown. Our objective is to identify the incidence of vitamin K refusal and to characterize the maternal-newborn dyads with increased refusal rates. METHODS This retrospective multi-institution study analyzed vitamin K refusal in newborns born from 2015 to 2019. Maternal-newborn dyad delivery and community characteristics (language, religion, population size) were collected and analyzed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Among 102 451 term infants, 1.3% did not receive intramuscular vitamin K. Refusal increased from 0.9% in 2015 to 1.6% by 2019 (P < .0001). In multivariable analysis, factors associated with increased likelihood of refusal included female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.22, 95% CI 1.09–1.36), exclusive human milk feeding at hospital discharge (OR 3.46, 95% CI 2.87–4.17), parity greater than 0 (OR ranging from 1.32 [95% CI 1.13–1.54] for parity of 1, to 3.70 [95% CI 2.80–4.90] for parity of 4), having a midwife at delivery (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.45–2.01), public insurance (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.60–2.12), and Russian language (OR 4.92, 95% CI 2.90–8.35). Some religious identities had higher refusal rates (ie, Pentecostal 7.0%, Baptist 3.3%). CONCLUSION In a cohort of Minnesota hospital-born infants, the incidence of vitamin K refusal increased between 2015 and 2019. We identified large populations (eg, public insurance, exclusive human milk feeding) and smaller discrete communities (eg, Russian, Pentecostal) with opportunities for increasing prophylactic vitamin K acceptance through targeted community conversations.

Abstract Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a chronically relapsing disorder caused by autoantibody-mediated deficiency of ADAMTS13. Rituximab is frequently administered to prevent relapses, but whether the durability of rituximab effect is maintained with subsequent treatment courses has not been studied. Using the United States Thrombotic Microangiopathy Consortium (USTMA) retrospective iTTP registry, we evaluated clinical relapse-free survival (RFS) with subsequent courses of rituximab treatment in multiply relapsing patients. Separately, we evaluated overall RFS (composite of time to clinical relapse, ADAMTS13 relapse, or preemptive rituximab) in a prospective iTTP cohort from the Johns Hopkins University and the University of Minnesota. In the USTMA registry, median clinical RFS was shorter after the second or subsequent rituximab-treated episode than the first (2.1 vs 6.0 years; P = .04). White patients’ clinical relapse risk after the second and subsequent rituximab courses was not significantly different compared with the first (hazard ratio [HR], 1.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-15.80; P = .57), whereas for Black patients, clinical relapse risk was significantly higher after the second or subsequent courses (HR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.52-5.24; P = .001). In the prospective cohort, overall RFS progressively shortened after each episode of rituximab treatment with the first episode having the longest RFS (2.8 years; interquartile range, 2.0-6.0) and this loss of response durability was most pronounced in Black patients. The durability of rituximab’s effect declines with subsequent treatments, which is more pronounced in Black patients, who may benefit from closer monitoring and alternative immunomodulatory approaches such as maintenance rituximab and consideration of other agents.

Healthcare inequities are often attributed to large-scale structural barriers for access to medical care or patient-medical staff interactions. However, the role of the electronic medical record (EMR) in perpetuating hidden biases has been poorly characterized. This passive form of sharing implicit biases with unknown readers may have profound ripple effects asynchronous in place and time from the note writer. This study aims to illustrate racial imbalances in ad hominem patient characterizations as documented by medical staff, regardless of role, in a large metro healthcare system. The use of certain potentially stigmatizing language in emergency department (ED) and inpatient notes for hematology/oncology patients was investigated. Retrospective chart review of four hospitals within a university network in a major metro area between 1/1/2019 - 6/30/2021 was undertaken. Patients ≥22 years old were included with two primary hypotheses in mind: 1) Negative terms are used more frequently for underrepresented minorities, and 2) words with shock value (i.e. curse words) are used more often than more general descriptors of these terms (e.g. “cursing” or “profanity”). Nine positive and twelve negative terms were evaluated, based on the authors' observations of their use in the EMR in past encounters (Table 1). Some were personal descriptors in which the ED or inpatient note writer would be less likely than outpatient providers to have a full sense of outpatient care or social determinants of health (e.g. compliant). Others were behavioral descriptions (e.g. hostile) or words with minimal medical relevance (e.g. curse words). If multiple notes in an encounter included the same word(s), the encounter was only analyzed once for each word to avoid word count inflation, though re-occurrences for the same patient in subsequent encounters were counted. Authors' manual data review using natural language processing software confirmed appropriate use of terms. Generalized estimating equations were used for race-based comparisons to account for same-patient clustered encounters. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for self-reported demographic comparisons with White as the reference category. P≤0.05 was considered significant. A total of 1,059 encounters for 889 hematology/oncology patients were analyzed. Mean age was 61 years (standard deviation 16.7) and 49.4% were female. White race was reported for 80.2% of patients (72% system-wide prevalence during same timeframe) and Black for 11.4% (15.2% system-wide); all others were ≤4% so only White/Black comparisons were included. Positive terms were more prevalent than negative ones (n=535 vs 459). However, negative terms were found more often for Black individuals (OR 2.24, CI 1.41 - 3.56, P<0.001), while the positive terms were less frequently documented in Black patients relative to White patients (OR 0.51, CI 0.33 - 0.77, P=0.001), and neither category was concordant with the overall patient racial demographics. Other significant racial differences existed for the terms “Argumentative”, “Disrespectful”, “Noncompliant”, and “Polite”, all discrepancies which favored White patients (Table 2). Specific curse words were documented nearly as often as “cursing”, “swearing”, or “profanity”, but no racial differences were observed. Some words in the initial search (“Brave”, “Courageous”, “Empathetic”, and “Ambitious”) were not found in hematology/oncology notes in this timeframe. EMR documentation in hospital-based hematology/oncology care demonstrated evidence of racial discrepancies in language that may carry stigma, positively or negatively. Importantly, many of these terms have questionable, if any, medical relevance. The use of stigmatizing terminology in the EMR may reflect implicit biases that extend past the direct patient encounter, passively and subconsciously prejudicing future care from other staff members. Time-saving heuristics and documentation shortcuts like copy-forwarding may further ossify healthcare inequities. This phenomenon is undoubtedly not limited to this hospital system or the hematology/oncology field, but quantitative real-world evidence has been scant. Improved awareness of stigmatizing language in documentation may be one step towards mitigating this contributor to unequal care for hematology/oncology providers and their patients.

Abstract Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is characterized by recurring episodes of thrombotic microangiopathy, causing ischemic organ impairment. Black patients are overrepresented in iTTP cohorts in the United States, but racial disparities in iTTP outcome and response to therapy have not been studied. Using the United States Thrombotic Microangiopathies Consortium iTTP Registry, we evaluated the impact of race on mortality and relapse-free survival (RFS) in confirmed iTTP in the United States from 1995 to 2020. We separately examined the impact of rituximab therapy and presentation with newly diagnosed (de novo) or relapsed iTTP on RFS by race. A total of 645 participants with 1308 iTTP episodes were available for analysis. Acute iTTP mortality did not differ by race. When all episodes of iTTP were included, Black race was associated with shorter RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.60; 95% CI, 1.16-2.21); the addition of rituximab to corticosteroids improved RFS in White (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18-0.73) but not Black patients (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.71-1.31). In de novo iTTP, rituximab delayed relapse, but Black patients had shorter RFS than White patients, regardless of treatment. In relapsed iTTP, rituximab significantly improved RFS in White but not Black patients. Race affects overall relapse risk and response to rituximab in iTTP. Black patients may require closer monitoring, earlier retreatment, and alternative immunosuppression after rituximab treatment. How race, racism, and social determinants of health contribute to the disparity in relapse risk in iTTP deserves further study.

Abstract Background: Immune Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a relapsing disorder, resulting from depletion of ADAMTS13. With the goal of preventing clinical relapse there has been considerable interest in ADAMTS13 monitoring and preemptive treatment. Indeed, preemptive treatment with rituximab has shown significant promise and is now included in the 2020 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) treatment guidelines. Evaluation of long-term outcomes of ADAMTS13 based preemptive treatment have generally relied on limited numbers of historical controls which did not incorporate matching for known risk factors for relapse such as race, number of prior episodes, and immunosuppression. Our study aims to leverage the data in the United States Thrombotic Microangiopathy (USTMA) iTTP registry to compare the clinical relapse-free survival (RFS) intervals between iTTP patients treated preemptively based on ADAMTS13 level and those treated only for clinical relapse base on clinical and laboratory manifestations of iTTP. Methods: We carried out a retrospective study utilizing the multi-center cohort of patients with iTTP from the USTMA Consortium (spanning 1985-2019 and containing 780 participant records). We selected for patients with relapsing disease treated either preemptively based on ADAMTS13 level or for clinical relapse. Each preemptively treated episode was matched to up to five clinically relapsed episodes using covariate balancing propensity score nearest-neighbor matching by age, gender, race, prior relapse status, acute treatment, treatment center, and calendar year, with exact matching required for treatment center and prior relapse status. Time from prior episode to relapse was compared between preemptively treated episodes and matched controls using a Cox proportional hazards model weighted by the matching weights, including subclasses as a cluster, and using cluster-robust standard errors. Results: We identified 1068 episodes of iTTP. Of these. Thirteen participants accounting for a total of seventeen preemptive treatment episodes were included in the data set however, we included only the thirteen first uses of preemptive treatment to avoid selection bias. These were matched with 59 episodes treated for clinical relapse. Over 70% of the included participants in both groups were identified as black/African American. Distribution of immunosuppressive medications used in clinically relapsed cases were not significantly different than those used in preemptive treatment, and corticosteroids were the most frequently used. Demographic and treatment data before and after matching are included in Table 1. There was no significant difference in RFS between the groups, hazard ratio 0.63 (95% confidence interval 0.26-1.54), p=0.31. Conclusion: To our knowledge this is the first study to use matching controls to obtain a causal estimate of the effect of ADAMTS13 monitoring based preemptive treatment on RFS in iTTP. In contrast to previous work, we did not observe a significant increase in RFS in the preemptively treated group. It is possible that the limited number of preemptively treated episodes herein did not provide sufficient power to detect a difference. However, given the significant effect size that has been proposed, based on prior work, we suspect other factors may have also influenced this finding. Previous analysis of the USTMA iTTP registry has shown a higher incidence of relapse in African American participants. While the precise reason for this finding is not yet clear, it is worth considering that there may also be differential response to preemptive treatment. Our study highlights the importance of continued efforts to determine the generalizability and efficacy of ADAMTS13 monitoring based preemptive treatment in iTTP. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Gangaraju: Alexion: Consultancy; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy. Masias: Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Parnes: Sigilon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire/Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; I-mAb: Consultancy; Sunovion: Consultancy; Genentech/Hoffman LaRoche: Research Funding; UniQure: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aspa: Consultancy. Mazepa: Answering TTP Foundation: Research Funding; Sanofi Aventis: Other. OffLabel Disclosure: Rituximab, an anti CD20 monoclonal antibody will be discussed in relation to treatment of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

We describe the anesthetic and operative techniques utilized for a tracheal tumor resection in a pediatric patient with 95% tracheal occlusion. In prior tracheal tumor cases that dictated complete resection, our team had been able to comfortably bypass a tumor with an endotracheal tube. In this case, we could not intubate past the tumor. A rigid bronchoscope was able to be placed past the tumor, so we continued with sternotomy and dissection before cardiopulmonary bypass while ventilating through that bronchoscope as our definitive airway.

Introduction The United States Thrombotic Microangiopathy (USTMA) Consortium consists of high-volume US referral centers that are committed to collaborative research in TMAs. The USTMA Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (iTTP) registry has compiled retrospective data on demographics, treatments and outcomes in patients with iTTP to create the world's largest database of patients with this rare disease. While there is consensus on the use of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) for treatment of iTTP, there are no large randomized trials on which to base use of rituximab. The drug is frequently used for refractory or relapsed iTTP, but is currently being used more frequently for de novo (first episode) iTTP. We queried the USTMA iTTP registry to determine whether relapse free survival (RFS) is superior when rituximab is added to TPE and corticosteroids for treatment of iTTP. We hypothesized that the addition of rituximab would improve RFS at 5 years in both de novo and relapsing iTTP. Methods Following IRB approval at each institution, investigators independently reviewed individual patient records to confirm diagnostic criteria and entered demographic, treatment and outcomes data into the REDCap database housed at the University of North Carolina. The diagnosis of iTTP was defined as ADAMTS13 < 10% or ADAMTS13 < 20% with an inhibitor or antibody detected at any point or a clinical diagnosis of iTTP based on presenting characteristics, response to treatment and/or relapsing phenotype before ADAMTS13 testing became available (N=173). Relapse was defined as a recurrence of iTTP after at least 30 days of remission (recurrence within 30 days was considered an exacerbation, or continuation of the prior episode). To explore the effect of rituximab added to TPE and corticosteroids, we first assessed the treatment effect in de novo iTTP patients and then separately in relapse. We constructed Kaplan-Meier curves to compare RFS for patients treated with rituximab plus corticosteroids versus corticosteroids alone in both groups, and compared RFS at specific time points using the Klein method. To better understand whether other patient variables had an effect on RFS in both de novo episodes and relapses, ordinary (time-to-event) and mixed-effects (recurrent time-to-event) Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the relationships of treatment, race/ethnicity, sex, age, treatment year, and presenting signs/symptoms with the outcome. Analyses were conducted using R version 3.5.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Results As of July, 2019, the USTMA database contains 775 unique study patients with a confirmed diagnosis of iTTP with 1397 unique iTTP episodes. The treatment of patients' de novo iTTP episode was available for analysis in 375 patients, 188 of whom were treated with corticosteroids alone, 131 with corticosteroids plus rituximab, and 56 with other therapies. RFS was significantly higher in patients treated with corticosteroids and rituximab compared to those treated with corticosteroids alone at 1 year (0.93 vs. 0.78, p=0.0002) and 3 years (0.82 vs. 0.66, p=0.004) but not 5 years (0.60 vs. 0.56, p=0.39). In addition, the risk of relapse decreased with later treatment year for de novo iTTP (hazard ratio (HR) 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.99, p=0.03), consistent with rituximab use increasing over time, and was increased in African Americans compared with Caucasians (HR 1.83, 1.10-3.06, p=0.02). We then explored the treatment effect in all iTTP relapses (743 relapses in 426 patients). Here, a significant (p=0.0007) interaction between treatment and race was found. Among African Americans, we found no difference in RFS when rituximab was added (HR 1.15, 0.81-1.62, p=0.43). However, among Caucasians, RFS was significantly improved when rituximab was added (HR 0.15, 0.06-0.35, p<0.0001). Conclusions For de novo iTTP, adding rituximab to corticosteroids for immunosuppression likely delays but does not prevent relapse. Unlike in de novo disease, in patients with relapsed iTTP, we found a novel and significant interaction between race and treatment: while Caucasians had significantly improved RFS with the addition of rituximab, there was no effect on RFS in African Americans. Further investigation is warranted to determine the mechanisms of this difference in the response to rituximab in relapsed iTTP to improve outcomes in African Americans. Figure Disclosures Marshall: Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Farland:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Metjian:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Raval:Bayer, Inc: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Liles:Imara: Other: PI on Clinical trial- Sickle cell ; Shire: Other: PI on clinical trial Sickle cell ; Novartis: Other: PI on clinical trial Sickle cell . Baumann Kreuziger:CSL Behring: Consultancy; Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: Consultancy. McCrae:Rigel Pharmaceutical: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dova Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer Pharmaceutical: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chaturvedi:Shire/Takeda: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy. Zheng:Clotsolution: Other: Co-Founder; Shire/Takeda: Research Funding; Ablynx/Sanofi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau. Cataland:Ablynx/Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Disclosure: rituximab for immunosuppression in TTP.

Abstract Clinical trials have established the benefit of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with radiotherapy in prostate cancer. ADT sensitizes prostate cancer to radiotherapy-induced death at least in part through inhibition of DNA repair machinery, but for unknown reasons, adjuvant ADT provides further survival benefits. Here, we show that androgen receptor (AR) expression and activity are durably upregulated following radiotherapy in multiple human prostate cancer models in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, the degree of AR upregulation correlates with survival in vitro and time to tumor progression in animal models. We also provide evidence of AR pathway upregulation, measured by a rise in serum levels of AR-regulated hK2 protein, in nearly 20% of patients after radiotherapy. Furthermore, these men were three-fold more likely to experience subsequent biochemical failure. Collectively, these data demonstrate that radiotherapy can upregulate AR signaling after therapy to an extent that negatively affects disease progression and/or survival. Cancer Res; 75(22); 4688–96. ©2015 AACR.