Citations

A new systems approach to diseased states and wellness result in a new branch in the healthcare services, namely, Personalized and Precision Medicine (PPM). To achieve the implementation of PPM concept, it is necessary to create a fundamentally new strategy based upon the recogni-tion of biomarkers and thus the targets to secure the grand future of drug design and drug dis-covery.Each decision-maker values the impact of their decision to use PPM on their own budget and well-being, which may not necessarily be optimal for society as a whole. It would be extremely useful to integrate data harvesting from different databanks for applications to provide more tai-lored measures for the patients resulting in improved patient outcomes, reduced adverse events, and more cost-effective use of the latest health care resources including diagnostic (companion ones or theranostics), preventive and therapeutic (targeted molecular and cellular) etc.Meanwhile, along with the impact of genomics and bioinformatics, pathology is the central specialty of PPM-related resources. Coupled with IT, the upgraded tools are ever more efficient and robust within clinical cancer settings. The latest algorithms may be able to identify and vali-date patterns which humans are not capable of quantifying easily, such as slight differences in textures or morphologies. In this sense, the impact of pathology allows a modular approach, as its various aspects are under development in several areas of PPM.Among the above-mentioned medical specialists involved in PPM, the pathologists play an im-portant and key role in the implementation and development of PPM-driven resources that are in the center of decision of many therapeutic choices. Recent advances in systems biology have tremendously affected the practice of precision pathology, gradually transforming it from a morphology-based into a precise molecular-based discipline. The enormous development of precision pathology research (integrating molecular OMICS and digital approaches) has raised great expectations concerning its impact on PPM aiming to custom-ize medical practice with a focus on the individual, based on the use of molecular tests, identifi-cation of genomic biomarkers, and development of targeted drugs.The precision pathology process introduces a new paradigm in pathology by leveraging digital imaging and IT technologies, and provides significant advancements in accuracy, efficiency, and collaboration. Among the latest innovations the precision pathology supported by digital tools, would dictate the implementation of high-resolution imaging, image analysis tools and integra-tion with molecular OMICS data. Integration of the approaches and resources will provide a true challenge for the future, requiring collaboration between oncologists, pathologists, biodesigners and bioengineers and remaining a challenge to precision cancer practice and profiled bioindustry.The latter requires precision pathologists highly trained in pre-analytic processes, tumor area mi-crodissection for tumor cell enrichment, methodology analysis and results. The in-depth study of molecular alterations in patients allows optimizing molecular diagnosis and selecting candidates for receive novel treatments against specific molecular targets. These patients would benefit from multidisciplinary approach and learning. In this sense, molecular diagnostics has a long tradition in pathology, especially in clinical one, where various OMICS-analyses of cancers are incorpo-rated into diagnostic and decision-making algorithms to secure a way where the pathologists con-tinue to play an essential role in developing and implementing molecular profiling tests in practice and communicate the results and their relevance with cancer practitioners.Cancer pathology is the central specialty of personalized and precision oncology (PPO). Meanwhile, the combination of comprehensive biobanking and the next wave of theranostic pathology technologies provides a natural, externally visible infrastructure that now allows pa-thology as a discipline – to engage directly with the biotechnology and pharma sector. We’re at an exciting junction in precision cancer pathology’s growth as a medical specialty, and pathology-driven biobanking is becoming both central to our core expertise and, even more importantly, a powerful enabler for many of the most promising growth areas of our discipline: PPM healthcare, clinical trials and drug development, theranostics, and functional assessment and monitoring of disease. In the context of these changes and challenges, the precision cancer pathology can play a fundamental role in both PPO-guided clinical practice and biodesign-driven cancer research.

Abstract Background Head and neck cancer represents the seventh most common cancer diagnosis globally. Maintaining sufficient nutrition is important for preventing malnutrition (undernutrition) and muscle wasting, which contribute to worse outcomes, although many patients are unable to maintain adequate oral intake throughout treatment. This guideline provides practice guidance on nutrition care for patients with head and neck cancer. Methods An interdisciplinary team developed key questions and scanned results from a systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central databases back to 2001. Recommendations were created for key questions concerning timing and duration of nutrition support (early vs delayed enteral nutrition [EN], postoperative feeding, and perioperative dietitian intervention), frequency of dietitian and speech pathology consultations, nutrition screening and assessment, macronutrient requirements, enteral access devices, adjunctive strategies (appetite stimulants and continuation of oral intake alongside EN), specialized nutrients (arginine, glutamine, ω‐3, and immunonutrition), and interdisciplinary care. Results Ninety‐two studies were included. Recommendations were made supporting early initiation of EN when oral intake is inadequate, nutrition within 24 h after surgery, weekly consultation with a dietitian during radiotherapy, malnutrition screening and assessment with validated tools, interdisciplinary models of care, dietitian involvement before and after surgery, and when to consider use of specialized nutrients. Recommendations are also provided for protein intake (1.2–1.5 g/kg/day) and energy intake (≥30 kcal/kg/day). Conclusion This guideline provides guidance for the nutrition care of patients with head and neck cancer, identifies research gaps, and calls for standardized outcome reporting to further the state of the evidence. This paper was approved by the ASPEN Board of Directors.

AbstractBackground: Updated National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB) Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for the use of tumor markers in the clinic have been developed.Methods: Published reports relevant to use of tumor markers for 5 cancer sites—testicular, prostate, colorectal, breast, and ovarian—were critically reviewed.Results: For testicular cancer, α-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, and lactate dehydrogenase are recommended for diagnosis/case finding, staging, prognosis determination, recurrence detection, and therapy monitoring. α-Fetoprotein is also recommended for differential diagnosis of nonseminomatous and seminomatous germ cell tumors. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is not recommended for prostate cancer screening, but may be used for detecting disease recurrence and monitoring therapy. Free PSA measurement data are useful for distinguishing malignant from benign prostatic disease when total PSA is <10 μg/L. In colorectal cancer, carcinoembryonic antigen is recommended (with some caveats) for prognosis determination, postoperative surveillance, and therapy monitoring in advanced disease. Fecal occult blood testing may be used for screening asymptomatic adults 50 years or older. For breast cancer, estrogen and progesterone receptors are mandatory for predicting response to hormone therapy, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 measurement is mandatory for predicting response to trastuzumab, and urokinase plasminogen activator/plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 may be used for determining prognosis in lymph node–negative patients. CA15-3/BR27–29 or carcinoembryonic antigen may be used for therapy monitoring in advanced disease. CA125 is recommended (with transvaginal ultrasound) for early detection of ovarian cancer in women at high risk for this disease. CA125 is also recommended for differential diagnosis of suspicious pelvic masses in postmenopausal women, as well as for detection of recurrence, monitoring of therapy, and determination of prognosis in women with ovarian cancer.Conclusions: Implementation of these recommendations should encourage optimal use of tumor markers.