Back to Authors

McKeever, Liam

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6002-2197

Mayo Clinic

Rush University

Citations 2

Guidelines for nutrition in adults with head and neck cancer: The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Kiss, Nicole, Lewis, Whitney E, Mills, Jeannine B., Singh, Anurag K, Church, David D. , Mey, Jacob T. , Peterson, Sarah J. , Aguzzi, Kathleen, Bellini, Sarah Gunnell , Coelho, Maria Paula Villela, Cordwin, Laura, Duffy, Michael, Hager, Shanna J., Owen‐Michaane, Michael, Price, Kathleen C., Stanner, Heather , Storm, Bridget, Udagedara, Malika, McKeever, Liam , Church, David D , Mey, Jacob T , Peterson, Sarah , Bellini, Sarah , Coelho, Maria Paula Villela , Mundi, Manpreet S , Kiss, Nicole K. , Findlay, Merran , Frowen, Jacqui J. , Mundi, Manpreet S.

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition | March 8, 2026 | Volume: 50 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 274-338

10.1002/jpen.70067 Get It

Abstract Background Head and neck cancer represents the seventh most common cancer diagnosis globally. Maintaining sufficient nutrition is important for preventing malnutrition (undernutrition) and muscle wasting, which contribute to worse outcomes, although many patients are unable to maintain adequate oral intake throughout treatment. This guideline provides practice guidance on nutrition care for patients with head and neck cancer. Methods An interdisciplinary team developed key questions and scanned results from a systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central databases back to 2001. Recommendations were created for key questions concerning timing and duration of nutrition support (early vs delayed enteral nutrition [EN], postoperative feeding, and perioperative dietitian intervention), frequency of dietitian and speech pathology consultations, nutrition screening and assessment, macronutrient requirements, enteral access devices, adjunctive strategies (appetite stimulants and continuation of oral intake alongside EN), specialized nutrients (arginine, glutamine, ω‐3, and immunonutrition), and interdisciplinary care. Results Ninety‐two studies were included. Recommendations were made supporting early initiation of EN when oral intake is inadequate, nutrition within 24 h after surgery, weekly consultation with a dietitian during radiotherapy, malnutrition screening and assessment with validated tools, interdisciplinary models of care, dietitian involvement before and after surgery, and when to consider use of specialized nutrients. Recommendations are also provided for protein intake (1.2–1.5 g/kg/day) and energy intake (≥30 kcal/kg/day). Conclusion This guideline provides guidance for the nutrition care of patients with head and neck cancer, identifies research gaps, and calls for standardized outcome reporting to further the state of the evidence. This paper was approved by the ASPEN Board of Directors.
Clinical Nutrition Research and the COVID‐19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review of the ASPEN COVID‐19 Task Force on Nutrition Research
Mechanick, Jeffrey I. , Carbone, Salvatore , Dickerson, Roland N. , Hernandez, Beverly, Irving, Sharon Y. , Li, Ding‐You , McCarthy, Mary S. , Mogensen, Kris M. , Gautier, Juan B. Ochoa, Prewitt, T. Elaine, Rosenthal, Martin D. , Warren, Malissa, Winkler, Marion F. , McKeever, Liam , Correia, María Isabel Toulson Davisson , Hurt, Ryan T. , Li, Ding-You , Mogensen, Kris M , Gautier, Juan B Ochoa , Patel, Jayshil J , Rosenthal, Martin , Winkler, Marion F , Mechanick, Jeffrey I. , Patel, Jayshil J.

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition | October 23, 2020 | Volume: 45 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 13-31

10.1002/jpen.2036 Get It

Abstract The purpose of this scoping review by the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) Nutrition Task Force was to examine nutrition research applicable to the COVID‐19 pandemic. The rapid pace of emerging scientific information has prompted this activity to discover research/knowledge gaps. This methodology adhered with recommendations from the Joanna Briggs Institute. There were 2301 citations imported. Of these, there were 439 articles fully abstracted, with 23 main topic areas identified across 24 article types and sourced across 61 countries and 51 specialties in 8 settings and among 14 populations. Epidemiological/mechanistic relationships between nutrition and COVID‐19 were reviewed and results mapped to the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Time (PICO‐T) questions. The aggregated data were analyzed by clinical stage: pre–COVID‐19, acute COVID‐19, and chronic/post–COVID‐19. Research gaps were discovered for all PICO‐T questions. Nutrition topics meriting urgent research included food insecurity/societal infrastructure and transcultural factors (pre–COVID‐19); cardiometabolic‐based chronic disease, pediatrics, nutrition support, and hospital infrastructure (acute COVID‐19); registered dietitian nutritionist counseling (chronic/post–COVID‐19); and malnutrition and management (all stages). The paucity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was particularly glaring. Knowledge gaps were discovered for PICO‐T questions on pediatrics, micronutrients, bariatric surgery, and transcultural factors (pre–COVID‐19); enteral nutrition, protein‐energy requirements, and glycemic control with nutrition (acute COVID‐19); and home enteral and parenteral nutrition support (chronic/post–COVID‐19). In conclusion, multiple critical areas for urgent nutrition research were identified, particularly using RCT design, to improve nutrition care for patients before, during, and after COVID‐19.