Citations

Abstract Introduction Inhaled corticosteroid/fast-acting beta2-agonist combinations are recommended over albuterol-alone as rescue in asthma due to superior exacerbation reduction. In adults with asthma, BATURA and MANDALA demonstrated as-needed albuterol-budesonide 180/160 μg reduced the risk of severe exacerbation by 46% in mild and 28% in moderate-to-severe asthma for patients aged ≥18 years versus albuterol 180 μg. However, albuterol is the long-held rescue therapy standard for treatment of bronchoconstriction. In the ALbuterol-budesonide Treatment in Acute Airway Obstruction (ALTA) (NCT05555290) study, repetitive albuterol-budesonide 180/160 ug versus albuterol 180 ug treatment resulted in equally rapid improvement in lung function over 60 minutes and provided enhanced bronchodilation at 480 minutes post-mannitol challenge: least squares mean/LSM(standard error/SE) [95%CI] difference in ΔFEV1=91.2 (27.4) [36.7-145.7] mL. This post-hoc analysis of ALTA evaluated whether baseline lung function affects treatment response. Methods ALTA was a Phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 2-period, crossover study evaluating efficacy of repetitive albuterol-budesonide 180/160 μg vs albuterol 180 μg in adults with mild asthma experiencing ≥15% fall in FEV1 with cumulative mannitol exposure ≤635 mg. Inclusion criteria included use of short-acting beta2-agonist as the only pre-enrollment therapy for ≥4 weeks and pre-challenge FEV1 ≥1.500 L and 60%-<90% of predicted. Participants received albuterol-budesonide or albuterol at end-mannitol challenge (time 0) and 20, 40, and 60 minutes thereafter. FEV1 was assessed starting pre-mannitol challenge (-30 minutes) and over 480 minutes post-challenge. For participants with baseline FEV1 60%-<80% and 80%-<90% predicted, LSM(SE) [95%CI] difference between treatment arms in ΔFEV1 from time 0 min at 480 minutes was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model. Results 88 randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study drug were included: mean(SD) age=44.5(13.7) years; 56.8% female; mean(SD) FEV1=2.462(0.540) L (76.7[7.7]% predicted). 56 participants had baseline FEV1 ≥60%-<80% predicted; 32 had baseline FEV1 80%-<90% predicted. Percent fall in FEV1 post-challenge was similar between lung function subgroups. Improvement in FEV1 post-mannitol (time 0 min) at 480 min was greater with albuterol-budesonide vs albuterol treatment for both FEV1 subgroups: LSM(SE) [95%CI] difference 71.0(29.8) [11.0-131.0] mL, p = 0.021 in the lower and 114.0(55.1) [1.0-227.0] mL, p = 0.048 in the higher baseline FEV1 participants (Figure). There was no significant difference in the treatment by subgroup interaction, suggesting consistent treatment efficacy between subgroups. Conclusions Albuterol-budesonide relieves acute obstruction better than albuterol over time in mild asthma whether or not baseline lung function falls within a normal range. This abstract is funded by: AstraZeneca

Abstract RATIONALE: Albuterol-budesonide 180/160 µg is indicated in the US for as-needed treatment or prevention of bronchoconstriction and to reduce risk of exacerbations in patients ≥18 years old with asthma. The objective of the ALbuterol-budesonide Treatment in Acute airway obstruction (ALTA) study (NCT05555290) is to assess comparative efficacy, safety, and mechanisms of action of albuterol-budesonide 180/160 µg versus albuterol 180 µg in treating and preventing bronchoconstriction. This report describes the clinical profiles of patients meeting criteria for randomization into the trial. METHODS: ALTA is a phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 2-period, cross-over study evaluating the effects of repetitive dosing of albuterol-budesonide 180/160 µg versus albuterol 180 µg for treating adults treated as intermittent asthma and experiencing acute airway obstruction induced by repeated mannitol challenges. Inclusion criteria evaluated during screening include asthma diagnosis ≥6 months, prescribed and utilizing albuterol as the only asthma treatment for ≥4 weeks, pre-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥1.50 L and FEV1 ≥60% to <90% predicted, and positive response to a mannitol challenge (decrease in FEV1≥15% at ≤635 mg cumulative mannitol dose). Exclusion criteria include clinically significant lung disease other than asthma; any smoking in the prior 6 months or ≥10 pack-year smoking history; or a clinical encounter for asthma worsening within the past 4 weeks. RESULTS: Thus far, 84 patients have met the criteria for randomization into ALTA. Mean(SD) age=44.9(13.7) years, 56.0% female, 40.5% African American, 9.5% Hispanic/Latino. Clinical characteristics include 10.7% with 1 prior-year severe exacerbation; mean(SD) fractional exhaled nitric oxide=37.0(37.4) ppb; mean(SD) baseline pre-bronchodilator FEV1=2.464(0.538) L; mean(SD) baseline percent predicted FEV1=76.7(7.9)%; mean(SD) % fall in FEV1 with mannitol challenge=22.1(7.3)% at a mean(SD) cumulative mannitol dose of 146.4(176.3) mg. Despite being treated for intermittent asthma, based upon symptoms, lung function, and exacerbation history, no patients met NAEPP 2007 criteria for intermittent disease, and 13.1% fell into the mild, 78.6% moderate, and 8.3% severe persistent asthma categories (Figure). With respect to asthma control, as measured by Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire scores, 60.7% had well-controlled, 20.2% not well-controlled, and 19.1% very poorly controlled disease. CONCLUSION: The baseline characteristics of patients in the ALTA study reveal that patients treated as intermittent asthma exhibit heterogeneity in clinical characteristics, airway hyper-reactivity, T2 inflammation, and disease severity and control. Additional genomic and biomarker data are forthcoming and altogether will provide an opportunity to address the mechanism of albuterol and budesonide interactions in a broad spectrum of asthma phenotypes.

TPS614 Background: Strategies to optimize treatment decision-making in early stage HER2-positive breast cancer are a priority. Recent studies suggest that early metabolic changes on FDG-PET/CT predict response to HER2-directed therapy. The TBCRC026 trial showed that participants not obtaining a 40% reduction in SULmax by cycle 1 day 15 (C1D15) following neoadjuvant trastuzumab/pertuzumab (HP) were unlikely to obtain pCR [negative predictive value (NPV) 91%]. This trial aims to validate FDG-PET/CT as a neoadjuvant interim (niFDG-PET/CT) imaging integral biomarker in patients treated with standard HER2-directed regimens (NCT05710328). Methods: Trial design: EA1211/DIRECT is a multicenter, single-arm, primary imaging phase 2 study enrolling patients with stage II/III HER2-positive breast cancer. Patients undergo standard skull base-thigh FDG-PET/CT at baseline and C1D15 and receive standard of care pertuzumab-based neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. Eligibility: Age ≥18 years, ECOG performance status 0-2, stage IIa-IIIc, untreated HER2-positive breast cancer with known hormone receptor status, suitable to undergo FDG-PET/CT imaging and neoadjuvant therapy. Statistical methods: ΔSULmaxD15 will be computed as: (D15 SULmax – baseline SULmax)/baseline SULmax. The primary objective is to estimate the NPV of niFDG-PET/CT for pCR using ΔSULmaxD15 of the primary breast cancer at a threshold of 40%. NPV is defined as the probability that pCR will not be achieved by participants with ΔSULmaxD15 <40%. Secondary endpoints include evaluating sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of ΔSULmaxD15 of the primary breast cancer at a threshold of 40% and ability of the niFDG-PET/CT biomarker to predict 3-year event free survival (EFS). Sample size: We expect that 50% of patients will not reach the ΔSULmax threshold of 40% and a pCR rate of 40-60%. The proposed sample size is 210 participants, adjusted to 235 to account for missing data in 10% of cases. Computation of exact, two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI) for NPV determined the lower limit of the CI is at least 80% when the true NPV is at least 88%. The lower limit is 84% when the true NPV has the value of 91%, which was estimated in the TBCRC026 study. Current status: EA1211/DIRECT was activated in May 2023 across the NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) and is anticipated to complete in March 2025. Those interested in the clinical trial can email ea1211team@ecog-acrin.org. The EA1211/DIRECT trial is the first step in implementing a Response-Guided Treatment Strategy by validating the ΔSULmax threshold of 40% as the optimum cut point across standard of care HER2-directed neoadjuvant regimens. If EA1211/DIRECT meets its objectives, the results will be used to design clinical utility studies, thus hoping to change practice. Clinical trial information: NCT05710328 .

Abstract Background: Strategies to optimize treatment decision-making in early stage HER2-positive breast cancer are a current priority for the oncology and patient advocacy community. Recent studies suggest that early metabolic changes on FDG-PET/CT (imaging biomarker) predict response to HER2-directed therapy. The TBCRC026 trial showed that participants not obtaining a 40% reduction in SULmax by cycle 1 day 15 (C1D15) following neoadjuvant trastuzumab/pertuzumab (HP) were unlikely to obtain pCR [negative predictive value (NPV) 91%]. The ECOG-ACRIN EA1211/DIRECT trial aims to validate FDG-PET/CT as a neoadjuvant interim (niFDG-PET/CT) imaging integral biomarker in patients treated with standard HER2-directed regimens (NCT05710328). Design: EA1211/DIRECT is a multicenter, single-arm, primary imaging phase 2 study enrolling patients with stage II/III HER2-positive breast cancer. Patients undergo standard skull base-thigh FDG-PET/CT at baseline and C1D15 and receive standard of care pertuzumab-based neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. Eligibility: Age ≥18 years, ECOG performance status 0-2, stage IIa-IIIc, untreated HER2-positive breast cancer with known hormone receptor status, suitable to undergo FDG-PET/CT imaging and neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: ΔSULmaxD15 will be computed as: (D15 SULmax – baseline SULmax)/baseline SULmax. The primary objective is to estimate the NPV of niFDG-PET/CT for pCR using ΔSULmaxD15 of the primary breast cancer at a threshold of 40%, in patients treated with neoadjuvant HER2-directed therapy. NPV is defined as the probability that pCR will not be achieved by participants with ΔSULmaxD15 &lt; 40%. Secondary endpoints include evaluating the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of ΔSULmaxD15 of the primary breast cancer at a threshold of 40% and the ability of the niFDG-PET/CT biomarker to predict 3-year event free survival (EFS). Sample Size: We expect that 50% of patients will not reach the ΔSULmax threshold of 40% and a pCR rate of 40-60%. The proposed sample size is 210 participants, adjusted to 235 to account for missing data in 10% of cases. Computation of exact, two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI) for NPV determined the lower limit of the CI is at least 80% when the true NPV is at least 88%. The lower limit is 84% when the true NPV has the value of 91%, which was estimated in the TBCRC026 study. Current Status: EA1211/DIRECT was activated in May 2023 across the NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN), and accrual is anticipated to complete in March 2025. Those interested in the clinical trial can email ea1211team@ecog-acrin.org. Conclusion: The EA1211/DIRECT trial is the first step in implementing a Response-Guided Treatment Strategy by validating the ΔSULmax threshold of 40% as the optimum cut point across standard of care HER2-directed neoadjuvant regimens. If EA1211/DIRECT meets its objectives, the results will be used to design clinical utility studies, and thus hoping to change practice. Citation Format: Heather Jacene, Constantine Gatsonis, Roisin Connolly, Brian Burnette, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Maeve Hennessy, Justin Romanoff, Alexander Taurone, Ciara O'Sullivan, H. T. Carisa Le-Petross, Courtney Lawhn Heath, Vered Stearns, Amy Fowler, Shou-Ching Tang, Karla A Sepulveda, Angela DeMichele, David Mankoff, Antonio Wolff. ECOG-ACRIN EA1211: Interim FDG-PET/CT for predicting response of HER2-positive breast cancer to neoadjuvant therapy (DIRECT Trial) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-01-01.

AbstractBackgroundPatient‐reported outcomes (PROs) are a better tool for evaluating the experiences of patients who have symptomatic, treatment‐associated adverse events (AEs) compared with clinician‐rated AEs. The authors present PROs assessing health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) and treatment‐related neurotoxicity for adjuvant capecitabine versus platinum on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group‐American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG‐ACRIN) EA1131 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02445391).MethodsParticipants completed the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Breast Cancer Symptom Index (NFBSI‐16) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Gynecologic Oncology Group neurotoxicity subscale (platinum arm only) at baseline, cycle 3 day 1 (C3D1), 6 months, and 15 months. Because of early termination, power was insufficient to test the hypothesis that HRQoL, as assessed by the NFBSI‐16 treatment side‐effect (TSE) subscale, would be better at 6 and 15 months in the capecitabine arm; all analyses were exploratory. Means were compared by using t‐tests or the Wilcoxon rank‐sum test, and proportions were compared by using the χ2 test.ResultsTwo hundred ninety‐six of 330 eligible patients provided PROs. The mean NFBSI‐16 TSE subscale score was lower for the platinum arm at baseline (p = .02; absolute difference, 0.6 points) and for the capecitabine arm at C3D1 (p = .04; absolute difference, 0.5 points), but it did not differ at other times. The mean change in TSE subscale scores differed between the arms from baseline to C3D1 (platinum arm, 0.15; capecitabine arm, −0.72; p = .03), but not from baseline to later time points. The mean decline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Gynecologic Oncology Group neurotoxicity subscale scores exceeded the minimal meaningful change (1.38 points) from baseline to each subsequent time point (all p < .05).ConclusionsDespite the similar frequency of clinician‐rated AEs, PROs identified greater on‐treatment symptom burden with capecitabine and complemented clinician‐rated AEs by characterizing patients’ experiences during chemotherapy.

Abstract Background Cardiomyopathy is a leading cause of pregnancy-related mortality and represents the number one cause of death in the late postpartum period. Purpose The goal of this study was to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of an artificial intelligence-based electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) and a point-of-care artificial intelligence-enhanced digital stethoscope for cardiomyopathy screening among pregnant and postpartum women. Methods We conducted a single-arm prospective study of pregnant and postpartum women (up to 12 months following delivery) enrolled at three sites between October 2021 and October 2022. Study participants completed a standard 12-lead ECG, ECG + phonocardiogram recordings with a digital stethoscope, a demographic questionnaire, and a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) within a 24-hour period. Diagnostic performance of the AI-ECG and digital stethoscope for cardiomyopathy detection, defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) &lt; 45%, was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and standard measures of diagnostic performance. Results We included 100 consecutive pregnant and postpartum women who provided informed consent and had at least one ECG recorded, completed the questionnaire, and had an echocardiogram performed. All participants self-identified as female, and 41% were recruited from a federally qualified health center. The median age of participants was 31 years (Q1: 27, Q3: 34). Thirty-eight percent identified as non-Hispanic White, 32% as non-Hispanic Black, 21% as Hispanic or Latino, 6% as Asian, and 3% as Other (1 Native Hawaiian and 2 multiracial). Five percent (5/100) had LVEF &lt;45%. The 12-lead AI-ECG model demonstrated close to perfect discrimination (accuracy 99%; AUC 1.00, sensitivity 100%) for detection of cardiomyopathy with 1 false positive screen (LVEF 49%), Figure 1A. The digital stethoscope (angled position) had an AUC of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97, 1.00) for detection of LVEF &lt;45%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the digital stethoscope were 60%, 98%, 60% and 98%, respectively for detection of LVEF &lt;45% (Figure 1B & 1C). Conclusions In this small prospective study, we found that 5% of pregnant and postpartum women had cardiomyopathy, a potentially life-threatening condition, and that a rapid, inexpensive, ubiquitous, massively scalable point-of-care test - the ECG - showed promising results, identifying it with an AUC &gt; 0.98 with the application of artificial intelligence.Figure 1

Abstract Background Pregnancy related cardiomyopathy is a significant cause of maternal morbidity and mortality globally. A presumed overlap between normal pregnancy-associated symptoms and clinical symptoms of cardiomyopathy contributes to delays in diagnosis and increased risk of maternal mortality. Purpose We sought to evaluate the association between patient-reported cardiovascular symptoms and the presence of cardiomyopathy among pregnant and postpartum patients. We hypothesize that individual cardiovascular symptoms are unrelated to the presence of cardiomyopathy. We also evaluated the use of a novel adaptation of a validated health status questionnaire in relation to cardiomyopathy. Methods We enrolled 48 pregnant (&gt;13 weeks) and postpartum (up to 12 months) participants in a prospective study between October 2021 and February 2022. All study participants completed a baseline questionnaire, which included current cardiovascular symptoms, an assessment of health status using an adapted version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12), followed by a resting transthoracic echocardiogram on the same day. We defined cardiomyopathy as a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) &lt;50% based on 2-D echocardiography. Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were employed to evaluate the association between reported cardiovascular symptoms, the adapted KCCQ-12 (KCC-A) score, and cardiomyopathy. Results At the time of enrollment, 67% were pregnant and 33% postpartum. Forty-eight percent identified as White, 31% as Black, 10% as Asian, and 10% as other race. The median age was 31 years (Q1: 28, Q3: 35) and 6% had an LVEF &lt;50%. We found no statistically significant association between four reported cardiovascular symptoms (shortness of breath, orthopnea, fast breathing, and episodes of “asthma” that did not improve with inhalers or other treatment) and cardiomyopathy or medial E/e' ratio. KCC-A scores were low in the study population overall (median 52; Q1:40, Q3: 61). We demonstrated a significantly lower KCC-A score among women with LVEF &lt;50% (median 24; Q1: 15, Q3: 44) compared to women with LVEF ≥50% (median 54; Q1: 44, Q3: 61) p=0.02. Conclusions We showed no significant association between individual cardiovascular symptoms and cardiomyopathy in an obstetric population. However, we demonstrate for the first time that an adapted KCCQ-12 questionnaire for health status assessment could potentially identify women with a high-likelihood of cardiomyopathy during the peripartum period who may benefit from additional evaluation including echocardiography. Larger studies are needed to validate this finding. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): This study was funded by a research grant from the Miami Heart Research Institute, Florida Heart Foundation. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health

Abstract Background Pain is the highest prioritized patient-reported outcome in people with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) but remains infrequently and inconsistently measured in clinical trials and poorly managed in clinical settings. A recently completed systematic review of pain in ADPKD identified 26 different outcome measures. None of these measures were considered appropriate as a core outcome measure due to the lack of patient-important dimensions, inadequate content, relatively long duration of completion time and limited evidence to support psychometric robustness. Methods We convened an international Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology–Polycystic Kidney Disease consensus workshop involving 21 patients/caregivers and 40 health professionals (clinicians, nurses, researchers, policy makers and industry representatives) from 18 countries to discuss the identification or development of a core outcome measure for pain. Results Four themes were identified highlighting fundamental issues for the measurement of pain in ADPKD: distressing and disrupting life participation; variability and ambiguity in defining pain; stigma, frustration and adaptation to pain; and ensuring validity and feasibility of pain measures. Conclusions Existing measures were found to be insufficient in capturing pain as a core outcome and there was consensus on the need for a new validated measure that is simple, succinct and addresses the impact of pain on life participation. This measure will facilitate the appropriate prioritization of pain in all trials and guide clinical decision making in people with ADPKD.