Akuthota, Praveen

Abstract RATIONALE: Albuterol-budesonide 180/160 µg is indicated in the US for as-needed treatment or prevention of bronchoconstriction and to reduce risk of exacerbations in patients ≥18 years old with asthma. The objective of the ALbuterol-budesonide Treatment in Acute airway obstruction (ALTA) study (NCT05555290) is to assess comparative efficacy, safety, and mechanisms of action of albuterol-budesonide 180/160 µg versus albuterol 180 µg in treating and preventing bronchoconstriction. This report describes the clinical profiles of patients meeting criteria for randomization into the trial. METHODS: ALTA is a phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 2-period, cross-over study evaluating the effects of repetitive dosing of albuterol-budesonide 180/160 µg versus albuterol 180 µg for treating adults treated as intermittent asthma and experiencing acute airway obstruction induced by repeated mannitol challenges. Inclusion criteria evaluated during screening include asthma diagnosis ≥6 months, prescribed and utilizing albuterol as the only asthma treatment for ≥4 weeks, pre-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥1.50 L and FEV1 ≥60% to <90% predicted, and positive response to a mannitol challenge (decrease in FEV1≥15% at ≤635 mg cumulative mannitol dose). Exclusion criteria include clinically significant lung disease other than asthma; any smoking in the prior 6 months or ≥10 pack-year smoking history; or a clinical encounter for asthma worsening within the past 4 weeks. RESULTS: Thus far, 84 patients have met the criteria for randomization into ALTA. Mean(SD) age=44.9(13.7) years, 56.0% female, 40.5% African American, 9.5% Hispanic/Latino. Clinical characteristics include 10.7% with 1 prior-year severe exacerbation; mean(SD) fractional exhaled nitric oxide=37.0(37.4) ppb; mean(SD) baseline pre-bronchodilator FEV1=2.464(0.538) L; mean(SD) baseline percent predicted FEV1=76.7(7.9)%; mean(SD) % fall in FEV1 with mannitol challenge=22.1(7.3)% at a mean(SD) cumulative mannitol dose of 146.4(176.3) mg. Despite being treated for intermittent asthma, based upon symptoms, lung function, and exacerbation history, no patients met NAEPP 2007 criteria for intermittent disease, and 13.1% fell into the mild, 78.6% moderate, and 8.3% severe persistent asthma categories (Figure). With respect to asthma control, as measured by Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire scores, 60.7% had well-controlled, 20.2% not well-controlled, and 19.1% very poorly controlled disease. CONCLUSION: The baseline characteristics of patients in the ALTA study reveal that patients treated as intermittent asthma exhibit heterogeneity in clinical characteristics, airway hyper-reactivity, T2 inflammation, and disease severity and control. Additional genomic and biomarker data are forthcoming and altogether will provide an opportunity to address the mechanism of albuterol and budesonide interactions in a broad spectrum of asthma phenotypes.

ObjectiveThis study examined the relationship between age at diagnosis and disease characteristics and damage in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitis (AAV).MethodsAnalysis of a prospective longitudinal cohort of patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and eosinophilic GPA (EGPA) in the Vasculitis Clinical Research Consortium (2013–2021). Disease cohorts were divided by age at diagnosis (years): children (<18), young adults (18–40), middle‐aged adults (41–65), and older adults (>65). Data included demographics, ANCA type, clinical characteristics, Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) scores, ANCA Vasculitis Index of Damage (AVID) scores, and novel disease‐specific and non‐disease‐specific damage scores built from VDI and AVID items.ResultsAnalysis included data from 1020 patients with GPA/MPA and 357 with EGPA. Female predominance in GPA/MPA decreased with age at diagnosis. AAV in childhood was more often GPA and proteinase 3‐ANCA positive. Children with GPA/MPA experienced more subglottic stenosis and alveolar hemorrhage; children and young adults with EGPA experienced more alveolar hemorrhage, need for intubation, and gastrointestinal involvement. Older adults (GPA/MPA) had more neurologic manifestations. After adjusting for disease duration, medications, tobacco, and ANCA, all damage scores increased with age at diagnosis for GPA/MPA (P < 0.001) except the disease‐specific damage score, which did not differ (P = 0.44). For EGPA, VDI scores increased with age at diagnosis (P < 0.009), whereas all other scores were not significantly different.ConclusionAge at diagnosis is associated with clinical characteristics in AAV. Although VDI and AVID scores increase with age at diagnosis, this is driven by non‐disease‐specific damage items.image

AbstractBackgroundBiomarkers of eosinophilic disease activity, especially in the context of novel therapies that reduce blood eosinophil counts, are an unmet need. Absolute eosinophil count (AEC) does not accurately reflect tissue eosinophilia or eosinophil activation. Therefore, the aims of this study were to compare the reliability of plasma and urine eosinophil major basic protein 1, eosinophil cationic protein, eosinophil‐derived neurotoxin (EDN), and eosinophil peroxidase measurement and to evaluate the usefulness of eosinophil granule protein (EGP) measurement for the assessment of disease activity in patients with eosinophil‐associated diseases treated with mepolizumab, benralizumab, or dexpramipexole.MethodsEosinophil granule protein concentrations were measured in serum, plasma, and urine from healthy volunteers and patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), and eosinophilic asthma using a multiplex assay.ResultsUrine EGP concentrations remained stable, whereas serum and plasma EGP concentrations increased significantly with delayed processing. Plasma (p) EDN, but not urine (u) EDN, concentration correlated with AEC and negatively correlated with prednisone dose. Both pEDN and uEDN decreased significantly following treatment of HES patients with benralizumab and EGPA patients with mepolizumab. uEDN appeared to increase with clinical relapse in both patient groups.ConclusionsMeasurement of EGP in urine is noninvasive and unaffected by cellular lysis. Although plasma and urine EDN concentrations showed a similar pattern following benralizumab and mepolizumab treatment, the lack of correlation between AEC or prednisone dose and uEDN concentrations suggests that measurement of uEDN may provide a potential biomarker of disease activity in patients with HES and EGPA.

The enigmatic eosinophil has emerged as an exciting component of the immune system, involved in a plethora of homeostatic and inflammatory responses. Substantial progress has been achieved through experimental systems manipulating eosinophils in vivo, initially in mice and more recently in humans. Researchers using eosinophil knockout mice have identified a contributory role for eosinophils in basal and inflammatory processes and protective immunity. Primarily fueled by the purported proinflammatory role of eosinophils in eosinophil-associated diseases, a series of anti-eosinophil therapeutics have emerged as a new class of drugs. These agents, which dramatically deplete eosinophils, provide a valuable opportunity to characterize the consequences of eosinophil knockout humans. Herein, we comparatively describe mouse and human eosinophil knockouts. We put forth the view that human eosinophils negatively contribute to a variety of diseases and, unlike mouse eosinophils, do not yet have an identified role in physiological health; thus, clarifying all roles of eosinophils remains an ongoing pursuit.

AbstractEosinophil-associated diseases (EADs) are rare, heterogeneous disorders characterized by the presence of eosinophils in tissues and/or peripheral blood resulting in immunopathology. The heterogeneity of tissue involvement, lack of sufficient animal models, technical challenges in working with eosinophils, and lack of standardized histopathologic approaches have hampered progress in basic research. Additionally, clinical trials and drug development for rare EADs are limited by the lack of primary and surrogate endpoints, biomarkers, and validated patient-reported outcomes. Researchers with expertise in eosinophil biology and eosinophil-related diseases reviewed the state of current eosinophil research, resources, progress, and unmet needs in the field since the 2012 meeting of the NIH Taskforce on the Research of Eosinophil-Associated Diseases (TREAD). RE-TREAD focused on gaps in basic science, translational, and clinical research on eosinophils and eosinophil-related pathogenesis. Improved recapitulation of human eosinophil biology and pathogenesis in murine models was felt to be of importance. Characterization of eosinophil phenotypes, the role of eosinophil subsets in tissues, identification of biomarkers of eosinophil activation and tissue load, and a better understanding of the role of eosinophils in human disease were prioritized. Finally, an unmet need for tools for use in clinical trials was emphasized. Histopathologic scoring, patient- and clinician-reported outcomes, and appropriate coding were deemed of paramount importance for research collaborations, drug development, and approval by regulatory agencies. Further exploration of the eosinophil genome, epigenome, and proteome was also encouraged. Although progress has been made since 2012, unmet needs in eosinophil research remain a priority.Review on eosinophil biology and eosinophil-related disorders (2012–2017) with a focus on continued unmet needs in eosinophil-associated diseases.