Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pericardial Late Gadolinium Enhancement and Elevated Inflammatory Markers Can Predict the Reversibility of Constrictive Pericarditis After Antiinflammatory Medical Therapy
Background— Constrictive pericarditis (CP) is a disabling disease, and usually requires pericardiectomy to relieve heart failure. Reversible CP has been described, but there is no known method to predict the reversibility. Pericardial inflammation may be a marker for reversibility. As a pilot study, we assessed whether cardiac magnetic resonance imaging pericardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and inflammatory biomarkers could predict the reversibility of CP after antiinflammatory therapy. Method and Results— Twenty-nine CP patients received antiinflammatory medications after cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Fourteen patients had resolution of CP, whereas 15 patients had persistent CP after 13 months of follow-up. Baseline LGE pericardial thickness was greater in the group with reversible CP than in the persistent CP group (4±1 versus 2±1 mm, P =0.001). Qualitative intensity of pericardial LGE was moderate or severe in 93% of the group with reversible CP and in 33% of the persistent CP group ( P =0.002). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging LGE pericardial thickness ≥3 mm had 86% sensitivity and 80% specificity to predict CP reversibility. The group with reversible CP also had higher baseline C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate than the persistent CP group (59±52 versus 12±14 mg/L, P =0.04 and 49±25 versus 15±16 mm/h, P =0.04, respectively). Antiinflammatory therapy was associated with a reduction in C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and pericardial LGE in the group with reversible CP but not in the persistent CP group. Conclusions— Reversible CP was associated with pericardial and systemic inflammation. Antiinflammatory therapy was associated with a reduction in pericardial and systemic inflammation and LGE pericardial thickness, with resolution of CP physiology and symptoms. Further studies in a larger number of patients are needed.
Intracardiac Thrombosis and Anticoagulation Therapy in Cardiac Amyloidosis
Background— Primary amyloidosis has a poor prognosis as a result of frequent cardiac involvement. We recently reported a high prevalence of intracardiac thrombus in cardiac amyloid patients at autopsy. However, neither the prevalence nor the effect of anticoagulation on intracardiac thrombus has been evaluated antemortem. Methods and Results— We studied all transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiograms of cardiac amyloid patients at the Mayo Clinic. The prevalence of intracardiac thrombosis, clinical and transthoracic/transesophageal echocardiographic risks for intracardiac thrombosis, and effect of anticoagulation were investigated. We identified 156 patients with cardiac amyloidosis who underwent transesophageal echocardiograms. Amyloidosis was the primary type (AL) in 80; other types occurred in 76 patients, including 56 with the wild transthyretin type, 17 with the mutant transthyretin type, and 3 with the secondary type. Fifth-eight intracardiac thrombi were identified in 42 patients (27%). AL amyloid had more frequent intracardiac thrombus than the other types (35% versus 18%; P =0.02), although the AL patients were younger and had less atrial fibrillation. Multivariate analysis showed that atrial fibrillation, poor left ventricular diastolic function, and lower left atrial appendage emptying velocity were independently associated with increased risk for intracardiac thrombosis, whereas anticoagulation was associated with a significantly decreased risk (odds ratio, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.51; P <0.006). Conclusions— Intracardiac thrombosis occurs frequently in cardiac amyloid patients, especially in the AL type and in those with atrial fibrillation. Risk for thrombosis increased if left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and atrial mechanical dysfunction were present. Anticoagulation therapy appears protective. Timely screening in high-risk patients may allow early detection of intracardiac thrombus. Anticoagulation should be carefully considered.
Intracardiac Thrombosis and Embolism in Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis
Background— Patients with primary amyloidosis (AL type) have a poor prognosis, in part due to frequent cardiac involvement. Although intracardiac thrombus has been reported in anecdotal cases, neither its frequency nor its role in causing mortality is known. Furthermore, the clinical and echocardiographic variables that may be associated with thromboembolism in cardiac amyloidosis have not been defined. Methods and Results— A total of 116 autopsy or explanted cases of cardiac amyloidosis (55 AL and 61 other type) were identified in the Mayo Clinic. Forty-six fatal nonamyloid trauma cases served as controls. Each heart was examined for intracardiac thrombus. The cause of death was determined from autopsy and clinical notes. Intracardiac thrombosis was identified in 38 hearts (33%). Twenty-three had 1 thrombus, whereas 15 had 2 to 5 thrombi. Although subjects in the AL group were younger and had less atrial fibrillation than those with other types of amyloidosis, the AL group had significantly more intracardiac thrombus (51% versus 16%, P <0.001) and more fatal embolic events (26% versus 8%, P <0.03). Control hearts had no intracardiac thrombus. The presence of both atrial fibrillation and AL was associated with an extremely high risk for thromboembolism (odds ratio 55.0 [95% confidence interval 8.1 to 1131.4]). By multivariate analysis, AL type (odds ratio 8.4 [95% confidence interval 1.8 to 51.2]) and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (odds ratio 12.2 [95% confidence interval 2.7 to 72.7]) were independently associated with thromboembolism. Conclusions— A high frequency of intracardiac thrombosis was present in cardiac amyloidosis. Furthermore, thromboembolism caused significant fatality. Several risk factors for thromboembolism were identified. Early screening, especially in high-risk patients, and early anticoagulation might reduce morbidity and mortality.
Myocardial Infarction with Normal Coronary Arteries: A Role for MRI?