Citations

Abstract Background: X4P-001 is an orally bioavailable, selective, allosteric inhibitor of the chemokine receptor CXCR4, and has been shown to downregulate hypoxia inducible factor-2α (HIF-2α) and myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) trafficking in the tumor microenvironment. In multiple RCC xenograft models, the addition of X4P-001 to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including axitinib, has demonstrated increased efficacy and delayed onset of TKI resistance. Methods: This is an ongoing phase 1/2 open-label study of X4P-001 in combination with axitinib in patients (pts) with histologically confirmed clear cell RCC (ccRCC) who have received ≥1 prior systemic therapy. The Ph1 portion of the study evaluates safety, tolerability, PK, PD, and antitumor activity of the combination using a 3+3 dose escalation schema (escalating doses of X4P-001+ axitinib at 5 mg BID). The Ph2 portion is a single-arm expansion cohort evaluating this combination treatment in ~ 45 ccRCC pts. The radiologic assessment is performed every 8 weeks with central review. Results: As of 30 June, 2017, enrollment for the Ph1 portion of the study has been completed. Sixteen (16) pts were enrolled and the median age was 64 years (range 50-76). Pts had received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range 1-5). The doses tested were 200 mg BID, 400 and 600 mg QD of X4P-001 + axitinib. There were two dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) observed at the X4P-001 600 mg QD dose level: one pt had multiple grade (G) 2 adverse events (AEs), including anorexia, cognitive disturbance, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and somnolence; another pt had G3 dyspnea and fatigue. The MTD/RP2D was determined to be 400 mg QD of X4P-001 + axitinib. Treatment-related AEs (≥ 10%) of any grade were diarrhea, fatigue, hypertension, nausea, headache, anorexia, vomiting, dry eye, dysphonia, abnormal loss of weight, increased lipase, proteinuria, dry mouth, stomatitis, cognitive disorder, dysgeusia, and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome. Treatment-related G3/4 AEs (≥ 10%) were hypertension. In addition, one pt had SAE due to G2 diarrhea and G2 creatinine elevation. Drug exposures (AUC0-24hr) at steady state (SS) are similar for 200 mg BID and 400 mg QD dose. Mean Cmax and AUC0-24hr at SS increased approximately 1.6- and 1.9-fold, respectively, from 400 mg to 600 mg QD dose. Leukocyte mobilization is a well-established surrogate marker for CXCR4 inhibition. At both 400 mg and 600 mg daily dose levels, X4P-001 demonstrated approximately 2 to 2.5-fold increase of WBC (range: 1.4-4.7 fold) and nearly 4-fold increase of CD34+ progenitor cells (range: 1.8-6.4 fold). The peak elevation of both markers occurred around 2 to 4 hours following dosing. Of the 12 clinically evaluable pts, 3 had confirmed partial response, 8 had stable disease, and 1 had progressive disease. As of 30 June 2017, 9 pts remain on study and median duration on treatment was 27 weeks (range 7.4-60). Conclusions: The combination treatment is well tolerated at a dose of 400 mg QD of X4P-001 + axitinib with preliminary evidence of clinical activity. The doses used in this phase I study were biologically active in inhibiting CXCR4 in peripheral blood as demonstrated by elevating WBC and CD34+ cell counts. The Ph2 portion of the study is ongoing. Citation Format: Michael Atkins, Richard Joseph, Thai Ho, Ulka Vaishampayan, Sarah Ali, Marc Matrana, Robert Alter, Jeff Edenfield, Yan Wang, Sarah Blanchette, Lu Gan, David McDermott. A phase 1 dose-finding study of X4P-001 (an oral CXCR4 inhibitor) and axitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2017 Oct 26-30; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17(1 Suppl):Abstract nr B201.

How cells ensure symmetric inheritance Parental histones with modifications are recycled to newly replicated DNA strands during genome replication, but do the two sister chromatids inherit modified histones equally? Yu et al. and Petryk et al. found in mouse and yeast, respectively, that modified histones are segregated to both DNA daughter strands in a largely symmetric manner (see the Perspective by Ahmad and Henikoff). However, the mechanisms ensuring this symmetric inheritance in yeast and mouse were different. Yeasts use subunits of DNA polymerase to prevent the lagging-strand bias of parental histones, whereas in mouse cells, the replicative helicase MCM2 counters the leading-strand bias. Science , this issue p. 1386 , p. 1389 ; see also p. 1311

Expression of histone H3.3K27M mutant proteins in human diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) results in a global reduction of tri-methylation of H3K27 (H3K27me3), and paradoxically, H3K27me3 peaks remain at hundreds of genomic loci, a dichotomous change that lacks mechanistic insights. Here, we show that the PRC2 complex is sequestered at poised enhancers, but not at active promoters with high levels of H3.3K27M proteins, thereby contributing to the global reduction of H3K27me3. Moreover, the levels of H3.3K27M proteins are low at the retained H3K27me3 peaks and consequently having minimal effects on the PRC2 activity at these loci. H3K27me3-mediated silencing at specific tumor suppressor genes, including Wilms Tumor 1, promotes proliferation of DIPG cells. These results support a model in which the PRC2 complex is redistributed to poised enhancers in H3.3K27M mutant cells and contributes to tumorigenesis in part by locally enhancing H3K27me3, and hence silencing of tumor suppressor genes.

Significance ES cells possess the unique capacity to self-renew as well as differentiate into specialized cell types. It is known that transcription factors and chromatin regulators regulate the cell-fate choices during differentiation. We report unexpectedly that Asf1a, a histone chaperone involved in nucleosome assembly, regulates mouse ES cell differentiation. Mechanistically, we show that Asf1a functions in nucleosome disassembly to resolve the bivalent chromatin domains at lineage-specific genes for gene activation during differentiation. These insights will likely be applicable for understanding human ES cell differentiation and regenerative medicine.

ABSTRACT Background: MAPT haplotypes are associated with PD, but their association with rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder is unclear. Objective: To study the role of MAPT variants in rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. Methods: Two cohorts were included: (A) PD (n = 600), rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (n = 613) patients, and controls (n = 981); (B) dementia with Lewy bodies patients with rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (n = 271) and controls (n = 950). MAPT ‐associated variants and the entire coding sequence of MAPT were analyzed. Age‐, sex‐, and ethnicity‐adjusted analyses were performed to examine the association between MAPT , PD, and rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. Results: MAPT‐ H2 variants were associated with PD (odds ratios: 0.62‐0.65; P = 0.010‐0.019), but not with rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. In PD, the H1 haplotype odds ratio was 1.60 (95% confidence interval: 1.12‐2.28; P = 0.009), and the H2 odds ratio was 0.68 (95% confidence interval: 0.48‐0.96; P = 0.03). The H2/H1 haplotypes were not associated with rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. Conclusions: Our results confirm the protective effect of the MAPT ‐H2 haplotype in PD, and define its components. Furthermore, our results suggest that MAPT does not play a major role in rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, emphasizing different genetic background than in PD in this locus. © 2018 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society