Citations

Abstract DAB2IP (Disabled homolog 2 interacting protein), a recognized tumor suppressor, plays a pivotal role in regulating various oncogenic pathways. Our previous research demonstrated that DAB2IP functions as a cell cycle regulator by facilitating PLK1-mediated mitosis progression. Here, we elucidate a novel function of DAB2IP in promoting DNA replication origin firing. Mechanistically, we identified that DAB2IP localizes to the nucleus, where it interacts with the histone acetyltransferase HBO1 and enhances the HBO1–PLK1 interaction. DAB2IP facilitates PLK1-mediated phosphorylation of HBO1, which subsequently promotes HBO1-directed acetylation of histone 3 at lysine 14 (H3K14Ac). This modification enables the loading of the minichromosome maintenance protein (MCM) complex onto chromatin, thereby supporting DNA replication and maintaining genome integrity. Additionally, we found that ATR regulates CDK1-mediated phosphorylation of DAB2IP, and that this phosphorylation is essential for the formation and activation of the HBO1-PLK1 complex. Ablation of DAB2IP phosphorylation results in increased genomic instability due to incomplete replication of genomic DNA, as evidenced by the accumulation of anaphase ultrafine bridges and 53BP1 nuclear bodies in G1 phase of the cell cycle. In summary, our findings underscore the critical regulatory role of DAB2IP in DNA replication initiation and genomic stability maintenance, providing new insights into its function in cellular homeostasis.

Background The association between lifestyle factors and Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathophysiology remains incompletely understood. Objective The aim of this study was to assess the association of alcohol consumption, smoking behavior, sleep quality and physical, cognitive, and social activity with cerebral amyloid pathology. Methods For this cross-sectional study, we selected participants from the Amyloid Biomarker Study data pooling initiative. We used generalized estimating equations to assess associations of dichotomized lifestyle measures with amyloid pathology. Results We included 9171 participants with normal cognition (NC) and 2555 participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from the Amyloid Biomarker Study. Of participants with NC, 58% were women, 34% were APOE ε4 carrier, and 27% had amyloid pathology. Of participants with MCI, 48% were women, 47% were APOE ε4 carrier, and 57% had amyloid pathology. In NC, cognitively active participants were less likely to have amyloid pathology (OR = 0.77, 95%CI 0.66–0.89, p < 0.001). In MCI, participants who had ever smoked or had sleep problems were less likely to have amyloid pathology (OR = 0.85, 95%CI 0.73–0.99, p = 0.029; OR = 0.62, 95%CI 0.45–0.86, p = 0.004). Conclusions In NC, cognitive activity was associated with a lower frequency of amyloid pathology. In MCI, favorable lifestyle behaviors were not associated with a lower frequency of amyloid pathology. The results of the current study contribute to the broader evidence base on lifestyle and AD by further characterizing the role of lifestyle behaviors in AD pathology across different clinical stages.

Abstract Purpose: CD4 T-cell immunity is associated with improved survival in patients with breast cancer. We previously reported a phase I trial evaluating a folate receptor alpha (FRα) vaccine administered with cyclophosphamide (CP), demonstrating excellent safety and immunogenicity. To simplify the vaccine strategy for ease of use, we report here the results of a randomized phase II trial evaluating a lower vaccine dose alongside the original dose, administered with or without CP pretreatment. Patients and Methods: Patients with triple-negative breast cancer who completed all systemic and local therapies were assigned to receive either low-dose (825 μg) or high-dose (2.5 mg) vaccine peptides plus GM-CSF in six 4-week cycles, with or without CP prior to vaccination. Safety was monitored, and immunogenicity was evaluated before and after vaccination. Results: A total of 80 patients were dosed with vaccine, and 58 patients were evaluable for immunogenicity. Vaccination was well tolerated and elicited immunity in 83% of patients. Levels of FRα-specific T cells were high, persistent, and comparable with T-cell levels against tetanus toxoid. No differences in immunity were observed between the two doses. CP pretreatment also did not affect the immune responses. Recurrences occurred in eight evaluable patients and were unrelated to the treatment arm. No patients died during the study because of their disease. Conclusions: The reduced-dose FRα vaccine is as effective as the original dose and does not require CP to generate maximal immunity. These findings may inform the design of trials testing efficacy in triple-negative breast cancer or other cancers.

Objective To provide evidence‐based and expert guidance for the treatment and management of non‐renal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); treatment and management of lupus nephritis are addressed in a separate guideline. Methods Clinical questions for treatment and management of SLE were developed in the PICO format (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome). Systematic literature reviews were developed for each PICO question, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess evidence quality and formulate recommendations. The Voting Panel achieved a consensus of ≥70% agreement on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of each recommendation. Results We present recommendations and ungraded, consensus‐based good practice statements for the treatment and management of SLE that are applicable to pediatric and adult patients. Recommendations emphasize uniform treatment with hydroxychloroquine, limiting duration of glucocorticoid use, and early introduction of conventional and/or biologic immunosuppressive therapies to achieve and maintain control of SLE inflammation (remission or a low level of disease activity), reduce SLE‐related morbidity and mortality, and minimize medication‐related toxicities. Conclusion This guideline presents direction regarding treatment and management of SLE and provides a foundation for well‐informed, shared clinician–patient decision‐making. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies, as treatment decisions may vary due to the unique clinical situation and personal preferences of each person with SLE.

Objective To provide evidence‐based and expert guidance for the treatment and management of non‐renal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); treatment and management of lupus nephritis are addressed in a separate guideline. Methods Clinical questions for treatment and management of SLE were developed in the PICO format (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome). Systematic literature reviews were developed for each PICO question, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess evidence quality and formulate recommendations. The Voting Panel achieved a consensus of ≥70% agreement on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of each recommendation. Results We present recommendations and ungraded, consensus‐based good practice statements for the treatment and management of SLE that are applicable to pediatric and adult patients. Recommendations emphasize uniform treatment with hydroxychloroquine, limiting duration of glucocorticoid use, and early introduction of conventional and/or biologic immunosuppressive therapies to achieve and maintain control of SLE inflammation (remission or a low level of disease activity), reduce SLE‐related morbidity and mortality, and minimize medication‐related toxicities. Conclusion This guideline presents direction regarding treatment and management of SLE and provides a foundation for well‐informed, shared clinician–patient decision‐making. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies, as treatment decisions may vary due to the unique clinical situation and personal preferences of each person with SLE.

Introduction/Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF), a common postoperative arrhythmia, is associated with increased morbidity and mortality across various surgical populations. In patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (LT), the presence of AF has been linked to poorer clinical outcomes. However, data on the prognostic significance of new-onset AF during early post-transplant readmissions in orthotopic LT recipients remain limited. Hypothesis: We postulated that incident AF occurring during 90-day post-LT readmissions is independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay, and higher healthcare costs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the National Readmission Database (2016–2019). Adult LT recipients (aged >18 years) readmitted within 90 days were identified via ICD-10 coding. Patients who developed new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) during readmission were compared to those without AF. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total hospitalization costs. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models, adjusted for demographic and clinical confounders, were used. Results: Of 31,557 adult LT recipients (mean age 55.5 years, 35% female), 8,449 (27.6%) (mean age 55.3 years, 36.7% women) were readmitted within 90 days. Among those readmitted, 222 patients (2.6%) developed new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF), and 84 (1.0%) died during the readmission period. New-onset AF was associated with a 7.6-fold increased risk of in-hospital mortality (95% CI: 3.0–19.0; P < 0.05). Additionally, AF onset was linked to a mean increase in LOS of 6.2 days (95% CI: 6.2–7.1; P = 0.001) and an average increase in hospitalization costs of $75,396 (95% CI: $11,932–$138,860; P = 0.02). All associations achieved statistical significance. Conclusion(s): New-onset AF during early post-transplant readmissions is associated with significantly worse clinical outcomes and increased healthcare utilization. These findings underscore the need for proactive rhythm monitoring and risk-stratified arrhythmia management during the liver transplant recovery period.