Citations

Abstract Background/Introduction: Lower-risk (IPSS low risk and Int-1) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are typically treated supportively to address cytopenias. DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi) such as azacitidine and decitabine (DEC) are FDA-approved for higher risk MDS patients (pts), and while the DEC USPI includes IPSS Int-1 pts, it is not widely used in this population. Approved intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) regimens require 5-7 days of treatment every month burdening older cancer pts due to daily travel and treatment time and may increase potential risk from pandemic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Because DNMTis are rapidly degraded by cytidine deaminase (CDA) in the gut and liver, oral availability has only been recently possible. A randomized study with CC-486, an oral formulation of azacitidine, in the Int-1 population showed a median overall survival (mOS) of approximately 17 months for both placebo and treated patients (Garcia-Manero, 2021). Oral DEC 35 mg/cedazuridine 100 mg (ASTX727) or DEC-C, is an oral fixed dose combination (FDC) of DEC and the CDA inhibitor cedazuridine (CED) resulting in equivalent exposure (99%; 90% CI 93% to 106%) to standard IV DEC 20 mg/m 2 for 5 days in an intra-patient randomized cross-over study (Garcia-Manero et al, ASH 2019). Here, we present data on patients with lower risk MDS from that study. Methods: We used a randomized cross over design with pts randomized 1:1 in the first 2 cycles to either Sequence A: (DEC 35 mg/ CED 100 mg in Cycle 1 and IV DEC at 20 mg/m 2 in Cycle 2), or Sequence B (IV DEC in Cycle 1 and oral DEC/CED in Cycle 2). Cycles were repeated every 28 days unless delays were needed, and all patients received oral DEC-C in Cycles 3+ until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. We conducted an intra-patient comparison of DEC PK (DEC AUC equivalence over 5 days of dosing). Pts were eligible as per the FDA-approved label of IV DEC (MDS pts by FAB classification including CMML, or MDS IPSS Intermediate-1, 2 or high-risk pts). Clinical endpoints were best response as assessed by an independent expert panel according to IWG 2006 response criteria, transfusion independence (TI), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Of the 133 pts treated in ASCERTAIN, 69 had a diagnosis of lower-risk MDS (93% Int-1, 7% LR). Median age was 70.0 years (range 45-87), 65% were male, median weight was 84 kg (range 50-127), median baseline hematologic parameters were: hemoglobin 89 g/L (range 69.8-146.5), WBCs 1.50 X 10 9/L (range 0.11-7.1), platelets (plt) 86 x 10 9/L (range 5-703), bone marrow blasts 4% (range 0-18), cytogenetics: 7 (10.1%) poor-risk, 21 (30.4%) intermediate risk, 37 (53.6%) better-risk, 4 (5.7%) missing or not evaluable. 27(39%) of the pts were RBC transfusion dependent (TD) and 6 (9%) plt TD. 17 (25%) had received prior MDS treatment, 3% prior DNMTi. Pts received a median of 9 cycles of therapy (range 1-28). Treatment-emergent adverse events of CTCAE Gr 3 or higher in >10% of pts, independent of relationship to ASTX727, included cytopenias (neutropenia [59%], thrombocytopenia [58%], anemia [48%], leukopenia [26%]), febrile neutropenia (32%), and pneumonia (19%). Sixteen pts (23%) achieved Complete Response (CR), 18 (26%) had marrow CR (mCR), including 9 (13%) with hematologic improvement (HI). Overall Response rate (ORR; CR + PR+ mCR + HI) was 57%. Of those RBC or plt TD at baseline, 13 (48%) became RBC TI and 4 (67%) became plt TI. With approximately 32 months of median follow up, neither median leukemia-free survival (mLFS) nor mOS had been reached (Figure 1). Twelve pts (17%) went on to allogeneic stem cell transplant. Conclusions: Oral decitabine/cedazuridine given as a FDC in MDS pts produced equivalent PK exposure to 20 mg/m 2 IV DEC; in lower risk MDS pts with treatment indicated, the agent was generally well-tolerated with prolonged treatment and could result in mLFS and mOS which exceeds 32 months. This FDC and other dosing regimens of oral DEC-C should be further studied in this patient population. References: Garcia-Manero, et al, ASH 2019 Savona, et al, Int. MDS Symp. 2021 Garcia-Manero, et al, Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of CC-486 (Oral Azacitidine) in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes. J.Clin.Onc. 2021 39:13, 1426-1436 Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures McCloskey: Pfizer: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; COTA: Other: Equity Ownership; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Griffiths: Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Taiho Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Apellis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy. Yee: Paladin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TaiHo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Geron: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Otsuka: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shattuck Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann La Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Astex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Zeidan: Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees, Travel support, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Ionis: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees, Research Funding; Jasper: Consultancy; Cardiff Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; BeyondSpring: Consultancy; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees; Janssen: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees; Agios: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding; Geron: Other: Clinical Trial Committees; BMS: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees, Research Funding; BioCryst: Other: Clinical Trial Committees; Pfizer: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Aprea: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding. Al-Kali: Astex: Other: Research support to institution; Novartis: Research Funding. Patel: Celgene-BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PVI: Honoraria; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sabloff: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ROCHE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TaiHo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jaxx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dao: Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment. Fazal: Taiho Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Glaxo Smith Kline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AMGEN: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Odenike: AbbVie, Celgene, Impact Biomedicines, Novartis, Taiho Oncology, Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene, Incyte, AstraZeneca, Astex, NS Pharma, AbbVie, Gilead, Janssen, Oncotherapy, Agios, CTI/Baxalta, Aprea: Research Funding. Kantarjian: AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ipsen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Jazz: Research Funding; Astellas Health: Honoraria; Immunogen: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Aptitude Health: Honoraria; KAHR Medical Ltd: Honoraria; NOVA Research: Honoraria; Precision Biosciences: Honoraria; Taiho Pharmaceutical Canada: Honoraria. DeZern: Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Taiho: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roboz: Novartis: Consultancy; Mesoblast: Consultancy; Jasper Therapeutics: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; MEI Pharma - IDMC Chair: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Actinium: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Glaxo SmithKline: Consultancy; Helsinn: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy. Busque: Novartis: Consultancy. Leber: Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Otsuka: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; TaiHo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AMGEN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hao: Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment. Keer: Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment. Azab: Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Savona: Geron: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS-Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ryvu: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Taiho: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ALX Oncology: Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding.

Abstract Background Disease-free survival (DFS) with a 3-year median follow-up (3-year DFS) was validated as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) with a 5-year median follow-up (5-year OS) in adjuvant chemotherapy colon cancer (CC) trials. Recent data show further improvements in OS and survival after recurrence in patients who received adjuvant FOLFOX. Hence, reevaluation of the association between DFS and OS and determination of the optimal follow-up duration of OS to aid its utility in future adjuvant trials are needed. Methods Individual patient data from 9 randomized studies conducted between 1998 and 2009 were included; 3 trials tested biologics. Trial-level surrogacy examining the correlation of treatment effect estimates of 3-year DFS with 5 to 6.5-year OS was evaluated using both linear regression (RWLS2) and Copula bivariate (RCopula2) models and reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For R2, a value closer to 1 indicates a stronger correlation. Results Data from a total of 18 396 patients were analyzed (median age = 59 years; 54.0% male), with 54.1% having low-risk tumors (T1-3 and N1), 31.6% KRAS mutated, 12.3% BRAF mutated, and 12.4% microsatellite instability high or deficient mismatch repair tumors. Trial-level correlation between 3-year DFS and 5-year OS remained strong (RWLS2 = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.98; RCopula2 = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.83 to 1.00) and increased as the median follow-up of OS extended. Analyses limited to trials that tested biologics showed consistent results. Conclusions Three-year DFS remains a validated surrogate endpoint for 5-year OS in adjuvant CC trials. The correlation was likely strengthened with 6 years of follow-up for OS.

Background: Although graft choice may be limited in the revision setting based on previously used grafts, most surgeons believe that graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is an important factor related to outcome. Hypothesis: In the ACL revision setting, there would be no difference between autograft and allograft in rerupture rate and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at 6-year follow-up. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients who had revision surgery were identified and prospectively enrolled in this cohort study by 83 surgeons over 52 sites. Data collected included baseline characteristics, surgical technique and pathology, and a series of validated PRO measures. Patients were followed up at 6 years and asked to complete the identical set of PRO instruments. Incidence of additional surgery and reoperation because of graft failure were also recorded. Multivariable regression models were used to determine the predictors (risk factors) of PROs, graft rerupture, and reoperation at 6 years after revision surgery. Results: A total of 1234 patients including 716 (58%) men were enrolled. A total of 325 (26%) underwent revision using a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autograft; 251 (20%), soft tissue autograft; 289 (23%), BTB allograft; 302 (25%), soft tissue allograft; and 67 (5%), other graft. Questionnaires and telephone follow-up for subsequent surgery information were obtained for 809 (66%) patients, while telephone follow-up was only obtained for an additional 128 patients for the total follow-up on 949 (77%) patients. Graft choice was a significant predictor of 6-year Marx Activity Rating Scale scores ( P = .024). Specifically, patients who received a BTB autograft for revision reconstruction had higher activity levels than did patients who received a BTB allograft (odds ratio [OR], 1.92; 95% CI, 1.25-2.94). Graft rerupture was reported in 5.8% (55/949) of patients by their 6-year follow-up: 3.5% (16/455) of patients with autografts and 8.4% (37/441) of patients with allografts. Use of a BTB autograft for revision resulted in patients being 4.2 times less likely to sustain a subsequent graft rupture than if a BTB allograft were utilized ( P = .011; 95% CI, 1.56-11.27). No significant differences were found in graft rerupture rates between BTB autograft and soft tissue autografts ( P = .87) or between BTB autografts and soft tissue allografts ( P = .36). Use of an autograft was found to be a significant predictor of having fewer reoperations within 6 years compared with using an allograft ( P = .010; OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.87). Conclusion: BTB and soft tissue autografts had a decreased risk in graft rerupture compared with BTB allografts. BTB autografts were associated with higher activity level than were BTB allografts at 6 years after revision reconstruction. Surgeons and patients should consider this information when choosing a graft for revision ACL reconstruction.

Several loci have been discovered and replicated for urine albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR), a measure of kidney function, in European populations; however, other ethnic populations such as African-Americans have been less studied for this trait. We examined the association of genetic variants on the Metabochip with natural log transformed ACR (ln(ACR)) in 4,629 African-Americans from the Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) Study which includes participants from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC), Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA), and Epidemiologic Architecture for Genes Linked to the Environment (EAGLE-BioVU) studies. We then replicated our findings in 1,533 African-American participants from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Linear regression models were used to examine associations, assuming additive effects of the SNPs. Within each study, models were adjusted for age, field center (where applicable), and principal components of ancestry, and stratified by sex. Fixed effects inverse variance weighted meta-analysis was used to combine results from contributing studies. Array-wide statistical significance was concluded for SNP associations of p-value less than 2.8 x 10-7. Mean ln(ACR) ranged from 1.4 to 2.9 mg/g, average age ranged from 44 to 77 years, and percent female participants ranged from 59-65% in the contributing studies. Four SNPs were significantly associated array-wide with ACR in the discovery sample: rs17399841 in GRHL2 (β=-0.67, MAF=0.01, p=2.7x10-9), rs153914 near SPATA9/RHOBTB3 (β=-0.59, MAF=0.01, p=1.0x10-7), rs17439845 in LEF1 (β=-0.49, MAF=0.02, p=1.3x10-7), and rs11836243 near ZNF641/ANP32D (β=0.23, MAF=0.12, p=1.8x10-7). Of these four loci, only the association of rs17439845 with ACR replicated in MESA (β=-0.36, p=0.038), with a combined discovery-replication beta of -0.46 and p value of 1.8x10-8. Combined discovery-replication for rs17399841, rs153914, and rs11836243 no longer achieved array-wide significance (p-values 9.84x10-7, 1.98x10-5, and 1.32x10-4, respectively). LEF1 is a mediator in the Wnt signaling pathway, and has been previously implicated in systemic lupus erythematosus and osteoporosis, as well as previously associated with waist circumference, echocardiographic traits, bone mineral density, and blood count traits. Continuing studies in diverse populations are warranted to identify a set of loci important in contributing to the variation in ACR.

Periprocedural bleeding is one of the most frequent complications of percutaneours coronary interventions. We assessed the relation between blood transfusion and all-cause mortality or incident cardiovascular events (death, MI, stroke) among 6103 patients of the Evaluation of Oral Xemilofiban in Controlling Thrombotic Events (EXCITE)-trial. Subjects were followed for 7 months after enrollment for the occurrence of events. Multivariate Cox-regression analysis evaluated the independent association of blood transfusion with each outcome adjusted for age, gender, race, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, history of MI, PCI, CABG, heart failure, LVEF<30%, use of beta-blockers, statins, ACE-inhibitors, platelet inhibitors and allocation to treatment with xemolifiban. In addition, propensity score analyses were performed (ROC 0.80). Mean age was 59.2 years, 21.7% were female, and 18.9% had diabetes mellitus. Of the169 patients who received blood transfusion, 14 (8.3%) died and 42 (24.9%) experienced a CVD event. Of the 5934 patients without transfusion, 65 (1.1%) died (p-value: <0.001) and 555 (9,4%) experienced a CVD event (p-value: <0.001) In multivariate analysis, blood transfusion was associated with a 5.3 fold increased risk of mortality (HR 5.3; 95% CI 2.8 –10.2), and a 2.5 fold increased risk of incident CVD (HR 2.5; 95% CI 1.7–3.4.) Noteworthy, patients who were US citizens had a higher transfusion rate then non-US citizens (OR 1.45, 95%CI 1.02–2.06) The need of blood transfusion is a strong and independent predictor of all-cause mortality and incident CVD events among patients undergoing PCI.

Background: Benchmarking international cancer survival differences is necessary to evaluate and improve healthcare systems. Our aim was to assess the potential regional differences in outcomes among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) participating in international randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Design: Countries were grouped into 11 regions according to the World Health Organization and the EUROCARE model. Meta-analyses based on individual patient data were used to synthesize data across studies and regions and to conduct comparisons for outcomes in a two-stage random-effects model after adjusting for age, sex, performance status, and time period. We used mCRC patients enrolled in the first-line RCTs from the ARCAD database, which provided enrolling country information. There were 21,509 patients in 27 RCTs included across the 11 regions. Results: Main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Compared with other regions, patients from the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland were proportionaly over-represented, older, with higher performance status, more frequently male, and more commonly not treated with biological therapies. Cohorts from central Europe and the United States (USA) had significantly longer OS compared with those from UK and Ireland ( p = 0.0034 and p < 0.001, respectively), with median difference of 3–4 months. The survival deficits in the UK and Ireland cohorts were, at most, 15% at 1 year. No evidence of a regional disparity was observed for PFS. Among those treated without biological therapies, patients from the UK and Ireland had shorter OS than central Europe patients ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: Significant international disparities in the OS of cohorts of mCRC patients enrolled in RCTs were found. Survival of mCRC patients included in RCTs was consistently lower in the UK and Ireland regions than in central Europe, southern Europe, and the USA, potentially attributed to greater overall population representation, delayed diagnosis, and reduced availability of therapies.

Background. Lynch syndrome is the most common genetic predisposition for hereditary cancer. Carriers of pathogenic changes in mismatch repair (MMR) genes have an increased risk of developing colorectal (CRC), endometrial, ovarian, urinary tract, prostate, and other cancers, depending on which gene is malfunctioning. In Lynch syndrome, differences in cancer incidence (penetrance) according to the gene involved have led to the stratification of cancer surveillance. By contrast, any differences in penetrance determined by the type of pathogenic variant remain unknown. Objective. To determine cumulative incidences of cancer in carriers of truncating and missense or aberrant splicing pathogenic variants of the MLH1 and MSH2 genes. Methods. Carriers of pathogenic variants of MLH1 (path_MLH1) and MSH2 (path_MSH2) genes filed in the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database (PLSD) were categorized as truncating or missense/aberrant splicing according to the InSiGHT criteria for pathogenicity. Results. Among 5199 carriers, 1045 had missense or aberrant splicing variants, and 3930 had truncating variants. Prospective observation years for the two groups were 8205 and 34,141 years, respectively, after which there were no significant differences in incidences for cancer overall or for colorectal cancer or endometrial cancers separately. Conclusion. Truncating and missense or aberrant splicing pathogenic variants were associated with similar average cumulative incidences of cancer in carriers of path MLH1 and path_MSH2.

Abstract Background Colon cancer (CC) incidence in young adults (age 20-49 years), termed early-onset CC (EO-CC), is increasing. Methods Individual patient data on 35 713 subjects with stage III colon cancer from 25 randomized studies in the Adjuvant Colon Cancer ENdpoint database were pooled. The distributions of demographics, clinicopathological features, biomarker status, and outcome data were summarized by age group. Overall survival, disease-free survival, time to recurrence, and survival after recurrence were assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models stratified by treatment arms within studies, adjusting for sex, race, body mass index, performance status, disease stage, grade, risk group, number of lymph nodes examined, disease sidedness, and molecular markers. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results Using a 5% difference between age groups as the clinically meaningful cutoff, patients with stage III EO-CC had similar sex, race, performance status, risk group, tumor sidedness, and T stage compared with patients with late-onset CC (age 50 years and older). EO-CC patients were less likely to be overweight (30.2% vs 36.2%) and more commonly had 12 or more lymph nodes resected (69.5% vs 58.7%). EO-CC tumors were more frequently mismatch repair deficient (16.4% vs 11.5%) and less likely to have BRAFV600E (5.6% vs 14.0%), suggesting a higher rate of Lynch syndrome in EO-CC. Patients with EO-CC had statistically significantly better overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.74 to 0.89; P &lt; .001), disease-free survival (HR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.98; P = .01), and survival after recurrence (HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.80 to 0.97; P = .008) in the analysis without molecular markers; however, age at onset of CC lost its prognostic value when outcome was adjusted for molecular markers. Conclusion Tumor biology was found to be a more important prognostic factor than age of onset among stage III colon cancer patients in the Adjuvant Colon Cancer ENdpoint database.

Introduction Baroreflex activation through electrical carotid sinus stimulation has been developed for the treatment of patients with arterial hypertension not sufficiently responding to pharmacological therapy. Previous studies suggested that peripheral chemoreflex afferents located in proximity to carotid baroreceptors are tonically active in hypertensive patients and may inhibit baroreflex responses. Therefore, we hypothesized that peripheral chemoreflex activation attenuates the efficacy of electrical carotid sinus stimulation. Methods We screened 35 patients with an implanted electrical carotid sinus stimulator. Of those, 11 patients exhibited a consistent acute depressor response and were included in the study (7 men/4 women, age: 67±8 years, BMI: 31.6±5.2 kg/m 2 , 6±2 antihypertensive drug classes). We assessed responses to electrical baroreflex stimulation during normoxia, isocapnic hypoxia (SpO2: 79.0±1.5%), and hyperoxia (40% end‐tidal O2 fraction) by recording ECG, blood pressure (SBP), ventilation, SpO2, end‐tidal CO2 and O2 fractions, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). Results During normoxia, baroreflex activation reduced SBP from 164±27 to 151±25 mmHg (means±SD, p<0.001), HR from 64±13 to 61±13 bpm (p=0.002), and MSNA from 42±12 to 36±12 bursts/min (p=0.004). Hypoxia increased SBP 8±12 mmHg (p=0.057), HR 10±6 bpm (p<0.001), MSNA 7±7 bursts/min (p=0.031), and ventilation 10±7 l/min (p=0. 002). However, responses to electrical carotid sinus stimulation did not differ between hypoxic and hyperoxic conditions; SBP: −15±7 vs −14±8 mmHg (p=0.938), HR: −2±3 vs −2±2 bpm (p=0.701), and MSNA: −6±4 vs −4±3 bursts/min (p=0.531). Conclusion The main finding of our study is that moderate peripheral chemoreflex activation does not attenuate acute responses to electrical baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) in patients with resistant hypertension. These patients provide insight in human baroreflex physiology and baroreflex‐chemoreflex interactions that could not be gained otherwise. Support or Funding Information Financial support by Boston Scientific Corporation (St. Paul, MN, U.S.A.) This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .